Prevailing Word Ministries
A religious exempt child day center in Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
1656 Mountain Road, Glen Allen, Virginia 23060. (804) 515-0037.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 1 deficiency in the last three years
- Apr 272026 the latest visit on record
- 35 children, its capacity in the state’s list
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
14 inspections on record, the latest on Apr 27, 2026.
1 violation cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Apr 18, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
(Repeat Violation) Based on interviews conducted, the vendor did not ensure that behavioral guidance shall be constructive in nature and age and stage appropriate and shall be intended to redirect children to appropriate behavior and resolve conflicts.
“Evidence: During interview, Staff #1 reported that on 4/10/24, she pinched Child #1 (4-year-old), after he said to Staff #2 ?you better not pinch me.? Staff #1 reported she did not like the child’s tone, so she decided to pinch him. The staff and management acknowledged this was not constructive in nature or age and stage appropriate.”
Jul 19, 2023: subsidy health and safety inspection8 deficiencies
-
Based on a review of five staff records, the vendor did not ensure two staff had the satisfactory results of the fingerprint-based national criminal background check prior to employment.
The inspectors’ words, 91 words
“Evidence: 1) The fingerprint-based national criminal background check in the record of Staff #1, employed on 07/03/23, was completed on 07/06/23. 2) The record of Staff #5, employed on 06/27/22, did not contain the results of the fingerprint-based national criminal background check. 3) During interview, a member of management acknowledged the results of the fingerprint-based national criminal background check for Staff #1 were obtained after the staff started employment. Management acknowledged the results of the fingerprint-based national criminal background check for Staff #5 were not obtained at the time of employment.”
-
Based on a review of five staff records and interview, the vendor did not ensure one staff had documentation of subsequent background check conducted every five years.
“Evidence: 1) The results of the fingerprint-based national criminal background check in the record of Staff #3, employed on 01/04/14, were dated 03/29/18. A subsequent fingerprint-based national criminal background check should have been conducted no later than 03/29/23. 2) During interview, a member of management confirmed the subsequent background check for Staff #3 was not conducted every five years as required.”
-
Based on a review of five staff records and interview, the vendor did not ensure two staff were evaluated by a health professional and be issued a statement that the individuals were determined to be free of communicable tuberculosis (TB) within the required time frame. Documentation of the screening shall be submitted at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children. The documentation shall have been completed within the last 30 calendar days of the date of employment and be signed by a physician, physician’s designee, or an official of the local health department.
“Evidence: 1) The TB test in the record of Staff #1, employed on 07/03/23, was completed on 01/18/23. 2) The record of Staff #5, employed on 06/27/22, does not contain documentation that the staff has been determined to be free of communicable TB. 3) During interview, a member of management confirmed the TB test in the record of Staff #1 was completed more than 30 days prior to the date of employment. Management acknowledged Staff #5 does not have the documentation of a negative TB screening on file.”
-
Based on a review of five staff records, the vendor did not ensure one staff who works directly with children complete the Virginia Preservice Training for Child Care Staff within the first 90 days of employment.
“Evidence: 1) The record of Staff #5, employed on 06/27/22, did not contain documentation that the staff completed the Virginia Preservice Training for Child Care Staff. 2) During interview, a member of management confirmed Staff #5 has not completed the Virginia Preservice Training for Child Care Staff to date.”
-
Based on a review of five staff records and interview, the vendor did not ensure one staff who works directly with children had current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) appropriate to the ages of children in care within 90 days of the date of employment.
“Evidence: 1) The record of Staff #5, employed on 06/27/22, did not contain documentation that the staff has current certification in CPR. 2) During interview, a member of management reported Staff #5 does not have current certification in CPR and the training was not completed within 90 days of the date of employment.”
-
Based on a review of five staff records and interview, the vendor did not ensure one staff who works directly with children had current certification in first aid appropriate to the ages of children in care within 90 days of the date of employment.
“Evidence: 1) The record of Staff #5, employed on 06/27/22, did not contain documentation that the staff has current certification in first aid. 2) During interview, a member of management reported Staff #5 does not have current certification in first aid and the training was not completed within 90 days of the date of employment.”
-
Based on a review of five staff records and interview, the vendor did not ensure one staff who works directly with children completed the department’s health and safety update course annually.
“Evidence: 1) The record of Staff #5, employed on 06/27/22, did not contain documentation that the staff completed the department’s health and safety update course. The course should have been completed no later than 06/27/23. 2) During interview, a member of management acknowledged Staff #5 did not complete the health and safety update course annually as required.”
-
Based on a review of documentation and interview, the vendor did not ensure the evacuation procedures were practiced at least monthly.
“Evidence: 1) The emergency response drill log was reviewed. The most recently documented evacuation drill was dated 04/11/23. 2) During interview, a member of management reported the evacuation procedures were not practiced in May 2023 or June 2023.”
