Hearth Record

The Meyer C and Ida Miller Hospice

A hospice in Tulsa, Oklahoma 74136

6914 S Yorktown Ave, 2nd Floor, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74136. (918) 742-6415.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 35 hospices serving ZIP code 74136 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 19, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 19, 2024: recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the IDG failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment was completed within 5 days of the election of hospice care for two (#3 and #8) of nineteen (#1 -#19) records reviewed. Patient #3 Review of clinical record #3 initial certification period revealed a primary diagnosis of Cerebrovascular Disease with a SOC date of 11/29/23. Further review of Clinical Visit Notes indicated a Social Worker Initial Assessment was conducted on 12/19/23 (15 days late). Patient #8 Review of clinical record #8 initial certification period revealed a primary diagnosis of Cerebrovascular Disease with a SOC date of 04/19/24. Further review of Clinical Visit Notes indicated a Social Worker Initial Assessment was conducted on 04/25/24 (1 day late). During an interview on 06/19/24 at 10:00 AM, the Patient Care Coordinator stated the Social Worker failed to ensure the Initial Assessment was completed within 5 days of the SOC as required for Patients #3 and #8.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 156 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the IDG failed to ensure documentation of Imminence of Death as part of the Comprehensive Assessment for three (#3, #13 and #14) of nineteen (#1 -#19) records reviewed. Patient #3 Review of clinical record #3 with a SOC date of 11/29/24 failed to provide evidence of documentation regarding imminence of death as part of the Comprehensive Assessment. Patient #13 Review of clinical record #13 with a SOC date of 04/12/24 failed to provide evidence of documentation regarding imminence of death as part of the Comprehensive Assessment. Patient #14 Review of clinical record #14 with a SOC date of 10/06/22 failed to provide evidence of documentation regarding imminence of death as part of the Comprehensive Assessment. During an interview on 06/19/24 at 10:00 AM, the Patient Care Coordinator stated the SN failed to provide documentation regarding Imminence of Death as part of the Comprehensive Assessment for Patients #3, #13 and #14.”

    Rule L0528. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 114 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the IDG failed to ensure an Initial Bereavement Risk Assessment was conducted as part of the Comprehensive Assessment to identify needs of the patient and family and to incorporate that information into the hospice bereavement plan of care for one (#3) of nineteen (#1 -#19) records reviewed. Patient #3 Review of clinical record #3 with a SOC date of 11/29/23 failed to provide evidence an initial Bereavement Risk Assessment was completed as required. During an interview on 06/19/24 at 10:00 AM, the Patient Car Coordinator stated the SN failed to ensure the Initial Bereavement Risk Assessments for Patients #3 was completed timely as part of the Comprehensive Assessment.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 19, 2024Recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 18, 2004.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 99.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 60% at home, 6% in assisted living, 27% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 2% in a hospital, 3% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.4%
Visits near death99.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • The Tulsa Jewish Community Retirement and Health Care Center Inc. owns 100% directly since Nov 8, 2008.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Michelle Fox (managing employee (on the payroll), 25%); James Jakubovitz (corporate officer, 20%); Elaine Epperson Lay (managing employee (on the payroll), 15%); Brandi N Jeans (managing employee (on the payroll), 10%); Charity F Moravek (managing employee (on the payroll), 5%); Breece M Eberley (managing employee (under contract), 5%); James Jakubovitz (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
The Tulsa Jewish Community Retirement and Health Care Center Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Nov 8, 2008

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 90% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 93% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 89.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 35 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74136, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 3.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.