Hearth Record

Saint Francis Hospice

A hospice in Tulsa, Oklahoma 74136

6600 South Yale, Suite 350, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74136. (918) 494-6465.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 35 hospices serving ZIP code 74136 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 12, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 12, 2026: recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure interventions for the hospice diagnosis were specified in the plan of care for two (Pt #20 and 22) of 27 patients. Findings:Pt #20A review of a POC dated 05/20/26 to 05/27/26 with IDG updates on 05/28/26, 06/11/26, 06/25/26, 07/09/26, 07/26/26 and 08/06/26, showed no interventions to monitor for the hospice diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Pt #22A review of a POC dated 07/16/26 to 07/29/26 with IDG updates on 07/16/26 and 07/30/26, showed no interventions to monitor for the hospice diagnosis of congestive heart failure.On 08/12/26 at 11:50 a.m, Staff E stated the plans of care for Pt #20 and 22 did not have interventions related to their hospice diagnosis.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the plan of care contained interventions and goals for pain for one (Pt #10) of 27 patients. Findings: Pt #10 A review of a POC dated 08/09/26 to 08/12/26 with no IDG updates showed the Pt had orders for Morphine Concentrate 20 mg/1 ml with no: 1. Acceptable pain level.2. Pt education on Morphine and pain scales.3. When to notify the hospice regarding pain. On 08/12/26 at 11:45 a.m., Staff E stated the plan of care showed no interventions or goals for pain.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure nursing staff provided services based on patient needs for two (Pt #1 and 3) of 27 patients. Findings:Pt #1A review of a plan of care dated 12/18/26 to 01/01/26 and a nursing assessment dated 12/30/26 showed a blood pressure of 120/0 and showed no other attempt to obtain the patient’s blood pressure. Pt #3A review of an initial plan of care dated 01/22/26 to 02/04/26 and a nursing assessment dated 01/22/26 showed the patient’s last bowel movement was 01/13/26 with the patient started on Senna (a medication) two daily for constipation. A nursing assessment dated 01/23/26 showed the last bowel movement was 01/13/26 with no further interventions or physician notification. On 08/12/26 at 12:06 p.m., Staff E stated:1. The nurse should have rechecked the BP on Pt #1.2. The nurse did not follow up on the patient not having had a bowel movement in 10 days.”

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure that a facility had a current plan of care for one (Pt #9) of six patients who reside in a facility. Findings: Pt #12 A review of the hospice record in the assisted living facility showed a plan of care that was dated 07/22/26 to 08/05/26. On 08/11/26 at 1:00 pm, Assisted Living Staff #1 stated they had not received the current plan of care from the hospice”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure required background checks were completed for one (Staff P) of 10 employees. Findings:Staff PThe “Long-Term Care Security Act Title 63 of the Oklahoma Statues” documented requirement for an OKSCREEN national background check with fingerprinting for all employees of a hospice agency whose employment began after 06/01/14.A review of personnel records showed a hire date of 04/19/21 with no OKSCREEN background check completed.On 08/11/2026 at 10:15 a.m., Staff B stated there was no OKSCREEN completed.”

    Rule L0796. Standard-level.

