Hearth Record

Columbus Hospice of Alabama

A hospice in Phenix City, Alabama 36867

1200 14th Street, Unit D, Phenix City, Alabama 36867. (334) 664-0075.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 12 hospices serving ZIP code 36867 had 9.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 5, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 16, 2024: recertification inspection by the state6 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 285 words

    “Based on review of medical records (MR), hospice policy and procedure, and staff interview it was determined the hospice failed to ensure a suicide risk assessment was conducted to assess the patient’s emotional needs related to the terminal illness. This deficient practice did affect 19 of 19 MR’s reviewed, including MR # 1, MR # 2, MR # 3, MR # 4, MR # 5, MR # 6, MR # 7, MR # 8, MR # 9, MR # 10, MR # 11, MR # 12, MR # 13, MR # 14, MR # 15, Home Visit (HV) # 1, HV # 2, HV # 3, and HV # 4 and had the potential to negatively affect all patient served by the hospice. Findings Include: Hospice Policy: Suicidal Precautions Policy Number: 14.60 Revised Date: 1/20/23 Purpose: To provide a continuous integrated process of patient assessment for those patients who may be suicidal. Elements: 1. A suicide risk assessment will be completed on all hospice patients during the initial social worker assessment.... 2. All clinical information will be assessed to determine emotional, mental, or situational factors thought to be associated with suicidal behaviors... Procedure: 1. The hospice social worker will complete a suicide risk assessment... Review of the initial social worker assessment for 19 of 19 MR’s reviewed revealed no documentation a suicide risk assessment had been conducted as directed per policy. Review of MR # 1, MR # 5, MR # 9, and MR # 14 revealed documentation the patient had a history of depression. An interview was conducted on 5/16/24 at 2:13 PM with Employee Identifier # 1, Nurse Director, who confirmed there was no suicide risk assessment conducted as directed in hospice policy.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 439 words

    “Based on review of Medical Records (MR), hospice policy and procedure, and staff interview it was determined the hospice staff failed to obtain physician orders for wound care and document the specific wound care provided. This deficient practice did affect two of ten MR’s review with a wound, including MR # 1 and MR # 14, and had the potential to affect all patient’s who required wound care. Findings include: Hospice Policy: Physician Orders Policy Number: 27.27 Revised Date; 3/13/23 Purpose: To have a consistent, uniform, and dependable method for obtaining physician orders in accordance with patient’s plan of care. ...Procedure: 1. All physician orders must be complete. Complete physician orders should include the following: ...b. Wound care order - the location of the wound, type of wound cleanser, medication if applicable, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change. 2. MR # 14 was admitted to the hospice on 2/2/24 with diagnoses including Heart Disease with Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation. Review of the nursing notes dated 2/5/24 and 2/12/24 revealed the nurse performed wound care to a wound on the left lower leg. There was no documentation of the specific wound care provided. Review of the Team Care Plan and Physician Orders dated 2/2/24 revealed no physician order for wound care to the left lower leg. An interview was conducted on 5/16/24 at 3:17 PM with EI # 9, Quality Safety Coordinator, who confirmed the nurse failed to obtain a physician’s order for wound care and document the specific wound care provided. 1. MR # 1 was admitted to the hospice on 3/21/24 with diagnoses including Fracture of Ramus of Left Pubis, Sequela and Alzheimer Disease. Review of the nursing note dated 3/21/24 revealed the nurse performed wound care for wounds to the left elbow, right inner elbow, right top of wrist, right lower arm, and right lower leg. There was no documentation of the specific wound care provided. . Review of the nursing note dated 3/28/24 revealed the nurse performed a wound care for wounds to the right lower leg, left forearm, and left upper arm. There was no documentation of the specific wound care provided. Review of the Team Care Plan and Physician Orders dated 3/21/24 to 3/28/24 revealed no physician order for wound care to the left elbow, right inner elbow, right top of wrist, right lower arm, right lower leg, left forearm, and left upper arm. An interview was conducted on 5/16/24 at 3:05 PM with Employee Identifier (EI) # 1, Nurse Director, who confirmed the nurse failed to obtain a physician’s order for wound care and document the specific wound care provided.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 269 words

