Hearth Record

Elara Caring Xiv

A hospice in Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135

4815 S Harvard, Suite 300a, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135. (918) 683-9400.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 36 hospices serving ZIP code 74135 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 21, 2026: a complaint and recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 21, 2026: complaint and recertification inspection by the state10 deficiencies
  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure emergency preparedness disaster table-top exercises, drills, community drills or plan activation events were conducted for calendar year 2025 for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of emergency preparedness records showed no emergency preparedness table-top exercises, drills, community drills or plan activation events in calendar year 2025. On 07/21/26 at 4:00 pm, Staff B stated the hospice had no exercises, drills, or activation events in 2025.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Initial assessment (42 CFR 418.54(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 179 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure it completed an evaluation for services within 48 hours of referral for three (Patients #11, 13, 19) of 19 patients. Patient #11A review of the clinical record showed a referral date of 11/27/24 with an initial evaluation and election of the hospice benefits on 12/04/24. The clinical record showed no declined visits, no physician notification and no changes in orders.Patient #13A review of the clinical record showed a referral date of 06/05/26 with an initial evaluation and election of the hospice benefits on 07/02/26. The clinical record showed the patient requested SOC delayed until 06/15/26. The clinical record showed no physician notification of delay of care and no changes in orders.Patient #19A review of the clinical record showed a referral date of 12/02/25 with an initial evaluation and election of the hospice benefits on 12/07/25. The clinical record showed no changes to physician orders.On 07/21/26 from 4:55 p.m. to 5:55 p.m., Staff B stated there was a delay in the evaluation for services for patients #11, 13, 19.”

    Rule L0522. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 180 words

    “Based on record review and interviews, the hospice failed to ensure the complete development of a bereavement POC or included bereavement goals in the overall POC at the time of initial assessment for five (Patients #1, 2, 9,10, 17) of 19 patients. Patient #1A review of the clinical record showed no Bereavement Care Plan and showed no bereavement goals in the overall POC.Patient #2A review of the clinical record showed no Bereavement Care Plan and showed no bereavement goals in the overall POC.Patient #9A review of the clinical record showed no Bereavement Care Plan and did not include bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC.Patient #10A review of the clinical record showed no Bereavement Care Plan and showed no bereavement goals in the overall POC.Patient #17A review of the clinical record showed no Bereavement Care Plan and showed no bereavement goals in the overall POC.On 07/21/26 from 4:05 p.m., 4:40 p.m., Staff B stated that there were no bereavement interventions and goals in the overall POC and no interventions in the BCPs for Patients #1, 2, 9, 10, 17.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 465 words