May 3, 2024: recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 656 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure hospice aide visits were provided in accordance with the plan of care for four (Patients #1, 7, 10 and 17) of 23 patients. Patient #1 A review of the plan of care dated 12/05/23 to 03/03/24 and plan of care updates dated 01/04/24 and 01/18/24 showed a hospice aide frequency of two visits per week for one week and three visits per week for 12 weeks. A review of the clinical record showed the following: A hospice aide missed visit dated 01/15/24 documented the reason for the missed visit as bad weather for the week of 01/14/24 to 01/20/24 (two of three completed visits for this week). Documentation showed no attempts to reschedule the missed visit and no change in the ordered frequency. Patient #7 A review of the plan of care dated 02/09/24 to 05/08/24 and plan of care updates dated 02/15/24, 02/29/24, 03/14/24, 03/28/24 and 04/11/24 showed a hospice aide frequency of three visits per week for 12 weeks. A review of the clinical record showed the following: A hospice aide missed visit dated 02/14/24 documented the reason for the missed visit was due to a refusal of bath for the week of 02/11/24 to 02/17/24 (two of three completed visits for this week). Documentation showed no refusal of other services outlined in the plan of care, no attempts to reschedule the missed visit and no change in the ordered frequency. A hospice aide missed visit dated 03/25/24 and 03/29/24 documented the reason for the missed visit was due to a refusal of bath for the week of 03/24/24 to 03/30/24 (one of three completed visits for this week). Documentation showed no refusal of other services outlined in the plan of care, no attempts to reschedule the missed visit and no change in the ordered frequency. A hospice aide missed visit dated 04/05/24 documented the reason for the missed visit was due to a refusal of bath for the week of 03/31/24 to 04/06/24 (two of three completed visits for this week). Documentation showed no refusal of other services outlined in the plan of care, no attempts to reschedule the missed visit and no change in the ordered frequency. Patient #10 A review of the plan of care dated 03/27/24 to 06/24/24 and plan of care updates dated 04/04/24, 04/18/24 and 05/02/24 showed a hospice aide frequency of one visit per week for one week and three visits per week for 12 weeks. A review of the clinical record showed the following: A hospice aide missed visit dated 04/17/24 and 04/19/24 documented the no reason for the missed visit for the week of 04/14/24 to 04/20/24 (one of three completed visits for this week). Documentation showed no refusal of services outlined in the plan of care, no attempts to reschedule the missed visit and no change in the ordered frequency. Patient #17 A review of the plan of care dated 04/23/24 to 06/21/24 and plan of care update dated 04/25/24 showed a hospice aide frequency of two visits per week for one week and three visits per week for 12 weeks. A review of the clinical record showed the following: A hospice aide missed visit dated 04/24/24 documented the reason for the missed visit was due to a refusal of bath for the week of 04/23/24 to 04/24/24 (one of two completed visits for this week). Documentation showed no refusal of other services outlined in the plan of care, no attempts to reschedule the missed visit and no change in the ordered frequency. On 05/02/24 at 3:30 pm., Staff B stated the hospice aide frequencies were not met in accordance with the ordered frequencies in the plan of care for Patients #1,7 and 10. On 05/03/24 at 10:16 am., Staff B stated the hospice aide frequency was not met in accordance with the ordered frequencies in the plan of care for Patient #17.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 597 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the plan of care was individualized and fully developed to include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness for eleven (Patients #2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14, 16 and 18) of 23 patients reviewed. Patient #2 A review of the plan of care dated 02/21/24 to 05/21/24 documented a primary diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of left lung and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #3 A plan of care dated 04/24/24 to 07/22/24 documented a primary diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #4 A plan of care dated 02/15/24 to 04/14/24 documented a primary diagnosis of late effect cerebrovascular accident and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #5 A plan of care dated 01/03/24 to 04/01/24 documented a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #7 A plan of care dated 02/09/24 to 05/08/24 documented a primary diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #9 A plan of care dated 04/12/23 to 07/10/24 documented a primary diagnosis of cancer of larynx and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #10 A plan of care dated 03/27/24 to 06/24/24 documented a primary diagnosis of acute congestive heart failure and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #11 A plan of care dated 04/10/24 to 07/06/24 documented a primary diagnosis of late effect cerebrovascular accident and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #14 A plan of care dated 01/24/24 to 03/23/24 documented a primary diagnosis of atherosclerosis of native coronary artery and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #16 A plan of care dated 04/20/24 to 07/18/24 documented a primary diagnosis of cancer of the colon and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #18 A plan of care dated 04/12/24 to 07/10/24 documented a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. On 05/01/24 at 3:18 pm., Staff B stated the plans of care for Patients #2 and 3 failed to be individualized for services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. On 05/02/24 at 3:20 pm., Staff B stated the plans of care for Patients #4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14 and 16 failed to be individualized for services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. On 05/03/24 at 10:36 am., Staff B stated the plans of care for Patients #18 and 19 failed to be individualized for services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 152 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure required background checks were completed by the surveyed hospice for two (Staff H and K) of five employees. A review of the “Long-Term Care Security Act Title 63 of the Oklahoma Statutes” documented requirement for an OKSCREEN national background check with fingerprinting for all employees of a home care agency whose employment began after 07/01/14. Staff H A review of the personnel record showed a background check performed by another agency license number. No background check was performed for the surveyed agency through OKSCREEN for Staff H. Staff K A review of the personnel record showed a background check performed by another agency license number. No background check was performed for the surveyed agency through OKSCREEN for Staff K. On 05/02/24 at 1:30 pm, Staff L stated the OKSCREEN for Staff H and K were not completed by the surveyed hospice.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 12, 2026Recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies cited
May 3, 2024Recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 29, 1987.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 65% at home, 13% in assisted living, 18% in a nursing facility, 4% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.4%
Visits near death97.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Saint Francis Health System Inc. runs it.
  • 21 owners or officers are people: Laura Stuemky (corporate director); Judith Z Kishner (corporate director); William K Warren (corporate officer); Barry L Steichen (corporate officer); Barry L Steichen (corporate director); Barry L Steichen (managing employee (on the payroll)); Sailatha P Thomas (corporate director); Thomas Cooper (corporate director); Kyle Terry (managing employee (on the payroll)); Michael D Case (corporate director); Gary Kastl (corporate director); David A Konderla (corporate officer); Michael J Lissau (corporate officer); Mike Cooke (corporate director); Jeffrey Scott Smith (other role (CMS gives no detail)); John Kelly C Warren (corporate director); Deborah Dage (corporate officer); Douglas Williams (corporate officer); Cliff A Robertson (corporate officer); Cliff A Robertson (corporate director); Cliff A Robertson (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Saint Francis Health System Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)80%Sep 24, 1997

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.42% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 83.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 35 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74136, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.