Hearth Record

Hospice By Loving Care

A hospice in Noble, Oklahoma 73068

100 Woodbriar, Noble, Oklahoma 73068. (405) 872-1515.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 31 hospices serving ZIP code 73068 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 31, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 25, 2026: recertification inspection by the state9 deficiencies
  • Volunteers (42 CFR 418.78)

    The inspectors’ words, 181 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure volunteers were available for office activities and home visits for all patients, their families, and staff. This failed practice contributed to lost support for the operation of the hospice programs, patients, their families, and staff. (See L0644)Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure volunteers had been identified for what position they would occupy for seven (Volunteer #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7) of seven volunteers. This failed practice placed all patients and their families at risk of:1. Not matching skills to needs.2. Not enhancing patient and family support.3. Not providing respite for caregivers.4. Not ensuring training and readiness. (See L0646) Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure volunteers provided services that equaled 5% of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees for 2024 and 2025 for all patients and staff. This failed practice placed all patients and families at risk for their need for companionship, emotional support, practical assistance, and respite for being caregivers unmet. (See L0647)”

    Rule L0641. Condition-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 135 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the plan of care included the frequency of a foley catheter change for one (Pt #11) of nineteen patients. Findings: Pt #11A plan of care dated 04/25/26 to 06/23/26 was not updated with the standing order dated 08/28/25 that read in part “Insert foley catheter, changing once a month and prn equipment malfunction or obstruction.” The nurses’ notes dated 04/27/26, 04/30/26, 05/04/26, 05/07/26, and 05/11/26 showed the patient had a foley catheter that was last changed on 03/27/26. The nurses note dated 05/14/26 showed the catheter was changed and nurses’ notes through the end of the patient’s benefit period 06/23/26 did not show the catheter was changed again. On 06/24/26 at 12:55 p.m., Staff B stated the catheter was not changed every 30 days.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure an IDG meetings were conducted every 15 days for one (Pt # 3) of nineteen patients. Findings: Pt #3A plan of care dated 03/03/26 to 05/31/26 (patient deceased 04/04/26). IDG meetings were held 03/06/26 and 03/20/26. The documentation showed no IDG meeting held 03/03/26 or 03/14/26. On 06/24/26 at 12:30 p.m., Staff B stated IDG meetings were not conducted every 15 days for Pt #3.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure that a facility had a current POC for one (Pt #11) of four patients who reside in a facility. Findings: Pt #6The surveyor requested the hospice folder with the POC. The request yielded no results. On 06/23/26 at 2:30 p.m., Staff 1 stated the facility had not been provided with a hospice folder or a plan of care for Pt #6.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Role (42 CFR 418.78(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure volunteers were available for office activities and home visits for all patients, their families, and staff. This failed practice contributed to lost support for the operation of the hospice programs, patients, their families, and staff. Findings: A review of the volunteer list showed seven volunteers. No documentation showed the volunteers had provided any administrative assistance or home visit activity for patient and family support. On 06/24/26 at 8:35 a.m., Staff C stated:1. The volunteers did not want to go into homes.2. The volunteers have not provided any office work.”

    Rule L0644. Standard-level.

  • Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 116 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure volunteers had been identified for what position they would occupy for seven (Volunteer #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7) of seven volunteers. This failed practice placed all patients and their families at risk of:1. Not matching skills to needs.2. Not enhancing patient and family support.3. Not providing respite for caregivers.4. Not ensuring training and readiness. Findings: A review of the volunteer list did not show a designation of what position each volunteer would have. On 06/24/26 at 8:35 a.m., Staff C stated the volunteers do not have assigned positions. The volunteers have not provided work in the office or in the patient’s homes.”

    Rule L0646. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure volunteers provided services that equaled 5% of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees for 2024 and 2025 for all patients and staff. This failed practice placed all patients and families at risk for their need for companionship, emotional support, practical assistance, and respite for being caregivers unmet. Findings: A request for volunteer records and hours for Calendar Year 2024 and 2025 yielded no results. On 06/24/26 at 8:35 a.m., Staff C stated cost savings for 2024 and 2025 is 0%.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure discharge summaries were completed for two (Pt #4 and 5) of three patients who had revoked services. Findings: Pt #4A review of the plan of care showed a certification period of 02/24/26 to 05/24/26 with a hospice revocation dated 05/03/26. The record did not show a discharge summary. Pt #5A review of the plan of care showed a certification period of 01/22/26 to 03/27/26 with a hospice revocation dated 03/27/26. The record did not show a discharge summary. On 06/24/26 at 12:43 p.m., Staff B stated a Pt #4 and 5 did not have discharge summaries completed.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure OKSCREEN background checks were completed for eight (Staff F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M) of eight employees reviewed. Findings:A review of the “Long Term Care Act” documented requirements for hospices to acquire and maintain an OKSCREEN background check on all employees with access to patients and patient records and whose employment began after 06/01/14.Staff F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M A review of the personnel record showed no background checks through OKSCREEN. On 06/24/26 at 09:20am, Staff C stated OKSCREEN background checks for Staff F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M were not for the hospice.”

