Hearth Record

Heartland Hospice (Shawnee)

A hospice in Shawnee, Oklahoma 74804

2802 North Kickapoo Ave, Shawnee, Oklahoma 74804. (405) 214-6442.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 32 hospices serving ZIP code 74804 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 30, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 30, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 records (Patient #11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #11: The patient was admitted on 8/20/24. The record indicated that the spiritual assessment was completed on 8/26/24.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 records (Patient #3,#13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #3,#13: There was not evidence of a spiritual assessment.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 193 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 records (Patient #7, 10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #7: Phenytoin, Albuterol Aerosol, Carbamazepine, Lisinopril and Toprol were on the medication record of the hospice record but not the facility MAR. In addition Benzonatate, Ipratropium-Albuterol Nebulization and Pramipexole Dihydrochloride were on the facility MAR but not on the medication record of the hospice record. Corrected on site. Patient #10: The medication profile contained Potassium Chloride 20mEq oral packet BID. There was not evidence of a diluent. Corrected on site. In addition, Voltarin 1%, Docusate and ASA were on the hospice medication profile but not on the MAR at the facility. Also, Atorvastatin, Nasal saline gel, Eliquis, Freeze-it gel 3.5% Multi vitamins and Xyzal were on the facility MAR but not on the hospice medication profile. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 records (Patient #13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient #13: The record indicated an assessment by the RN on 10/3/24. There was not evidence of an update until 10/24/24.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 227 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 records (Patient #7,#10,#13,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #7: Benzonatate, Ipratropium-Albuterol Nebulization and Pramipexole Dihydrochloride were on the facility MAR but there was not evidence of an order on the hospice record. Corrected on site. Patient #10: The record contained an order for Potassium Chloride 20mEq oral packet BID. There was not evidence of a diluent. In addition, Atorvastatin, Nasal saline gel, Eliquis, Freeze-it gel 3.5% Multi vitamins and Xyzal were on the facility MAR but there was not evidence of an order on the hospice record. Corrected on site Patient #13: Nurse documentation dated 9/10/24 indicated that the patient had a suprapubic catheter that needed to be changed 2x in 1 week. The CTI dated 9/10/24 indicated that the suprapubic catheter got plugged yesterday. There was not evidence of an order to irrigate or change the catheter. Corrected on site. Patient #14: The record indicated a prn visit on 10/6/24 due to the caregiver stating that the patient’s BP was 90’s/40’s. Documentation indicated that the nurse advised to hold all BP medications and they were removed from the pill box. There was not evidence of an order from the physician to hold the BP medications.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 104 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 records (Patient #1,#12,#13) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #1: The record indicated a volunteer frequency was initiated on 10/4/24. There was not evidence of a visit. Patient #12: The social work visit frequency was 1m1, 2m2, 1m1 for the benefit period beginning 7/12/24. The record indicated only one visit in August and one visit in September. Patient #13: The visit frequency for the skilled nurse was 1w14. There was not evidence of a visit for the week of 10/13/24-10/19/24.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 records (Patient #12) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions, including alerts and precautions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 Patient #12: The aide plan of care contained an alert/precaution for oxygen precautions. There was not evidence in the record that the patient was on oxygen. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 250 words

    “Upon patient record review 4 of 19 records (Patient #1,#2,#6,#7) did not have evidence of documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care Patient #1: The aide plan of care indicated for the task of shower weekly and shampoo the first visit of the week. Visit frequency was 3X/week. For the weeks beginning with 10/6/24, 10/13/24 and 10/30/24, documentation for the shower was with every visit and documentation for the shampoo was 2 times for the week of 10/6/24. Patient #2: The aide plan of care indicated for a shampoo to be performed at the second visit of the week. Visit frequency was 3x/week. For the week starting 9/15/24, the documentation revealed not needed at all 3 visits. For the weeks beginning 9/22/24 and 10/6/24, documentation revealed a shampoo was performed at 2 visits. For the weeks starting 9/29/24 and 10/13/24, a shampoo was performed at all visits. Patient #6: The aide plan of care indicated to provide shave and hair care the first visit of every week. Shave and hair care were performed at all visits in 3 of 4 weeks. Patient #7: Effective 8/14/24, the aide visit frequency was 2 aides 3x/week. On 10/14/24, 1 aide documented a shampoo was provided and the 2nd aide documented not needed. On 10/23/24 and 10/25/24, one aide documented yes to a shower and a bed bath and the second aide documented not needed.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 records (Patient #13) did not have evidence of documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient #13: The record indicated that aides visited the patient 2x/week. There was not evidence of an aide supervisory visit between 10/3/24 and 10/24/24.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. Documentation reveals the annual percentage of volunteer usage for the year 2023 was < 4%.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 records (Patient #3) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #3: The record indicated that the patient/representative wished to receive the Patient Notification of Hospice Non-Covered Items, Services, and Drugs. There was not evidence that this was furnished.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 30, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 13, 2003.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 61% at home, 14% in assisted living, 24% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8%
Visits near death93.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Hospice Development Company 2, LLC owns 100% directly since Jan 19, 2016.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); Ronald C Lazas (corporate director, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); David L Holland (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate director, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%); Crystal Jayd Mcgaha (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 19, 2016
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Hospice Development Company 2, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 19, 2016
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.57% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 71% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 32 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74804, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.