    “Based on observation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Guidelines for Prevention of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections, 2009, and staff interview the hospice failed to ensure staff maintained clean technique when inserting an indwelling urethral catheter. This deficient practice did affect Home Visit (HV) # 4, one of one observations conducted for the insertion of a indwelling urethral catheter. Findings include: CDC Guidelines for Prevention of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections, 2009 Update Date: June 6, 2019 ...II. Proper Techniques for Urinary Catheter Insertion. ...D. In the non-acute care setting, clean (i.e., non-sterile) technique for intermittent catheterization is an acceptable and more practical alternative to sterile technique for patients requiring chronic intermittent catheterization... III. Proper Techniques for Urinary Catheter Maintenance ...1. If breaks in aseptic technique...replace the catheter...using aseptic technique and sterile equipment... 1. HV # 4 was admitted to the hospice on 6/17/23 with a diagnosis of Liver Cirrhosis. Review of the POC dated 4/17/24 revealed a physician’s order to change an indwelling urethral catheter as needed. A home visit was conducted on 5/14/24 at 3: 28 PM with Employee Identifier (EI) # 5, Registered Nurse, to observe the change of a indwelling urethral catheter. EI # 5 inserted the new indwelling urethral catheter two thirds of the length of the catheter into the patients urethra, then fully removed the catheter, and reinserted the same catheter back into the urethra for a second time. An interview was conducted on 5/16/24 at 2:15 PM with EI # 1, Director, who confirmed failed to maintain clean technique when inserting the indwelling urethral catheter as directed by the CDC.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Nursing services (42 CFR 418.64(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 305 words

    “Based on review of medical records (MR), hospice policy and procedure, and interviews it was determined the agency failed to ensure the hospice nurse notified the physician for the pronounce of the death. This did affect, MR # 5, one of three death at home MR’s reviewed and had the potential to affect all patients admitted to this hospice. Findings include: Hospice Policy: Pronouncement of Death/Telecommunication for Pronouncement of Patient Death Policy Number: 10.00 Revised: 1/31/24 ...Purpose: To provide guidelines for pronouncement of death of hospice patients in both Georgia and Alabama. ...Procedures for patients at home: Upon arrival at the residence the nurse will observe the death scene and the position of the body in death. The nurse will also: a. Check for the cessation of cardiopulmonary function b. Check for pupil response. ...4. In Alabama, once satisfied that the death was the result of natural causes: a. Notify the physician via telephone and report the findings of death, to include the absence of the signs of life and the time the RN (Registered Nurse) observed those findings. The physician, via telecommunication, will issue the pronouncement of death... 1. MR # 5 was admitted on 9/13/23 with a diagnosis of Closed Fracture of Right Femur, Sequala. Review of the Skilled Nursing Clinical Notes dated 10/4/23 revealed Employee Identifier (EI) # 6, RN, documented MR # 5 was found lying in bed with no pulse, no respirations, no blood pressure, pupils fixed and dilated and the coroner was notified. There was no documentation EI # 6 notified the physician to report the findings of death and no documentation of the pronouncement of death by the physician. An interview was conducted on 5/16/24 at 3:15 PM with EI # 1, Director, who confirmed MR # 5 was at home in Alabama at the time of death.”