    Rule L0796. Standard-level.

Apr 3, 2024: recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure completion of an initial plan of care no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice benefits for one (Patient #18) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #18 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 10/24/23 with no completion of the initial POC from 10/24/23 to 11/07/23 date of the first IDG (14 days after election of the hospice benefit). Documentation showed no communications or notifications to the physician prior to the 11/07/23 IDG. On 04/03/24 at 2:49 p.m., Staff A stated the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit for patient #18.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 865 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the IDG updated the plans of care to include scope and discipline frequencies prior to the recertification periods for nine (Patients #1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 and 16) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #1 A review of the plan of care for the certification period 02/01/24 to 03/31/24 showed the POC was updated on 02/13/24 (12 days after the beginning of the certification period). IDG updates dated 01/16/24, 01/30/24 and on 02/06/24 showed no documentation of anticipated service scope and discipline frequencies for the recertification period of 02/01/24 to 03/31/24. Documentation showed no IDG communications and no physician notifications related to recertification scope of hospice services and discipline frequencies prior to the end of the POC ending on 01/31/24. Patient #2 A review of the plan of care for the certification period 02/21/24 to 04/20/24 showed the POC was updated on 02/27/24 (6 days after the beginning of the certification period). IDG updates dated 01/30/24 and on 02/13/24 showed no documentation of anticipated service scope and discipline frequencies for the recertification period of 02/21/24 to 04/20/24. Documentation showed no IDG communications and no physician notifications related to recertification scope of hospice services and discipline frequencies prior to the end of the POC ending on 02/20/24. Patient #3 A review of the plan of care for the certification period 03/07/24 to 05/05/24 showed the POC was updated on 03/12/24 (5 days after the beginning of the certification period). IDG updates dated 02/13/24 and on 02/27/24 showed no documentation of anticipated service scope and discipline frequencies for the recertification period of 03/07/24 to 05/05/24. Documentation showed no IDG communications and no physician notifications related to recertification scope of hospice services and discipline frequencies prior to the end of the POC ending on 03/06/24. Patient #5 A review of the plan of care for the certification period 03/06/24 to 05/04/24 showed the POC was updated on 03/12/24 (6 days after the beginning of the certification period). IDG updates dated 02/13/24 and on 02/27/24 showed no documentation of anticipated service scope and discipline frequencies for the recertification period of 03/06/24 to 05/04/24. Documentation showed no IDG communications and no physician notifications related to recertification scope of hospice services and discipline frequencies prior to the end of the POC ending on 03/05/24. Patient #6 A review of the plan of care for the certification period 03/21/24 to 05/19/24 showed the POC was updated on 03/26/24 (5 days after the beginning of the certification period). IDG updates dated 02/27/24 and on 03/12/24 showed no documentation of anticipated service scope and discipline frequencies for the recertification period of 03/21/24 to 05/19/24. Documentation showed no IDG communications and no physician notifications related to recertification scope of hospice services and discipline frequencies prior to the end of the POC ending on 03/20/24. Patient #7 A review of the plan of care for the certification period 03/05/24 to 05/03/24 showed the POC was updated on 03/12/24 (7 days after the beginning of the certification period). IDG updates dated 02/13/24 and on 02/27/24 showed no documentation of anticipated service scope and discipline frequencies for the recertification period of 03/05/24 to 05/03/24. Documentation showed no IDG communications and no physician notifications related to recertification scope of hospice services and discipline frequencies prior to the end of the POC ending on 03/04/24. Patient #8 A review of the plan of care for the certification period 01/17/24 to 04/15/24 showed the POC was updated on 01/26/24 (9 days after the beginning of the certification period). IDG updates dated 01/09/24 and on 01/23/24 showed no documentation of anticipated service scope and discipline frequencies for the recertification period of 01/17/24 to 04/15/24. Documentation showed no IDG communications and no physician notifications related to recertification scope of hospice services and discipline frequencies prior to the end of the POC ending on 01/16/24. Patient #12 A review of the plan of care for the certification period 03/05/24 to 05/03/24 showed the POC was updated on 03/12/24 (7 days after the beginning of the certification period). IDG updates dated 02/13/24 and on 02/27/24 showed no documentation of anticipated service scope and discipline frequencies for the recertification period of 03/05/24 to 05/03/24. Documentation showed no IDG communications and no physician notifications related to recertification scope of hospice services and discipline frequencies prior to the end of the POC ending on 03/04/24. Patient #16 A review of the plan of care for the certification period 12/21/23 to 02/19/24 showed the POC was updated on 12/29/24 (8 days after the beginning of the certification period). IDG updates dated 12/14/23 and on 12/26/23 showed no documentation of anticipated service scope and discipline frequencies for the recertification period of 12/21/23 to 02/19/24. Documentation showed no IDG communications and no physician notifications related to recertification scope of hospice services and discipline frequencies prior to the end of the POC ending on 12/20/23. On 04/03/24 at 2:49 p.m. to 3:15 p.m., Staff A stated the plans of care for patients #1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 and 16 were not updated and implemented by the IDG prior to the beginning of the patients recertification periods.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 257 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure patient refusal of social work services was communicated and addressed by the IDG for one (Patient #7) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #7 A review of a POC dated 03/05/24 to 05/04/24 documented a MSW visit frequency of one time a month with IDG meetings to update the POC on 02/27/24, 03/12/24, and on 03/26/24. Documentation showed patient refusal of MSW visits on 02/23/24 and on 03/28/24. Documentation showed no attempts to reschedule the visits or follow up with the patient and showed no IDG team meeting discussions of patient refusal of MSW visits and no changes in MSW visit frequency. On 04/03/24 at 3:00 p.m., Staff A stated patient refusal of spiritual MSW visits should have been discussed during the IDG team meetings and the MSW visit frequency should have been addressed. Findings: Patient #7 A review of a POC dated 03/05/24 to 05/04/24 documented a MSW visit frequency of one time a month with IDG meetings to update the POC on 02/27/24, 03/12/24, and on 03/26/24. Documentation showed patient refusal of MSW visits on 02/23/24 and on 03/28/24. Documentation showed no attempts to reschedule the visits or follow up with the patient and showed no IDG team meeting discussions of patient refusal of MSW visits and no changes in MSW visit frequency. On 04/03/24 at 3:00 p.m., Staff A stated patient refusal of spiritual MSW visits should have been discussed during the IDG team meetings and the MSW visit frequency should have been addressed.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure an initial spiritual assessment was conducted by the Chaplain for one (Patient #19) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #19 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 09/19/23 with no completion of the spiritual assessment prior to the patients death on 10/06/23 (17 days after the initial comprehensive assessment). Documentation showed no declined chaplain visits and no changes in orders. On 04/03/24 at 2:55 p.m., Staff A stated the Chaplain had not conducted the initial spiritual assessment for patient #19 within the five day timeframe required to complete the initial comprehensive assessment.”