    “Based on record review and staff interview, the hospice failed to ensure:Hospice aide interventions and goals on the POCs for four (Patient # 2, 3, 4, 19) of 19 patients.A POC identified the site location of a gastrostomy tube for one (Patient #9) of 19 patients.The POC listed a date for a foley catheter to be changed for one (Patient #10) of 19 patients. Patient #2A review of a POC dated 07/01/26 to 08/29/26 with IDG updates on 06/30/26, 07/14/26, ordered hospice aide services of one time a week for eight weeks showed no hospice aide interventions and goals.Patient #3 A review of a POC dated 06/30/26 to 08/28/26 with IDG updates on 05/29/26, 06/12/26, 06/25/26, 07/10/26 ordered hospice aide services of two times a week for nine weeks showed no hospice aide interventions and goals.Patient #4A review of a POC dated 06/11/26 to 09/08/26 with IDG updates on 06/25/26, 07/10/26, ordered hospice aide services of two times a week for 12 weeks then one time a week for one week showed no hospice aide interventions and goals. Patient #9A review of a POC dated 5/20/26 to 8/17/26 with IDG updates dated 05/29/26, 06/12/26, 06/25/26, 07/10/26, 07/14/26 ordered SN to conduct gastrostomy site care and assess for site infection did not identify the gastrostomy site.Patient #10A review of a POC dated 04/25/26 to 07/23/26 with IDG updates dated 05/05/26, 05/19/26, 06/02/26, 06/16/26, 06/30/26, 07/14/26 ordered SN to conduct foley catheter 16 French 10 cubic centimeter change every month and showed no next due or last change date.Patient #11A review of a POC dated 05/28/26 to 07/26/26 with IDG updates 05/05/26, 05/19/26, 06/02/26, 06/16/26, 07/14/26 showed no interventions for the hospice diagnosis of Dementia.Patient #14A review of a POC dated 07/08/26 to 09/05/26 with IDG update 07/10/26 showed no interventions for the hospice diagnosis of Neoplasm of Ureter.Patient #16A review of a POC dated 04/10/26 to 06/08/26 with IDG updates 04/10/26, 04/24/26 showed no interventions for the hospice diagnosis of Cerebral Atherosclerosis.Patient #17A review of a POC dated 07/02/25 to 08/30/25 with IDG updates 07/11/25 showed no interventions for the hospice diagnosis of Dementia.Patient #19A review of a POC dated 1/25/26 to 03/25/26 with IDG updates on 1/27/26, ordered hospice aide services of two times a week for eight weeks then one time a week for one week showed no hospice aide interventions and goals.On 07/21/26 from 4:10 p.m. to 5:55 p.m., Staff B stated:1. The POC for patients #2, 3, 4 and 19 did not contain aide interventions and goals.2. The POC did not have a date the foley change was due for patient #10.3. The PEG tube site was not identified on the POC for patient #9.4. The POC did not contain interventions related to the hospice diagnoses for patients #11, 14, 16, 17.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 576 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure care was followed according to the POCs for seven (Patients #3, 6, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16) of 19 patients. Patient #3A review of a POC dated 06/30/26 to 08/28/26 with IDG updates on 05/29/26, 06/12/26, 06/25/26, 07/10/26 ordered MSW visit frequency of one time a week for one week then once every four weeks for four weeks. The clinical record showed no MSW visits were conducted (two visits ordered, no visits conducted) and showed no patient refusal of visits or change in orders.Patient #6A review of a POC dated 06/08/26 to 08/06/26 with IDG updates dated 06/06/26, 06/30/26, 07/14/26 ordered MSW visit frequency of one time a week for one week then one time every two weeks for six weeks. The clinical record showed no MSW visits were conducted (four visits ordered, no visits conducted) and showed no patients refusal of visits and no change in orders.Patient #10A review of a POC dated 04/25/26 to 07/23/26 with IDG updates dated 05/05/26, 05/19/26, 06/02/26, 06/16/26, 06/30/26, 07/14/26 ordered MSW visit frequency of one time a week for one week. The clinical record showed no MSW visits were conducted (one visit ordered, no visits conducted) and showed no patient’s refusal of visits.Patient #13A review of a POC dated 07/02/26 to 09/29/26 with IDG updates dated 07/14/2026 ordered Chaplain visit frequency of one time a week for one week. The clinical record showed one Chaplain visit was conducted per week (one visit ordered, two visits conducted) and during the week of 07/05/26 to 07/11/26, there was a missed aide visit (three visits per week ordered, one visit conducted, one missed visit) and showed no patient refusal of visits or change in orders.Patient #14A review of a POC dated 06/30/26 to 08/28/26 with IDG updates on 05/29/26, 06/12/26, 06/25/26, 07/10/26 ordered MSW visit frequency of one time a week for one then once every four weeks for four weeks. The clinical record showed no MSW visits were conducted (two visits ordered, no visits conducted) and showed no patient refusal of visits or change in orders.Patient #15A review of a POC dated 08/06/25 to 10/4/25 with IDG updates dated 08/08/25, 08/22/25, 09/05/25 ordered Chaplain visit frequency of one time a week for one week then once every two weeks for six weeks. The clinical record showed one Chaplain visit was conducted during the weeks of 08/24/25 to 08/30/25 and 08/31/25 to 09/06/25 (two visits ordered, no visits conducted) and ordered MSW frequency of one time a week for one week then once every four weeks for four weeks. During the week of 08/24/26, there was a missed MSW visit (one visits per week ordered, no visits conducted) and no patient refusal of visits and no change in orders.Patient #16A review of a POC dated 04/10/26 to 06/08/26 with IDG updates dated 04/10/26 and 04/24/26 ordered MSW visit frequency of one time a week for one week then once every four weeks for eight weeks. The clinical record showed during the week of 04/12/26 to 04/18/26 there was no MSW visit conducted (one visits ordered, no visits conducted) and showed no patient refusal of visits and no change in orders.On 07/21/26 at from 4:12 p.m. to 5:20 p.m., Staff B stated:1. The patient had no MSW visits for patients #3,10,14,15 and 16.2. There were no Chaplain visits for patients #13 and 15..3. There were no aide visits for patient #13.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 104 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure an initial hire tuberculosis screening test was performed for one volunteer (Volunteer #3) of three volunteers. Findings: A policy titled, Infection Control TB [tuberculosis] Screening and Testing stated team members will require a baseline skin or blood test. Volunteer #3 A review of personnel records showed no results of an initial hire tuberculosis test result or records of health screenings from the hire date of 10/01/24. A request for additional request for personnel records yielded no results. 07/21/26 at 4:00 p.m., Staff B stated Volunteer #3 had no initial hire testing for tuberculosis.”

