Hearth Record

Anew Hospice

A hospice in Indianapolis, Indiana 46237

3830 E Southport Rd, Suite 300, Indianapolis, Indiana 46237. (317) 300-2292.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 21 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

21 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 33 hospices serving ZIP code 46237 had 5.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 30, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

21 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

21 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 30, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care21 deficiencies
  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that the hospice informed and provided written information to the patient concerning its policies on advance directives, including a description of applicable state law. Patient 7: Pt is documented as orientation x 3. RN in summary notes Patty (POA) present and signed consent. There is no evidence of a DPOA for health care on file and Patty is a friend of the patient, not a family member.”

    Rule L0503. Standard-level.

  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that the hospice obtained the patient’s or representative’s signature confirming that they received a copy of the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities. Patient 7: Pt is documented as orientation x 3. RN in summary notes Patty (POA) present and signed consents. There is no evidence of a DPOA for health care on file and Patty is a friend of the patient, not a family member.”

    Rule L0504. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patient 7: Pt is documented as orientation x 3. RN in summary notes Patty (POA) present and signed consents. There is no evidence of a DPOA for health care on file and Patty is a friend of the patient, not a family member.”

    Rule L0515. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence of the appropriate documentation for release of confidential information. Patient 7: Pt is documented as orientation x 3. RN in summary notes Patty (POA) present and signed consents. There is no evidence of a DPOA for health care on file and Patty is a friend of the patient, not a family member.”

    Rule L0516. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(7))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that the patient received information about the services covered under the hospice benefit. Patient 7: Pt is documented as orientation x 3. RN in summary notes Patty (POA) present and signed consents. There is no evidence of a DPOA for health care on file and Patty is a friend of the patient, not a family member.”

    Rule L0518. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(8))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that the patient received information about the scope of services that the hospice will provide and specific limitations on those services. Patient 7: Pt is documented as orientation x 3. RN in summary notes Patty (POA) present and signed consents. There is no evidence of a DPOA for health care on file and Patty is a friend of the patient, not a family member.”

    Rule L0519. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 124 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #2) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 2: Patient admitted 7/8/25 and the psychosocial comprehensive assessment was not completed by MSW or SN within 5 days. The MSW did not visit within 5 days as patient refused MSW on 7/10/25 when the MSW called. The SN did not cover financial needs in the comprehensive assessment to cover the MSW assessment. Many of the psychosocial questions have documented “None noted or verbalized this visit”. ie: Ethnic and or cultural considerations affecting family/patient, community support.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 106 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #10,11) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: Patient 10: The medication profile contains an order for Nystop topical powder with no location to apply. Order updated, corrected on site. Patient 11: The medication profile contains an order for Ammonium lactate 12% topical lotion, apply 1 application topical 2 times per day; Apply small amount topically two times per day. There is no application site. Order updated, corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 5: There is no Bereavement assessment completed within 5 days of SOC.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 226 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #2,4,5,9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 2: The patient is on Eliquis twice daily per POC 7/8/25, there is no risk for bleeding care plan with goals and interventions. Care plans updated to include the cited element, corrected on site. Patient 4: Physician order stated patient is receiving dexamethasone 4mg oral tab daily for brain swelling, aspirin EC 81mg oral delayed release tab daily for platelet aggregates and Ibuprofen 400mg oral every 6 hours as needed for pain. There is no bleeding risk care plan with goals and interventions. Care plan added corrected on site. Patient 5: Pt is a high aspiration risk per CTI, per initial POC 3/28/25 there was no aspiration risk care plan with problems, goals and interventions Patient 9: The initial POC 6/10/25 contains orders for aspirin and Plavix. There is not risk for bleeding care plan with goals and interventions. Care plans updated to include the cited element, corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 118 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #10,11) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 10: POC 7/12/25 contains an order for Nystop topical powder with no location to apply. Corrected on site, order updated. Admit order remains on POC for a recertification. The SN documented on 7/12/25. Agency updated order corrected onsite. Patient 11: The POC 2/22/2025 contains an order for Ammonium lactate 12% topical lotion, apply 1 application topical 2 times per day; apply small amount topically two times per day. There is no application site. Agency updated order, corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #2,12) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 2: The SN documented 7/9/25 ordering a lift chair for the patient. There is no order for a lift chair on the POC. Pt received lift chair per SN documentation 7/11/25. Agency obtained order, corrected on site. Patient 12: The SN documented 7/14/25 ordering a seat cushion for the wheelchair, there is no order for a seat cushion. Agency added an order corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 12: The SN documented on 7/28/25 “patient on a dysphagia ground diet and Kennedy cup for liquids” there is no risk for aspiration care plan with goals and interventions. On 7/24/25 the patient is sleeping 18+ hours a day and is incontinent of bowel and bladder. There is no risk for skin breakdown care plan. Both care plans updated to include the cited elements, corrected on site.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 2: The MD ordered a BMP for 7/17/25 once patient finished the ordered Sodium tabs. The patient did not fill the Rx and the lab did not get performed. The lab order was not discontinued. Lab order discontinued, corrected on site.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #14) did not have evidence that the IDG documents the sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings, whether the care and services are provided directly or under arrangement. Patient 14: Pt has new infection of cellulitis, orders were obtained 6/30/25 for antibiotics and wound care from the medical director. There is no evidence the Attending MD was notified or attempted to call.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 139 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #17,19) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patients 17 and 19: The medical records do not contain evidence of the development of a bereavement plans of care that note the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #6) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel 6: There is no evidence of a tub shampoo being performed as a competency. Agency brought in the aide and the RN and competency performed at facility with RN day 3 survey.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #10,14) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: Patient 10: The SN ordered for linens to be changed every visit. The aide documented on 7/28/25, 7/14/25 under linen change “unable to document: Caregiver”. There is no evidence the SN was notified. The aide is ordered to provide intervention for oxygen precautions each visit, the aide documented on 7/21/25 “unable to document: Not needed at this time. Patient 14: The aide POC has ordered a shower with chair every visit. The aide documented on 7/18/25 “Unable to document: Refused shower but she did request a bed bath this visit. Facility staff aware of this situation. Bed bath was given.” There is no evidence the SN was made aware of these changes to order a bed bath.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 127 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #2,7) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient 2: The EOB under Right to choose an attending. Neither box is marked for “I do not wish to choose an attending” or “I acknowledge that my choice for attending is”. The alternate medical director’s name is written in the Physician full name box. Patient 7: Pt is documented as orientation x 3. RN in summary notes Patty (POA) present and signed EOB. There is no evidence of a DPOA for health care on file and Patty is a friend of the patient, not a family member.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #7,14) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient 7: Pt is documented as orientation x 3. RN in summary notes Patty (POA) present and signed consent. There is no evidence of a DPOA for health care on file and Patty is a friend of the patient, not a family member. Patient 14: MSW documented on 3/10/25 comp assessment advanced directives completed by RN on comprehensive assessment. RN documented 3/7/25 advanced directives discussed and copy of documentation provided. There was no evidence of a copy in the medical record.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 396 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #2,5,7,10,14) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 2: SN documented “eol” in the narrative 7/8/25. The approved abbreviation in the agency policy is “EOL” capitalized. SN documented 7/17/25 “Pt’s anxiety is fair to Middling” this does not make sense. Patient 5: The POC contains the following documentation in the goals: “MSW provided education to patient/caregiver**on measures to manage stress appropriately including **”. This is unclear what the goal is for. In addition, the SN documented 0n 6/16/25, 6/19/25, 6/23/25 wound care by restating the order and then documented “completed”. There are no details of the wound care provided. Patient 7: RN Comprehensive Assessment 3/31/25 The SN documented “Advanced Directives discussed and copy provided. Then under clinical record items notes the SN documented under section: Advance care plan/advance directive reviewed and completed by admitting clinician, then the SN documented “not completed with this visit.” It is unclear whether the advance directives were discussed and there was no evidence of copies of Advance directives in the medical record. Patient 10: POC 7/12/25 contains “SN: Home health staff will wash pubic area with soap and water, dry thoroughly and apply antifungal powder to groin TID.” This is a hospice patient there is no Home Health involved. Patient 14: The SN documented Wound care dressing change “Per care plan” and in narrative the SN documents “dressing clean dry and intact on 6/20/25 and 7/18/25. It is unclear if the dressing was changed. The SN documented 6/20/25 “She does have some redness to her right lower area”. It is unclear what area the SN is describing. SN documents on SOC wound care performed by both clinician and caregiver, though the narrative the SN documents “declined to let writer asses since the FSN had already completed wound care and it causes her pain.” It is unclear who performed the wound care. Wound care completed on 6/27/25 documented by restating the order and then “completed” there are no details of the wound care provided. On 7/18/25 the SN documented “Dressings removed and wound cleaned with new dressings applied during visit.””

