Georgia Hospice Care
A hospice in Warner Robins, Georgia 31088
645 Tallulah Trail Ste 202, Warner Robins, Georgia 31088. (800) 932-2738.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 9 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
9 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 19 hospices serving ZIP code 31088 had 2.
The last inspection on record was on Aug 19, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
9 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Mar 25, 2026: complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 431 words
“Based on a review of policy titled “The Interdisciplinary Plan of Care,” record review, and staff and family interviews, it was determined that the agency failed to provide care to the patient in accordance with the plan of care for one patient (P) (P2) of five sampled patients. Findings included: Review of an undated policy titled “The Interdisciplinary Plan of Care,” No. 9-017 revealed the following:“Policy:The care provided to the patient must be in accordance with the plan of care.Procedure:10. Any change in the patient’s condition must result in a change in the plan of care, prior to implementation of the new service.14. Care provided to the patient will be in accordance with the plan of care.” Clinical record for P2 failed to reveal documentation of wound care according to Plan of Care. Chart review for P2 failed to reveal order for UNNA boot (a specialized, non-elastic compression bandage, containing zinc oxide and calamine). Review of clinical record revealed coordination notes report dated 01/07/2026 with nurse documentation stating, “Skin tear covered with ointment and a bandage.”Coordination notes report dated 01/23/2026 revealed “RN cleaned site, applied Neosporin, and applied a new bandage.Coordination notes report dated 01/26/2026 revealed “informed pt and son, pt will need to UNNA boot applied to extremity.”Coordination notes report dated 02/02/2026 revealed “writer cleansed the wound using wound cleanser. No dressing was on her leg when I arrived.”Coordination noted dated 02/03/2026 revealed “both areas cleaned with wound cleanser, pat dry applied UNNA boot to extremity. Instructed to keep BLLE elevated, and not to remove UNNA boot will be changed in one week.” On 03/25/2026 at 10:20 AM, a phone interview was conducted with License Practical Nurse (LPN) who recalled making multiple visits to see P2, and recalled providing wound care, The LPN stated that the patient needed a UNNA boot and that the agency did not have the supplies for the UNNA boot. The LPN stated the agency had to order the supplies. The LPN stated that the family of P2 bought the supplies for the boot. The LPN was unable to confirm if pictures or measurements were taken of the wounds and stated she could not remember what doctor she notified of the wounds and UNNA boot order. The LPN could not confirm putting in an order for the UNNA boot. An in-person interview was conducted on 03/25/2026 at 11:00 AM with the Area Vice President who confirmed that wound measurements were documented only once for P2 on the visit dated 02/02/2026. Area Vice President also agreed that there was no order for a UNNA boot for P2.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 331 words
“Based on review of policy titled “Ongoing Comprehensive Assessment,” review of records, family and staff interviews, it was determined the agency failed to ensure that care and services were provided in accordance with the plan of care for one patient (P) (P2) of five sampled patients. Specifically, the agency failed to obtain Partial Thromboplastin Time /International Normalized Ratio (PTT/INR-test that measures how fast a blood sample forms a clot) every Wednesday as ordered. Findings included: Review of an undated policy titled” Ongoing Comprehensive Assessment,” No. 1-016, revealed the following:“Procedure:1. During each home visit, the Registered Nurse or other discipline will evaluate the patient according to the care plan problems identified during the initial assessment and thereafter the comprehensive assessment.2. The nurse will assess each patient on each visit for: O. Compliance with treatments and medication regime5. Based upon the findings of the assessment, change/verbal orders will be obtained as needed and forwarded to the physician for signature.6. The physician will be notified to verify any changes in medications, including over-the -counter medications, and treatments/ interventions that require physician approval.” Review of records for P2 revealed a start of care (SOC) date of 10/31/2025, and discharge date of 02/08/2026. Review of records revealed a Hospice certification and Plan of Care dated 10/31/2025 with an order for hospice nurse to obtain Partial Prothrombin Time and International Normalized Ratio PTT/INR lab every Wednesday. Review of plan of care update dated 01/13/2026 revealed an order for hospice nurse to obtain PTT/INR every Wednesday. An in-person interview was conducted on 03/25/2026 at 11:00 AM with the Area Vice President who confirmed that there was an order in P2 chart for PTT/INR to be drawn every Wednesday. The Area Vice President also stated that she was only able to confirm the PTT/INR being checked two times and provided copies of the test results of first lab result dated 11/14/2025 and second on 01/26/2026. Additional weekly lab reports for Wednesday’s were not received prior to exit of survey.”