Jul 19, 2023: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on a review of five staff records and interview, one staff did not obtain the required staff health report within the required timeframe.
“Evidence: 1) The record of Staff #5, employed on 06/27/22, did not contain a staff health report. 2) During interview, a member of management reported Staff #5 does not have a complete staff health report on file. The staff health report for the staff member should have been obtained prior to the staff supervising children.”
-
Based on a review of five staff records and interview, the center did not ensure one staff had documentation of subsequent background check conducted every five years.
“Evidence: 1) The results of the fingerprint-based national criminal background check in the record of Staff #3, employed on 01/04/14, were dated 03/29/18. A subsequent fingerprint-based national criminal background check should have been conducted no later than 03/29/23. 2) During interview, a member of management confirmed the subsequent background check for Staff #3 was not conducted every five years as required.”
-
Based on a review of five staff records and interview, the center did not ensure two staff had the satisfactory results of the fingerprint-based national criminal background check prior to employment.
“Evidence: 1) The fingerprint-based national background check in the record of Staff #1, employed on 07/03/23, was completed on 07/06/23. 2) The record of Staff #5, employed on 06/27/22, did not contain the results of the fingerprint-based national criminal background check. 3) During interview, a member of management acknowledged the results of the fingerprint-based national criminal background check for Staff #1 were obtained after the staff started employment. Management acknowledged the results of the fingerprint-based national criminal background check for Staff #5 were not obtained at the time of employment.”
Jul 19, 2023: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on a review of documentation and interviews, the vendor did not ensure that behavioral guidance shall be constructive in nature and age and stage appropriate and shall be intended to redirect children to appropriate behavior and resolve conflicts.
“Evidence: 1) During interview, Staff #1 reported that on 7/11/23, she swatted a child’s hand when the child tried to reach for her cup. Staff #1 reported it was a “natural instinct,” but she was trying to redirect him. 2) In a written Incident Report dated 7/11/23, Staff #1 stated: “[Child #1] was reaching for my water cup and I swatted his hand before he touched it. I then told him to swat my hand back.””
Oct 12, 2022: subsidy health and safety inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on a review of five staff records and interview, the vendor did not ensure one staff, who works directly with children, completed the Virginia Preservice Training for Child Care Staff within the first 90 days of employment.
“Evidence: 1) The Virginia Preservice Training certificate in the record for Staff #2, employed 07/22/21, was dated 03/28/22. 2) During interview, management confirmed the training was completed more than 90 days after employment.”
-
Based on a review of five staff records, the vendor did not ensure one staff had current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) appropriate to the ages of children in care within the required timeframe.
“Evidence: The CPR certification in the record for Staff #2, employed 07/22/21, was completed on 02/12/22. All staff who work directly with children should have within 90 days of the date of employment current certification in CPR.”
-
Based on a review of five staff records, the vendor did not ensure one staff had current certification in first aid appropriate to the ages of children in care within the required timeframe.
“Evidence: The first aid certification in the record for Staff #2, employed 07/22/21, was completed on 02/12/22. All staff who work directly with children should have within 90 days of the date of employment current certification in first aid.”
Oct 12, 2022: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on observation and interview, the child day program, which was build before 2015, was not equipped with at least one carbon monoxide detector.
“Evidence: 1) A carbon monoxide detector was not observed during the walk-through of the facility. 2) During interview, management stated that they have not yet installed a carbon monoxide detector.”
All 14 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| May 16, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| May 16, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 18, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 18, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Apr 18, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 18, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 19, 2023 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 19, 2023 | Complaint inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Jul 19, 2023 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Jul 19, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 8 violations cited |
| Feb 6, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Oct 12, 2022 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Oct 12, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 3 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Religious Exempt Child Day Center: Exempt from licensure, expires May 23, 2027.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: 3 years 6 months - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 35 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 4 complaint inspections on record.
- 2 complaint allegations published with Virginia’s findings, 2 of them found valid.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Date | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2024 | Complaint | Allegation: Restraints/Behavior Management. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
| Sep 12, 2023 | Complaint | Allegation: Restraints/Behavior Management. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 232 child care providers in Henrico County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 10; this one had 1.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Tuckaway-Innsbrook Child Development Center | 14 |
| Coal Pit Ministry | 13 |
| Young Men’s Christian Association of Greater Richmond-Echo Lake | 16 |
| Sonia Johnston | 2 |
| Prevailing Word Ministries This child care provider | 1 |
| St. Peter Baptist Church | 3 |
| Susan Cassidy | 14 |
| The Gingerbread Cottage Preschool, Inc. - Staples Mill | 8 |
| Maliha Darwish | Not given |
| Children of America (Glen Allen) LLC | 59 |
| Ms. Subhashini Arunachala | 3 |
| Claudia Robles Arias | 19 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.