Elara Caring
A hospice in Indianapolis, Indiana 46278
7820 Innovation Blvd, Suite 150a, Indianapolis, Indiana 46278. (317) 537-1140.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 18 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 3of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
18 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 20 hospices serving ZIP code 46278 had 6.
The last inspection on record was on Sep 25, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
18 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Nov 19, 2024: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care1 deficiency
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 130 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 4:The medical record include documentation that the patient had a port-a-cath in place in the left chest and that the patient required Plavix and aspirin for use as anticoagulation therapy. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions for management of the port-a-cath or the risk of bleeding.”
Oct 2, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies
-
IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)
“Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
“Upon patient record review 4 of 19 (Patient #1, 3, 12, 13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 1 admitted 7/14/24, initial spiritual assessment completed on 8/4/24. Patient 3 admitted 5/13/24, initial spiritual assessment completed on 5/20/24. Patient 12 admitted 8/15/24, initial spiritual assessment completed on 8/21/24. Patient 13 admitted 8/29/24, initial spiritual assessment completed on 9/4/24.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))
“Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #10, 14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 10, 14 no evidence of an initial spiritual assessment.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 341 words
“Upon patient record review, 7 of 19 (Patient #1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1 Nursing visits 9/19/24 and 9/26/24 oxygen in the home. No evidence of oxygen on the medication profile. Miralax on the medication profile, no evidence of a diluent or mixing instructions. Patient 2 Nursing visit on 9/9/24 documented the use of Morphine, no evidence of Morphine on the medication profile. Nursing visit on 9/16/24 documented the use of Zofran and Lorazepam, no evidence of Zofran or Lorazepam on the medication profile. Patient 5 Oxygen DME and oxygen precautions included on initial plan of care, no evidence of oxygen on the medication profile. Patient 7 Miralax on the medication profile, no evidence of a diluent or mixing instructions. Initial plan of care includes oxygen DME and oxygen precautions, no evidence of oxygen on the medication profile. Patient 8 Initial plan of care includes oxygen DME and oxygen precautions, no evidence of oxygen on the medication profile. Tylenol 325mg 2 tab Q6h prn and Tylenol 650mg sup Q6h on the medication profile, no evidence of a 4000 mg max daily dosage. Patient 10 Miralax on the medication profile, no evidence of a diluent or mixing instructions. Nursing visits 8/23/24, 8/27/24, 9/3/24, 9/13/24, 9/17/24 and 9/24/24 document the oxygen is safely stored, no evidence of oxygen on the medication profile. Patient 14 Tylenol 325mg 2 tab Q6h prn, Hydrocodone/Tylenol 5mg/325mg 1 Q4h prn, and Hydrocodone/Tylenol 5mg/325mg 2 at bedtime, no evidence of a 4000 mg max daily dosage. Oxygen is on the medication profile at 2LPM, nursing visit on 9/6 documents 4LPM, 9/11 documents 5LPM, 9/18 documents 3 and 4LPM, and 9/25 and 9/26 document 4LPM.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 5 admitted on 1/11/24, initial bereavement risk assessment completed on 2/27/24.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 132 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #3, 10, 11, 14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 3, 14 on Aspirin, no evidence of bleeding precautions. Patient 10 Nursing visits 8/23/24, 8/27/24, 9/3/24, 9/13/24, 9/17/24 and 9/24/24 document the oxygen is safely stored, no evidence of a care plan for oxygen usage or safety. Patient 11 oxygen is ordered, no evidence of a care plan for oxygen usage or safety.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 306 words
“Upon patient record review, 8 of 19 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1 Nursing visits 9/19/24 and 9/26/24 oxygen in the home. No evidence of an order for oxygen. Miralax ordered, no evidence of a diluent or mixing instructions. Patient 2 Nursing visit on 9/9/24 documented the use of Morphine, no evidence of an order for Morphine. Nursing visit on 9/16/24 documented the use of Zofran and Lorazepam, no evidence of an order. Patient 3 Initial care plan includes 16fr foley. Nursing visit 9/3/24 documents 14fr foley, no evidence of an order for 14fr foley. Patient 5 Oxygen DME and oxygen precautions included on initial plan of care, no evidence of an order for oxygen usage. Patient 7 Miralax ordered, no evidence of a diluent or mixing instructions. Initial plan of care includes oxygen DME and oxygen precautions, no evidence of an order for oxygen. Patient 8 Initial plan of care includes oxygen DME and oxygen precautions, no evidence of an order for oxygen. Tylenol 325mg 2 tab Q6h prn and Tylenol 650mg sup Q6h ordered, no evidence of a 4000 mg max daily dosage. Patient 10 Miralax ordered, no evidence of a diluent or mixing instructions. Nursing visits 8/23/24, 8/27/24, 9/3/24, 9/13/24, 9/17/24 and 9/24/24 document the oxygen is safely stored, no evidence of an order for oxygen. Patient 14 Tylenol 325mg 2 tab Q6h prn, Hydrocodone/Tylenol 5mg/325mg 1 Q4h prn, and Hydrocodone/Tylenol 5mg/325mg 2 at bedtime, no evidence of a 4000 mg max daily dosage. Oxygen is ordered at 2LPM, nursing visit on 9/6 documents 4LPM, 9/11 documents 5LPM, 9/18 documents 3 and 4LPM, and 9/25 and 9/26 document 4LPM.