Hearth Record

Elara Caring Xxiii

A hospice in Ada, Oklahoma 74820

2020 Arlington Rd., Ste 5a, Ada, Oklahoma 74820. (580) 322-8613.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 19 hospices serving ZIP code 74820 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 4, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 4, 2024: recertification inspection by the state6 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,326 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure a bereavement care plan was initiated or was included as a part of the overall POC after the initial and ongoing spiritual/bereavement assessments for 15 (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and #15) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #1 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit and completion of the bereavement assessment on 05/07/24, and psychosocial and spiritual assessments on 05/10/24. A review of a POC dated 05/07/24 to 08/04/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/17/24 and on 05/31/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #2 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit and completion of the bereavement assessment on 03/29/22, and psychosocial and spiritual assessments on 03/31/22. A review of a POC dated 05/17/24 to 07/15/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/17/24 and on 05/31/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #3 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit and completion of the bereavement assessment on 09/28/23, and psychosocial and spiritual assessments on 10/02/23. A review of a POC dated 05/25/24 to 07/23/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/17/24 and on 05/31/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #4 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit and completion of the bereavement assessment on 03/02/21, and psychosocial and spiritual assessments on 03/15/21. A review of a POC dated 04/15/24 to 06/13/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/19/24, 05/03/24, 05/17/24 and on 05/31/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #5 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit and completion of the bereavement assessment on 03/19/24, and psychosocial and spiritual assessments on 03/22/24. A review of a POC dated 03/19/24 to 06/16/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/16/24, 04/30/24, 05/14/24 and on 05/28/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #6 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit and completion of the bereavement assessment on 11/11/23, and psychosocial and spiritual assessments on 11/14/23. A review of a POC dated 05/09/24 to 07/07/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/17/24 and on 05/31/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #7 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit and completion of the bereavement assessment on 02/02/23, and psychosocial and spiritual assessments on 02/06/24. A review of a POC dated 05/02/24 to 07/30/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/03/24, 05/17/24 and on 05/31/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #8 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 01/04/24 and completion of bereavement and spiritual assessments on 01/08/24. A review of a POC dated 04/03/24 to 07/01/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/18/24, 05/02/24 and on 05/30/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #9 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit and completion of the bereavement assessment on 06/16/23, and psychosocial and spiritual assessments on 06/19/23. A review of a POC dated 04/11/24 to 06/09/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/16/24, 04/30/24, 05/14/24 and on 05/28/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #10 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit and completion of the bereavement assessment on 05/17/24, psychosocial assessment on 05/20/24 and a spiritual assessment on 05/21/24. A review of a POC dated 05/17/24 to 05/28/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/28/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #11 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit and completion of the bereavement assessment on 02/06/23, psychosocial assessment on 02/10/23 and a spiritual assessment on 02/09/24. A review of a POC dated 04/01/24 to 05/30/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/18/24, 05/02/24, 05/16/24 and on 05/30/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #12 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit and completion of the bereavement assessment on 02/15/24, psychosocial assessment on 02/20/24 and a spiritual assessment per patient request on 02/29/24. A review of a POC dated 05/15/24 to 08/12/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/16/24 and on 05/30/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #13 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit and completion of the bereavement assessment on 12/15/22, psychosocial assessment on 12/19/22 and a spiritual assessment on 12/16/22. A review of a POC dated 04/08/24 to 06/06/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/16/24, 04/30/24, 05/14/24 and on 05/28/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #14 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit and completion of the bereavement assessment on 05/10/24, psychosocial assessment on 05/16/24 and a spiritual assessment on 05/15/24. A review of a POC dated 05/10/24 to 08/07/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/16/24 and on 05/30/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. Patient #15 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit and completion of the bereavement assessment on 12/31/20, psychosocial assessment on 01/05/21 and a spiritual assessment on 01/07/21. A review of a POC dated 05/03/24 to 07/01/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/16/24 and on 05/30/24 showed no bereavement care plan and/or no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Documentation showed no changes in orders. On 06/04/24 at 10:30 a.m., Staff C stated: 1. Patients are given a bereavement risk score at the time of the SOC assessment and are advised of spiritual and bereavement services provided by the Hospice. 