Hearth Record

Enhabit Hospice

A hospice in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012

1913 West Tacoma, Suite E-F, Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012. (918) 893-1467.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 36 hospices serving ZIP code 74012 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 3, 2025: a complaint and recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 3, 2025: complaint and recertification inspection by the state10 deficiencies
  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure emergency preparedness disaster declaration, table-top exercises, drills, community drills or plan activation events were conducted as required for 05/12/2023 to 12/31/23, and 01/01/24 to 12/31/24 for 49 patients, seven volunteers, and 26 employees. Findings: A review of emergency preparedness records showed winter weather advisories were emailed out to staff on 01/14/24 and again on 02/17/25. Documentation showed no after action summary reporting, table-top exercises, drills, community drills or plan activation events for 05/12/23 to 12/31/23, and 01/01/24 to 12/31/24.On 04/03/25 at 3:00 p.m., Staff B stated the hospice had no emergency preparedness disaster declarations, table-top exercises, drills, community drills or plan activation events for 05/12/23 to 12/31/23, and 01/01/24 to 12/31/24.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Initial assessment (42 CFR 418.54(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 338 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure it completed an initial assessment within 48 hours of election of the hospice benefit for five (Patients #1, 6, 8, 10, and 11) of 14 patients. Findings: Patient #1A review of the clinical record showed a referral date of 09/13/24 with election of the hospice benefit and SOC on 09/19/24 (6 days later). Documentation showed no declined visits, no physician notifications, and no changes in orders. On 04/03/25 at 2:56 p.m., Staff B stated the initial comprehensive assessment was not completed within five days for patient #1. Patient #6A review of the clinical record showed a referral date of 06/03/24 with election of the hospice benefit and SOC on 08/23/24 (81 days later). Documentation showed no declined visits, no physician notifications, and no changes in orders. On 04/03/25 at 3:55 p.m., Staff B stated the initial comprehensive assessment was not completed within five days for patient #6. Patient #8A review of the clinical record showed a referral date of 03/14/25 with election of the hospice benefit and SOC on 03/20/25 (6 days later). Documentation showed no declined visits, no physician notifications, and no changes in orders. On 04/03/25 at 4:05 p.m., Staff B stated the initial comprehensive assessment was not completed within five days for patient #8. Patient #10A review of the clinical record showed a referral date of 06/14/24 with election of the hospice benefit and SOC on 07/20/24 (36 days later). Documentation showed no declined visits, no physician notifications, and no changes in orders. On 04/03/25 at 4:15 p.m., Staff B stated the initial comprehensive assessment was not completed within five days for patient #10. Patient #11A review of the clinical record showed a referral date of 11/15/24 with election of the hospice benefit and SOC on 11/21/24 (6 days later). Documentation showed no declined visits, no physician notifications, and no changes in orders. On 04/03/25 at 4:20 p.m., Staff B stated the initial comprehensive assessment was not completed within five days for patient #11.”

