Hearth Record

Dunes Hospice LLC

A hospice in Valparaiso, Indiana 46383

4711 Evans Avenue, Valparaiso, Indiana 46383. (888) 602-9004.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 21 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

21 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 14 hospices serving ZIP code 46383 had 9.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 17, 2024: a complaint inspection by the state.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

21 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

21 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 20, 2024: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #2) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #2: There is evidence in the record of a spiritual assessment completed on paper by the admission nurse which identified a spiritual problem for the patient; Fear and/or anxiety of dying with goals and interventions. The spiritual problem was not included on the Plan of Care on the computerized record and there is no evidence of follow up by the IDG regarding the spiritual problem. There is no evidence in the record that the spiritual problem: Fear and/or anxiety of dying was resolved. (Corrected on site.)”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #2) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient #2: There is evidence in the medical record that the plan of care contained a PRN frequency order for the Social Worker. SW visit PRN frequency: SW to see patient 1X month in July 2024, then 2X month beginning August 2024. Which is not a detailed statement of the scope and frequency to meet the patient’s individual needs. (Corrected on site.)”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patient #1, 3) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: The Plan of Care has a duplicate medication on 7/20/24 for MiraLAX 17 gm by mouth mixed with 8 oz. water or juice once daily as needed. Corrected on site.) Patient #3: The Plan of Care contains Baqsimi 3mg/actuation spray. Instill 3 mg in nostril PRN for low blood sugar. There is not indication of the blood sugar at which the drug should be given. (Corrected on site.)”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #1) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #1: There is evidence in the medical record of a nurse’s note of 8/6/24 “to address on going skin concerns, wheelchair pad requested from Dunes”. There is no evidence of an order for wheelchair pad. (Corrected on site.)”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 5 (Patient #5) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #5: There is evidence in the medical record on 7/25/24 the HHA noted “patient has small open area in vaginal area orange cream applied.” No creams are listed on the HHA plan of care.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

Jun 27, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care16 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Hospice aide and homemaker services (42 CFR 418.76)

    “Condition of Participation: Hospice Aide and Homemaker Services. L607”

    Rule L0607. Condition-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 140 words

