Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Columbus, Georgia 31904

700 Brookstone Centre Parkway, Suite 100, Columbus, Georgia 31904. (706) 653-0835.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 15 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

15 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 10 hospices serving ZIP code 31904 had 7.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 3, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

15 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

15 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 3, 2026: complaint inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Based on review of policy titled “Governing Body,” review of records, family and staff interview, it was determined the governing body failed to assume authority and responsibility for the management and day-to-day operation of the agency. Specifically, the governing body failed to provide supplies for one patient (P)(P1) of three patients reviewed. Findings included: Cross refer to L0652 relating to Services.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Services (42 CFR 418.100(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 365 words

    “Based on review of policy titled “Durable Medical Equipment and Supplies,” review of records, family and staff interview, it was determined the agency failed to provide medical supplies based on the health care needs of the patient. Specifically, the agency failed to provide supplies for one patient (P)(P1) of three patients reviewed. Findings included: Review of the policy titled “Durable Medical Equipment and Supplies,” revised 12/23/2025, reveals the following:PurposeTo ensure that equipment and supplies are provided for Hospice patients based on assessed health care needs.Procedure:1. As part of the Comprehensive assessment, the patient will be assessed as to the medical equipment being used within the home. Included in the assessment is the identification of the Durable Medical Equipment (DME) company providing the equipment. Review of clinical record for P1 revealed a Hospice certification and Plan of Care dated 10/29/2025 with an order for management of tracheostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the neck to facilitate breathing), inner cannula (removable tube inside a tracheostomy tube that helps maintain a clear airway) size 6.5 to be changed daily. Review of supply orders failed to reveal the delivery of inner cannulas from 10/29/2025. The first documentation for delivery of inner cannulas is on 11/18/2025. Delivery confirmation noted delivery of 30-8.0 mm Shiley inner cannulas. Chart review for P1 revealed nurse note dated 01/15/2026, nurse narrative stating ” Pt [family member] states that respiratory therapist has not been to their house nor have they received any respiratory supplies from (the facility) since admission.” A phone interview was conducted on 06/02/2026 at 9:44 AM with the family of P1 who stated ”The issue I have with (the facility) is that they could not get the inner cannula for the trach, and every time I called to check on the status of the trach supplies, they always had an excuse.” An in-person interview was conducted on 06/03/2026 at 9:30 AM with the Executive Director who confirmed that tracheostomy supplies were ordered for P1 on 11/14/2026 and delivered on 11/18/2026. The Executive Director stated that the agency had to add the tracheostomy supplies to the Durable Medical Equipment (DME) contract prior to being able to order the inner cannulas.”

    Rule L0652. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jan 30, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #1) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 1: Patient elected to receive SC evaluation at the time of admission. The record indicates that the spiritual assessment was not completed within 5 calendar days following the election of hospice. Patient was admitted on 10/07/2024. Spiritual assessment completed on 10/16/2024, 9 days after election.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 5: Duplicate drug therapy: The medication profile contained 2 listings of Nystatin 100,000 units/ml dated 08/20/23 and 01/05/25 that were active in the profile. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 132 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #1,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 1: No evidence that a bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of the election of hospice. Patient admitted on 10/07/2024, assessment completed on 01/28/2025. Patient 8: No evidence that a bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of the election of hospice. Patient admitted on 08/18/2024, assessment completed on 10/16/2024.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 163 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #11,12) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient 11: No evidence that an RN assessed the patient as the condition required but no less frequently than every 15 days. The record indicates that there were 17 days between RN assessments 12/23/2024 and 01/09/2025. Patient 12: No evidence that an RN assessed the patient as the condition required but no less frequently than every 15 days. The record indicates that there were 17 days between RN assessments 12/10/2024 and 12/27/2024.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 7: The record indicates that patient developed a DTI on 10/09/2024. No evidence that the wound has been measured since 12/13/2024. Wound remains active in the wound chapter, the plan of care has active wound care orders. Gentiva policy is for wounds to be measured weekly.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 184 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #8,9,13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 8: Patient current takes Phenobarbital and Dilantin for seizures. Seizures listed as related diagnosis. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to seizures included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 9: Patient has type 2 diabetes listed as a related diagnosis. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to diabetes included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 13: Plavix 75mg as a blood thinner and has a history of GI hemorrhage. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to safety for risk for bleeding included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 125 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #1,13) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The record indicates that patient had a wound at the time of admit that was deactivated in the wound chapter on 10/28/2024. No evidence that an order was received to take the wound care supplies off the current POC supply list. Corrected on site. Patient 13: Wound supplies were listed on the patient active plan of care supply list. No evidence that the patient had a wound at the time of admit or at any time during the current benefit period. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 414 words

