Hearth Record

Aseracare Hospice

A hospice in Valparaiso, Indiana 46383

808 Vale Park Road, Suite 200, Valparaiso, Indiana 46383. (219) 462-6398.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 14 hospices serving ZIP code 46383 had 9.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 25, 2024: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 25, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that the hospice had developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions: Patient #8: SOC 06/28/24.The RN visit report dated 07/02/2024 reflected that the patient had a “port in the right jugular and subclavian vein, that is not accessed and open to air.” This port was present at time of admission. However was not present on the most recent IDG plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #4,14) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #4: A volunteer evaluation was conducted on 06/25/24, and a subsequent volunteer visit was made. However the plan of care did not include a scope for the planned volunteer interventions. Patient #14: Patient was currently receiving volunteer services at time of survey. However, there was no documented scope or frequency for such volunteer services on the most recent IDG plan of care for this discipline.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #9) did not contain documented evidence that a Registered Nurse had made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs: Patient #9: An aide supervisory visit was conducted on 06/11/24. The next supervisory visit was not conducted until 06/28/24.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Upon observation, there was not documented evidence that the Hospice’s use of Volunteers, providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services, is an amount that at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid Hospice employees and contract personnel: The Administrator provided their 2023 calendar-year Volunteer report, which totaled 0.01%. A PIP was reviewed/revised 04/30/2024. The Volunteer percentages for calendar-year 2024 so far are: 1) January 0.49%; 2) February 0.31%; 3) March 0.41%; 4) April 0.28%; and 5) May 045%. The Hospice continues to hold biweekly meetings to include the Regional Volunteer Coordinator and Director or OPs related to ongoing Volunteer recruitment and utilization needs.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #16) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, that the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: A copy of the hospice discharge summary. Patient #16: Patient was discharged on 03/21/24. There was no documented evidence of a discharge summary having been completed.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

Jul 17, 2024: complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 193 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to include all medications necessary to meet the needs of the patient on the plan of care in 1 of 1 patient that resided in a skilled nursing facility (Patient #5). Findings include: A revised policy dated 06/14/2023, titled, “;Medication Management Policy,” indicated medication reconciliation would be done at admission, recertification, and when a new medication was ordered. A revised policy dated 06/30/2023, titled, “;Hospice Plan of Care,” indicated the plan of care would include drugs including the dose for medication, frequency and duration. A Visit Note Report dated 06/21/2024, for Patient #5 indicated the Patient had a lidocaine patch (pain reliever) to the right knee for complaints of pain. An Updated Plan of Care dated for the benefit period 06/07/2024 – 09/04/2024 failed to include the use of the lidocaine patch. During an interview on 07/17/2024, beginning at 12:50 PM, the Administrator indicated if a new medication was noted, the hospice nurse should have reconciled medications with the nursing facility, notified the hospice physician and updated the plan of care but the lidocaine patch was not on the plan of care medication list.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 294 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure physician orders were included in the clinical record for 2 of 2 clinical records reviewed with a foley catheter (tube into bladder to drain bladder) (Patient #1, #5). Findings include: 1. The policy titled “;Hospice Plan of Care” with revised date 06/30/2023, indicated the plan of care would include the treatments necessary to meet the needs of the patient. 2. The clinical record for Patient #1, included an Updated Plan of Care for the benefit period 04/11/2024 – 07/09/2024, that indicated the skilled nurse was to perform insertion and maintenance of a 16 French Foley catheter and change every month and as needed. A. A nurse visit note dated 07/09/2024, indicated the nurse patients foley was changed and placed an 18 French coude catheter. B. A clinical record review failed to include an order for the change in the foley, catheter size and type of catheter. C. During an interview on 07/17/2024, beginning at 12:18 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 indicated the order for the change of the Foley catheter type and size should have been written and updated to the plan of care and he/she did not write the physician order. 3. The clinical record for Patient #5 included an Updated Plan of Care for the benefit period 06/07/2024 – 09/04/2024, which indicated the skilled nurse was to insert/maintain patients catheter. A. A Visit Note Report dated 06/18/2024 indicated the Patient had a foley catheter. B. The clinical record failed to include an order for a foley catheter, size, and the frequency of change required. C. During an interview on 07/17/2024, beginning at 12:18 PM, RN 1 indicated the plan of care should include orders for a foley catheter type and size.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 188 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the plan of care delineated the care and services to be provided, specifically which provider was responsible for performing each function in 1 of 1 clinical record reviewed that resided in a skilled nursing facility (Patient #5). Findings include: The policy titled “;Hospice Plan of Care,” last revision date 6/030/2023, indicated the plan of care would include education for the patient and primary caregiver to their responsibility for the care and services identified in the plan of care. A Visit Note Report dated 03/09/2024, for Patient #5 indicated the Patient resided at entity 6, a skilled nursing facility, and was dependent for all activities of daily living. The Plan of Care for the benefit period 6/07/2024 to 9/04/2024, with last Interdisciplinary Team Plan of Care update, dated on 7/10/2024, failed to evidence the specific delineation of care between the skilled nursing facility and the hospice staff. During an interview on 07/17/2024, beginning at 12:50 PM, the Administrator indicated the delineation of care between the skilled nursing facility and the hospice was not on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 25, 2024Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies cited
Jul 17, 2024Complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 29, 2006.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 17.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 40% at home, 15% in assisted living, 46% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day17.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.8%
Visits near death95.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Homecare Preferred Choice, Inc. owns 100% directly since Dec 29, 2006.
  • 12 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Marcus Macip (corporate director); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Bridget R Kaigler (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bridget R Kaigler (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer); Lynn Criggley (managing employee (on the payroll)); Lynn Criggley (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Kristina J Braud (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kristina J Braud (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jeanne Shingleton (corporate officer); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 14, 2025
Amedisys Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 29, 2020
Amedisys Hospice, L.L.C.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 29, 2020
Amedisys Holding LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 29, 2020
Homecare Preferred Choice, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 29, 2006

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 75% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 76% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 79% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 52 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 14 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 46383, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.