Hearth Record

Heart to Heart Hospice of Indianapolis LLC

A hospice in Indianapolis, Indiana 46214

2611 Waterfront Pkwy E Dr Ste 200, Indianapolis, Indiana 46214. (317) 718-7422.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 29 hospices serving ZIP code 46214 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 25, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 25, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 540 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current: prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs; supplements; herbal remedies; [and] other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The medication review process includes the identification of the following: the effectiveness of drug therapy; drug side effects; actual or potential drug interactions; duplicate drug therapy; [and] drug therapy associated with laboratory monitoring. The assessment includes evidence that common side effects of medication in the hospice populations are anticipated, and, as appropriate, preventive measures are implemented to manage the side effects. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by observation, clinical record review, and interview. In 3 of 4 (75%) home visits observed, the agency did not ensure that the comprehensive assessment included a drug profile that contained the patient’s current medications. Home Visit 1/Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/16/2024 with a diagnosis of chronic systolic heart failure. The patient resided in an assisted living facility (ALF). During the home visit with the Hospice Aide (HA) [Personnel Record 7] on 09/23/2025, the hospice medication profile (printed on 09/22/2025) was compared to the ALF medication profile (printed on 09/23/2025). The following medications were documented on the ALF medication profile and not on the hospice medication profile: ferrous sulfate 325 mg, one (1) tablet daily (ordered 03/20/2025). The last comprehensive nursing visit was dated 09/18/2025. Home Visit 2/Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/21/2023 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). During the home visit with the Registered Nurse (RN) [Personnel Record 4] on 09/23/2025, the hospice medication profile (printed on 09/22/2025) was compared to the SNF medication profile (printed on 09/23/2025). The following medications were documented on the SNF medication profile and not on the hospice medication profile: artificial tears, one (1) drop in the left eye four times daily (ordered 08/15/2025); and bisacodyl 10 mg suppository, one (1) every 24 hours as needed (ordered 11/22/2024). The last comprehensive nursing visit was dated 09/20/2025. Home Visit 3/Clinical Record 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/09/2025 for a diagnosis of intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). During the home visit with the Social Worker (SW) [Personnel Record 5] on 09/23/2025, the hospice medication profile (printed on 09/22/2025) was compared to the SNF medication profile (printed on 09/23/2025). The following medications were listed on the SNF medication profile and not on the hospice medication profile: nitroglycerin, one (1) tablet every 5 minutes as needed for chest pain (ordered 09/13/2025); oxycodone 10 mg, one (1) tablet every 4 hours as needed (ordered 08/09/2025); polyethylene glycol, 17 grams by mouth as needed (ordered 08/09/2025); and Senna S 8.6-50 mg, two (2) tablets twice daily (ordered 08/12/2025). The last comprehensive nursing visit was dated 09/16/2025. During a joint clinical record review and interview on 09/24/2025, the Administrator/Executive Director confirmed the findings, stating, “The nurses should be doing medication reconciliations with every visit.””

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 212 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care: drugs and treatment necessary to meet the needs of the patient. This standard was not met as evidenced by observation. clinical record review, and interview. In 1 of 4 (25%) home visits observed, the agency did not ensure that the patient’s written plan of care included the necessary drugs and treatments to meet the patient’s needs. Home Visit 3/Clinical Record 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/09/2025 for a diagnosis of intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). During the home visit with the Social Worker (SW) [Personnel Record 5] on 09/23/2025, the following medications were listed on the SNF medication profile and not on the patient’s plan of care: nitroglycerin, one (1) tablet every 5 minutes as needed for chest pain (ordered 09/13/2025); oxycodone 10 mg, one (1) tablet every 4 hours as needed (ordered 08/09/2025); polyethylene glycol, 17 grams by mouth as needed (ordered 08/09/2025), and Senna S 8.6-50 mg, two (2) tablets twice daily (ordered 08/12/2025). The last comprehensive nursing visit was dated 09/16/2025. During a joint clinical record review and interview on 09/24/2025, the Administrator/Executive Director confirmed the findings, stating, “These medications were not included in the hospice list.””

