Hearth Record

Paradigm Health

A hospice in Indianapolis, Indiana 46256

8904 Bash St, Suite B, Indianapolis, Indiana 46256. (317) 735-6001.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 31 hospices serving ZIP code 46256 had 5.5.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 13, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 13, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 27 (Patients #4, 13, 17) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patients #4, 13, 17: There was no evidence of an initial spiritual care assessment being completed by any discipline.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 161 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #3: On 12/05/25, the patients spouse and facility staff called stating that patient was experiencing symptoms of a UTI. Augmentin was ordered and called in, however, there was no visit made, and no follow up on infection or new medication until 12/11/25. In the meantime, on 12/7/25, the facility called stating patient fell but there was no injury followed by a call from the facility the next day on 12/8/25 stating they needed antibiotic cream for abrasions on face received from fall the day prior. No visit that day and no follow up visit or phone call until 12/11/25.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 557 words

    “Upon patient record review, 9 of 27 (Patient #2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 16) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #2: The patient is on Melatonin, however there are no interventions or goals on the POC for sleep. The patient has Music Therapy, however there is no POC with interventions or goals for the Music Therapist. The patient is on several medications for constipation, however, there is no evidence of interventions or goals in the POC for constipation. Patient #3: The patient has been prescribed Boost as a nutritional supplement. There is no evidence of interventions or goals for use of supplements in a nutritional POC. The patient is on Melatonin, however there are no interventions or goals on the POC for sleep. The patient has Music Therapy, however there is no POC with interventions or goals for the Music Therapist. Patient #4: The patient is prescribed phenylephrine for cough, there is no evidence of interventions or goals for cough on the POC. The patient is on service for intestinal cancer. They are prescribed Loperamide and Zofran for GI upset - there is no evidence of interventions or goals for GI disturbance on the POC. Patient #5: The patient is taking Seroquel and Sertraline for depression. There is no evidence of interventions or goals related to depression on the POC. The patient is on Melatonin, however there are no interventions or goals on the POC for sleep. Patient #7: The patient has Music Therapy, however there is no POC with interventions or goals for the Music Therapist. Patient #8: The patient is on service with Cirrhosis. The patient is receiving warfarin. Although there is a bleeding precautions POC, there is no evidence of interventions or goals for education on the use of anticoagulants. The patient is a full code, however there is no evidence of interventions or goals regarding advanced directives. The patient is on Melatonin, however there are no interventions or goals on the POC for sleep. Patient #12: This patient is on service for ALS. She has DME including a Trilogy ventilator, a suction machine, and a cough assist. There is no evidence of interventions or goals for these DME items. In addition, there is no evidence of interventions or goals for cough included on the respiratory POC. The patient has a peg tube. There are interventions and goals for the peg tube, however there is no evidence of interventions or goals for the site care ordered for the peg tube. Patient #14: The patient is on service with pulmonary fibrosis and has a nebulizer with nebulized medications. There is no evidence of interventions or goals related to use of a nebulizer on the POC. Patient #16: The patient is on service for Senile degeneration of the brain and co-morbidity of Lewy bodies dementia. The patient is prescribed Zyprexa, citalopram, and Trazadone for depression and anxiety. There is no evidence of interventions or goals for depression or anxiety on the POC.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 27 (Patients #5, 12) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #5: On 12/28/25, the facility nurse called stating patient was experiencing nosebleeds. The orders were to discontinue aspirin. There was no update to the POC. Patient #12: On 12/23/25, spouse called stating the patient was experiencing increased gas and bloating. New medications ordered, including Simethicone. There was no update to the POC.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The Volunteer services equaled 1.4% in Quarter #1 of 2025. The total in Quarter #2 was 2.4%. The total in Quarter #3 was 1.52%, and the total for Quarter #4 was 2.004%.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 13, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies cited
Jan 8, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 12, 2014.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 40% at home, 32% in assisted living, 27% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.5%
Visits near death97.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Plc Acquisition, LLC owns 100% directly since Jun 21, 2021.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Andrew Worswick (managing employee (on the payroll), 1.6%); Jenna Grimes (managing employee (on the payroll), 0.9%); Jessica Nagel (managing employee (on the payroll), 0.4%); Deshini Moonesinghe (managing employee (under contract)); Deshini Moonesinghe (corporate director, 0%); Danielle Tucker (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Plc Acquisition, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jun 21, 2021
Plc Intermediate, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 21, 2021
Plc Hc I, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 21, 2021
Cc Plc Splitter, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies40.9%May 6, 2025
Cc Plc Blocker, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies40.9%May 6, 2025
Cressey & Company Fund VII-A LPOwns 5% or more through other companies40.2%May 6, 2025
Cressey & Company Fund VII LPOwns 5% or more through other companies33.6%May 6, 2025
Cc Plc Buyer, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies33.6%May 6, 2025
Havencrest Healthcare Partners II, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies20.7%May 6, 2025
New York State Teachers’ Retirement SystemOwns 5% or more through other companies5.5%May 6, 2025
Cressey & Company Gp VII LPOwns 5% or more through other companies5.1%May 6, 2025
Plc Employee Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies4.6%May 6, 2025
Cressey & Company LPOwns 5% or more through other companies0%May 6, 2025

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.65% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 81.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 31 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 46256, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.