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
“Based on policies and procedures, record reviews, staff and family interviews, it was determined the agency’s governing body failed to ensure care provided had physician orders for one patient (P) (P2) of five sampled patients and the governing body failed to ensure nursing services were provided as ordered by the physician for one patient (P2) of five sampled patients. Findings included: Cross refer to L0545 relating to care plansCross refer to L0555 relating to Coordination of Services”
Feb 13, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner6 deficiencies
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 213 words
“It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care: reflects patient and family goals; [and] identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 19 (11%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the patient’s plan of care identified planned interventions based on problems identified in the comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 3: The patient elected hospice care on 03/15/2024 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The skilled nursing (SN) recertification assessment dated 10/22/2024 documented that the patient was using oxygen continuously at 3 liters (L) per nasal cannula (NC). The plan of care orders dated 11/01/2024 for the certification period dated 11/10/2024 through 01/08/2025 did not document planned interventions and goals addressing the patient’s use of oxygen. Clinical Record 14: The patient, a 13-year-old male, was admitted to hospice services on 01/16/2025 with the diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The SN’s initial comprehensive assessment dated 01/16/2025 documented that the patient complained of severe fatigue. The plan of care did not document interventions and goals to address the patient’s complaints of fatigue. The Manager of Compliance and Regulations confirmed findings after clinical record reviews on 02/11/2025.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 152 words
“It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care measurable outcomes anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. In 1 of 19 (5%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the patient’s plan of care included measurable outcomes anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care. Clinical Record 14: The patient, a 13-year-old male, was admitted to hospice services on 01/16/2025 with the diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The SN’s initial assessment documented the patient’s severe pain. The plan of care dated 01/16/2025 through 04/15/2025 documented the patient’s goal: “caregiver will demonstrate adequate knowledge of pain management.” The goal did not document measurable outcomes or parameters to measure the patient’s pain level. In an interview on 02/11/2025, the Manager of Compliance and Regulations confirmed that the plan of care did not include measurable outcomes.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 366 words
“It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care: includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including the following: drugs and treatment necessary to meet the needs of the patient. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 19 (16%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the patient’s plan of care included drugs and treatments necessary to meet the patient’s needs. Clinical Record 6: The patient elected hospice care on 01/19/2023 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). The skilled nursing (SN) recertification assessment dated 12/22/2024 documented, “recurrent stage 3 pressure ulcer to left hip, pressure ulcer being managed by the facility wound care team.” The plan of care dated 12/24/2024 did not include documentation of orders for wound care or orders for the SNF to manage the wound care. Clinical Record 14: The patient, a 13-year-old male, was admitted to hospice services on 01/16/2025 with the diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The SN’s initial comprehensive assessment dated 01/16/2025 documented, “Left chest port accessed with dressing intact with dried blood underdressing... the patient would be seen tomorrow for labs and possible transfusion.” The plan of care did not document interventions or orders to address the port. Clinical Record 15: The patient elected hospice care on 09/10/2024 with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction. An SN recertification assessment dated 11/25/2024 documented that the patient required a Foley catheter, which was in place, and a G-tube for tube feedings. The plan of care ordered: “The hospice nurse to provide instructions/ reinforcement related to urinary incontinence,” Isosource tube feedings, and medication routes per gastrostomy tube (G-tube). The plan of care dated 12/14/2024 through 03/13/2024 did not document orders or interventions for the care and maintenance of the Foley catheter or the G-tube. During a joint record review and interview on 02/11/2025, the Manager of Compliance and Regulation confirmed the finding and reported that the nurse forgot to push the orders through on the recertification plan of care. The Manager of Compliance and Regulations confirmed findings after chart reviews on 02/11/2025.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 663 words
