Carter Healthcare Hospice of Northeast Oklahoma LLC
A hospice in Bixby, Oklahoma 74008
6630 E 121st St., Ste 108, Bixby, Oklahoma 74008. (918) 425-4000.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 17 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 8of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
17 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 36 hospices serving ZIP code 74008 had 5.5.
The last inspection on record was on Aug 18, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
17 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Aug 18, 2026: recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
The inspectors’ words, 110 words
“Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure that the social worker completed the psychosocial within five days of the initial comprehensive assessment for one (Pt #4) of 14 patients. Findings: Pt #4A review of the clinical record showed an initial comprehensive assessment performed 03/06/26 and showed no psychosocial assessment was completed. A missed visit note was completed by the social worker dated 03/13/26 that showed the patient refused social work services (seven days after the initial comprehensive assessment). On 08/18/26 at 1:51 p.m., Staff B stated no psychosocial assessment was completed, and the patient refusal was not documented until seven days after the initial comprehensive assessment.”
-
Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))
The inspectors’ words, 258 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure: 1. Wound measurements were completed for one (Pt #2) of 14 patients.2. Wound care was completed as ordered for one (Pt #2) of 14 patients. Findings: Pt #2A review of a plan of care period dated 07/16/26 to 09/15/26 showed an order dated 07/28/26 that read, “Hospice SN/family/caregiver to perform wound care to right buttock stage II pressure ulcer wound with skilled nursing visits. Measurements and picture to be taken weekly as patient allows. Wound care as follows: Cleanse wound with NS and pat dry with 4x4 gauze, apply 4x4 duoderm or like hydrocolloid dressing twice weekly and as needed for soilage. Wound care performed as patient/caregiver allows...” A review of the clinical record showed wound measurements were obtained 07/28/26. A review of nurses’ notes showed:1. A nurse’s note dated 07/30/26 showed no wound care performed by the nurse or caregiver, no patient refusal, and no change in orders.2. A nurse’s note dated 08/04/26 showed no wound care performed by the nurse or caregiver, no wound measurements obtained, no patient refusal, and no change in orders.3. A nurse’s note dated 08/06/26 showed no wound care performed by the nurse or caregiver, no patient refusal, and no change in orders.4. A nurse’s note dated 08/11/26 showed no wound care performed by the nurse or caregiver, no wound measurements obtained, no patient refusal, and no change in orders. On 08/18/26 at 1:38 p.m., Staff B stated: 1. Wound care was not completed as ordered.2. Wound measurements were not obtained.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 166 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure:1. Wound care orders were included in the plan of care for one (Pt #13) of 14 patients.2. Foley catheter orders were included in the plan of care for one (Pt #13) of 14 patients. Findings: Pt #13 A review of a plan of care dated 02/03/26 to 02/06/26 showed an initial nursing assessment completed 02/03/26 that showed a Stage 2 open pressure ulcer to the coccyx the nurse applied triad paste. A review of the clinical record showed a physician’s order dated 02/03/26 for the SN to insert a 16 Fr 30 ml Foley catheter 1 time monthly and 2 prn visits for malfunction, leaking or removal. The plan of care did not contain interventions or treatments for the pressure ulcer or interventions for a foley catheter. On 08/18/26 at 1:38 p.m., Staff B stated the plan of care did not contain: 1. Interventions or treatment of the pressure ulcer.2. Interventions for the foley catheter.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 118 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the plan of care included all services necessary for the palliation and management of their terminal hospice diagnosis for two (Pt # 7 and 13) of 14 patients. Findings: Pt #7A review of a plan of care dated 08/07/26 to 10/05/26 showed no interventions and goals for the hospice diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Pt #13A review of a plan of care dated 02/03/26 to 02/06/26 showed no interventions and goals for the hospice diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of pancreas. On 08/18/26 at 1:57 p.m., Staff B stated the plan of care did not include goals or interventions for the hospice diagnoses for Pt # 3 and 7.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure personnel records included orientation to the hospice philosophy for two (Staff E and F) of seven personnel. Findings: Staff E and FA review of the personnel record showed no orientation to the hospice philosophy. On 08/18/26 at 1:07 p.m., Staff B stated Staff E and F had no documentation of orientation to the hospice philosophy.”