2. The bereavement program consists of intermittently timed mail outs and follow up telephone calls which begin after the patients death. 3. The Hospice does not maintain a written POC for bereavement and, 4. Bereavement is not included on the overall POC unless the patients family or caregiver is assessed at a moderate to high risk for bereavement, then social work and/or chaplain services are provided as needed and interventions and/or related goals for each discipline is added to the plan of care.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,072 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure: 1. Hospice aide visits were provided in accordance with the plan of care for six (Patients #3, 5, 8, 11, 12 and #13) of 19 patients. 2. SN visits were provided in accordance with the plan of care for one (Patient #5) of 19 patients. 3. Chaplain visits were provided in accordance with the plan of care for two (Patients #7 and #8) of 19 patients. Medical Social Work visits were provided in accordance with the plan of care for three (Patients #7, 8 and #13) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #3 A review of a POC dated 05/25/24 to 07/23/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/17/24 and on 05/31/24 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of two visits every week for eight weeks. Documentation showed during the week of 05/26/24 to 06/01/24 hospice aide visits were conducted on 05/26/24 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted). Documentation showed no patient or family refusal of visits and no changes in the ordered frequency for the hospice aide. On 06/04/24 at 12:55 p.m., Staff B stated the hospice aide frequency was not followed as ordered for patient #3. Patient #5 A review of a POC dated 03/19/24 to 06/16/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/16/24, 04/30/24, 05/14/24 and on 05/28/24 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of one time a week for one week, then two visits every week for 11 weeks and a SN visit frequency of three times a week for one week, then two times a week for 12 weeks. Documentation showed during the week of 05/12/24 to 05/18/24 hospice aide visits were conducted on 05/16/24 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted) and during the week of 05/19/24 to 05/25/24 SN visits were conducted on 05/21/24 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted). Documentation showed no patient or family refusal of visits and no changes in the ordered frequency for the hospice aide. On 06/04/24 at 1:05 p.m., Staff B stated the hospice aide and SN visit frequencies were not followed as ordered for patient #5. Patient #7 A review of a POC dated 05/02/24 to 07/30/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/03/24, 05/17/24 and on 05/31/24 ordered chaplain visits at a frequency of one visit every week for 13 weeks and Medical Social Work visits at a frequency of one visit every week for 13 weeks. Documentation showed during the weeks of 05/12/24 to 05/18/24 and 05/19/24 to 05/25/24 no chaplain visits were conducted (two visits ordered, no visits conducted) and no MSW visit was conducted (two visits ordered, no visits conducted). Documentation showed no patient or family refusal of visits and no changes in the ordered frequency for the hospice aide. On 06/04/24 at 1:10 p.m., Staff B stated the Chaplain and MSW visit frequencies were not followed as ordered for patient #7. Patient #8 A review of a POC dated 04/03/24 to 07/01/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/18/24, 05/02/24 and on 05/30/24 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of one time a week for one week, then two visits every week for 12 weeks, chaplain visits at a frequency of one visit every two weeks for 12 weeks and Medical Social Work visits at a frequency of one visit every two weeks for 10 weeks. Documentation showed during the weeks of 04/03/24 to 04/06/24 no chaplain visit was conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted), 04/07/24 to 04/13/24 a hospice aide visit was missed on 04/12/24 (two visits ordered, no visit conducted, 04/14/24 to 04/20/24 no chaplain visit was conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted), and 05/26/24 to 06/01/24 no chaplain visit was conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted) and no MSW visit was conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted). Documentation showed no patient or family refusal of visits and no changes in the ordered frequencies for the hospice aide, chaplain or MSW services. On 06/04/24 at 1:15 p.m., Staff B stated the Aide, Chaplain and MSW visit frequencies were not followed as ordered for patient #8. Patient #11 A review of a POC dated 04/01/24 to 05/30/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/18/24, 05/02/24, 05/16/24 and on 05/30/24 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of two visits every week for nine weeks, increased to three times a week effective 04/23/24. Documentation showed