Hearth Record

Mercy Hospice

A hospice in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73120

4401 W Memorial Road, Suite 116, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73120. (405) 486-8600.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 45 hospices serving ZIP code 73120 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 12, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 12, 2025: recertification inspection by the state10 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 538 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure completion of initial assessments for plans of care no later than five calendar days after election of hospice benefits for five (Patients # 5, 7, 8, 13 and #18) of 23 patients. Findings: Patient #5A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 04/19/25 with current POC from 07/18/25 to 10/15/25. The clinical record showed a chaplain spiritual assessment dated 04/25/25 (6 days) after the initial comprehensive assessment (election of benefits) and development of the POC. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of assessment and showed no communications or notifications to the physician. On 09/12/25 at 2:28 p.m., Staff B stated the chaplain spiritual assessment component of the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit. Patient #7A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 06/22/25 with current POC from 06/22/25 to 09/19/25. The clinical record showed no medical social work assessment after the initial comprehensive assessment (election of benefits) and development of the POC. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of assessment and showed no communications or notifications to the physician. On 09/12/25 at 2:34 p.m., Staff B stated the medical social work assessment component of the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit. Patient #8A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 06/19/25 with current POC from 07/17/25 to 10/14/25. The clinical record showed no medical social work assessment after the initial comprehensive assessment (election of benefits) and development of the POC. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of assessment and showed no communications or notifications to the physician. On 09/12/25 at 2:37 p.m., Staff B stated the medical social work assessment component of the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit. Patient #13A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 09/02/25 with current POC from 09/02/25 to 10/31/25. The clinical record showed a medical social work assessment dated 09/09/25 (7 days) after the initial comprehensive assessment (election of benefits) and development of the POC. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of assessment and showed no communications or notifications to the physician. On 09/12/25 at 2:59 p.m., Staff B stated the medical social work assessment component of the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit. Patient #19A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 05/30/25 with current POC from 08/28/25 to 11/25/25. The clinical record showed no chaplain spiritual assessment after the initial comprehensive assessment (election of benefits) and development of the POC. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of assessment and showed no communications or notifications to the physician. On 09/12/25 at 3:10 p.m., Staff B stated the chaplain spiritual assessment component of the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 741 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure development of a bereavement POC at the time of initial assessment for eight (Patients #2, 4, 7, 12, 16, 18, 22 and #23) of 23 patients. Findings: Patient #2A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 03/13/24 with IDG updates on 08/20/25 and 09/03/25. The clinical record showed no bereavement POC and no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC dated 09/03/25 to 11/01/25. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC since the bereavement assessment dated 03/13/24. On 09/12/25 at 2:07 p.m., Staff A stated:1. The patient had no bereavement POC and showed no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC.2. A bereavement POC is put into place at the time of a patient’s death. Patient #4A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 06/20/25 with IDG updates on 06/20/25, 07/02/25, 07/16/25, 07/30/25, 08/13/25, and 08/27/25. The clinical record showed no bereavement POC and no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC dated 06/19/25 to 09/16/25. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC since the bereavement assessment dated 06/20/25. On 09/12/25 at 2:21 p.m., Staff A stated:1. The patient had no bereavement POC and showed no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC.2. A bereavement POC is put into place at the time of a patient’s death. Patient #12A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 01/24/25 with IDG updates on 07/23/25, 08/06/25, 08/20/25, and 09/03/25. The clinical record showed no bereavement POC and no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC dated 07/23/25 to 09/20/25. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC since the bereavement assessment dated 01/24/25. On 09/12/25 at 2:54 p.m., Staff A stated:1. The patient had no bereavement POC and showed no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC.2. A bereavement POC is put into place at the time of a patient’s death. Patient #16A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 02/12/24 with IDG updates on 08/06/25, 08/20/25, and 09/03/25. The clinical record showed no bereavement POC and no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC dated 08/07/25 to 10/05/25. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC since the bereavement assessment dated 02/12/24. On 09/12/25 at 3:04 p.m., Staff A stated:1. The patient had no bereavement POC and showed no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC.2. A bereavement POC is put into place at the time of a patient’s death. Patient #18A review of the clinical record showed no initial bereavement assessment with IDG updates on 08/20/25, and 09/03/25. The clinical record showed no bereavement POC and no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC dated 08/28/25 to 11/25/25. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC since the initial comprehensive assessment dated 05/30/25. On 09/12/25 at 3:10 p.m., Staff A stated:1. The patient had no bereavement POC and showed no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC.2. A bereavement POC is put into place at the time of a patient’s death. Patient #22A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 06/14/23 with IDG updates on 01/29/25, 02/12/25, and 02/26/25. The clinical record showed no bereavement POC and no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC dated 02/02/25 to 04/02/25. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC since the initial comprehensive assessment dated 06/14/23. On 09/12/25 at 3:23 p.m., Staff A stated the patient had no bereavement POC and showed no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC at the time of the hospice revocation on 03/30/25. Patient #23A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 02/05/25 with IDG updates on 02/12/25, 02/26/25, 03/12/25, 03/26/25, 04/09/25 and 04/23/25. The clinical record showed no bereavement POC and no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC dated 02/01/25 to 05/01/25. The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC since the initial comprehensive assessment dated 05/01/25. On 09/12/25 at 3:23 p.m., Staff A stated the patient had no bereavement POC and showed no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC at the time of the hospice revocation on 05/01/25.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure POCs included interventions and goals related to hospice aide services for one (Patients #10) of 23 patients. Findings: Patient #10A review of the plan of care dated 08/11/25 to 10/09/25 with IDGs dated 08/11/25, 08/13/25, 08/26/25 and 09/10/25 showed no interventions and goals for hospice aide services for visits conducted on 08/18/25, 08/21/25, 08/25/25, 09/04/25 and 09/08/25. On 09/12/25 at 2:45 p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care should have included interventions and goals for hospice aide services.