Aseracare Hospice
A hospice in Indianapolis, Indiana 46268
8910 Purdue Road Ste 130, Indianapolis, Indiana 46268. (317) 337-0439.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 13 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
13 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 30 hospices serving ZIP code 46268 had 9.
The last inspection on record was on Jul 3, 2024: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jul 3, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 148 words
“Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #14) did not have evidence that the plan of care included IDG’s documentation of the patient’s or families level of understanding, involvement and agreement with the plan of care. Patient 14 order on 5/24/24 for SW effective 5/21/24 2m1, 4m1, 5m1, 2m1 (weekly visits). SW visit on 5/24 and a refusal documented on 5/29. A refusal is documented on 6/7, and a note on 6/13 states the patient desires a visit next week and not this week. Missed visit note on 6/20/24 documents no answer to calls and due to previous refusals will change visit frequency. Order entered on 6/20/24 for SW effective 6/1/24 2m1, 1m2. No evidence that the patient requested a change in the visit frequency and no evidence documented within the IDG of communication with the patient or family for involvement in the change in visit frequency.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 188 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #1, 2, 14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1 medication profile includes oxygen at 2LPM NC continuous. Nursing visit on 6/28/24 documents patient using oxygen at 4LPM, nursing visits on 6/29 and 6/30 document patient using oxygen at 3LPM. Patient 2 medication profile includes 2/20/24 for Miralax17g prn constipation mix with 8oz of water drink day 2 no BM, does not include a frequency for how often to take. Medication profile includes Ativan 0.5mg, 2 tabs as directed give 2 tabs 1 hour prior to shower, does not include a frequency for how often it can be given. Patient 14 medication profile includes oxygen 2LPM continuous/prn, does not include a route. Nursing visit on 5/21/24 and initial CTI document oxygen at 3LPM.”
-
Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #14) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 14 abdominal incision (previously closed) reopened 6/21/24 with drainage, call to physician. No evidence of an assessment of this draining incision from 6/21/24 to current, documented continued drainage and dressing changes during this timeframe.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 194 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #5, 8, 9, 12, 14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 5 nursing visits throughout June document dysphagia and pureed diet, no evidence of aspiration precautions on care plan. Patient 8 is on Aspirin for stroke prevention, no evidence of bleeding precautions on care plan. Patient 9 initial CTI documents dysphagia with possible aspiration, no evidence of aspiration precautions on care plan. Patient 12 aide care plan has fall precautions and a prn nursing visit was completed on 6/20/24 for a fall. No evidence of fall precautions on the care plan. Patient 14 nursing visits throughout June document the presence of a port, nursing visit on 6/9/24 documents cleaning and applying a dressing to the port. No evidence of a care plan for the port.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 165 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #1, 2, 14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1 initial plan of care orders oxygen at 2LPM NC continuous. Nursing visit on 6/28/24 documents oxygen at 4LPM, nursing visits on 6/29 and 6/30 document oxygen at 3LPM. Patient 2 order on 2/20/24 for Miralax17g prn constipation mix with 8oz of water drink day 2 no BM, does not include a frequency for how often to take. Order on 6/12/24 for Ativan 0.5mg, 2 tabs as directed give 2 tabs 1 hour prior to shower, does not include a frequency for how often it can be given. Patient 14 initial plan of care includes order for oxygen 2LPM continuous/prn, does not include a route. Nursing visit on 5/21/24 and initial CTI document oxygen at 3LPM, no evidence of an order for oxygen 3LPM.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 5 nursing visit 6/13/24 documents hoyer lift, aide care plan includes the use of hoyer lift and wheelchair, no evidence of an order for hoyer lift and wheelchair on the POC.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 137 words
“Upon client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #6, 14) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 6 order on 2/1/24 for SW frequency of 2m2, 1m1. SW visit completed on 2/1/24, no evidence of a second visit for February. Order on 4/11/24 for SW frequency effective 4/22/24 of 1m1, 2m2, 1m1. No evidence of a SW visit completed after 4/22/24 for April. Patient 14 nursing visit on 6/9/24 documented port site not accessed site cleaned gauze and sure site placed to reduce sheering, no evidence of an order. Nursing visit 6/21/24 documents abdominal incision now draining (previously closed), nursing visit on 6/25 and 6/27 document new dressing to ABD incision. No evidence of an order for dressings or site care.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
“Upon observation, 1 of 4 (Patient 2) there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient 2, RN placed phone on the patient’s wheelchair to utilize the stopwatch and did not clean the phone prior to or after use, and did not utilize a barrier.”