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 587 words

    “It is required that written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 16 (19%) clinical records reviewed of patients who received Hospice Aide services, the agency did not ensure that the Hospice Aide (HA) received written patient care instructions to meet the patient’s needs. CLINICAL RECORD 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/16/2024 with a diagnosis of chronic systolic heart failure. The patient resided in an assisted living facility (ALF). The HA care plan dated 07/30/2025 assigned the HA the relevant tasks: “Bathing-shower, foot care, hair care, nail care-clean and filing, perineal care, shampoo (weekly) skin care, skin care-lotion, transfer client from bed/chair, transfer client from chair to bed, offer fluids, wheelchair bound, RN notified of changes, diabetic precautions, fall precautions, standard precautions.” All tasks were to be completed on every visit, except shampoo. The HA services were ordered twice weekly. The skilled nursing (SN) visit note dated 08/24/2025 documented a “new wound to right leg.” The physician’s order dated 09/09/2025 ordered: “Mid back wound. Cleanse with wound cleanser twice weekly, pat dry, and place a 4 x 4 foam dressing. Measure weekly.” The HA care plan did not notify the HA of the wound, nor did it provide specific instructions to notify the RN if the wound dressing became soiled, dislodged, or wet during the shower. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient elected hospice care on 03/24/2025 with a diagnosis of sarcopenia. The patient resided in an ALF. The HA care plan revision dated 08/08/2025 assigned the HA the relevant tasks: “Bathing-bed bath, dressing-apply compression stockings, glasses, hair care, nail care-clean, oral care-brush, perineal care, skin care-lotion, review patient diet, two person transfer, wheelchair bound, companionship (three times a week), narrative, RN notified of changes, bleeding, fall precautions, take patient’s weight (monthly).” A revision on 08/11/2025 included “assist with feeding.” All tasks were to be completed on every visit unless otherwise specified. HA services were ordered seven (7) times weekly. The physician’s order dated 08/11/2025 ordered: “Wound care to BLE (bilateral lower extremity). Clean the wound with wound cleanser or normal saline (NS). Pat dry, cover open areas with non-adherent dressing, wrap with kerlix, secure with tape, and apply Tubigrip.” The HA care plan did not notify the HA of the wound, nor did it provide specific instructions to notify the RN if the wound dressing became soiled, dislodged, or wet during the bed bath. CLINICAL RECORD 6: The patient elected hospice care on 04/20/2024 with a diagnosis of end-stage heart failure. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). The HA care plan revision dated 08/04/2025 assigned the HA the relevant tasks: “Bathing-bed bath, shampoo, hair care, skin care-deodorant, lotion, perineal care, oral care, nail care-clean, dressing, hearing aides, change linens, tidy patient area.” All tasks were to be completed on every visit. HA services were ordered twice weekly. The physician’s order dated 08/29/2025 ordered: “Right calf skin tear. Apply Xero foam and wrap with kerlix.” The HA care plan did not notify the HA of the wound, nor did it provide specific instructions to notify the RN if the wound dressing became soiled, dislodged, or wet during the bed bath. During a joint clinical record review and interview on 09/24/2025, the Administrator/Executive Director confirmed the findings. He agreed that the HA care plans should provide “specific instructions for the wound dressings.””

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 209 words

    “It is required that a registered nurse makes an annual on-site visit to the location where a patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess each hospice aide while he or she is performing care per the hospice’s policies and procedures. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview, and personnel record review. Agency policy #HR.60 “Employee Supervision” (revised 12/06/2024) stated in relevant part: “A RN must make an annual on-site visit to the location where a patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess each hospice aide while he or she is performing care.” In 1 of 1 (100%) personnel records reviewed for a Hospice Aide (HA), the agency did not ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) made an annual on-site visit to the location where a patient was receiving care, to observe and assess each HA while they were performing care. Personnel Record 7: The Hospice Aide was hired on 03/30/2017. A personnel record review revealed that no documented annual on-site supervisory visit was conducted in 2024. During a joint personnel record review and interview on 09/24/2025, the Administrator/Executive Director confirmed the finding and stated that the “previous Administrator/Executive Director had not documented the completion of many items in 2024.””

    Rule L0632. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 247 words

    “It is required that the hospice assesses the skills and competencies of all individuals providing care, including volunteers providing services and, as necessary, provides in-service training and education programs where required. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview, and personnel record review. Agency policy #HR.10 “Staff Competency” (revised 11/15/2024) stated in relevant part: “The Hospice will provide for competency assessments by qualified individuals on hire and annually to assess direct care staff’s basic skill levels for all staff providing care, including volunteers (if applicable), contracted staff, paraprofessionals, and professionals.” In 3 of 9 (33%) personnel records reviewed of individuals providing care, the agency did not ensure that the skills and competencies of all individuals providing care, including volunteers, were assessed. Personnel Record 3: The Registered Nurse was hired on 08/12/2024. A personnel record review revealed that no initial skills competencies were documented at the time of hire. Personnel Record 5: The Social Worker was hired on 05/26/2021. A personnel record review revealed that no annual skills competency was completed in 2024. Personnel Record 8: The Social Worker/Bereavement Coordinator was hired on 05/31/2008. It was confirmed with the Administrator that this employee “sometimes functions as a social worker.” A personnel record review revealed that no annual skills competency was completed in 2024. During a joint personnel record review and interview on 09/24/2025, the Administrator/Executive Director confirmed the finding, stating that the “previous Administrator/Executive Director had not documented the completion of many items in 2024.””

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 25, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies cited
Jun 5, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Feb 26, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 13, 2007.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 39% at home, 12% in assisted living, 49% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9%
Visits near death95.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Heart to Heart Indiana Holdco, LLC owns 100% directly since Oct 27, 2021; Heart to Heart Hospice Holdings LLC owns 100% directly since Oct 27, 2021.
  • 4 owners or officers are people: Kelly Mitchell (owns 5% or more through other companies, 65.87%); Kelly Mitchell (corporate officer); Kelly Mitchell (corporate director); Kelly Mitchell (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Heart to Heart Indiana Holdco, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Oct 27, 2021
Heart to Heart Hospice Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Oct 27, 2021
Indiana Medical Couriers and Express Delivery Services, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies87.5%Oct 27, 2021
H to H Founders, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies59.83%Jun 25, 2015
Htohh Preferred LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies39.92%Oct 27, 2021
Indiana Hospice Dfw, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies6.25%Oct 27, 2021
Indiana Hospice Dfw Two, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies6.25%Oct 27, 2021

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.14% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 79.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 29 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 46214, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.