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 808 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure POCs included services discipline visit frequencies for 16 (Patients #1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21 and #22) of 23 patients. Findings: Patient #1A review of a POC dated 07/20/25 to 10/17/25 with IDG dated 07/23/25, 08/06/25, 08/20/25 and 09/03/25 showed no visit frequencies for chaplain, MSW and volunteer services. On 09/12/25 at 1:55 p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care did not include visit frequencies for chaplain, MSW and volunteer services. Patient #2A review of a POC dated 09/03/25 to 11/01/25 with IDG dated 08/20/25 and 09/03/25 showed no visit frequencies for chaplain, MSW and volunteer services. On 09/12/25 at 2:07 p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care did not include visit frequencies for chaplain, MSW and volunteer services. Patient #3A review of a POC dated 08/05/25 to 10/06/25 with IDG dated 08/06/25, 08/20/25 and 09/03/25 showed no visit frequencies for chaplain, MSW and volunteer services. On 09/12/25 at 2:13 p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care did not include visit frequencies for chaplain, MSW and volunteer services. Patient #5A review of a POC dated 07/18/25 to 10/15/25 with IDG dated 07/23/25, 08/06/25, 08/20/25 and 09/03/25 showed no visit frequencies for chaplain and volunteer services. On 09/12/25 at 2:28 p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care did not include visit frequencies for chaplain and volunteer services.Patient #6A review of a POC dated 07/29/25 to 10/28/25 with IDG dated 07/23/25, 08/06/25, 08/20/25 and 09/03/25 showed no visit frequencies for MSW services. On 09/12/25 at 2:28 p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care did not include visit frequencies for MSW services.Patient #8A review of a POC dated 07/17/25 to 10/14/25 with IDG dated 07/23/25, 08/06/25, 08/20/25 and 09/03/25 showed no visit frequencies for chaplain and MSW services. On 09/12/25 at 2:37 p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care did not include visit frequencies for chaplain and MSW services.Patient #9A review of a POC dated 08/24/25 to 10/22/25 with IDG dated 08/20/25 and 09/03/25 showed no visit frequencies for chaplain, MSW and volunteer services. On 09/12/25 at 2:41p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care did not include visit frequencies for chaplain, MSW and volunteer services. Patient #10A review of a POC dated 08/11/25 to 10/09/25 with IDG dated 08/20/25 and 09/03/25 showed no visit frequencies for chaplain, MSW and volunteer services. On 09/12/25 at 2:45p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care did not include visit frequencies for chaplain, MSW and volunteer services. Patient #12A review of a POC dated 07/23/25 to 09/20/25 with IDG dated 07/23/25, 08/06/25, 08/20/25 and 09/03/25 showed no visit frequencies for chaplain, MSW and volunteer services. On 09/12/25 at 2:54 p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care did not include visit frequencies for chaplain, MSW and volunteer services.Patient #14A review of a POC dated 08/14/25 to 11/11/25 with IDG dated 08/20/25 and 09/03/25 showed no visit frequencies for hospice aide and MSW services. On 09/12/25 at 3:01p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care did not include visit frequencies for hospice aide and MSW services. Patient #16A review of a POC dated 08/07/25 to 10/05/25 with IDG dated 08/06/25, 08/20/25 and 09/03/25 showed no visit frequencies for chaplain, MSW and volunteer services. On 09/12/25 at 3:04 p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care did not include visit frequencies for chaplain, MSW and volunteer services.Patient #17A review of a POC dated 08/24/25 to 10/22/25 with IDG dated 08/20/25 and 09/03/25 showed no visit frequencies for MSW services. On 09/12/25 at 3:07 p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care did not include visit frequencies for MSW services. Patient #18A review of a POC dated 08/28/25 to 10/25/25 with IDG dated 08/20/25 and 09/03/25 showed no visit frequencies for MSW and volunteer services. On 09/12/25 at 3:07p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care did not include visit frequencies for MSW and volunteer services. Patient #19A review of a POC dated 04/06/25 to 07/04/25 with IDG dated 03/26/25, 04/09/25, 04/23/25, 05/07/25, 05/21/25, 06/04/25 and 06/18/25 showed no visit frequency for hospice aide services. On 09/12/25 at 3:14 p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care did not include a visit frequency for hospice aide services. Patient #21A review of a POC dated 03/27/25 to 06/24/25 with IDG dated 03/26/25, 04/09/25, 04/23/25, 05/07/25, 05/21/25, 06/04/25 and 06/18/25 showed no visit frequency for chaplain services. On 09/12/25 at 3:14 p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care did not include a visit frequency for chaplain services. Patient #22A review of a POC dated 02/02/25 to 04/02/25 with IDG dated 01/29/25, 02/12/25 and 02/26/25 showed no visit frequency for volunteer services. On 09/12/25 at 3:23 p.m., Staff A stated the plan of care did not include a visit frequency for volunteer services.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 656 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure:Aide visits were provided in accordance with the plan of care for three (Patients #3, 4 and #5) of 23 patients.SN visits were provided in accordance with the plan of care for two (Patients #4 and #14) of 23 patients.SN to perform weight assessment every month for one (Patient #19) of 23 patients. Findings: Patient #3A review of a POC dated 08/05/25 to 10/06/25 with IDG updates on 08/06/25, 08/20/25 and 09/03/25 showed an aide visit frequency of two times a week for one week, then three times a week for three weeks. The clinical record shown during the week of:· 08/05/25 to 08/09/25 aide visits were conducted on 08/06/25 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted). · 08/17/25 to 08/23/25 aide visits were conducted on 08/18/25 and 08/22/25 (three visits ordered, two visits conducted). The clinical record showed no communication between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered aide visit frequency. On 09/12/25 at 2:13 p.m., Staff A stated aide visits were not conducted as ordered on the plan of care. Patient #4A review of a POC dated 06/19/25 to 09/16/25 with IDG updates on 06/20/25, 07/02/25, 07/16/25, 07/30/25, 08/13/25 and 08/27/25 showed an aide visit frequency of three times a week for three weeks and SN visit frequency of two times a week for four weeks. The clinical record shown during the week of:· 06/19/25 to 06/21/25 no aide visits were conducted (three visits ordered, no visit conducted). · 06/22/25 to 06/28/25 no aide visits were conducted (three visits ordered, no visits conducted). · 06/29/25 to 07/05/25 two aide visits were conducted on 06/30/25 and 07/03/25 (three visits ordered, two visits conducted). · 08/18/25 to 08/24/25 one visit was conducted on 08/18/25 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted). The clinical record showed no communication between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered aide and SN visit frequencies. On 09/12/25 at 2:21 p.m., Staff A stated the aide and SN visits were not conducted as ordered on the plan of care. Patient #5A review of a POC dated 07/18/25 to 10/15/25 with IDG updates on 07/09/25, 07/23/25, 08/06/25, 08/20/25 and 09/03/25 showed an aide visit frequency of three times a week for six weeks, two times a week for one week, then three times a week for three weeks. The clinical record shown during the week of:· 08/17/25 to 08/23/25 aide visits were conducted on 08/18/25 (three visits ordered, one visit conducted). The clinical record showed no communication between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered aide visit frequency. On 09/12/25 at 2:28 p.m., Staff A stated aide visits were not conducted as ordered on the plan of care. Patient #14A review of a POC dated 08/14/25 to 11/11/25 with IDG updates on 08/06/25, 08/20/25 and 09/03/25 showed an SN visit frequency of two times a week for one week, then three times a week for four weeks. The clinical record shown during the week of:· 08/13/25 to 08/16/25 SN visits were conducted on 08/14/25 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted). The clinical record showed no communication between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered SN visit frequency. On 09/12/25 at 3:01 p.m., Staff A stated SN visits were not conducted as ordered on the plan of care. Patient #19A review of a POC dated 04/06/25 to 07/14/25 with IDG updates on 03/26/25, 04/09/25, 04/23/25, 05/07/25, 05/21/25, 06/04/25 and 06/18/25 showed orders for SN to perform weight assessment every month. The clinical record shown one weight assessment on 02/20/25 of 230.5 pounds from 02/20/25 to the date of the patient’s death on 06/20/25. The clinical record showed no communication between the IDG and showed no changes in the order for SN to perform weight assessment every month. On 09/12/25 at 3:14 p.m., Staff A stated SN did not conduct weight assessments as ordered on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 141 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure care was coordinated between the IDG members and the physician for one (Patient #22) of 23 patients. Findings: Patient #22A review of the POC dated 02/02/25 to 04/02/25 and plan of care updates dated 01/29/25, 02/12/25 and 02/26/25 showed the patient was discharged from hospice for benefit revocation for an in-patient hospital stay on 03/30/25. The clinical record showed:· An aide visit was conducted on 04/01/25.· A MSW visit was conducted on 04/08/25.· A SN visit was conducted on 04/20/25. The clinical record showed no discussion by the IDG and showed no orders for the discipline visits by the aide, MSW or SN. On 09/12/25 at 3:23 p.m., Staff A stated the hospice team members had no orders to see the patient for services after the revocation date of 03/30/25.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide training (42 CFR 418.76(b)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Based on a record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure certification or completion of alternative training requirements to meet the qualifications of a hospice aide for one (Staff H) of eight employees reviewed. Findings: Staff HA review of personnel records showed certification as a home care aide expired on 06/30/25. The personnel record showed no current home health aide certification and showed no completion of alternative training requirements to meet the qualifications of a hospice aide. Additional request for information yielded no results. On 09/12/25 at 3:30 p.m., Staff A stated the personnel record for Staff H showed:1. The home health aide certification had expired.2. It did not include documentation of alternative training requirements that met qualifications as a hospice aide.”