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 138 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #2, 4, 9, 10, 11) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 2 documented use of a wheelchair, no evidence of an order for wheelchair DME. Patient 4 nursing visit 5/18/24 documents rollator walker in use, no evidence of an order for rollator walker. Patient 9 nursing visit on 9/17/24 documented Broda chair ordered, no evidence of an order for Broda chair DME. Patient 10 Nursing visits 8/23/24, 8/27/24, 9/3/24, 9/13/24, 9/17/24 and 9/24/24 document the oxygen is safely stored, no evidence of an order for oxygen DME. Patient 11 nursing visit 9/4/24 documented Broda chair ordered, no evidence of an order for Broda chair DME.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 170 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #1, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 1 has an active care plan for music therapy, no music therapist is seeing the patient. Current care plan includes goal that the wound will heal by 11/6/23. Nursing visits document Oxygen in the home, and use of nebulizers. No active care plan for respiratory of oxygen usage or safety. Patient 8 social work discontinued on 9/5/24 and the care plan remains active. Patient 9 social work discontinued on 9/8/24 and the care plan remains active. Patient 10 social work discontinued on 9/8/24 and the care plan remains active. Patient 11 social work discontinued on 8/25/24 and the care plan remains active. Patient 14 care plan includes spiritual care and aide for ADL care plans, SC and the aide are not seeing the patient.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 141 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #2, 3, 6, 12, 14) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 2 social worker completed phone visits on 8/19/24 and 8/23/24, no evidence of an order for phone visits. Patient 3 prn nursing visit 9/13/24 documents foley removed and not replaced, no evidence of an order to remove the foley. Patient 6 social worker completed phone visit on 9/17/24, no evidence of an order for phone visits. Patient 12 nursing frequency on initial plan of care ordered as 2w1, 1w12. Nursing prn visit completed on 9/29/24, no evidence of an order for prn nursing visits. Patient 14 order on 8/15/24 effective 9/1/24 for SW frequency of 2w1, 2every2w6w, no evidence of visits the week of 9/1/24.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient 1, during surveyor visit the Chaplain placed his tablet and Hymnal on the patient’s chair without a barrier and without cleaning the chair or devices during the visit.”
-
Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 155 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #15, 16, 17) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient 15 -30 day letter due 4/6/24 and sent on 5/16/24. Patient 16 sympathy card due 2/27/24 sent on 5/16/24. 30 day letter due 3/22/24, sent 5/16/24. 60 day letter due 4/21/24, sent 5/16/24. Patient 17 -90 day letter due 4/26/24 sent 5/23/24. 180 day letter due 7/25/24 sent 8/12/24.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 247 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #2, 3, 5, 8, 11, 12) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 2 aide care plan did not include bleeding precautions. Aide care plan included full sponge bath and shower every visit. Patient 3 on Aspirin, no evidence of bleeding precautions on the aide care plan. Patient 5 aide care plan did not have evidence of bleeding, aspiration, or oxygen precautions. Patient 8 aide care plan does not include aspiration or oxygen precautions. Patient 11 no evidence of aspiration precautions on the aide care plan. Patient 12 aide care plan includes shower every visit patient may not want shampoo every visit, nail care check every visit clean/file if needed, change linen per facility protocol-patient at home from 8/31/24-9/29/24, and companionship as needed; frequency not specific for each task.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 216 words
“Upon patient record review 5 of 19 (Patient #3, 4, 5, 9, 11) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 3 aide care plan included shampoo 1x week on the first visit of the week. Aide visits on 9/4/24, 9/12/24, 9/17/24, 9/18/24, 9/19/24, 9/20/24, 9/23/24, 9/24/24, 9/26/24, 9/27/24 document shampoo completed. Patient 4 aide care plan includes shampoo every visit, and bathing every visit. Aide visit on 9/3/24 documented partial bed bath given, and 9/21/24 documented shampoo not needed today’s visit. Patient 5 aide visits were completed with 2 aides for each visit, no evidence of an order or care plan for 2 person assist for each visit. Patient 9 aide care plan included ear care 1x week on Friday, hair care 1xw on Friday, shampoo 1xw on Monday, linen 1xw on Tuesday. All of these tasks were completed 2xw on Monday/Wednesday from 9/9/24 to current. Patient 11 aide visits were completed with 2 aides for each visit, no evidence of an order or care plan for 2 person assist for each visit.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 123 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1, 3, 5, 6) did not have evidence that each patient record contains responses to medications, symptom management, treatments, and services. Patient 1 nursing visit on 9/19/24 documents wound care to buttock provided per orders, no evidence of how the patient tolerated the wound care. Patient 3 nursing visits on 9/3/24, 9/19/24, 9/23/24, 9/26/24 document wound care provided, no evidence of how the patient tolerated the wound care. Patient 5 nursing visit on 8/27/24 documented skin tear right hip ordered, followed, no evidence of how the patient tolerated the care provided. Patient 6 Nursing visits on 8/30/24, 9/4/24, 9/13/24, 9/16/24, 9/23/24 documented wound care provided, no evidence of how the patient tolerated the wound care.