    Rule L0522. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 246 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure initial psychosocial assessments were conducted by the MSW within the five-day for two (Patients #1 and #6) of 14 patients. Findings: Patient #1A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit and SOC on 09/19/24. Documentation showed no psychosocial assessment conducted and showed no follow up care and services were offered or provided by an MSW. Documentation showed no declined MSW visits, no physician notifications, and no changes in orders. On 04/03/25 at 2:56 p.m., Staff B stated:1. The MSW had not conducted the initial psychosocial assessment for patient #1 within the five-day timeframe and2. The hospice didn’t have a MSW available at that time and was utilizing a social worker out of Denton, Texas that was licensed in Oklahoma. Patient #6A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit and SOC on 08/23/24. Documentation showed no psychosocial assessment conducted and showed no follow up care and services were offered or provided by an MSW. Documentation showed no declined MSW visits, no physician notifications, and no changes in orders. On 04/03/25 at 3:55 p.m., Staff B stated:1. On 04/03/25 at 2:56 p.m., Staff B stated:1. The MSW had not conducted the initial psychosocial assessment for patient #1 within the five-day timeframe and2. The hospice didn’t have a MSW available at that time and was utilizing a social worker out of Denton, Texas that was licensed in Oklahoma.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 259 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure development of a bereavement POC for four (Patients #2, 4, 6 and #13) of 14 patients. Findings: Patient #2A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit/SOC on 02/27/25. Documentation showed a spiritual assessment on 03/03/25, and a psychosocial assessment was conducted 03/04/25. Documentation showed a bereavement POC dated 04/03/25 (35 days later). Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #4A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit/SOC on 03/26/25. Documentation showed a spiritual assessment on 03/27/25, and a psychosocial assessment was conducted 03/28/25. Documentation showed no bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #6A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit/SOC on 08/23/24. Documentation showed a spiritual assessment on 08/26/24, and showed no psychosocial assessment was conducted. Documentation showed no bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #13A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit/SOC on 03/03/23. Documentation showed a spiritual assessment on 03/07/23, and a psychosocial assessment was conducted 03/06/24. Documentation showed no bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. On 04/03/25 at 4:40 p.m., Staff C stated patients #2, 4, 6 and #13 had no bereavement POCs.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 438 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the IDG developed and updated the plans of care four (Patients #4, 5, 8 and #12) of 14 patients. Findings: Patient #4A review of the clinical record showed no POC for the certification period of 03/26/25 to 05/24/25. IDG update meetings on 03/17/25 and on 03/31/25 showed no documentation of an identified wound care site on the POC for subsequent recertification period starting on 03/26/25. Documentation showed no IDG communications and no physician notifications for wound site care. On 04/03/25 at 3:33 p.m., Staff B stated the recertification plan of care for patient #4 was not updated with an identified wound care site prior to the beginning of the patient’s subsequent recertification period. Patient #5A review of the clinical record showed no POC for the certification period of 03/04/25 to 05/02/25. IDG update meetings on 03/03/25, 03/17/25 and on 03/31/25 showed no interventions and goals related to the hospice diagnosis of sarcopenia on the POC for the subsequent recertification period starting on 03/04/25. Documentation showed no IDG communications, no IDG review of the patients care and services provided by the hospice and no physician notifications for wound site care. On 04/03/25 at 3:50 p.m., Staff B stated the recertification plan of care for patient #5 did not include interventions and goals for the hospice diagnosis of sarcopenia. Patient #8A review of the clinical record showed no POC for the certification period of 03/20/25 to 06/17/25. IDG update meetings on 03/17/25 and on 03/31/25 showed no interventions and goals related to the hospice diagnosis of heart failure on the POC for the subsequent recertification period starting on 03/04/25. Documentation showed no IDG communications, no IDG review of the patients care and services provided by the hospice and no physician notifications for wound site care. On 04/03/25 at 3:50 p.m., Staff B stated the recertification plan of care for patient #8 did not include interventions and goals for the hospice diagnosis of heart failure. Patient #12A review of the clinical record showed no POC for the certification period of 08/25/24 to 10/23/24. IDG update meetings on 08/19/24, 09/02/24, 09/16/24, 09/30/24, 10/14/24 showed no interventions and goals related to the hospice diagnosis of heart failure on the POC for the certification period starting on 08/25/24. Documentation showed no IDG communications, no IDG review of the patients care and services provided by the hospice and no physician notifications for wound site care. On 04/03/25 at 4:35 p.m., Staff B stated the recertification plan of care for patient #12 did not include interventions and goals for the hospice diagnosis of heart failure.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure urinary catheter management was included in the POC for one (Patient #9) of 14 patients. Findings: Patient #9A review of a POC dated 02/10/25 to 05/10/25 showed IDG updates during the weeks of 02/17/25, 03/03/25, 03/17/25 and 03/31/25. SN visit notes dated 02/26/25, 03/04/25, 03/11/25, 03/18/25, 03/25/25 and 04/01/25 showed the patient had an indwelling Foley catheter in place but showed no orders for SN to perform urinary catheter management monthly. Documentation showed no communications between the IDG and showed no changes in the POC. On 04/03/25 at 4:12 p.m., Staff B stated there were no orders SN to perform urinary catheter management monthly.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Licensed professional services (42 CFR 418.62(c))

    “Based on a record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure multi-disciplined skilled professional staff (PT, OT, MSW and SLP) were available to participate and provide input into the agency’s QAPI program for 49 patients, 26 employees and seven volunteers. Findings:A review of QAPI records showed no multi-disciplined skilled professional staff (PT, OT, MSW and SLP) participation in QAPI activities for calendar years 2023 and 2024. On 04/03/25 at 3:00 p.m., Staff C stated no multi-disciplined skilled professional staff participated in the QAPI program activities for the hospice.”