during the week of 05/12/24 to 05/18/24 a hospice aide visit was missed on 05/13/24 (two visits ordered, no visits conducted), 05/19/24 to 05/25/24 hospice aide visits were missed on 05/20/24 and 05/23/24 (two visits ordered, no visits conducted). Documentation showed no changes in the ordered frequency for the hospice aide. On 06/04/24 at 1:32 p.m., Staff B stated the hospice aide frequency was not followed as ordered for patient #11. Patient #12 A review of a POC dated 05/15/24 to 08/12/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/16/24 and on 05/30/24 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of two visits every week for one week, then three visits a week for 12 weeks. Documentation showed during the week of 05/26/24 to 06/01/24 hospice aide visits were conducted on 05/29 and on 05/31/24 (three visits ordered, two visits conducted). Documentation showed no patient or family refusal of visits and no changes in the ordered frequency for the hospice aide. On 06/04/24 at 1:40 p.m., Staff B stated the hospice aide frequency was not followed as ordered for patient #12. Patient #13 A review of a POC dated 04/08/24 to 06/06/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/16/24, 04/30/24, 05/14/24 and on 05/28/24 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of two visits every week for nine weeks and Medical Social Work visits at a frequency of one visit every two weeks for eight weeks. Documentation showed during the weeks of 04/21/24 to 04/27/24 no MSW visit was conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted), 04/28/24 to 05/04/24 a hospice aide visit was missed on 04/30/24 (two visits ordered, no visit conducted and 05/19/24 to 05/25/24 a hospice aide visit was missed on 05/23/24 (two visits ordered, no visit conducted). Documentation showed no patient or family refusal of visits and no changes in the ordered frequencies for the hospice aide or MSW services. On 06/04/24 at 1:45 p.m., Staff B stated the Aide and MSW visit frequencies were not followed as ordered for patient #13.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 838 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure: 1. Individualized plans of care were fully developed to include physician pain reporting parameters for seven (Patients #1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 17 and #19) of 19 patients and. 2. Individualized plan of care was fully developed to include urinary catheter management treatment intervention due date or last changed date for one (Patient #12) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #1 A review of a POC dated 05/07/24 to 08/04/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/17/24 and on 05/31/24 showed orders for SN to assess, monitor and instruct patients pain level every visit. POC documentation showed no pain reporting parameters for physician notification. SN visits conducted on 05/07/24, 05/14/24, 05/16/24 and on 05/23/24 documented a patient reported pain level of two of 10. Documentation showed no patient tolerable pain level on scale of one to 10, showed no physician notifications and no change in orders. Patient #2 A review of a POC dated 05/17/24 to 07/15/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/17/24 and on 05/31/24 showed orders for SN to assess, monitor and instruct patients pain level every visit. POC documentation showed no pain reporting parameters for physician notification. SN visits conducted on 05/30/24 documented a patient reported pain level of 10 of 10. Documentation showed no patient tolerable pain level on scale of one to 10, showed no physician notifications and no change in orders. Patient #5 A review of a POC dated 03/19/24 to 06/16/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/16/24, 04/30/24, 05/14/24 and on 05/28/24 showed orders for SN to assess, monitor and instruct patients pain level every visit. POC documentation showed no pain reporting parameters for physician notification. SN visits conducted on 03/27/24 showed a reported pain level of 2, 04/01/24 showed a reported pain level of 3, 04/13/24 showed a reported pain level of 2. Documentation showed no patient tolerable pain level on scale of one to 10, showed no physician notifications and no change in orders. Patient #7 A review of a POC dated 05/02/24 to 07/30/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/03/24, 05/17/24 and on 05/31/24 showed orders for SN to assess, monitor and instruct patients pain level every visit. POC documentation showed no pain reporting parameters for physician notification. SN visits conducted on 05/03/24 showed a reported pain level of 3, 05/07/24 showed a reported pain level of 3, 05/13/24 showed a reported pain level of 4, 05/14/24 showed a reported pain level of 4, 05/16/24 showed a reported pain level of 6, 05/17/24 showed a reported pain level of 3, 05/28/24 showed a reported pain level of 2, 05/30/24 showed a reported pain level of 4. Documentation showed no patient tolerable pain level on scale of one to 10, showed no physician notifications and no change in orders. Patient #8 A review of a POC dated 04/03/24 to 07/01/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/18/24, 05/02/24 and on 05/30/24 showed orders for SN to assess, monitor and instruct patients pain level every visit. POC documentation showed no pain reporting parameters for physician notification. SN visits conducted on 05/06/24 showed a reported pain level of 2. Documentation showed no patient tolerable pain level on scale of one to 10, showed no physician notifications and no change in orders. Patient #12 A review of a POC dated 05/15/24 to 08/12/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/16/24 