Apr 10, 2024: recertification inspection by the state12 deficiencies
-
Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)
The inspectors’ words, 295 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to maintain evidence that its QAPI program showed measurable improvement in indicators related to improved palliative outcomes and hospice services. This failed practice had the potential to place 12 current patients and any new patient admitted to the hospice at risk of poorly identified outcome measures related to symptom control. (See L561) Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to analyze quality indicators. This failed practice had the potential to place 12 current patients and any new patient admitted to the hospice at risk for repeated hospice mishaps due to failure of the hospice to self-identify problem areas. (See L562) Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to maintain evidence of the use of quality indicator data in their QAPI program. This failed practice had the potential to negatively affect patient care due to hospice failure to collect and correct areas of deficient practices for all 12 current patients and any new patient admitted to the hospice. (See L563) Based on a record review and interview, the hospice failed to implement and maintain an effective QAPI Program and failed to ensure performance improvements were tracked to ensure that improvements were sustained. This failed practice had the potential to place 12 current patients and any new patient admitted to the hospice at risk for repeated unidentified areas of poor care and symptom management. (See L570) Based on a record review and interview, the governing body failed to ensure a QAPI program was maintained and evaluated annually. This failed practice had the potential to place all patients on service for the calendar years of 2022 and 2023 at risk for poor outcomes due to the lack oversight and governing body involvement. (See L574) .”
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
The inspectors’ words, 104 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure completion of the initial bereavement assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care for one (Patient #1) of 14 patients. A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 01/26/24 with no completion of the initial bereavement assessment from 01/26/24 to 04/10/24 (43 days after the election of the hospice benefit) with no documentation of patient or caregiver refusal of the initial bereavement risk assessment. On 04/10/24 at 3:00 pm., Staff B stated the initial bereavement assessment was not completed for Patient #1.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 124 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure imminence of death was assessed during the comprehensive assessment for four (Patients #1, 2, 3 and 7) of 14 patients. Patient #1 A review of the Initial Assessment dated 01/26/24 showed no assessment of imminence of death. Patient #2 A review of the Initial Assessment dated 02/05/24 showed no assessment of imminence of death. Patient #3 A review of the Initial Assessment dated 01/31/24 showed no assessment of imminence of death. Patient #7 A review of the Initial Assessment dated 01/10/24 showed no assessment of imminence of death. On 04/10/24 at 3:05 pm., Staff B stated imminence of death was not assessed on the comprehensive assessment for Patients #1, 2, 3 and 7.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 655 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure an individualized plan of care was fully developed to include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness for nineteen (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of 14 patients reviewed. Patient #1 A plan of care dated 01/26/24 to 04/24/24 documented a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #2 A review of the plan of care dated 02/05/24 to 05/04/24 documented a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #3 A plan of care dated 01/31/24 to 04/29/24 documented a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #4 A plan of care dated 03/18/24 to 06/15/24 documented a primary diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #5 A plan of care dated 02/05/24 to 04/04/24 documented a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #6 A plan of care dated 03/26/24 to 06/23/24 documented a primary diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #7 A plan of care dated 01/10/24 to 04/08/24 documented a primary diagnosis of dementia and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #8 A plan of care dated 01/14/24 to 03/13/24 documented a primary diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #9 A plan of care dated 01/07/24 to 03/06/24 documented a primary diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #10 A plan of care dated 02/26/24 to 05/25/24 documented a primary diagnosis of dementia and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #11 