    Rule L0586. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 632 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure continued review and update of the hospice aide care plan for six (Patients #3, 5, 7, 9, 10 and #12) of 14 patients. Findings: Patient #3A recertification plan of care dated 03/19/25 to 06/16/25 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/17/25 and 03/31/25 showed no physician orders for hospice aide visits. Documentation showed a hospice aide care plan dated 03/19/25 with an aide visit frequency and duration of two times a week for six weeks, then one time a week for one week effective 12/22/24 (prior certification period) and showed no review or update to the hospice aide care plan for the 03/19/25 to 06/16/25 certification period. Documentation showed no communication between the IDG, no physician notifications and showed no ordered aide visit frequency. Patient #5A recertification plan of care dated 03/04/25 to 05/02/25 and IDG update meetings on 03/03/25, 03/17/25 and on 03/31/25 showed no physician orders for hospice aide visits. Documentation showed a hospice aide care plan dated 03/04/25 with an aide visit frequency and duration of one time a week for one week, three times a week for eight weeks, then one time a week for one week effective 01/03/25 (prior certification period) and showed no review or update to the hospice aide care plan for the 03/04/25 to 05/02/25 certification period. Documentation showed no communication between the IDG, no physician notifications and showed no ordered aide visit frequency. Patient #7A recertification plan of care dated 03/23/25 to 06/20/25 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/17/25 and 03/31/25 showed no physician orders for hospice aide visit. A hospice aide care plan dated 03/23/25 showed no aide visit frequency and showed no review or update to the hospice aide care plan for the 03/23/25 to 06/20/25 certification period. Documentation showed no communication between the IDG, no physician notifications and showed no ordered aide visit frequency. Patient #9A recertification plan of care dated 02/10/25 to 05/10/25 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/17/25, 03/03/25, 03/17/25 and 03/31/25 showed no physician orders for hospice aide visits. Documentation showed a hospice aide care plan dated 02/10/25 with an aide visit frequency and duration of one time a week for 13 weeks, effective 11/12/24 (prior certification period) and showed no review or update to the hospice aide care plan for the 02/10/25 to 05/10/25 certification period. Documentation showed no communication between the IDG, no physician notifications and showed no ordered aide visit frequency. Patient #10A recertification plan of care dated 03/17/25 to 05/15/25 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/17/25 and 03/31/25 showed no physician orders for hospice aide visits. Documentation showed a hospice aide care plan dated 03/17/25 with an aide visit frequency and duration of two times a week for 12 weeks, then one time a week for one week effective 07/21/24 (prior certification period) and showed no review or update to the hospice aide care plan for the 03/17/25 to 05/15/25 certification period. Documentation showed no communication between the IDG, no physician notifications and showed no ordered aide visit frequency. Patient #12A recertification plan of care dated 08/25/24 to 10/23/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 08/19/24, 09/02/24, 09/16/24, 09/30/24, 10/14/24 documented no physician orders for hospice aide visits. The documentation showed a hospice aide care plan dated 08/25/24 which showed no aide visit frequency and duration and showed no review or update to the hospice aide care plan for the 08/25/24 to 10/23/24 certification period. Documentation showed no communication between the IDG, no physician notifications and showed no ordered aide visit frequency. On 04/03/25 at 3:30 p.m., Staff B stated the clinical record documentation for patients #3, 5, 7, 9, 10 and #12 showed no review or update to the hospice aide care plans.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.78(a))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure volunteer orientation and training included hospice care and philosophy for three (Volunteer #1, 2 and #3) of three volunteers. Findings: Volunteer #1, 2, and #3A review of volunteer personnel records showed no orientation or training for hospice care and philosophy. Additional request for personnel records yielded no results. On 04/03/25 at 2:30 p.m., Staff C stated the hospice had no documentation that showed Volunteers #1, 2, and #3 were provided hospice care and philosophy training.”

    Rule L0643. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure orientation and training of hospice care and philosophy for five (Staff E, F, G, H and I) of five employees. Findings: Staff E, F, G, H, and I A review of personnel records showed no training for hospice care and philosophy. Additional request for personnel records yielded no results. On 04/03/25 at 2:00 p.m., Staff A stated the hospice had no documentation that showed Staff E, F, G, H and I were provided training on hospice care and philosophy.”

    Rule L0661. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 3, 2025Complaint and recertification inspection by the state10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 15, 2003.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 10 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 85% at home, 6% in assisted living, 7% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.4%
Visits near death96.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Advanced Homecare Management LLC owns 100% directly since Aug 5, 2013.
  • Advanced Homecare Management LLC runs it.
  • 13 owners or officers are people: Tanya R Marion (corporate officer); Waqas Qamar (managing employee (under contract)); Collin S Mcquiddy (corporate officer); Barbara A Jacobsmeyer (corporate officer); Bobby Tolar (managing employee (on the payroll)); Sarah W Braley (corporate officer); Julie D Jolley (corporate officer); Dylan C Black (corporate officer); Jeanne L Kalvaitis (corporate officer); Michelle Olmstead (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jobie G Williams (corporate officer); Ryan T Solomon (corporate officer); Sean P Richardson (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Enhabit Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 1, 2022
Enhabit Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 31, 2014
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Holds 5% or more security interest100%Jun 30, 2022
Advanced Homecare Management LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Aug 5, 2013
Advanced Homecare Management LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Aug 5, 2013
8 Knots Management, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies8.81%Dec 31, 2024
Blackrock Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies7.8%Dec 31, 2023
Deerfield Management Company LPOwns 5% or more through other companies6.1%Dec 31, 2023
Vanguard Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.91%Dec 31, 2023

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 87% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.71% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 64.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 36 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74012, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.