    Rule L0614. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 140 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure on-site aide supervisory visits were completed every 14 days for two (Patients #7 and #9) of 23 patients. Findings: Patient #7A review of the plan of care dated 06/22/25 to 09/19/25 showed home health aide visits were conducted on:· 07/07/25· 07/21/25 The clinical record showed no supervisory visits from 06/22/25 to 07/22/25(30 + days between supervisory visits). On 09/12/25 at 2:34 p.m., Staff A stated supervisory aide visits were not conducted every 14 days. Patient #9A review of the plan of care dated 08/24/25 to 10/22/25 showed home health aide visits were conducted on:· 08/29/25· 09/05/25 The clinical record showed no supervisory visits from 08/19/25 to 09/10/25(22 + days between supervisory visits). On 09/12/25 at 2:41 p.m., Staff A stated supervisory aide visits were not conducted every 14 days.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure personnel records were maintained with volunteer acknowledged job descriptions for two (Volunteer #1 and #2) of three volunteer files reviewed. Findings: Volunteer 1A review of personnel records showed no signed job description for hospice volunteer role, responsibilities and limitations. Volunteer 2A review of personnel records showed no signed job description for hospice volunteer role, responsibilities and limitations.Additional request for information yielded no results. On 09/12/25 at 3:30 p.m., Staff A stated personnel records were provided in their entirety and did not contain job descriptions Volunteers #1 and #2.”