“It is required that hospice aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse who is a member of the Interdisciplinary Group. Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by an RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 5 of 11 (45%) clinical records reviewed of patients receiving Hospice Aide services, the agency did not ensure that the Hospice Aide received patient care instructions that addressed all of the patient’s needs. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected hospice care on 05/12/2023 with a diagnosis of heart disease. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). The skilled nursing (SN) visit notes and SN assessment dated 02/10/2025 documented that the patient was a high fall risk and required a Hoyer lift. The plan of care dated 01/01/2025 through 03/01/2025 ordered HA services “1w1, 2w8” and documented equipment that included Mobility Aids -(Hoyer). The HA care plan, last updated on 10/23/2024, documented fall precautions, wheelchair-bound, and transfer assistance. The HA documented “DONE or complete” for fall precautions, wheelchair-bound, and transfer assistance for each visit, as noted on the care plan. The HA care plan did not document using the Hoyer lift for transfers. Clinical Record 6: The patient elected hospice care on 01/19/2023 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The patient resided in a SNF. The SN assessment dated 12/22/2024 documented that the patient had a stage 3 pressure ulcer and was bedbound. The HA care plans dated 10/28/2024 and updated 01/19/2024 assigned the HA the relevant task of providing a shower (the SNF had a special shower for bedbound patients) every visit but did not provide any direction to the HA related to the left hip area and how to manage the dressing should it become wet or soiled during the shower. Clinical Record 8: The patient elected hospice care on 01/13/2025 with a diagnosis of hemiplegia following a cerebral vascular accident. The SN assessment dated 01/13/2025 documented that the patient had a gastrostomy tube (G-tube), a Foley catheter, and a stage 2 pressure ulcer on their “bottom.” The HA care plan dated 01/13/2025 and updated 01/15/2025 assigned the HA the relevant task of bed bath. The HA care plan did not include documentation of instructions for the HA related to the care of the Foley catheter during personal care or the G-tube and wound dressings should they become soiled or dislodged during the bedbath. Clinical Record 12: The patient elected hospice care on 02/03/2025 with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the laryngeal cartilage. The plan of care ordered HA services “1w1,1w12.” The SN assessment dated 02/03/2025 documented that the patient had a new tracheostomy and a peg tube and was dependent on 5 liters (L) of oxygen per nasal cannula (NC). The HA care plan created by the RN on 02/03/2025 and updated on 02/04/2025 assigned the HA the relevant task of a bedbath. The HA care plan did not provide the HA with instructions related to the care of the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube and the tracheostomy dressings should they become soiled or dislodged during the bedbath. The HA care plan did not provide instructions for the patient’s use of oxygen during the bedbath. Clinical Record 13: The patient elected hospice care on 12/13/2024 with a diagnosis of memory deficit following a cerebral infarct. The plan of care ordered HA services “2w2, 3w7.” The SN assessment and plan of care dated 12/13/2024 ordered oxygen as needed (PRN) and documented that the patient was on fall and oxygen precautions. The HA care plan documented by the RN dated 12/13/2024 assigned the HA the relevant task of bedbath. The HA care plan did not provide the HA with instructions on the patient’s use of oxygen or fall precautions during personal care. During an interview on 02/13/2025, the Manager of Compliance and Regulations confirmed the findings.”
-
Professional management (42 CFR 418.112(b))
The inspectors’ words, 226 words
“It is required that the hospice is responsible for providing all hospice services to the residents/hospice patients including: ongoing assessment, monitoring, care planning, coordination, and provision of care by the hospice Interdisciplinary Group (IDG). This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 5 (20%) clinical records reviewed of patients residing in a skilled nursing facility (SNF), the agency did not ensure that the hospice was responsible for the ongoing assessment, monitoring, care planning, coordination, and provision of care by the hospice IDG. Clinical Record 6: The patient was elected hospice care on 01/19/2023 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The patient resided in a long-term care facility. The skilled nursing (SN) assessment dated 12/22/2024 documented that the patient had a stage 3 pressure ulcer on the left hip: “Pressure ulcer being managed by the facility wound care team.” A clinical record review revealed no evidence that the hospice IDG directed, coordinated, or supervised the patient’s wound care. The clinical record did not include documentation of descriptions of the wound. The plan of care did not include orders or interventions for the pressure wound. After a joint review of the clinical record on 02/11/2025, the Manager of Compliance and Regulations confirmed the findings and agreed that the plan of care should include orders for wound management.”