    Rule L0580. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 618 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure continued review and update of hospice aide care plans for eight (Patients #2, 6, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19) of 19 patients. Patient #2A review of a POC dated 07/01/26 to 08/29/26 with IDG updates on 06/30/26, 07/14/26 showed an aide visit frequency of one time a week for eight weeks. A review of the clinical record showed a physician order dated 07/19/26 for aide visits one time a week for six weeks. The clinical record showed an ACP last updated on 09/04/25.Patient #6A review of a POC dated 06/08/26 to 08/06/26 with IDG updates dated 06/06/26, 06/30/26, 07/14/26 showed an aide visit frequency of six times a week for eight weeks then one times a week for one week. A review of the clinical record showed a physician order dated 06/28/26 for aide visits two times a week for one week, three times a week for four weeks then two times a week for one week. The clinical record showed an ACP last updated on 04/24/26.Patient #10A review of a POC dated 04/25/26 to 07/23/26 with IDG updates dated 05/05/26, 05/19/26, 06/02/26, 06/16/26, 06/30/26, 07/14/26 showed an aide visit frequency of one time a week for 13 weeks. A review of the clinical record showed a physician order dated 05/04/26 for aide visits two times a week for 12 weeks. The clinical record showed an ACP last updated on 04/25/26.Patient #12A review of a POC dated 05/21/26 to 08/18/26 with IDG updates dated 06/02/26, 06/16/26, 06/30/26, 07/14/26 showed an aide visit frequency of one time a week for 12 weeks. A review of the clinical record showed a physician order dated 06/21/26 for aide visits two times a week for one week then one time a week for eight weeks. The clinical record showed an ACP last updated on 05/21/26.Patient #14A review of a POC dated 07/08/26 to 09/05/26 with IDG updates dated 07/10/26 showed an aide visit frequency of one time a week for eight weeks. A review of the clinical record showed a physician order dated 07/11/26 for aide visits one time a week for eight weeks. The clinical record showed an ACP last updated on 01/13/26.Patient #16A review of a POC dated 04/10/26 to 06/08/26 with IDG updates dated 04/10/26, 04/24/26 showed an aide visit frequency of two times a week for eight weeks then one time a week for one week. A review of the clinical record showed a physician order dated 04/10/26 for aide visits two times per week for eight weeks then one time a week for one week. The clinical record showed an ACP last updated on 12/29/25.Patient #18A review of a POC dated 04/03/26 to 06/01/26 with IDG updates dated 04/07/26, 04/21/26, 05/05/26 showed an aide visit frequency of one time a week for eight weeks. A review of the clinical record showed a physician order dated 04/20/26 for aide visits once every two weeks for two weeks. The clinical record showed an ACP last updated on 07/22/25.Patient #19A review of a POC dated 01/25/26 to 03/25/26 with IDG updates dated 01/27/26 showed an aide visit frequency of two times a week for eight weeks then one time a week for one week. A review of the clinical record showed a physician order dated 12/07/25 for aide visits one time a week for one week then two times a week for eight weeks. The clinical record showed an ACP last updated on 09/04/25.On 07/21/26 from 4:10 p.m. to 5:55 p.m., Staff B stated the ACPs for patients #2, 6, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 19 were not reviewed and updated when their ordered aide frequencies changed.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.78(a))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure volunteer orientation and training related to hospice care and philosophy for one (Volunteer #1) of 3 volunteers reviewed. Findings: Volunteer #1A review of volunteer personnel records showed no orientation or training related to hospice care and philosophy. A request for additional personnel records yielded no results. On 07/21/26 at 4:00 p.m., Staff B stated the volunteer program records showed no orientation and training for hospice care and philosophy was provided.”