    Rule L0662. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 141 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure required background checks were completed for three (Volunteers #1, 2 and #3) of three volunteer files reviewed. Findings: The “Long-Term Care Security Act Title 63 of the Oklahoma Statutes” documented requirement for an OKSCREEN national background check with fingerprinting for all employees of a home care agency whose employment began after 07/01/14. Volunteer #1A review of the personnel record showed no documentation of a background check through OKSCREEN. Volunteer #2A review of the personnel record showed no documentation of a background check through OKSCREEN. Volunteer #3A review of the personnel record showed no documentation of a background check through OKSCREEN. Additional request for information yielded no results. On 09/12/25 at 3:30 p.m., Staff A stated Volunteers #1, 2 and #3 did not have background checks completed through the OkScreen database.”

    Rule L0796. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 12, 2025Recertification inspection by the state10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 20, 1990.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 71% at home, 12% in assisted living, 14% in a nursing facility, 4% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.1%
Visits near death97.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Mercy Health Oklahoma Communities owns 100% directly since Aug 10, 2012.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Jamie Wilke (corporate officer, 0%); Shannon Sock (corporate director); John M Mohart (corporate director); Jennifer Cohen (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Jeffrey Peter Ciaramita (corporate director); Christopher F Hahne (corporate officer, 0%); Brian Day (corporate officer, 0%); Brian Bennett Geister (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Mercy HealthOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 1, 1986
Mercy Health Oklahoma CommunitiesOwns 5% or more directly100%Aug 10, 2012

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.54% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 58.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 45 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73120, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.