-
Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))
The inspectors’ words, 291 words
“It is required that hospice care of the patient/resident is stated in a written plan of care established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. The hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifies which provider is responsible for performing the functions that are agreed upon and included in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 5 (20%) clinical records reviewed of patients residing in a skilled nursing facility (SNF), the agency did not ensure that the hospice plan of care identified the care and services that were needed and specified which provider was responsible for performing the functions that were agreed upon and included in the plan of care. Clinical Record 6: The patient was elected hospice care on 01/19/2023 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The patient resided in a long-term care facility. The skilled nursing (SN) assessment dated 12/22/2024 documented that the patient had a stage 3 pressure ulcer on the left hip: “Pressure ulcer being managed by the facility wound care team.” The plan of care dated 12/24/2025 for the certification period 01/08/2025 through 03/08/2025 contained no orders for wound care or treatment of the stage 3 pressure ulcer. The plan of care contained one intervention: “prescribed medications will be administered by hospice/facility staff.” The plan of care did not document if the SNF or hospice was responsible for administering the patient’s medications or managing the pressure ulcer. After a joint review of the clinical record on 02/11/2025, the Manager of Compliance and Regulations confirmed the findings and the need for the plan of care to specify the responsibilities of care of services.”
All 5 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2026 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Jun 15, 2026 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Mar 25, 2026 | Complaint inspection by the state | 3 deficiencies cited |
| Feb 13, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner | 6 deficiencies cited |
| Dec 31, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 15, 2009.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.3% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 63% at home, 25% in assisted living, 2% in a nursing facility, 9% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% elsewhere.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 12.3 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 7.1% |
| Visits near death | 97.3% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Acg Acquisition LLC owns 100% directly since Jul 25, 2025.
- 10 owners or officers are people: Jordan Crumley (managing employee (on the payroll)); Troy Yarborough (corporate officer); Hayley Eby (managing employee (on the payroll)); Anilkumar Pillai (managing employee (under contract)); Janelle I Plows (corporate officer); Marsha Hayes (managing employee (on the payroll)); Samantha Turk (managing employee (on the payroll)); Pamela A Duncan Owens (corporate officer); Rhonda Hamilton (corporate officer); Amanda Whitehead (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acg Intermediate, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 25, 2025 |
| Acg Parent Holdings, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 25, 2025 |
| Arrow Management Holdings LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 25, 2025 |
| Acg Mississippi, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 25, 2025 |
| Acg Buyer, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 25, 2025 |
| Acg Acquisition LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Jul 25, 2025 |
| Rep Coinvest III Agp Blocker, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 28.41% | Jul 25, 2025 |
| Rep Agp II Holdco, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 28.23% | Jul 25, 2025 |
| Cdpq Fonds 780, S.e.c | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 20.53% | Jul 25, 2025 |
| Linden Capital Partners V-A LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 16.31% | Jul 25, 2025 |
| Tvg Hcsc Blocker, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 15.61% | Jul 25, 2025 |
| Linden Investments III LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 14.33% | Jul 25, 2025 |
| Linden Capital Partners V LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 10.39% | Jul 25, 2025 |
| Rep Agp III Blocker, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 9.82% | Jul 25, 2025 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 77.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 19 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 31088, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 9.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Heart of Georgia Hospice, Inc. | 0 |
| Gentiva | 9 |
| Georgia Hospice Care This hospice | 9 |
| Georgia Hospice Partners | 0 |
| Eternal Faith Hospice and Palliative Care | 6 |
| Atrium Health Navicent Hospice Pine Pointe | 2 |
| Pruitthealth Hospice-Macon | 2 |
| Hospice Care Options Inc. | 0 |
| Heartland Hospice- Macon | 4 |
| Brightmoor Hospice, LLC | 23 |
| Regency Southerncare | 18 |
| Georgia Hospice Care | 7 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.