-
Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 212 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #15, 16, 17) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient 15 holiday card and memorial letter/invitation, and your not alone mailing due 12/19/23. No evidence these were sent and no coordination note to explain any variances that were needed. Patient 16 holiday card and memorial letter/invitation, and your not alone mailing due 11/12/23. No evidence that the holiday card or memorial mailing were sent, and the your not alone mailing was documented as sent on 1/8/24, no coordination note to explain and variances that were needed. Patient 17 holiday card and memorial letter/invitation, and your not alone mailing due 1/12/24. No evidence these were sent and no coordination note to explain any variances that were needed.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 198 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #3, 5, 8) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 3 is high risk for aspiration per the plan of care and nursing documentation, no evidence of aspiration precautions on the aide care plan. Patient 5 is high risk for falls per the plan of care and nursing documentation, no evidence of fall precautions on the aide care plan. Patient 8 is high risk for seizures and bleeding, no evidence of seizure or bleeding precautions on the aide care plan.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 5 shampoo is to be performed every visit. Aide visit on 6/28/24 documented no not completed for shampoo.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 310 words
“Upon patient client record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #1, 3, 4, 6, 11, 14) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1 order on 6/16/24 for SN order description stated 6/16 4xweek, week of 6/23 3xweek. The calendar frequency included effective 6/16 8w1, 7w8, 1w1. The frequencies conflicted within the order. Order on 6/28 order description included daily visits starting 6/28, the calendar frequency documented effective 6/23 11w8, 2w1 and these conflicted within the same order. Nursing visit on 5/21 documented patient needed 1 person gait belt transfer and aide care plan documented 1 person transfer without gait belt, unclear which is correct. Patient 4 order on 6/17/24 for aide visit frequency in the order description stated aide 4xweek the week of 6/16 and 5x week starting 6/23, the calendar frequency read effective 6/16 4w1, 3w1, the order was not clear for the frequency. Patient 6 nursing visit on 6/25/24 documented wound care provided as per orders and did not include the detail of the care provided. Patients 3, 11, 14 agency procedure is to write SW visit frequency as a monthly frequency then 2prn visits and 5 phone calls for psychosocial needs, the phone calls are intended to be prn for support per the procedure. No evidence of the calls, unclear on visit frequency and didn’t follow the agency procedure, utilized phone visits and not phone calls. Patient 3 on 6/5/24 SW frequency effective 6/15 included 5 prn phone visits Patient 11 on 4/4/24 SW frequency effective 4/1 includes 5 phone visits. Patient 14 on 5/24/24 and 6/20 SW frequency included 5 phone visits.”
-
Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 8 order on 4/30/24 for SW frequency effective 4/14/24 of 3m3, 1m1. SW visit completed on 4/23/24 no evidence of a 2nd or 3rd visit for April after 4/14/24.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2024 | Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 13 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 6, 1995.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 17.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.8% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 38% at home, 19% in assisted living, 42% in a nursing facility, 1% elsewhere.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 17.8 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 9.4% |
| Visits near death | 96.8% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Homecare Preferred Choice, Inc. owns 100% directly since Dec 15, 1999.
- 12 owners or officers are people: Christina Medaris (managing employee (on the payroll)); Christina Medaris (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Bridget R Kaigler (corporate officer); Bridget R Kaigler (managing employee (on the payroll)); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer); Kristina J Braud (corporate officer); Ami V Patel (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jeanne Shingleton (corporate officer); Mahendra K Kalra (managing employee (on the payroll)); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unitedhealth Group Incorporated | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 14, 2025 |
| Amedisys Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | May 29, 2020 |
| Amedisys Hospice, L.L.C. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | May 29, 2020 |
| Amedisys Holding LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | May 29, 2020 |
| Homecare Preferred Choice, Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Dec 15, 1999 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 85.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 30 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 46268, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 13.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Aseracare Hospice This hospice | 13 |
| Compassus-Indianapolis Metro | 5 |
| Indiana University Health Hospice | 8 |
| Heartland Hospice (Indianapolis) | 23 |
| Gentiva III | 16 |
| Heart to Heart Hospice of Indianapolis LLC | 5 |
| Adoration Hospice | 16 |
| Gentiva II | 12 |
| Accentcare Hospice and Palliative Care of Indiana | 0 |
| Traditions Health | 4 |
| Paradigm Health | 5 |
| Elara Caring | 18 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.