Hearth Record

Elara Caring

A hospice in Indianapolis, Indiana 46278

7820 Innovation Blvd, Suite 150a, Indianapolis, Indiana 46278. (317) 537-1140.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 18 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

18 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 20 hospices serving ZIP code 46278 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 25, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

18 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

18 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 19, 2024: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care1 deficiency
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 4:The medical record include documentation that the patient had a port-a-cath in place in the left chest and that the patient required Plavix and aspirin for use as anticoagulation therapy. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions for management of the port-a-cath or the risk of bleeding.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

Oct 2, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 4 of 19 (Patient #1, 3, 12, 13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 1 admitted 7/14/24, initial spiritual assessment completed on 8/4/24. Patient 3 admitted 5/13/24, initial spiritual assessment completed on 5/20/24. Patient 12 admitted 8/15/24, initial spiritual assessment completed on 8/21/24. Patient 13 admitted 8/29/24, initial spiritual assessment completed on 9/4/24.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #10, 14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 10, 14 no evidence of an initial spiritual assessment.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 341 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 19 (Patient #1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1 Nursing visits 9/19/24 and 9/26/24 oxygen in the home. No evidence of oxygen on the medication profile. Miralax on the medication profile, no evidence of a diluent or mixing instructions. Patient 2 Nursing visit on 9/9/24 documented the use of Morphine, no evidence of Morphine on the medication profile. Nursing visit on 9/16/24 documented the use of Zofran and Lorazepam, no evidence of Zofran or Lorazepam on the medication profile. Patient 5 Oxygen DME and oxygen precautions included on initial plan of care, no evidence of oxygen on the medication profile. Patient 7 Miralax on the medication profile, no evidence of a diluent or mixing instructions. Initial plan of care includes oxygen DME and oxygen precautions, no evidence of oxygen on the medication profile. Patient 8 Initial plan of care includes oxygen DME and oxygen precautions, no evidence of oxygen on the medication profile. Tylenol 325mg 2 tab Q6h prn and Tylenol 650mg sup Q6h on the medication profile, no evidence of a 4000 mg max daily dosage. Patient 10 Miralax on the medication profile, no evidence of a diluent or mixing instructions. Nursing visits 8/23/24, 8/27/24, 9/3/24, 9/13/24, 9/17/24 and 9/24/24 document the oxygen is safely stored, no evidence of oxygen on the medication profile. Patient 14 Tylenol 325mg 2 tab Q6h prn, Hydrocodone/Tylenol 5mg/325mg 1 Q4h prn, and Hydrocodone/Tylenol 5mg/325mg 2 at bedtime, no evidence of a 4000 mg max daily dosage. Oxygen is on the medication profile at 2LPM, nursing visit on 9/6 documents 4LPM, 9/11 documents 5LPM, 9/18 documents 3 and 4LPM, and 9/25 and 9/26 document 4LPM.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 5 admitted on 1/11/24, initial bereavement risk assessment completed on 2/27/24.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 132 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #3, 10, 11, 14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 3, 14 on Aspirin, no evidence of bleeding precautions. Patient 10 Nursing visits 8/23/24, 8/27/24, 9/3/24, 9/13/24, 9/17/24 and 9/24/24 document the oxygen is safely stored, no evidence of a care plan for oxygen usage or safety. Patient 11 oxygen is ordered, no evidence of a care plan for oxygen usage or safety.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 306 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 19 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1 Nursing visits 9/19/24 and 9/26/24 oxygen in the home. No evidence of an order for oxygen. Miralax ordered, no evidence of a diluent or mixing instructions. Patient 2 Nursing visit on 9/9/24 documented the use of Morphine, no evidence of an order for Morphine. Nursing visit on 9/16/24 documented the use of Zofran and Lorazepam, no evidence of an order. Patient 3 Initial care plan includes 16fr foley. Nursing visit 9/3/24 documents 14fr foley, no evidence of an order for 14fr foley. Patient 5 Oxygen DME and oxygen precautions included on initial plan of care, no evidence of an order for oxygen usage. Patient 7 Miralax ordered, no evidence of a diluent or mixing instructions. Initial