Hearth Record

Carter Healthcare Hospice of Central Oklahoma, LLC

A hospice in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73127

7725 West Reno Ave., Ste 332, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73127. (405) 947-7700.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 36 hospices serving ZIP code 73127 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on May 14, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 14, 2026: recertification inspection by the state9 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 246 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure medical social work completion of the initial psychosocial assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care for three (Patients #7, 12 and #14) of 15 patients. Findings: Patient #7A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 03/04/26 with no completion of an initial psychosocial assessment from 03/04/26 to 03/18/26 (14 days after election of the hospice benefit). The clinical record showed a MSW missed visit on 03/13/26 (nine days after the election of the hospice benefit) and showed no other attempts to complete the initial psychosocial assessment until 03/18/26. Patient #12A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 02/14/25 with no completion of an initial psychosocial assessment from 02/14/25 to 04/10/25 (55 days after election of the hospice benefit). The clinical record showed no MSW missed visits, no other attempts to complete the initial psychosocial assessment until 04/10/25 and showed no change in orders. Patient #14A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 12/19/25 with no completion of an initial psychosocial assessment from 12/19/25 to 01/04/26 (16 days after election of the hospice benefit) and no patient or caregiver refusal of medical social work visits or change in orders. On 05/14/26 at 10:42 a.m. to 11:05 a.m., Staff A stated the initial psychosocial assessments were late for patients #7, 12 and #14.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 498 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure plans of care were fully developed to include SN interventions and goals related to the hospice diagnoses for seven (Patients 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11 and #13) of 15 patients. Findings: Patient #2A review of a POC dated 04/17/26 to 07/15/26 with IDG updates on 04/22/26 and on 05/06/26 showed no SN interventions and goals that addressed the hospice diagnoses of colon and lung cancer and showed no communication between the IDG to update the POC. On 05/14/26 at 10:25 a.m., Staff A stated the POC did not have interventions or goals for colon or lung cancer. Patient #3A review of a POC dated 04/22/26 to 07/22/26 with IDG updates on 04/22/26 and on 05/06/26 showed no SN interventions and goals that addressed the hospice diagnoses of Alzheimer’s disease and chronic kidney disease and showed no communication between the IDG to update the POC. On 05/14/26 at 10:31 a.m., Staff A stated the POC did not have interventions or goals for Alzheimer’s disease or chronic kidney disease. Patient #4A review of a POC dated 04/09/26 to 07/07/26 with IDG updates on 04/22/26 and on 05/06/26 showed no SN interventions and goals that addressed the hospice diagnoses of Alzheimer’s disease and cerebrovascular disease and showed no communication between the IDG to update the POC. On 05/14/26 at 10:35 a.m., Staff A stated the POC did not have interventions or goals for Alzheimer’s disease and cerebrovascular disease. Patient #5A review of a POC dated 04/15/26 to 07/13/26 with IDG updates on 04/22/26 and on 05/06/26 showed no SN interventions and goals that addressed the hospice diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and showed no communication between the IDG to update the POC. On 05/14/26 at 10:40 a.m., Staff A stated the POC did not have interventions or goals for pancreatic cancer. Patient #10A review of a POC dated 01/07/26 to 04/06/26 with IDG updates on 01/14/26 and on 01/28/26 showed no SN interventions and goals that addressed the hospice diagnosis of lung cancer and showed no communication between the IDG to update the POC. On 05/14/26 at 10:50 a.m., Staff A stated the POC did not have interventions or goals for lung cancer. Patient #11A review of a POC dated 03/31/26 to 06/28/26 with IDG updates on 04/08/26 and on 04/22/26 showed no SN interventions and goals that addressed the hospice diagnosis of congestive heart failure and showed no communication between the IDG to update the POC. On 05/14/26 at 10:52 a.m., Staff A stated the POC did not have interventions or goals for congestive heart failure. Patient #13A review of a POC dated 11/23/25 to 02/20/26 with IDG updates on 12/02/25, 12/16/25 and on 12/30/25 showed no SN interventions and goals that addressed the hospice diagnosis of cardiovascular disease and showed no communication between the IDG to update the POC. On 05/14/26 at 11:00 a.m., Staff A stated the POC did not have interventions or goals for cardiovascular disease.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 240 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the POCs were fully developed to include service discipline visit frequencies for four (Patients #4, 5, 8 and #9) of 15 patients. Findings: Patient #4A review of the POC dated 04/09/26 to 07/07/26 with IDG plan of care updates dated 04/22/26 and 05/06/26 showed no SN visit frequencies and IDG communication notes showed no changes in the physician orders. Patient #5A review of the POC dated 04/15/26 to 07/13/26 with IDG plan of care updates dated 04/22/26 and 05/06/26 showed no SN or volunteer coordinator visit frequencies and IDG communication notes showed no changes in the physician orders. Patient #8A review of the POC dated 04/01/26 to 06/29/26 with IDG plan of care updates on 04/08/26 showed no SN visit frequency from 04/01/26 to 04/21/26 and showed no changes in the physician orders until 04/22/26. Patient #9A review of the POC dated 04/11/25 to 04/17/25 with no IDG plan of care update showed no SN visit frequency. The clinical record showed a physician’s order dated 01/26/26 for a SN visit frequency effective 04/11/25 of daily SN visits. On 05/14/26 at 10:35 a.m. to 10:45 a.m., Staff A stated the POCs for patients #4, 5 and #8 did not include discipline visit frequencies. At 10:50 a.m., Staff A stated the POC for patient #9 did not include a SN discipline visit frequency until a correction order was entered on 01/07/26.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure an increase in hospice aide visit frequency was communicated and addressed by the IDG for one (Patient #13) of 15 patients. Findings: Patient #13A review of a POC dated 11/23/25 to 02/20/26 with IDG updates on 12/02/25 and on 12/16/25 showed an aide visit frequency of one time per week. The clinical record showed from 11/30/25 to 12/27/25 two hospice aide visits were conducted per week. The IDG communication notes showed no increase in the hospice aide visits and no change in the physician orders until the IDG meeting on 12/30/25. On 05/14/26 at 11:00 a.m., Staff A stated the IDG did not address the increase in hospice aide visits until 12/30/25.”