    “Upon patient record review 12 of 23 (Patient #4,9,10,11,12,13,15,16,17,19,21,22) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 9,16,17: The medical record does not contain an MSW or SC assessment with in 5 days. Pt refused MSW and SC and there is no evidence in the comprehensive assessment the RN completed the social services or spiritual assessment. Patient 4,10,12,13,15,19,21,22: The medical record does not contain evidence of a SC assessment completed with in 5 days and SC was refused. There is no evidence the nurse completed the assessment with in 5 days. Patient 11: The medical record does not contain evidence of a SC assessment completed with in 5 days.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 179 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 23 (Patient #1,2,6,23) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: Patient 1: The medication profile contains orders for ES Tylenol, Colace. The facility did not have these medications on their MAR. The facility MAR contained Aplisol, Loperamide, Senna and these were not included in the hospice medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The Hospice medication profile 6/12/24 contains an order for Levothyroxine 112mcg, the facility MAR has Levothyroxine 137mcg updated on 4/4/24. Medication profile 6/12/24 has acetaminophen 325 and Senna orders. The facility MAR does not contain these medications. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medication profile contains an order for Lorazepam 0.5ml Q2 hours prn, the facility MAR has give 0.25ml Q2 hours prn. The medication profile has fleets enema, the facility MAR does not contain this order. Corrected on site. Patient 23: The medication profile 6/19/23 contains Polyethylene Glycol with no diluent.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 194 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 23 (Patient #9,10,14,17) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 9: The POC contains evidence of pt having a G tube. There is no care plan included on the POC for a G tube. Pt is receiving comfort feedings and there is no risk for aspiration care plan included on the POC. Corrected on site. Patient 10: Pt is taking Eliquis, has an open wound and there is no evidence of a risk for bleeding care plan. Corrected on site. Patient 14: The POC contains evidence pt is diabetic and receiving insulin. There is no endocrine care plan on the POC. Corrected on site. Patient 17: The POC contains evidence pt is diabetic, on Glipizide and there is no endocrine care plan on the POC. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 20 of 23 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: Patients 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20: The most recent POC’s contain orders for SN 2 times a week and 2 prn weekly for symptom control which is not a detailed statement of the scope and frequency to meet individual patient needs.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 276 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 23 (Patient #1,2,6,7,10,19,21,23) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The POC contains orders for ES Tylenol, Colace. The facility did not have these medications on their MAR. The facility MAR contained Aplisol, Loperamide, Senna and these were not included in the hospice POC. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The Hospice POC 6/12/24 contains an order for Levothyroxine 112mcg, the facility MAR has Levothyroxine 137mcg updated on 4/4/24. POC 6/12/24 has acetaminophen 325 and senna orders. The facility MAR does not contain these medications. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The POC contains an order for Lorazepam 0.5ml Q2 hours prn, the facility MAR has give 0.25ml Q2 hours prn. The POC has fleets enema, the facility MAR does not contain this order. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The POC 6/19/24 contains an order “Cleansing with solution” does not indicate type of solution Patient 10: POC 6/19/24 contains part of an order “Cleanse with SN, pat dry”. The order should have said NS. Patient 19: POC 2/21/24 contains order for “Insert/maintain 16F foley catheter, change foley catheter as needed for occlusion/dislodgement, Irrigate foley prn to maintain patency”. There is no balloon size or directive of what or how much to irrigate with or how often it may be irrigated. Corrected on site. Patient 21: The POC 6/14/23 contains an order for SN 2 times per week starting 6/9/23. The EOB is for start of care 6/10/23. Patient 23: The POC 6/19/23 contains Polyethylene Glycol with no diluent.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 207 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 23 (Patient #1,2,4,13,14,15,17) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: Upon home visit finding the pt has a floor fall mat that was not ordered on the POC. Corrected on site. Patient 2: Upon home visit finding the pt has a floor fall mat, heel protectors, hoyer lift these items were not ordered on the POC. Corrected on site. Patient 4: Upon observation pt has heel protectors on. These were not included on the POC. Corrected on site. Patient 13: SN documented 5/13 “pt ambulated to bathroom with wheeled walker”. There is no wheeled walker on the POC. Corrected on site. Patient 14: SN documented “Pt ambulated using a rollator assistive device to living room”. There is not order for a rollator on the POC. Corrected on site. Patient 15: SN documented “pt is Hoyer lift at all times” on 5/6/24. There is no order on the POC for the Hoyer lift. Corrected on site. Patient 17: SN documented on 6/11/24 “pt uses wheelchair to ambulate”. There is no order for a wheelchair. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 294 words

    “Upon client record review, 4 of 23 (patient #4,12,16,21) did not have evidence in the patient record that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 4: The POC contains orders for MSW 1 within 5 days and twice a month. The medical record contains evidence of visits by the MSW on 4/4,4/26,5/23, 6/13. There was not evidence of any refusals. Patient 12: On 6/10/24 the SN documented “writer wraps with Coban and kerlix to help with edema and on 5/28/24 “legs cleansed with wound wash, Aquaphor applied, wrapped with kerlix and Coban”. There is no evidence of an order for this wound care. Corrected on site. Patient 16: The POC 5/8/24 contains order for “Cleanse with saline, pat dry, apply Z guard and cover with Optifoam. Change twice weekly with hospice RN visit and as needed if visible soiled”. On 6/24/24 the SN documented “Optifoam dressing right hip clean, dry, intact”. There is no evidence the dressing was changed during the hospice nurses visit as ordered or that the facility nurse had performed the dressing change. The SN documented 6/24/24 “Pt has a band aid on right knee, band aid removed, wound cleansed and dressing applied” There is no order for this dressing. Received order 6/26/24 for care of the knee. Patient 21: The POC 6/14/23 contains an order for SN 2 times per week starting 6/9/23 Pt was not admitted until 6/10/23. The nurse visited the pt one time that week on 6/10/23 There was no second visit made that week, it was a Saturday. The week of 6/11-6/17 the pt was visited by the nurse on 6/13,6/15,6/16 with no evidence of visit being PRN or an order for the extra visit.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 23 (Patient #21,22,23) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: Patients 21,22,23: The Bereavement POC’s for the agency are all them same regardless of the patient’s bereavement risk level. They have Low, average, moderate and high risk and the POC’s remain the same for the bereavement follow up. There is no evidence the bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 275 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 23 (Patient #3,5,6,7,10,11,17) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: Patient 3: The aide POC 6/6/24 contains documentation by the SN “pt and/or caregiver are cognitively able to make decisions in personal care”. The patients Hospice Dx is End Stage Alzheimer’s. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The aide POC 4/3/24 contains documentation by the SN “pt and/or caregiver are cognitively able to make decisions in personal care”. The patients Hospice Dx is End Stage Alzheimer’s. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The aide POC 4/17/24 has an order to change linens 3x a week and PRN and “pt and/or caregiver are cognitively able to make decisions in personal care”. The patients Hospice Dx is End Stage Alzheimer’s. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The aide POC 4/22/24 contains documentation by the SN “pt and/or caregiver are cognitively able to make decisions in personal care”. The patients Hospice Dx is End Stage Alzheimer’s. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The aide POC has orders for aide 3 times per week. The aide tasks are ordered to be completed 7 times a week. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The aide POC 4/29/24 contains documentation by the SN “pt and/or caregiver are cognitively able to make decisions in personal care”. The patients Hospice Dx is End Stage Alzheimer’s. Corrected on site. Patient 17: The aide POC 5/9/24 contains documentation by the SN “pt and/or caregiver are cognitively able to make decisions in personal care”. The patients Hospice Dx is End Stage Alzheimer’s. The aide POC contains an order for change linens weekly and PRN. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 454 words