plan of care includes oxygen DME and oxygen precautions, no evidence of an order for oxygen. Patient 8 Initial plan of care includes oxygen DME and oxygen precautions, no evidence of an order for oxygen. Tylenol 325mg 2 tab Q6h prn and Tylenol 650mg sup Q6h ordered, no evidence of a 4000 mg max daily dosage. Patient 10 Miralax ordered, no evidence of a diluent or mixing instructions. Nursing visits 8/23/24, 8/27/24, 9/3/24, 9/13/24, 9/17/24 and 9/24/24 document the oxygen is safely stored, no evidence of an order for oxygen. Patient 14 Tylenol 325mg 2 tab Q6h prn, Hydrocodone/Tylenol 5mg/325mg 1 Q4h prn, and Hydrocodone/Tylenol 5mg/325mg 2 at bedtime, no evidence of a 4000 mg max daily dosage. Oxygen is ordered at 2LPM, nursing visit on 9/6 documents 4LPM, 9/11 documents 5LPM, 9/18 documents 3 and 4LPM, and 9/25 and 9/26 document 4LPM.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 138 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #2, 4, 9, 10, 11) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 2 documented use of a wheelchair, no evidence of an order for wheelchair DME. Patient 4 nursing visit 5/18/24 documents rollator walker in use, no evidence of an order for rollator walker. Patient 9 nursing visit on 9/17/24 documented Broda chair ordered, no evidence of an order for Broda chair DME. Patient 10 Nursing visits 8/23/24, 8/27/24, 9/3/24, 9/13/24, 9/17/24 and 9/24/24 document the oxygen is safely stored, no evidence of an order for oxygen DME. Patient 11 nursing visit 9/4/24 documented Broda chair ordered, no evidence of an order for Broda chair DME.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 170 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #1, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 1 has an active care plan for music therapy, no music therapist is seeing the patient. Current care plan includes goal that the wound will heal by 11/6/23. Nursing visits document Oxygen in the home, and use of nebulizers. No active care plan for respiratory of oxygen usage or safety. Patient 8 social work discontinued on 9/5/24 and the care plan remains active. Patient 9 social work discontinued on 9/8/24 and the care plan remains active. Patient 10 social work discontinued on 9/8/24 and the care plan remains active. Patient 11 social work discontinued on 8/25/24 and the care plan remains active. Patient 14 care plan includes spiritual care and aide for ADL care plans, SC and the aide are not seeing the patient.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 141 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #2, 3, 6, 12, 14) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 2 social worker completed phone visits on 8/19/24 and 8/23/24, no evidence of an order for phone visits. Patient 3 prn nursing visit 9/13/24 documents foley removed and not replaced, no evidence of an order to remove the foley. Patient 6 social worker completed phone visit on 9/17/24, no evidence of an order for phone visits. Patient 12 nursing frequency on initial plan of care ordered as 2w1, 1w12. Nursing prn visit completed on 9/29/24, no evidence of an order for prn nursing visits. Patient 14 order on 8/15/24 effective 9/1/24 for SW frequency of 2w1, 2every2w6w, no evidence of visits the week of 9/1/24.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient 1, during surveyor visit the Chaplain placed his tablet and Hymnal on the patient’s chair without a barrier and without cleaning the chair or devices during the visit.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 155 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #15, 16, 17) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient 15 -30 day letter due 4/6/24 and sent on 5/16/24. Patient 16 sympathy card due 2/27/24 sent on 5/16/24. 30 day letter due 3/22/24, sent 5/16/24. 60 day letter due 4/21/24, sent 5/16/24. Patient 17 -90 day letter due 4/26/24 sent 5/23/24. 180 day letter due 7/25/24 sent 8/12/24.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 247 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #2, 3, 5, 8, 11, 12) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 2 aide care plan did not include bleeding precautions. Aide care plan included full sponge bath and shower every visit. Patient 3 on Aspirin, no evidence of bleeding precautions on the aide care plan. Patient 5 aide care plan did not have evidence of bleeding, aspiration, or oxygen precautions. Patient 8 aide care plan does not include aspiration or oxygen precautions. Patient 11 no evidence of aspiration precautions on the aide care plan. Patient 12 aide care plan includes shower every visit patient may not want shampoo every visit, nail care check every visit clean/file if needed, change linen per facility protocol-patient at home from 8/31/24-9/29/24, and companionship as needed; frequency not specific for each task.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 216 words