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 228 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #1, 3, 5, 6, 9, 12) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1 nursing visit on 9/19/24 documents wound care to buttock provided per orders, no evidence of the detail of the wound care provided. Nursing visit 9/13/24 documents aide supervision completed, no evidence of an aide ordered. Patient 3 nursing visits on 9/3/24, 9/6/24, 9/19/24, 9/23/24, 9/26/24 document wound care provided per orders and do not document the detail of the wound care provided. Patient 5 nursing visit on 8/27/24 documented skin tear right hip ordered, followed, no evidence of the detail of the care provided. Patient 6 nursing visits on 8/30/24, 9/13/24, 9/16/24, 9/23/24, 9/27/24 documented wound care per orders, no evidence of the detail of wound care provided. Nursing visit on 9/16/24 documented aide supervision, no evidence of an aide ordered. Patient 9 had an active order for suction but no evidence that suction was needed, corrected with an order to discontinue suction. Patient 12 nursing visits on 8/15/24, 9/18/24, 9/25/24 document oxygen is safely stored, there is no oxygen in use.”
-
Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 7 order on 7/31/24 for SW frequency effective 8/6/24 of 1w1, 1every2w8. No evidence of a visit the week of 9/1, and visits completed 9/12 and 9/16.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2025 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Nov 19, 2024 | Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 1 deficiency cited |
| Oct 2, 2024 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 17 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 23, 2015.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.9% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 75% at home, 9% in assisted living, 15% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 11.3 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 7.7% |
| Visits near death | 91.9% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Great Lakes Acquisition Corp. owns 100% directly since Apr 20, 2015.
- 17 owners or officers are people: Brian H Black (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Daniel R Manley (corporate officer); Ananth P Mohan (corporate officer); Scott A Powers (corporate officer); Scott A Powers (corporate director); Scott A Powers (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Christina M Blasi (corporate director); John Mcmahon (corporate officer); Amy L Barker (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Katie L Monastiere (managing employee (on the payroll)); Elizabeth S Swanson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Hugh B Mcbride (corporate director); Henry Mannix (corporate director, 0%); Mark Pacala (corporate director); Adam M Blumenthal (corporate director); Jeremy Michael Kogler (corporate director); Church M Moore (corporate director).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| GL Holding Corp. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Apr 20, 2015 |
| Bw Homecare Holdings LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | May 15, 2018 |
| Elara Holdings, L.L.C. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 30, 2019 |
| Great Lakes Acquisition Corp. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Apr 20, 2015 |
| Bw GL Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 8, 2016 |
| Bw Nhhc Holdco, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 8, 2016 |
| Gl Superholding Corp. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Apr 20, 2015 |
| Bw Nhhc Co-Invest, L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 42.85% | Jul 1, 2023 |
| Kia Ix (Hh) Investor, L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40.27% | Jul 1, 2023 |
| Kelso Hh Co-Investment, L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 19.2% | Dec 30, 2019 |
| Kelso Investment Associates Ix, L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 15.68% | Dec 30, 2019 |
| Blue WOLF Capital Fund III L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 11.13% | Jul 1, 2023 |
| Bw III Homecare Holdings, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 11.13% | Jul 1, 2023 |
| Stepstone H Opportunities Fund, L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 8.78% | Dec 30, 2019 |
| Stepstone K Strategic Opportunities Fund II L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 5.48% | Dec 30, 2019 |
| Ironsides Direct Investment Fund IV, L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 4.94% | Dec 30, 2019 |
| Uss-Constitution Co-Investment Fund II, L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 4.94% | Dec 30, 2019 |
| Kep VI LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 4.52% | Dec 30, 2019 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 84% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 67.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 20 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 46278, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 18.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Compassus-Indianapolis Metro | 5 |
| Accentcare Hospice and Palliative Care of Indiana | 0 |
| Elara Caring This hospice | 18 |
| St. Croix Hospice | 4 |
| Indiana University Health Hospice | 8 |
| Aseracare Hospice | 13 |
| Heartland Hospice (Indianapolis) | 23 |
| Gentiva III | 16 |
| Heart to Heart Hospice of Indianapolis LLC | 5 |
| Adoration Hospice | 16 |
| Traditions Health | 4 |
| Paradigm Health | 5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.