A plan of care dated 02/10/24 to 05/09/24 documented a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #12 A plan of care dated 01/22/24 to 04/20/24 documented a primary diagnosis of hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #13 A plan of care dated 12/13/24 to 03/11/24 documented a primary diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #14 A plan of care dated 11/16/23 to 02/13/24 documented a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. On 04/10/24 at 2:45 pm, Staff B stated the plans of care for Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 failed to include services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 306 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure to include the frequency of services provided in the plan of care for five (Patients #1, 2, 3, 5 and 7) of 14 patients. Patient #1 A review of the plan of care dated 01/26/24 to 04/24/24 showed no skilled nurse frequencies from 01/26/24 to 03/14/24. Skilled nurse visits were performed on 01/26/24, 02/06/24, 02/14/24, 02/19/24, 02/27/24 and 03/06/24. Patient #2 A review of the plan of care dated 02/05/24 to 05/04/24 showed no skilled nurse or hospice aide frequencies from 02/05/24 to 03/20/24. Skilled nurse visits were performed on 02/05/24, 02/06/24, 02/12/24, 02/19/24, 02/26/24, 03/06/24, 03/11/24, 03/14/24 and 03/19/24. Hospice aide visits were performed on 02/08/24, 02/09/24, 02/12/24, 02/14/24, 02/21/24, 02/28/24, 03/06/24, 03/13/24 and 03/15/24. Patient #3 A review of the plan of care dated 01/31/24 to 04/29/24 showed no skilled nurse or hospice aide frequencies from 01/31/24 to 03/20/24. Skilled nurse visits were performed on 01/31/24, 02/01/24, 02/15/24, 02/20/24, 02/29/24, 03/05/24 and 03/15/24. Hospice aide visits were performed on02/06/24, 02/14/24, 02/21/24, 02/28/24, 03/07/24 and 03/13/24. Patient #5 A review of the plan of care dated 02/05/24 to 05/04/24 showed no skilled nurse or hospice aide frequencies from 02/05/24 to 03/20/24. Skilled nurse visits were performed on 02/05/24, 02/06/24, 02/12/24, 02/20/24, 02/27/24, 03/04/24, 03/12/24, 03/14/24 and 03/19/24. Hospice aide visits were performed on 02/09/24, 02/13/24, 02/20/24, 02/23/24, 02/27/24, 02/29/24, 03/05/24, 03/08/24 and 03/12/24. Patient #7 A review of the plan of care dated 01/10/24 to 04/08/24 showed no skilled nurse from 01/10/24 to 03/20/24. Skilled nurse visits were performed on 01/10/24, 01/11/24, 01/16/24, 01/25/24, 02/02/24, 0208/24, 02/10/24, 02/16/24, 02/22/24, 02/28/24 and 03/05/24. On 04/10/24 at 3:10 pm., Staff B stated the plan of care failed to contain frequencies for skilled nurse visits and hospice aide visits for Patients #1, 2, 3, 5 and 7.”
-
Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 126 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to maintain evidence that its QAPI program showed measurable improvement in indicators related to improved palliative outcomes and hospice services. This failed practice had the potential to place 12 current patients and any new patient admitted to the hospice at risk of poorly identified outcome measures related to symptom control. A review of administrative records showed no evidence of measurable improvements in indicators related to improved palliative outcomes and hospice services for 2023, from 01/01/23 to 08/01/23 and 10/01/23 to 02/01/24. On 04/10/24 at 2:45 pm, Staff B stated there was no documentation showing measurable improvement in indicators related to palliative outcomes and hospice services for 2023 and from 01/01/23 to 08/01/23 and from 10/01/23 to 02/01/24.”
-
Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 97 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to analyze quality indicators. This failed practice had the potential to place 12 current patients and any new patient admitted to the hospice at risk for repeated hospice mishaps due to failure of the hospice to self-identify problem areas. A review of administrative records showed no analysis of quality indicators for 2022, from 01/01/23 to 08/01/23 and 10/01/23 to 02/01/24. On 04/10/24 at 2:45 pm, Staff B stated the QAPI for 2022, from 01/01/23 to 08/01/23 and 10/01/23 to 02/01/24 did not contain an analysis of quality indicators.”
-
Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 117 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to maintain evidence of the use of quality indicator data in the QAPI program. This failed practice had the potential to negatively affect patient care due to hospice failure to collect and correct areas of deficient practices for all 12 current patients and any new patient admitted to the hospice. A review of administrative records showed no use of quality indicator data in their QAPI program for 2022, from 01/01/23 to 08/01/23 and from 10/01/23 to 02/01/24. On 04/10/24 at 2:45 pm, Staff B stated the QAPI program did not include the use of quality indicator data for 2022, from 01/01/23 to 08/01/23 and from 10/01/23 to 02/01/24.”