    “Upon patient record review 8 of 23 (Patient #3,6,7,8,9,10,13,17) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: Patient 3: The Aide POC 6/6/24 contains orders for a shower twice a week. There is evidence the aide showered the pt on 6/17,6/19,6/21 and 6/10,6/12,6/14 with no evidence of communication with the RN for the extra showers those weeks. Patient 6: The aide documented the pt refused linen change on May 28,29,30 and May 7,8,10 the pt’s diagnosis is Alzheimer’s there is no evidence the aide spoke with the nurse or caregiver to verify if the linens needed changed. The aide POC contains an order for a bath 2 times per week. The aide documented that a bath was given May 28,29,30 and May 7,8,10. There is not evidence the aide called to obtain an order to give the bath the third time those weeks. Patient 7: The aide documented on 5/31/24 “pt requested we shave face”. This was not included on the aide POC and pt has dementia. Patient 8: The aide POC has ordered task of change linens 3 times per week. There is no evidence the aide changed the linens on visits 5/13,5/28,5/29,5/31. The task was omitted from their documentation. Note at the bottom of their documentation states “notified nurse of visit”. Patient 9: Aide POC 5/14/24 contains orders for visits 3 times per week. The week of May 12-18 aide visited the 15 & 16, the week of May 26-June 1 the aide visited 28,29,30,31. There was no evidence of an order for the extra visit and no evidence of an refusal for the missed visit. Bed bath was ordered 2 times per week. The aide gave a bath all four visits the week of May 26-June 1. The bottom of the documentation aide documented “notified nurse of visit”. Patient 10:The aide documented 6/18/24 they shaved the pt. On 6/11, 6/14 the aide gave a back rub. These were not ordered on aide POC, pt is taking Eliquis. The bottom of the documentation aide documented “notified nurse of visit”. Patient 13: The aide POC has ordered tasks for 3 times a week for oral care, hair care and change linens. Aide visited June 18,19,21 and did not completed these tasks. They were omitted from their documentation, no refusal. The bottom of the documentation aide documented “notified nurse of visit”. Patient 17: The aide POC has orders for a bath twice weekly. The aide documented they gave a bath on June 10,12,14 in the same week. The aide’s documentation contains the ability to provide back rub and shave pt, these were documented as refused on June 12,21,24 they’re not ordered on the aide POC.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. Upon observation the agency’s volunteer hours for 2023 0.83%.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel #2 ) did not have evidence the alternate administrator’s personnel record verifies that: Personnel 2: The personnel file does not include a signed job description for this role. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 400 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 15 of 23 (Patient #1,2,4,5,7,9,10,12,13,15,16,18,19,20,21) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: The SN documented on 6/12/24 “EOL”. This is not an approved abbreviation. Patient 2: The SN documented 5/15/24 “Performed wound care to sacrum as ordered”. Patient 4: The SN documented on 6/6/24 “ML for Dr per family request”. This is not an approved abbreviation. Patient 5: The SN documented on 5/21/24 “EOL”. This is not an approved abbreviation. Patient 7: The SN documented 5/10/24 “To sacrum-cleansing with solution pat dry” and “inner thighs/abdominal fold-site cleansed”, “barrier cream to carry tissues”No evidence of what they cleansed with. Patient 9: On 5/22/24 SN documents the following unapproved abbreviations “Bkfst, dgtr, PU”. Patient 10: SN documented performing wound care on 6/11/24 though did not document how pt tolerated the wound care. On 6/4 “Dressing change to mid back wound care performed”, 5/31 “Dressing change per MD order”. Patient 12: The comprehensive assessment 4/30/24 the SN documented under cardiopulmonary “Oxygen as ordered”. Does not indicate how much oxygen the pt is using. Patient 13: The SN documented on 6/10/24 “EOL, OPTH, FN”. On 6/3 “LBM,FN, BLL”. These are not approved abbreviations. Patient 15: SN documented on 6/17/24 “wound care provided as ordered” and did not state how pt tolerated the wound care. The approved abbreviation for extended care facility is ECF, the nurse documented ecf on 6/17/24. On 5/21,5/28,6/3,6/10 the SN documented “Pt continues on daily nursing visits for wound care”. There is no order for daily nursing visits and the nurses are not visiting daily. Patient 16: The SN documented 6/17/24 “wound care provided” and on 5/29/24 “Performed wound care to right hip”. No evidence the SN followed POC. Patient 18: SN documented “FN”. This is not an approved abbreviation. Patient 19: The MSW documented 2/26/24 “EOL and cg”. These are not approved abbreviations. Patient 20: SN documented 4/29/24 and 4/26/24 “Wound care provided”. There is not evidence the order was followed. Patient 21: SN documented on 6/11/23 “U/A found patient lying supine...” and “right s/c”, 6/24/23 “Smit’s FH called” which is approved for family history and not approved as documented.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 332 words