and on 05/30/24 ordered SN to change urinary catheter 16 FR/10 ml every month. Documentation showed no treatment last change or intervention due date for the certification period. Patient #17 A review of a POC dated 03/21/24 to 06/18/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/03/24 showed orders for SN to assess, monitor and instruct patients pain level every visit. POC documentation showed no pain reporting parameters for physician notification. SN visits conducted on 03/02/24 showed a reported pain level of 3. Documentation showed no patient tolerable pain level on scale of one to 10, showed no physician notifications and no change in orders. Patient #19 A review of a POC dated 09/26/23 to 12/24/23 and IDG updates to the POC on 11/02/23, 11/16/23, 11/30/23 and on 12/14/23 showed orders for SN to assess, monitor and instruct patients pain level every visit. POC documentation showed no pain reporting parameters for physician notification. SN visits conducted on 10/10/23 showed a reported pain level of 5, 10/13/23 showed a reported pain level of 4, 11/03/23 showed a reported pain level of 1, and 11/10/23 showed a reported pain level of 3. Documentation showed no patient tolerable pain level on scale of one to 10, showed no physician notifications and no change in orders. On 06/05/24 at 12:45 p.m. to 2:00 p.m., Staff B stated: 1. The POCs for patients #1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 17 and #19 had no physician pain reporting parameters. 2. The POC for patient #12 did not include a treatment last change or intervention due date for the certification period.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 343 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure: 1. Patient refusal of hospice aide services was communicated and addressed by the IDG for one (Patient #8) of 19 patients. 2. Patient refusal of MSW services was communicated and addressed by the IDG for one (Patient #19) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #8 A review of a POC dated 04/03/24 to 07/01/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/18/24, 05/02/24 and on 05/30/24 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of one time a week for one week, then two visits every week for 12 weeks. Documentation showed patient refusal of hospice aide visits on 04/08/24, 04/15/24, 04/19/24, 04/22/24, 04/24/24, 04/26/24, 05/01/24, 05/03/24, 0510/24, 05/15/24, 05/17/24, 05/20/24, 05/27/24 and on 05/28/24. Documentation showed no attempts to reschedule the visits or follow up with the patient, showed no IDG team meeting discussions of patient refusal of hospice aide visits and no changes in hospice aide visit frequency. On 06/04/24 at 1:15 p.m., Staff B stated IDG documentation showed no discussion of patient refusal of hospice aide services during the IDG team meetings, no physician notification, and no changes in orders. Patient #19 A review of a POC dated 09/26/23 to 12/24/23 and IDG updates to the POC on 11/02/23, 11/16/23, 11/30/23 and on 12/14/23 showed orders for MSW one time a week for one week, then one time every other week for 12 weeks. Documentation showed patient refusal of MSW on 10/12/23, a MSW visit during week of 10/29/23 to 11/04/23, 11/08/23, a MSW visit during week of 11/19/23 to 11/25/23 and on 12/21/23. A coordination note dated 11/23/23 documented the patient/family had no MSW needs. Documentation showed no attempts to reschedule the visits or follow up with the patient, showed no IDG team meeting discussions of patient refusal of MSW visits and no changes in MSW visit frequency. On 06/04/24 at 2:00 p.m., Staff B stated IDG documentation showed no discussion of patient refusal of MSW services during the IDG team meetings, no physician notification, and no changes in orders.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 292 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure: 1. Initial spiritual assessments were conducted by the Chaplain within the five-day timeframe required to complete the initial comprehensive assessment for two (Patients #4 and #15) of 19 patients. 2. Initial psychosocial assessments were conducted by the MSW within the five-day timeframe required to complete the initial comprehensive assessment for two (Patients #4 and #8) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #4 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit/SOC on 03/02/21; and psychosocial and spiritual assessments conducted on 03/15/21 (12 days from the date of election). Documentation showed no declined chaplain or MSW visits and no changes in orders. On 06/04/24 at 1:00 p.m., Staff B stated the Chaplain and MSW had not conducted the initial spiritual and psychosocial assessments for patient #4 within the five-day timeframe required to complete the initial comprehensive assessment. Patient #8 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit/SOC on 01/04/24 and no completion of the psychosocial assessment (Documentation showed a missed visit on 01/15/24 and a telephone contact call on 02/19/24). Documentation showed no changes in orders. On 06/04/24 at 1:15 p.m., Staff B stated the MSW had not conducted the initial psychosocial assessments for patient #8 within the five-day timeframe required to complete the initial comprehensive assessment. Patient #15 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit/SOC on 12/31/20 and a spiritual assessment on 01/07/21 (6 days from the date of election). Documentation showed no changes in orders. On 06/04/24 at 1:55 p.m., Staff B stated the Chaplain had not conducted the initial spiritual assessment for patient #15 within the five-day timeframe required to complete the initial comprehensive assessment.”

