Hearth Record

Frontier Hospice

A hospice in Norman, Oklahoma 73069

2782 Washington Street, Suite 100, Norman, Oklahoma 73069. (405) 789-2913.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 36 hospices serving ZIP code 73069 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 12, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 12, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 232 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1, 4, 6, 8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1: There is documentation in nurses note written 5/8/24 that patient is wearing oxygen at 3LPM. Patient medication profile for oxygen states 2LPM via nasal cannula per profile written on 4/27/24. Patient medication profile for oxygen states 2LPM via nasal cannula per profile written on 5/2/24. There is no evidence of oxygen in medication profile with administration rate of 3LPM. Patient 4: 5/13/24 Cotisporin otic drops in medication profile. This medication is profiled as administration for ten days. This order is still active. Patient has artificial tears in medication profile. There is no evidence of administration site for this medication. Patient 6: Fluticanasone on medication profile states 2 sprays daily. There is no evidence of administration site for this profiled medication. There is no evidence of dilutant in profiled medication: Miralax. Patient 8: Profiled medication: Catapres Transdermal Patch 0.1mg/24 hours. Dose states 0.1 microgram. Frequency states twice daily. Route states mouth/throat. Special instructions list HTN/do not crush.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 304 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #12, 13, 14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient 12: Nurse visits made 5/16/24, 5/21/24, 5/23/24, 5/28/24, 5/30/24, 6/4/24, 6/6/24, 6/11/24. Only body system assessed was skin. Patient 13: Nurse visit made 5/7/24, only body systems assessed: neuro, skin, musculoskeletal, nutrition. Nurse visit made 5/10/24, body systems assessed: neurological, gastrointestinal, skin, nutrition. Nurse visit made 5/14/24, body systems assessed: neurological, respiratory, skin, nutrition. Nurse visits made 5/16/24 and 5/21/24, body systems assessed: neurological, gastrointestinal, skin, nutrition. Nurse visit made 5/23/24, body systems assessed: neurological, respiratory, gastrointestinal, skin, musculoskeletal. Nurse visit made 6/5/24, body systems assessed: neurological, gastrointestinal, skin, nutrition. Nurse visit made 6/7/24, body systems assessed: neurological, respiratory, skin, nutrition. Nurse visit made 6/11/24, body systems assessed: neurological, skin, musculoskeletal. Patient 14: Nurse visit made 5/7/24, only body systems assessed: cardiac, gastrointestinal, skin, urinary. Nurse visit made 5/10/24, body systems assessed: neurological, respiratory, cardiac, skin, urinary. Nurse visit made 5/13/24, body systems assessed: neurological, cardiac, gastrointestinal, skin. Nurse visit 5/21/24, body systems assessed: neurological, respiratory, cardiac, skin. Nurse visit 5/24/24, body systems assessed: respiratory, cardiac, skin, musculoskeletal. Nurse visit 5/29/24, body systems assessed: neurological, respiratory, cardiac, skin, urinary, musculoskeletal. Nurse visit 6/3/24, body systems assessed: respiratory, cardiac, skin, urinary. Nurse visit 6/6/24, body systems assessed: neurological, respiratory, cardiac, skin. Nurse visit 6/11/24, body systems assessed: neurological, cardiac, skin, musculoskeletal.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1, 3, 5, 9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 1: Patient determined to be high risk for falls. There is no evidence of falls precautions on patient’s plan of care. Patient 3: Patient is taking daily aspirin. There is no evidence of bleeding precautions on patient’s plan of care. Patient 5: Patient is taking Eliquis. There is no evidence of bleeding precautions on patient’s plan of care. Patient 9: Patient is taking Keppra for seizures. There is no evidence of seizure precautions on patient’s plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 190 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1, 4, 6, 8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: There is documentation on 5/8/24 that patient is wearing oxygen at 3LPM. Patient has order for oxygen that reads 2LPM via nasal cannula written on 4/27/24. Patient also has order for oxygen that reads 4LPM via nasal cannula written on 5/2/24. There is no evidence of oxygen order with administration rate of 3LPM. Patient 4: 5/13/24 order for cotisporin otic drops. Order states drops to be administered for ten days. This order is still active. Patient has an order for artificial tears. There is no evidence of administration site for this order. Patient 6: Order for Fluticanasone states 2 sprays daily. There is no evidence of administration site for this order. There is no evidence of dilutant in order for miralax. Patient 8: Medication order: Catapres Transdermal Patch 0.1mg/24 hours. Dose states 0.1 microgram. Frequency states twice daily. Route states mouth/throat. Special instructions list HTN/do not crush.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #1) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: Oxygen is ordered as part of patient’s plan of care. Oxygen is not listed as DME in patient’s medical record.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 251 words