    Rule L0598. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 103 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure documentation of physician certificate of terminal illness for subsequent certification periods for one (Patient #4) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #4 A review of the clinical record showed a plan of care dated 02/27/24 to 04/26/24. Documentation showed a certificate of terminal illness dated 12/26/23. Documentation showed no certificate of terminal illness for subsequent certification period of 02/27/24 to 04/26/24. On 04/03/24 at 3:05 p.m., Staff A stated patient #4 had no certificate of terminal illness or related physician statement of imminence of death for subsequent certification period of 02/27/24 to 04/26/24.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 31, 2026Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jun 25, 2026Recertification inspection by the state9 deficiencies cited
Apr 3, 2024Recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 2, 1999.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 72% at home, 3% in assisted living, 25% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.3%
Visits near death96.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 10 owners or officers are people: Tammy Greenroyd (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Tammy Greenroyd (managing employee (on the payroll), 20%); Richard Woods (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Richard Woods (managing employee (on the payroll), 20%); Richard Mark Woods (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Richard Mark Woods (managing employee (on the payroll), 20%); Billie Woods (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Billie Woods (managing employee (on the payroll), 20%); Lisa Hyer (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Lisa Hyer (managing employee (on the payroll), 20%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 90% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.78% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 48.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 31 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73068, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.