-
Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 157 words
“Based on a record review and interview, the hospice failed to implement and maintain an effective QAPI Program and failed to ensure performance improvements were tracked to ensure that improvements were sustained. This failed practice had the potential to place 12 current patients and any new patient admitted to the hospice at risk for repeated unidentified areas of poor care and symptom management. A review of administrative records showed no implemented changes designed to measure and track performance or that improvements were sustained for 2022, from 01/01/23 to 08/01/23 and from 10/01/23 to 02/01/24. The hospice failed to ensure the QAPI Program mandated actions aimed at performance improvement, measured success after implementation and tracked performance to ensure that improvements were sustained. On 04/10/24 at 3:45 pm, Staff B stated the QAPI program did not contain documentation of measurement and tracking of performance improvement projects being sustained in 2022, from 01/01/23 to 08/01/23 and from 10/01/23 to 02/01/24.”
-
Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 99 words
“Based on a record review and interview, the governing body failed to ensure a QAPI program was maintained and evaluated annually. This failed practice had the potential to place all 12 patients on service at risk for poor outcomes due to the lack oversight and governing body involvement. A review of administrative records showed no governing body review of the surveyed hospice QAPI program for calendar years of 2022 and 2023. On 04/10/24 at 2:45 pm, staff B stated the governing body minutes did not show review of the surveyed hospice QAPI for the hospice in 2022 and 2023.”
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
The inspectors’ words, 107 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure governing body oversight of ongoing operations of the patient care delivery systems for calendar years 2022 and 2023 effecting all 12 patients and all current staff. A review of administrative records showed no governing body oversight of ongoing operations of the patient care delivery systems specific to the hospice in the calendar years of 2022 and 2023. On 04/10/24 at 1:55 p.m., Staff B stated there was no documentation which showed evidence of governing body oversight of ongoing operations of the patient care delivery systems specific to the surveyed hospice in calendar years 2022 and 2023.”
-
Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 166 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to the ensure plans of care was coordinated with the long-term care facility for one (Patients #7) of 14 patients reviewed. Patient #7 A review of the plan of care dated 01/10/24 to 04/08/24 showed a primary diagnosis of dementia and documented no patient specific interventions to be provided by the nursing home or the hospice for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, no frequency of skilled nurse or hospice aide visits and no medications. On 04/09/24 at 2:50 pm., nursing home staff A stated there were no other plans of care developed by the hospice for the patient present in the facility. On 04/10/24 at 2:40 pm, Staff B stated the plan of care for Patient #7 did not outline the patient specific interventions to be to be provided by the nursing home or the hospice for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, skilled nurse and hospice aide frequencies and no medications.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2026 | Recertification inspection by the state | 5 deficiencies cited |
| May 20, 2024 | Recertification inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Apr 10, 2024 | Recertification inspection by the state | 12 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 9, 1999.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 89.1% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 70% at home, 21% in assisted living, 7% in a nursing facility, 2% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 15.3 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 7.6% |
| Visits near death | 89.1% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 6 owners or officers are people: Justin Carter (owns 5% or more through other companies, 90.29%); Justin Carter (corporate officer, 90.29%); Shannon Clark-Leigh (managing employee (on the payroll), 90%); Joseph M Moore (managing employee (on the payroll), 10%); Cynthia Carter (owns 5% or more through other companies, 9.71%); Cynthia Carter (managing employee (on the payroll), 9.71%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 52.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 8 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 36 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74008, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 17.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Carter Healthcare Hospice of Northeast Oklahoma LLC This hospice | 17 |
| Live Well Hospice, LLC | 8 |
| Saint Francis Hospice | 8 |
| Hospice of Green Country, Inc. | 4 |
| Season’s Hospice, Inc. | 6 |
| Choice Health at Home - Henryetta Hospice | 2 |
| Good Shepherd Hospice, Inc. | 6 |
| Grace Hospice | 14 |
| Enhabit Hospice | 10 |
| Acg Hospice | 7 |
| The Meyer C and Ida Miller Hospice | 3 |
| Elara Caring Xiv | 14 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.