    Rule L0598. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 516 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure continued review and update of a home hospice aide care plan for seven (Patients #2, 3, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #2 A review of a POC dated 05/17/24 to 07/15/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/17/24 and on 05/31/24 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of two visits every week for eight weeks. Documentation showed no update to the hospice aide care plan, including frequency and durations of service since 07/19/22. Patient #3 A review of a POC dated 05/25/24 to 07/23/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/17/24 and on 05/31/24 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of two visits every week for eight weeks. Documentation showed no update to the hospice aide care plan, including frequency and durations of service since 10/05/23. Patient #7 A review of a POC dated 05/02/24 to 07/30/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/03/24, 05/17/24 and on 05/31/24 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of one time a week for one week, three visits every week for 12 weeks, then one time a week for one week. Documentation showed no update to the hospice aide care plan, including frequency and durations of service since 02/08/24. Patient #9 A review of a POC dated 04/11/24 to 06/09/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/16/24, 04/30/24, 05/14/24 and on 05/28/24 one time a week for one week, then two visits every week for eight weeks. Documentation showed no update to the hospice aide care plan, including frequency and durations of service since 11/20/23. Patient #11 A review of a POC dated 04/01/24 to 05/30/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/18/24, 05/02/24, 05/16/24 and on 05/30/24 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of two visits every week for nine weeks, increased to three times a week effective 04/23/24. Documentation showed no update to the hospice aide care plan, including frequency and durations of service since 02/07/24. Patient #13 A review of a POC dated 04/08/24 to 06/06/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/16/24, 04/30/24, 05/14/24 and on 05/28/24 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of two visits every week for nine weeks. Documentation showed no update to the hospice aide care plan, including frequency and durations of service since 12/15/22. Patient #15 A review of a POC dated 05/03/24 to 07/01/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/16/24 and on 05/30/24 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of two visits every week for eight weeks, then one time a week for one week. Documentation showed no update to the hospice aide care plan, including frequency and durations of service since 04/10/23. On 06/05/24 at 12:50 p.m. to 1:55 p.m., Staff B stated: 1. Clinical record documentation for patients #2, 3, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15 showed no updated or hospice aide care plans with current hospice aide service discipline frequencies and durations. The hospice does not update the aide care plans unless the aide tasks change.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 4, 2024Recertification inspection by the state6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 25, 2001.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 67% at home, 2% in assisted living, 31% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.6%
Visits near death93.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Home Health Holdings Inc. owns 100% directly since Jul 31, 2009.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Daniel R Manley (corporate officer); Ananth P Mohan (corporate officer); Ananth P Mohan (corporate director); John Mcmahon (corporate officer); Katie L Monastiere (corporate officer, 0%); Ryan W Schafer (managing employee (under contract)); Kindra Wilcox (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kindra Wilcox (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Angel Stansbury (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Airjaguar Holdco, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Ec Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
Ec Homecare Holdings Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
Airjaguar Acquisition, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Ec Homecare Holdings Intermediate, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
Ec Homecare Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
HCI Holdings CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 21, 2018
Healthcare Innovations Private Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 21, 2018
Home Health Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jul 31, 2009
Hci Parent Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 21, 2018
Jhh/Cima Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 21, 2018
Bw Nhhc Holdco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Acof VII Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies49.3%Jul 20, 2026
Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund VII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies35.8%Jul 20, 2026
Davita Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies32.9%Jul 20, 2026
Total Renal Care, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies32.9%Jul 20, 2026
Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund VII Parallel (Te), L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies9.07%Jul 20, 2026
Dawson Holdings (Armstrong), LPOwns 5% or more through other companies7.8%Jul 20, 2026
Acof VII Axiom Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies7.8%Jul 20, 2026

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.72% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 79.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 19 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74820, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.