Hearth Record

Goshen Home Care and Hospice

A hospice in Goshen, Indiana 46526

1147 Professional Drive, Goshen, Indiana 46526. (574) 364-2700.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 15 hospices serving ZIP code 46526 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on May 7, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 7, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission6 deficiencies
  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 190 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 14 patient records reviewed, hospice services were not provided according the hospice plan of care. For HOS RRNHV #1 Spiritual Care Service visits were planned 2 times a month for 2 months however in review of the medical record there was no evidence that the Spiritual Counselor made a visit in the second month following the Election of the Hospice Benefit. Also, for HOS RRNHV #2 Spiritual Care Service visits were planned 1 time a month for 3 months and in review of the medical record there was no evidence that the Spiritual Counselor made a visit in the third month following the Election of the Hospice Benefit and documentation in the IDG notes stated that the Spiritual Counselor planned to increase visits to weekly, however there was no evidence of those visits. Finally, for HOS RRNHV #4 Social Work visits were planned 2 times a month however in review of the medical record there was only one visit made by the social worker in the second month following the Election of the Hospice Benefit. This was validated with the Hospice Team Lead.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 145 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization did not collaborate in the care of the patient and coordinate their efforts to support the goals outlined in the hospice plan of care. The organization did follow the Hospice Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) policy for HOS RRHV #2 that states any changes in the hospice plan of care are discussed with the patient and are approved by the hospice before implementation. In review of the inpatient record for HOS RRHV #2 who was receiving respite care the surveyor noted that the medications Zofran and Aspirin were included on the inpatient medication list and that there was a wound care order by the wound care nurse however there was no evidence of communication with or approval by the Hospice program. This was validated with the Inpatient Director of Nursing and Hospice Team Lead.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the patient record did not contain required clinical information including; any specific notes on care, treatment, or services specifically the hospice plan of care, and information required by organization policy, in accordance with law and regulation including the Election of Hospice Benefit and a list of medications. For HOS RRHV #2 who was receiving respite care there was no evidence that the in-patient medical record contained the required documentation including the Certification of Terminal Illness (CTI), the Interdisciplinary Group Plan of Care, and medication list. This was validated with the Inpatient Director of Nursing and the Hospice Team Lead.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 326 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the surveyor noted that the contracted DME had stored oxygen tanks in the home unsecured. During the survey visit for HOS RRHV #4 the daughter who was the primary caregiver reported that the DME had delivered the oxygen concentrator and back up oxygen which was standing and unsecured without a stand. This was validated with the Hospice RN. Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization had not provided education based on the patient’s assessed needs. In review of the medical record for HOS RRHV #1 the patient’s spouse contacted the after hours on call number at 1:30 a.m. reporting the patient was unresponsive and he wanted to know about giving the next dose of Morphine and Lorazapam. The husband was instructed to HOLD the dose. During the survey visit the patient was observed to become restless and the husband reported to the MSW that the patient had not had any medication since 9:00 p.m the previous evening as he understood the directions from the On Call service were to not give any more medication. The RN who was on the survey visit as an observer educated the husband on the use of the prn comfort medications and told him that the Hospice nurse would be visiting that afternoon and would go over the medications with them. In review of the medical record for the skilled nursing visit on that date there was no documentation or evidence that education had been provided to the husband on management of the patient’s medications. Also, in review of the medical record for HOS RRNHV #3 there was an order for the patient to begin Augmentin to treat a respiratory infection however, in review of the Skilled Nursing Visit note there was no evidence that the RN had provided teaching/education to the patient regarding the medication. This was validated with the Hospice Team Leader.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care for respite purposes (42 CFR 418.108(b)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 158 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization had not provided care, treatment, or services according to the patient’s individualized plan of care. For HOS RRHV #2 who was receiving respite care on the inpatient unit care was not provided according to hospice plan of care. In review of the inpatient medical record the patient was receiving Zofran and Aspirin which were not part of the Hospice Plan of Care. Additionally, the inpatient unit was not following the Hospice Plan of Care for wound care to the right buttock which were to cleanse with soap and water, pat dry, apply zinc cream. In review of the inpatient record there was an order by the Wound Care RN for a foam dressing. There was no evidence in the medical record of communication/coordination between the inpatient unit and the Hospice program. This was validated with the CNO and Director of Nursing for the inpatient unit.”

    Rule L0710. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 165 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, there was no evidence in the inpatient medical record of the patient’s most recent hospice plan of care, the patient’s hospice election form, the physician certification of terminal illness, information on the hospice medications for the patient and orders from the hospice physician and attending physician, for the patient. In review of the medical record for HOS RRHV #2 who was on respite care there was documentation in the Hospice program medical record that the required documents had been provided to the in patient unit however there was no evidence of the required documents or documentation that the documents were received. In conversation with the Hospice RN and the Inpatient Director of Nursing they reported that there was not a process in place to share medical information and coordinate care.In conversation with the Hospice RN and the Inpatient Director of Nursing that a process was in place to share medical information and coordinate care.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 7, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 15, 1994.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 66% at home, 6% in assisted living, 27% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11%
Visits near death94.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Goshen Hospital Association Inc. owns 100% directly since Apr 17, 1986.
  • 5 owners or officers are people: Rebecca Simmons (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Randal Christophel (corporate officer); Jennifer M Eiler (corporate officer); Lisa A Orn (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kate Shultz (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Goshen Hospital Association Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Apr 17, 1986

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 92% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.7% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 66.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 15 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 46526, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.