    Rule L0554. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 604 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure service discipline frequencies were provided in accordance with the POCs for five (Patients #1, 7, 8, 10 and #12) of 15 patients. Findings: Patient #1A review of the plan of care dated 02/25/26 to 04/25/26 ordered SN visits at a frequency of two times a week and hospice aide visits at three times a week. During the week of 02/25/26 to 02/28/26 showed a SN visit was conducted on 02/25/26 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted); and hospice aide visits were conducted on 02/25/26 and 02/27/26 (three visits ordered, two visits conducted). The clinical record showed no patient or family refusal of visits and no changes in the ordered frequencies. Patient #7A review of the plan of care dated 03/04/26 to 06/01/26 with IDG POC updates on 03/11/26, 03/25/26,04/08/26, 04/22/26 and on 05/06/26 ordered SN visits at a frequency of two to three times a week and hospice aide visits at two to four times a week. During the week of 03/04/26 to 03/07/26 showed no aide visits were conducted (two to three visits ordered, no visit conducted).During the week of 03/08/26 to 03/14/26 showed a SN visit conducted on 03/12/26 (two to three visits ordered, one visit conducted).During the week of 03/15/26 to 03/21/26 showed a SN visit conducted on 03/17/26 (two to three visits ordered, one visit conducted).During the week of 03/22/26 to 03/28/26 showed a SN visit conducted on 03/26/26 (two to three visits ordered, one visit conducted).During the week of 04/05/26 to 04/11/26 showed a SN visit conducted on 04/09/26 (two to three visits ordered, one visit conducted).During the week of 04/12/26 to 04/18/26 showed a SN visit conducted on 04/18/26 (two to three visits ordered, one visit conducted).During the week of 04/19/26 to 04/25/26 showed a SN visit conducted on 04/25/26 (two to three visits ordered, one visit conducted).During the week of 05/03/26 to 05/09/26 showed a SN visit conducted on 05/07/26 (two to three visits ordered, one visit conducted). The clinical record showed no patient or family refusal of visits and no changes in the ordered frequencies. Patient #8A review of the plan of care dated 04/01/26 to 06/29/26 with IDG POC updates on 04/08/26, 04/22/26 and on 05/06/26 ordered SN visits at a frequency of two to three times a week. During the week of 04/19/26 to 04/25/26 showed a SN visit was conducted on 04/21/26 (two to three visits ordered, one visit conducted). The clinical record showed no patient or family refusal of visits and no changes in the ordered frequencies. Patient #10A review of the plan of care dated 01/07/26 to 04/06/26 with IDG POC update on 01/14/26 ordered hospice aide visits two times a week. The clinical record showed no hospice aide visits were conducted between 01/14/26 and the patient’s death on 01/30/26 (six visits ordered, no visits conducted) and showed no patient or family refusal of visits and no changes in the ordered frequency. Patient #12A review of the plan of care dated 12/11/25 to 02/08/26 with IDG POC update on 12/17/26, 12/31/26, 01/14/26 and on 01/28/26 ordered chaplain visits one time a month and MSW visits one time a month. The clinical record showed no chaplain or MSW visits were conducted between 12/11/26 and the patient’s revocation from hospice services on 01/30/26 (two visits ordered, no visits conducted) and showed no patient or family refusal of visits and no changes in the ordered frequencies. On 05/14/26 at 10:25 a.m. to 10:55 a.m., Staff A stated the visit frequencies were not followed as ordered for patients #1, 7, 8, 10 and #12.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 222 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure implementation and review of hospice aide care plans for three (Patients #1, 10 and #12) of 15 patients. Findings: Patient #1A review of a POC dated 02/25/26 to 04/25/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/11/26, 03/25/26, 04/08/26 and 04/22/26 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of three visits every week. The clinical record showed no review and update to the hospice aide care plan since 10/28/25. Patient #10A review of a POC dated 01/07/26 to 04/06/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 01/14/26, 01/28/26 and 02/11/26 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of two visits every week. The clinical record showed no hospice aide care plan was implemented. On 05/14/26 at 10:50 a.m., Staff A stated the clinical records showed no hospice aide care plan. Patient #12A review of a POC dated 12/11/25 to 02/08/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 12/11/25, 12/30/25, 01/14/26 and 01/28/26 ordered hospice aide visit of one time per quarter. The clinical record showed no review and update to the hospice aide care plan since 08/15/25. On 05/14/26 at 10:25 a.m. to 11:00 a.m., Staff A stated the clinical records showed no review and update to the hospice aide care plans in each certification period for patients #1 and #12.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure aide supervisory visits were completed every 14 days for one (Patient #1) of 15 patients. Findings: Patient #1A review of a POC dated 02/25/26 to 04/25/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/11/26, 03/25/26, 04/08/26 and 04/22/26 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of three visits every week with aide visits conducted on 03/04/26, 03/06/26, 03/09/26, 03/10/26, 03/13/26 and on 03/18/26. The clinical record showed supervisory visits were conducted on 03/03/26 and on 03/19/26 (16 days between supervisory visits). On 05/14/26 at 10:25 a.m., Staff A stated supervisory aide visits were not completed every 14 days.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 148 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure completion of visit notes for two (Patients #3 and #5) of 15 patients. Findings: Patient #3 A review of the clinical record showed SN visits conducted on 05/05/26 and 05/08/26 were designated as ‘not started’ in the electronic medical record and showed no communication or coordination note entries for a delay in the documentation of the visits. On 05/14/26 at 10:31 a.m., Staff A stated the SN visit notes for visits on 05/01/26 and on 05/08/26 were not completed. Patient #5 A review of the clinical record showed a volunteer coordinator visit conducted on 05/01/26 was designated as ‘not started’ in the electronic medical record and showed no communication or coordination note entries for a delay in the documentation of the visit. On 05/14/26 at 10:40 a.m., Staff A stated the volunteer coordinator note was not completed.”