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 30, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care21 deficiencies cited
Jan 22, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 24, 2016.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 25% at home, 14% in assisted living, 61% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.4%
Visits near death95.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Ejj V LLC owns 23.75% directly since Dec 22, 2020; Sharon M Jackson Irrv Tr One owns 23.75% directly since Dec 20, 2024; Covenant Asset and Investment Services LP owns 23.75% directly since Sep 30, 2017; Abishai Xi LP owns 7.92% directly since Sep 27, 2021; Jackson Acorns LP owns 7.92% directly since Sep 29, 2021; Wej Xi LP owns 7.91% directly since Sep 27, 2021; Drj LP owns 5% directly since Sep 30, 2017.
  • American Senior Communities LLC runs it.
  • 14 owners or officers are people: Mark Jackson (owns 5% or more through other companies, 19.59%); Denice M Damerau (managing employee (on the payroll)); Zubair Khan (managing employee (under contract)); John Conner (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Mark Jackson (corporate director); Mark Jackson (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Blake Jackson (corporate director); Blake Jackson (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Wessley Jackson (corporate director); Holly Franko (corporate officer); Mark Dice (corporate officer); Kyle Jackson (runs it (operational or managerial control)); David Justice (corporate director); David Justice (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ejj V LLCOwns 5% or more directly23.75%Dec 22, 2020
Sharon M Jackson Irrv Tr OneOwns 5% or more directly23.75%Dec 20, 2024
Covenant Asset and Investment Services LPOwns 5% or more directly23.75%Sep 30, 2017
Abishai Xi LPOwns 5% or more directly7.92%Sep 27, 2021
Jackson Acorns LPOwns 5% or more directly7.92%Sep 29, 2021
Wej Xi LPOwns 5% or more directly7.91%Sep 27, 2021
Wessley E Jackson Irrevocable Trust IIOwns 5% or more through other companies6.53%Sep 27, 2021
Drj LPOwns 5% or more directly5%Sep 30, 2017
American Senior Communities LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)May 7, 2017

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 81% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.38% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 68.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 33 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 46237, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 21.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.