    “Upon client record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #1, 4, 5, 6, 8) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1: Spiritual care frequency is ordered twice monthly. There is evidence of only one spiritual care visit in May 2024. Patient 4: Spiritual care frequency order written 5/1/24 with an end date of 5/27/24. Frequency is ordered as twice monthly. There is evidence of only one spiritual care visit made in connection with this order. Visit date 5/7/24. Spiritual care frequency order written 5/28/24. Frequency is ordered as twice monthly. There is evidence of only one spiritual care visit made in connection with this order between 5/28/24 and 5/31/24. Visit date 5/28/24. Patient 5: Patient has wound care order written 6/3/24 for skin tear. Order reads: hospice nurse to cleanse with normal saline, apply steri strips, cover with opsite until hospice nurse removes. On 6/3/24 visit made by hospice nurse. Nurse documented wound care as cleansing skin tear, applying steri strips and covering with telfa and tape. Patient 6: Spiritual care frequency order written 5/30/24 with an end date of 8/27/24. Frequency is ordered as twice monthly. There is no evidence of a spiritual care visit made 5/30/24-6/1/24 in connection with this order. Patient 8: Spiritual care frequency order written 4/29/24. Frequency is ordered as monthly. There is no evidence of a spiritual care visit made in connection with this order between 4/29/24 and 5/1/24.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 250 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 5: Aide task shampoo is written with frequency of 3 times weekly. This task states per patient/caregiver request. Aide task max assist with toileting-no evidence of frequency. Patient 9: Patient is taking Keppra. No evidence of seizure precautions on aide care plan. Patient 10: Aide task nail clean and cut has frequency of PRN. Patient 11: Aide task range of motion has frequency of as tolerated. Patient 12: Aide task whirlpool bath has frequency of every visit. There is no task for dressing patient despite documentation in patient’s record indicating max assist. Patient 14: Plan of care states patient has need for electric razor and bleeding precautions. Aide care plan has no evidence of bleeding precautions or electric razor.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 266 words

    “Upon patient record review 8 of 19 (Patient #4,7,8,9,10,11,12,14) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 4: Aide task assist with urinal-frequency is every visit. This task is marked as not required/not completed since 5/9/24. Patient 7: Aide task blow dry hair is ordered every visit. This task was marked not required/not completed 5/24/24. Aide task change linen is ordered every visit. This task was marked not required/not completed 6/5/24. Patient 8: Aide task ensure oxygen in place at end of visit is ordered every visit. This task was marked not required/not completed on dates: 5/2/24, 5/7/24, 5/14/24, 5/20/24, 5/23/24, 6/6/24. Patient 9: Aide task shave is ordered every visit. This task was marked not required/not completed 5/1/24. Patient 10: Aide task apply lotion is ordered every visit. This task was marked not required/not completed 5/13/24. Aide task assist with ambulation using wheelchair is ordered every visit. This task was marked not required/not completed 5/21/24. Patient 11: Aide task complete bed bath is ordered twice weekly. This task was marked not required/not completed 6/7/24. Patient 12: Aide tasks shampoo, shave, apply lotion ordered every visit. These tasks marked not required/not completed 5/7/24. Aide task shampoo ordered every visit. This task was marked not required/not completed 6/10/24. Patient 14: Aide task shave is ordered every visit. This task was marked not required/not completed 5/21/24.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #18) did not have evidence that the hospice forwarded a summary and a copy of the patient record, if requested, to a facility when transferring the patient to that facility.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 12, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 9, 1999.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 40% at home, 41% in assisted living, 19% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.8%
Visits near death97.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Care Hospice, Inc. owns 100% directly since Dec 5, 2019.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: John B Hunter (owns 5% or more through other companies, 9.42%); Amy Jo Chadwick Smith (managing employee (under contract)); Jesse Reo Moore (corporate officer); Jesse Reo Moore (managing employee (on the payroll)); Dianne Kelly (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bart K Valdez (corporate officer); Bart K Valdez (managing employee (on the payroll)); Grant Brown (corporate officer); Grant Brown (managing employee (on the payroll)); Dana K Reid (corporate officer); Dana K Reid (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Care Hospice, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 5, 2019
Care Hospice Acquisition, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 5, 2019
Hospice Care Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 9, 2020
Hospice Care Holdings, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 9, 2020
Hospice Care Intermediate I, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 9, 2020
Hospice Care Intermediate II, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 9, 2020
Thl Equity Fund VIII Investors (Hospice Care), L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies29.16%Dec 9, 2020
Thomas H. Lee Parallel Fund VIII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies27.44%Dec 9, 2020
Thomas H. Lee Equity Fund VIII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies15.07%Dec 9, 2020

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 84% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.78% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 84.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 36 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73069, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.