    Rule L0672. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure a required background check was completed for one (Staff D) of five employees reviewed. Findings: The “Long-Term Care Security Act Title 63 of the Oklahoma Statutes” documented requirement for an OKSCREEN national background check with fingerprinting for all employees of a home care agency whose employment began after 07/01/14. Staff DA review of the personnel record showed no background check through OKSCREEN for employment that began 11/04/24. On 05/13/26 at 2:30 p.m., Staff B stated Staff D had no background check through the OKScreen database.”

    Rule L0796. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 14, 2026Recertification inspection by the state9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 7, 1994.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 99% at home, 1% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.1%
Visits near death90.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Carter Healthcare of Southwest Oklahoma, LLC owns 100% directly since Nov 1, 2016.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Justin Carter (corporate officer, 100%); Justin Carter (corporate director, 100%); Justin Carter (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Justin Carter (owns 5% or more through other companies, 90.29%); Darla S Smith (runs it (operational or managerial control), 34%); Robert L Peters (runs it (operational or managerial control), 33%); James B Carter (runs it (operational or managerial control), 33%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Carter Healthcare of Southwest Oklahoma, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Nov 1, 2016

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.3% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 44.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 36 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73127, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 36 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 73127
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Carter Healthcare Hospice of Central Oklahoma, LLC This hospice9
Mercy Hospice10
Integris Hospice House5
Apex Hospice7
Integris Hospice House7
Interim Healthcare Hospice14
Enhabit Hospice13
Trinity Hospice14
Oklahoma Palliative & Hospice Care0
Valir Hospice Care, LLC4
Complete Hospice Care of Oklahoma City4
Anthem Hospice7

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.