    Rule L0591. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 903 words

    “Based on review of medical records (MR), hospice policy and procedure, and interviews, it was determined the hospice failed to ensure the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA, Hospice Aide) followed plan of care, visit frequency, and documented the specific care provided to the patient. This affected five of 12 MR’s reviewed of patients receiving HA services including Home Visit (HV) # 3, MR # 6, MR # 7, HV # 4, and MR # 9 and had the potential to affect all patient requiring aide services. Findings include: Hospice Policy: CNA Plan of Care Policy Number: 8.00 Revised: 2/16/24 Purpose: To provide a plan for the CNA to follow for each patient assigned to their care... Procedure... 8. The CNA must follow the plan of care as written... 9. The CNA will document completion of assigned tasks from the plan of care in the EMR (Electronic Medical Record) during the visit. If a task cannot be completed, the reason why must be indicated in the record. 5. MR # 9 was admitted to the hospice on 4/4/24 with a diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease with Hypertension. Review of the POC dated 4/4/24 revealed orders for CNA services three times a week for one week beginning 4/4/24 then two times a week for one week beginning 4/17/24 then three times a week for ten weeks beginning 4/22/24. Review of the CNA visit notes revealed no documentation a visit was completed during week one which was 4/8/24 to 4/14/24. A review of the CNA visit notes dated 4/19/24 to 5/3/24 revealed 10 out of 11 visits the CNA failed to document the specific care provided during the visit. An interview was conducted on 5/16/24 at 1:41 PM with EI # 1 who confirmed there were no documentation a CNA visit was performed for the week of 4/4/24 and the CNA failed to document the specific care provided during the visits. 4. HV # 4 was admitted to the hospice on 6/17/23 with a diagnosis of Liver Cirrhosis. Review of the POC dated 4/15/24 revealed orders for CNA two times a week for eight weeks and a CNA POC with the following interventions: Take BP (blood pressure) every visit. Notify RN for systolic over 180 or under 90, diastolic over 100 or under 50. Take pulse every visit. Notify RN if pulse over 104 or under 50. Take respirations every visit. Notify RN of respirations less than 16 or over 30. Take temperature every visit. Notify RN of temperature over 100. Record BM each visit if no BM x 3 days notify RN. Review of the CNA visit notes dated 4/12/24 to 6/10/24 revealed the CNA failed to document the patient’s BP, pulse, respirations, and temperature on 21 of the 21 CNA visit notes reviewed. Further review of the CNA visit notes dated 4/12/24 to 6/10/24 revealed the CNA failed to document the date of the last BM on 18 of the 21 CNA visit notes reviewed. An interview was conducted on 5/16/24 at 3:00 PM with EI # 1 who confirmed the staff failed to follow the POC and document the patient’s vital signs and date of the last BM. 1. HV # 3 was admitted to the hospice on 11/7/23 and recertified from 2/5/24 to 5/2/24 with a diagnosis of Heart Disease. Review of the Plan of Care (POC) dated 2/5/24 revealed orders of CNA three times a week for 13 weeks. Review of the Team Care Plan dated 2/5/24 revealed CNA POC Interventions including for the CNA to record the bowel movement (BM) each visit and if no BM for three days to notify the Registered Nurse (RN). Review of the CNA visit notes from 2/5/24 to 5/13/24 revealed the CNA failed to document the date of the last BM on 39 of 43 visit notes reviewed. An interview was conducted on 5/16/24 at 1:52 PM with Employee Identifier (EI) # 1, Director, who confirmed the staff failed to follow the POC and document the date of the last BM. 2. MR # 6 was admitted to the hospice on 12/11/23 and recertified from 3/10/24 to 6/7/24 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease. Review of the CNA POC dated 3/10/24 revealed orders for CNA seven times a week for 12 weeks beginning 3/11/24, record BM each visit, and notify RN if no BM for three days. Review of the CNA visit notes from 3/11/24 to 5/6/24 revealed the CNA failed to document the date of the last BM on 47 of the 56 CNA visit notes reviewed. An interview was conducted on 5/16/24 at 3:00 PM with EI # 8, Compliance Officer, who confirmed the staff failed to follow the POC and document the date of the last BM each visit. 3. MR # 7 was admitted to the hospice on 4/19/24 with a diagnosis of Heart Disease. Review of the POC dated 4/19/24 revealed orders for CNA two times a week for 11 weeks beginning 4/19/24. Review of the CNA visit notes revealed no documentation a visit was completed during week one which was 4/19/24 to 4/21/24. Review of the physician’s orders and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Meeting notes revealed no documentation of the reason for missed visits. An interview was conducted on 5/16/24 at 2:38 PM with EI # 8 who confirmed there were no CNA visits completed during week one and there was no documentation the physician was notified of the missed visit.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 357 words

    “Based on review of the Medical Record (MR), hospice policies and procedures, and staff interview it was determined the hospice nurse failed to document the medications administered to flush an implanted port. This did affect MR # 13, one of one MR’s reviewed with an implanted port, and had the potential to negatively affect all patients with an implanted port. Findings include: Hospice Policy: Intravenous (IV) Line Management Policy Number: 27.35 Revised Date: 1/30/23 Purpose: To establish clinical guidelines for the management of IV lines in hospice patients. Elements: ...2. Care of IV lines will include.. flushes to maintain patency. Procedure: ...Implanted Ports: ...b. An implanted device should be accessed and flushed every thirty days when not in use. Flush with 10 ml (milliliters) of 0.9 % Sodium Chloride (Normal Saline) or with 5 ml of 10 Units/ml Heparin solution... assess the patient’s pain tolerance and discuss the preference for using a local anesthetic before accessing the port. ...Document the procedure... Hospice Policy: Medication Administration and Management Policy Number: 27.24 Revised Date: 12/3/21 Purpose: To ensure that medications are provided and administered correctly according to physician orders... and patients’ plans of care... Procedure: ...2. When a hospice employee is administering any medication to the patient, the medication name, strength, dose, route, date, and time will be documented in the record. MR # 13 was admitted to the hospice on 5/1/24 with diagnoses including Lung Cancer Metastatic to Brain and History of Left Breast Cancer. Review of the Plan of Care dated 5/7/24 revealed an order to flush the venous access device with Normal Saline (NS) and Heparin and the patient was to apply Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream 2.5-2.5% prior to the flush. Review of the nurse note dated 5/7/24 revealed “Implanted port flushed per policy...” There was no documentation of the medication name, strength, and dose used to flush the implanted port. Further review revealed no documentation if the patient had applied the Lidocaine-Prilocaine cream to the site. An interview was conducted on 5/16/24 at 2:50 PM with Employee Identifier # 8, Compliance Officer, who confirmed the nurse failed to document the medications administered to flush an implanted port.”

    Rule L0672. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 5, 2024Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
May 16, 2024Recertification inspection by the state6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 23, 2004.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 98% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 79% at home, 3% in assisted living, 14% in a nursing facility, 4% in an inpatient hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.4%
Visits near death98.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Donna L Morgan (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Susanna S Ulmer (managing employee (on the payroll)); Donna A Onley-Harden (managing employee (on the payroll)); Travis Blanton (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 94% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 94% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 92.61% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 76.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 36867, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.