    Rule L0643. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure volunteer recruitment efforts in calendar years 2024 and 2025 for all patients, family members and staff. Findings: A review of volunteer program records showed a log of volunteer recruitment efforts dated 10/02/24, 10/21/24, 11/05/24 and 11/11/24 in calendar year 2024; and 02/10/25 to 02/15/25 and 02/17/25 to 02/20/25 in calendar year 2025. The volunteer program records showed no other active, ongoing or viable volunteer recruitment efforts in calendar years 2024 and 2025. On 07/21/26 at 1:20 p.m., Staff B stated:The electronic file of volunteer coordinator recruitment activity in 2024 was not accessible.There were no other program records in 2025.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure cost savings of 5% with the use of volunteers as a part of the hospice program in calendar years 2024 and 2025 for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of volunteer records showed a cost savings utilization rate of 0.61% in calendar year 2024 and a cost savings utilization rate of 0.47% in calendar year 2025. On 07/21/26 at 4:00 pm, Staff B stated the hospice did not meet the cost saving utilization rate of 5% in 2024 and 2025.”

    Rule L0646. Standard-level. From a complaint.

May 1, 2024: complaint and recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 969 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure a bereavement care plan was initiated or was included as a part of the overall POC after the initial and ongoing spiritual/bereavement assessments for 11 (Patients #2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and #13) of 13 patients. Findings: Patient #2 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 10/05/23 with a completion of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 10/10/23. A review of a POC dated 04/02/24 to 05/31/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/22/24, 04/05/24 and on 04/19/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #3 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 10/25/23 with a completion of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 01/10/22. A review of a POC dated 04/22/24 to 04/24/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/05/24 and on 04/19/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #5 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 10/30/23 with a completion of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 10/30/23. A review of a POC dated 10/30/23 to 01/27/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 11/03/23 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #6 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 12/30/21 with a completion of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 01/03/22. A review of a POC dated 08/27/22 to 10/25/22 and IDG updates to the POC showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #7 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 01/23/24 with a completion of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 01/23/24. A review of a POC dated 03/28/24 to 05/21/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/22/24, 04/05/24 and on 04/19/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #8 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 10/23/23 with a completion of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 10/23/23. A review of a POC dated 04/20/24 to 06/18/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/19/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #9 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 09/13/23 with a completion of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 09/13/23. A review of a POC dated 03/11/24 to 05/09/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/08/24, 03/22/24, 04/05/24 and on 04/19/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #10 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 08/19/23 with a completion of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 08/19/23. A review of a POC dated 03/07/24 to 05/05/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/08/24, 03/22/24, 04/05/24 and on 04/19/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #11 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 01/10/23 with a completion of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 01/12/23. A review of a POC dated 03/05/24 to 05/03/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/23/24, 03/08/24, 03/22/24, 04/05/24 and on 04/19/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #12 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 07/20/22 with a completion of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 07/24/22. A review of a POC dated 03/11/24 to 05/08/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/08/24, 03/22/24, 04/05/24 and on 04/19/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #13 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 02/22/23 with a completion of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 02/28/23. A review of a POC dated 04/17/24 to 06/15/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/05/24 and on 04/19/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. On 05/01/24 at 10:40 a.m., Staff D stated: all patients are given a bereavement risk score at the time of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment and are advised of spiritual and bereavement services provided by the hospice and The bereavement program consists of intermittently timed mail outs and follow up telephone calls which begin after the patients death. On 05/01/24 at 10:50 a.m., Staff B stated the Hospice does not maintain a written POC for bereavement; bereavement is not included on the overall POC unless the patients family or caregiver is assessed at a moderate to high risk for bereavement, then social work and/or chaplain services are provided as needed and interventions and/or related goals for each discipline is added to the plan of care.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the plan of care was developed to include a hospice diagnosis for one (Patient #8) of 13 patients. Findings: Patient #8 A plan of care dated 04/20/24 to 06/18/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/19/24 documented no hospice diagnosis. On 05/01/24 at 2:02 p.m., Staff B stated the POC did not include a hospice diagnosis or any historical medical diagnoses.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 188 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure completion and provision of a discharge summary of care for two (Patients #4 and #6) of 13 patients. Findings: Patient #4 A review of the clinical record showed the patient was transferred to residential care facility (Nursing Home) for respite care on 04/21/23 and then was subsequently discharged at the time of death on 05/04/23. Documentation showed no transfer/discharge summary of care was completed or provided to the attending physician or to the to residential care facility (Nursing Home). Patient #6 A review of the clinical record showed the patient was transferred to another hospice agency on 09/07/22. Documentation showed no transfer/discharge summary of care was completed or provided to the attending physician or to the receiving hospice agency. On 05/01/24 at 1:57 p.m., Staff B stated: 1. The hospice did not complete or provide a transfer/discharge summary of care to the attending physician for patients #4 and #6 or; 2. Provide a transfer/discharge summary of care to the to residential care facility (Nursing Home) for patient #4 or to the receiving hospice agency for patients #6.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 175 words