    “Upon patient record review 4 of 19 (Patient #1,4,6,13) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 1: The record indicated that the aide plan of care has orders for the aide to provide nail care and shampoo weekly with the visit frequency of 3 visits a week. Aide documentation showed that those task were performed at multiple visits for the following weeks: Twice for the weeks of 12/15/24 (12/16 and 12/18), 12/22/2024 (12/23 and 12/26), and 01/13/2024 (01/13 and 01/15). Three times for the week of 01/05/2024 (01/06, 01/08, and 01/10). Also for this patient the record indicated that the aide plan of care has visit frequency ordered 3 times a week. No evidence that 3 visits occurred for the week of 12/23/24. Documentation shows visits were completed on 12/23 and 12/26. No missed visit noted or an order to decrease the visits for that week. Patient 4: Aide plan of care has visit frequency ordered as 3 times a week. No evidence that 3 visits occurred for the week of 12/2/24. Documentation shows visits were completed on 12/5 and 12/6. No evidence that the missed visit was at the request of the patient/caregiver or physician order entered to decrease visits for that week. Patient 6: Aide plan of care has visit frequency ordered as 3 times a week. No evidence that 3 visits occurred for the week of 11/10/24. No documentation to support that any aide visits were provided for that week. No evidence that 3 visits occurred for the week of 11/17/24. Documentation shows visits were completed on 11/21 and 11/22. No evidence that the missed visit was at the request of the patient/caregiver or physician orders entered to decrease visits for those weeks. Patient 13: The record indicated that the aide plan of care has orders for the aide to provide nail care and shampoo weekly with the visit frequency of 3 visits a week. Aide documentation showed that those task were performed at multiple visits for the following weeks: Twice for the weeks of 11/04/24 (11/5 and 11/8), 11/11/24 (11/11 and 11/15), 11/18/24 (11/25 and 11/27), 12/01/24 (12/02 and 12/06), 12/08/24 (12/09 and 12/13), 12/15/24 (12/16 and 12/20), 01/05/25 (01/06 and 01/10) and 01/12/25 (01/13 and 01/17).”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 104 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 3: The record indicated that patient has been receiving aide services since the time of admission. No evidence that a registered nurse made supervised visits every 14 days between 10/13/2024 and 11/02/2024 - 20 days between supervised visits.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #2: Family elected to receive the notice of Hospice Non-Covered Items at the time of admission 06/13/2024. No evidence that the responsible party had received a copy of the non-covered items at the time of survey.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 121 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 4: The record indicated that the aide entered a missed visit note on 10/16/2024 that was not completed, had no evidence of which physician/RN was notified that the visit was missed. The record indicated that the SC entered a missed visit note on 08/20/2024 that was not completed, did not include a reason why the visit was missed in the note.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 16 (Patient #16) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient 16: No evidence that a discharge summary was completed at the time of discharge.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 2: Plan of care has chaplain frequency as once a month. No evidence that the patient received a visit for the month of August, September, and October 2024. No evidence that the missed visits were at the request of the patient/caregiver or physician orders entered to skip visits for those month.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 3, 2026Complaint inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited
Jan 30, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 7, 1997.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 67% at home, 17% in assisted living, 9% in a nursing facility, 7% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.6%
Visits near death92.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Vista Hospice Care, LLC owns 100% directly since Aug 26, 1998.
  • Curo Health Services LLC runs it.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Sandi Filmore (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Jennifer Elizabeth Tyler (corporate officer); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Edward W Hamilton (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Odyssey Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 6, 2008
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 19, 2016
Odyssey Healthcare Holding CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 6, 2008
Vista Hospice Care, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Aug 26, 1998
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Vistacare LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 26, 1998
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)Jul 11, 2018

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 84% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 92.74% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 65.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 10 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 31904, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7.5; this one had 15.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.