    “Upon client record review, 8 of 23 (Patient #1,7,9,10,11,20,22,23) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 1: The POC 6/12/24 contains an order for SN 2 times per week. The SN made visits June 3,5,6 and there is evidence they were routine visits and not PRN. Patient 7: Pt has wound care orders to be completed by Hospice nurse each visit and facility nurse when hospice is not present. The hospice nurse visited pt 5/17/24 there was no documentation wound care was performed or had already been completed by facility nurse. Patient 9: SN documented 6/5/14 “Peg tube insertion site is free from infection, dressing became dislodged and was replaced”. There is no evidence of an order for the dressing on the POC. POC 5/15/24 “G tube to be flushed daily by facility staff”. There is no order for what or how much to flush the G tube with. There are no orders for site care or dressing changes. Corrected on site. Patient 10: SN documented 4/26/24,5/31/24, 6/4/24 “cleanse with wound wash, pat dry, apply Santyl, cover with foam”. The documentation is not past tense and the order was to wash with normal saline. Patient 11: The POC has MSW orders for 2 times per month. The MSW saw the pt one time in May on May 9. There is no evidence of a refusal of visit. Patient 20: The SN documented 4/26/24 “Pt transferred with use of Hoyer lift to hospice bed per writer and facility aide”. There is no order for a Hoyer lift. Patient 22: The SN documented 5/24/23 “Zinc oxide paste applied and small sacral dressing placed”. The order on POC 6/15/23, order date 6/6/23 is for coccyx and sacrum, cleanse with wound wash. Pat dry. Apply Zguard and cover with foam dressing. Change twice weekly by Hospice RN.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 17, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Aug 20, 2024Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies cited
Jun 27, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care16 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 9, 2015.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 17.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 37% at home, 33% in assisted living, 30% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day17.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.7%
Visits near death94.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Dunes Acquisition Co., LLC owns 100% directly since Jun 17, 2025.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Susan Marberry (corporate officer, 100%); Jeffery S Bonham (corporate officer, 100%); Jeffery S Bonham (corporate director, 100%); Kathy Poland (corporate officer, 100%); Kathy Poland (corporate director, 100%); Chad Schuitema (managing employee (on the payroll)); Derek Scott Gasper (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
New Day Healthcare Intermediate LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 17, 2025
New Day Healthcare, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 17, 2025
New Day Healthcare Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 17, 2025
Dunes Acquisition Co., LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jun 17, 2025

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 95% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.17% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 70.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 14 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 46383, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 21.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.