    “Upon patient record review 5 of 19 (Patient #3, 4, 5, 9, 11) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 3 aide care plan included shampoo 1x week on the first visit of the week. Aide visits on 9/4/24, 9/12/24, 9/17/24, 9/18/24, 9/19/24, 9/20/24, 9/23/24, 9/24/24, 9/26/24, 9/27/24 document shampoo completed. Patient 4 aide care plan includes shampoo every visit, and bathing every visit. Aide visit on 9/3/24 documented partial bed bath given, and 9/21/24 documented shampoo not needed today’s visit. Patient 5 aide visits were completed with 2 aides for each visit, no evidence of an order or care plan for 2 person assist for each visit. Patient 9 aide care plan included ear care 1x week on Friday, hair care 1xw on Friday, shampoo 1xw on Monday, linen 1xw on Tuesday. All of these tasks were completed 2xw on Monday/Wednesday from 9/9/24 to current. Patient 11 aide visits were completed with 2 aides for each visit, no evidence of an order or care plan for 2 person assist for each visit.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1, 3, 5, 6) did not have evidence that each patient record contains responses to medications, symptom management, treatments, and services. Patient 1 nursing visit on 9/19/24 documents wound care to buttock provided per orders, no evidence of how the patient tolerated the wound care. Patient 3 nursing visits on 9/3/24, 9/19/24, 9/23/24, 9/26/24 document wound care provided, no evidence of how the patient tolerated the wound care. Patient 5 nursing visit on 8/27/24 documented skin tear right hip ordered, followed, no evidence of how the patient tolerated the care provided. Patient 6 Nursing visits on 8/30/24, 9/4/24, 9/13/24, 9/16/24, 9/23/24 documented wound care provided, no evidence of how the patient tolerated the wound care.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 228 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #1, 3, 5, 6, 9, 12) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1 nursing visit on 9/19/24 documents wound care to buttock provided per orders, no evidence of the detail of the wound care provided. Nursing visit 9/13/24 documents aide supervision completed, no evidence of an aide ordered. Patient 3 nursing visits on 9/3/24, 9/6/24, 9/19/24, 9/23/24, 9/26/24 document wound care provided per orders and do not document the detail of the wound care provided. Patient 5 nursing visit on 8/27/24 documented skin tear right hip ordered, followed, no evidence of the detail of the care provided. Patient 6 nursing visits on 8/30/24, 9/13/24, 9/16/24, 9/23/24, 9/27/24 documented wound care per orders, no evidence of the detail of wound care provided. Nursing visit on 9/16/24 documented aide supervision, no evidence of an aide ordered. Patient 9 had an active order for suction but no evidence that suction was needed, corrected with an order to discontinue suction. Patient 12 nursing visits on 8/15/24, 9/18/24, 9/25/24 document oxygen is safely stored, there is no oxygen in use.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 7 order on 7/31/24 for SW frequency effective 8/6/24 of 1w1, 1every2w8. No evidence of a visit the week of 9/1, and visits completed 9/12 and 9/16.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 25, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Nov 19, 2024Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care1 deficiency cited
Oct 2, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 23, 2015.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 75% at home, 9% in assisted living, 15% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.7%
Visits near death91.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Great Lakes Acquisition Corp. owns 100% directly since Apr 20, 2015.
  • 17 owners or officers are people: Brian H Black (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Daniel R Manley (corporate officer); Ananth P Mohan (corporate officer); Scott A Powers (corporate officer); Scott A Powers (corporate director); Scott A Powers (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Christina M Blasi (corporate director); John Mcmahon (corporate officer); Amy L Barker (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Katie L Monastiere (managing employee (on the payroll)); Elizabeth S Swanson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Hugh B Mcbride (corporate director); Henry Mannix (corporate director, 0%); Mark Pacala (corporate director); Adam M Blumenthal (corporate director); Jeremy Michael Kogler (corporate director); Church M Moore (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
GL Holding Corp.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 20, 2015
Bw Homecare Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Elara Holdings, L.L.C.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 30, 2019
Great Lakes Acquisition Corp.Owns 5% or more directly100%Apr 20, 2015
Bw GL Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 8, 2016
Bw Nhhc Holdco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 8, 2016
Gl Superholding Corp.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 20, 2015
Bw Nhhc Co-Invest, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies42.85%Jul 1, 2023
Kia Ix (Hh) Investor, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies40.27%Jul 1, 2023
Kelso Hh Co-Investment, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies19.2%Dec 30, 2019
Kelso Investment Associates Ix, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies15.68%Dec 30, 2019
Blue WOLF Capital Fund III L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies11.13%Jul 1, 2023
Bw III Homecare Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies11.13%Jul 1, 2023
Stepstone H Opportunities Fund, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies8.78%Dec 30, 2019
Stepstone K Strategic Opportunities Fund II L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.48%Dec 30, 2019
Ironsides Direct Investment Fund IV, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies4.94%Dec 30, 2019
Uss-Constitution Co-Investment Fund II, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies4.94%Dec 30, 2019
Kep VI LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies4.52%Dec 30, 2019

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 84% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 67.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 20 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 46278, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 18.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.