    “Based on observation, record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the IDG communicated and coordinated the patients care with the residential care facility (Nursing Home) for one (Patient #4) of 13 patients. Findings: Patient #4 A review of the POC dated 04/05/23 to 07/03/23 showed orders for SN two times a week for 13 weeks, then one time a week for one week; hospice aide one time a week for one week, then two times a week for 12 weeks; medical social work one time a week for one week; and chaplain services one time a week for one week for palliation and management of terminal illness related to coronary artery disease. Documentation showed no IDG communications or coordination of care with the residential care facility (Nursing Home) at the time of placement for respite care on 04/21/23. On 05/01/24 at 1:55 p.m., Staff B stated documentation for patient #4 showed no IDG communications or coordination of care with the residential care facility (Nursing Home) at the time of placement for respite care.”

    Rule L0780. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 21, 2026Complaint and recertification inspection by the state10 deficiencies cited
May 1, 2024Complaint and recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 3, 2004.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 14 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 98% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 61% at home, 20% in assisted living, 17% in a nursing facility, 1% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.3%
Visits near death98.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Healthcare Innovations Private Services Inc. owns 100% directly since Sep 30, 2015.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Tasha Bryant (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Daniel R Manley (corporate officer); Ananth P Mohan (corporate officer, 0%); Ananth P Mohan (corporate director); John Mcmahon (corporate officer); Lindsay Richards (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Katie L Monastiere (corporate officer); Seth D Yandell (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Angel Stansbury (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Airjaguar Holdco, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Ec Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
Ec Homecare Holdings Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
Airjaguar Acquisition, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Ec Homecare Holdings Intermediate, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
Ec Homecare Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
HCI Holdings CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 30, 2015
Healthcare Innovations Private Services Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Sep 30, 2015
Hci Parent Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 30, 2013
Jhh/Cima Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 11, 2014
Bw Nhhc Holdco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
Acof VII Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies49.3%Jul 20, 2026
Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund VII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies35.8%Jul 20, 2026
Davita Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies32.9%Jul 20, 2026
Total Renal Care, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies32.9%Jul 20, 2026
Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund VII Parallel (Te), L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies9.07%Jul 20, 2026
Dawson Holdings (Armstrong), LPOwns 5% or more through other companies7.8%Jul 20, 2026
Acof VII Axiom Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies7.8%Jul 20, 2026

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 76.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 36 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74135, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.