Hearth Record

Honorhealth Deer Valley Medical Center

An acute care hospital in Phoenix, Arizona 85027

19829 North 27th Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85027. (623) 879-6100.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 28, 2026: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Oct 17, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Compliance With 489.24

    The inspectors’ words, 1,494 words

    “COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45618 Based on review of policies and procedures, hospital documents, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the hospital failed to enforce policies and procedures that comply with the requirements of 42CFR §489.20 and 42 CFR §489.24, responsibilities of Medicare participating hospitals in emergency cases. Findings include: Policy titled “Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) Policy,” revealed: “...HonorHealth will accept transfers of any un-stabilized person with an emergency medical condition from another hospital without regard to the person’s ability to pay if: 1. The transferring hospital does not have the specialized capability and equipment to provide the necessary stabilizing treatment; 2. HonorHealth has the specialized capability (if HonorHealth has the required on-call physician and he is available, then HonorHealth has the specialized capability) to provide the necessary stabilizing treatment and a physician is able to accept the transferred patient; and 3. HonorHealth has the capacity to provide this treatment (including bed availability, staffing, equipment, etc.). All transfers will be initiated in the HonorHealth Transfer Center. A Transfer Center Coordinator will be responsible for: Determining if the HonorHealth hospital has bed capacity (including appropriate equipment) and hospital staff availability; Determining if the HonorHealth hospital has an accepting physician; Facilitating a conversation between the sending and receiving physicians. HonorHealth Transfer Center personnel will document the circumstances under which it refuses to accept a transfer from another hospital....” Patient #1’s medical records from Hospital #1, contained a note titled “Emergency Department Note,” dated 05/21/24, which revealed: “...In summary the patient was involved in an MVC in which (Patient #1) sustained a right zygomatic fracture, large right subgaleal hematoma, closed head injury, concussion, first rib fracture, C5 on C6 injury, possible transverse process fracture, and possible pulmonary contusion. Dr (at Hospital #1) spoke with Dr. (at eventual receiving hospital) who had then requested a CTA of the neck to rule out vascular injury because of the mechanism suggested by the first rib fracture. I followed up when the report of the CTA neck returned and advised Dr. (at eventual receiving hospital) that no further pathology was radiographically evident, At that point the patient was accepted by Dr. (at eventual receiving hospital) for transfer to the emergency department at (eventual receiving hospital)...Patient with Presentation consistent with TBI, mild LOC, alcohol intoxicated, involved in a MVA...with large subgaleal hematoma on right forehead/temporal area, concerns for acute right 1 rib posterior fracture, T1 lef {sic} lateral process fracture, Spondylolisthesis on C5 over C6, concerns for being traumatic given rib fracture and tenderness on area. Also right zygoma fracture possible acute due ot {sic} tenderness on Area...Patient requires Trauma surgery/Neurosurgery evaluation and admission for observation...disposition is pending receiving facility acceptance. AZ reach contacted....” Document titled “Transfer Center Activity,” from Hospital #2, dated 05/21/2024, revealed: “...Level of Care Emergency Medicine; Reason: No specialty at sending facility...05/21 2124 Request Began...[Coleen] called from AZ Reach with a trauma pt for a MVA from (Hospital #1). Advised they reached out to (eventual receiving hospital) who did not decline but they wanted to send home pt and the referring provider didn’t want to send (Patient #1) home. Let them know if the patient is a true trauma they need to go to the closest facility and if (eventual receiving hospital) did not decline they need to go there...2223: Transfer type set to Emergency Transfer...2234: Request Canceled Reason: Cancelled- inquiry only....” Transcript pf phone call between Referring Transfer Center and Transfer Center for Hospital #2, as follows: Referring Transfer Center: Who has a trauma patient Transfer Center for Hospital #2: Ok where are they coming form Referring Transfer Center: (Hospital #1) Transfer Center for Hospital #2: (Hospital #1) and they have a trauma patient? Referring Transfer Center: Correct Transfer Center for Hospital #2: Ok hold on one moment. Ok where is that at? Referring Transfer Center: Ganado. Transfer Center for Hospital #2: There should be closer traumas to that. They’re not on our normal distance list. That seems further out. Have you tried (eventual receiving hospital) trauma? Referring Transfer Center: Yeah, we tried (eventual receiving hospital), they couldn’t accommodate so (Dr. at Hospital #1) said head to Phoenix and you’re the first stop Transfer Center for Hospital #2: So then it’s not a true trauma. If (Patient #1’s) a trauma, they can not, nobody can turn away a trauma Referring Transfer Center: Oh ok Transfer Center for Hospital #2: So if it’s a true trauma then they have to take it, if not then finish the intake and I’ll see if we can accommodate, but if it’s a true trauma, they should not be refusing it Referring Transfer Center: Ok, well my understanding is that (Dr. at Hospital #1) talked to them and they wouldn’t take (Patient #1) so he said don’t call (eventual receiving hospital), so you’re the next stop and that’s why I’m calling you. (Patient #1) was intoxicated and had a motor vehicle accident and had multiple fractures. (Patient #1) is stable. Transfer Center for Hospital #2: Yeah, (Patient #1’s) definitely a trauma. Do you have the provider who declined the trauma out of (eventual receiving hospital)? Referring Transfer Center: I do not Transfer Center for Hospital #2: Ok Referring Transfer Center: I do not Transfer Center for Hospital #2: Ok, if you could get that from (Hospital #1) we will need to document that because this trauma is coming way out of the closest trauma, for what the protocols are, they should go to the next closest. And (eventual receiving hospital) is their closest. Referring Transfer Center: I understand. I have Dr. (at Hospital #1) on the line now, I can go back to (Dr.) and tell (Dr.) what you said. Transfer Center for Hospital #2: Yeah, if you could please Referring Transfer Center: Yeah, do you want to chat with (Dr.) or do you want me to tell (Dr.) Transfer Center for Hospital #2: No, just let him know we will need that information because they are passing up a trauma center to come all the way to Phoenix. They shouldn’t be doing that. Referring Transfer Center: Ok, hold on 03:05-4:19: Call on hold Referring Transfer Center: Thank you so much holding, I do apologize. Ok, so what (Dr.) said to me is they did not decline. What they said was do a CTA, if there’s no vascular then (Patient #1) can go home. Dr. (at Hospital #1) is not feeling comfortable with sending (Patient #1) home. The CT was negative. So that’s why (Dr.) said (Dr.) didn’t bother calling (eventual receiving hospital) back or (Dr.) doesn’t want to go to (eventual receiving hospital) Transfer Center for Hospital #2: No, (Dr.) does need to attempt (eventual receiving hospital). If (Dr.) gets a true decline then (Dr.) can attempt us or New Mexico which may have a trauma center that’s closer Referring Transfer Center: Ok, I’ll let (Dr.) know Transfer Center for Hospital #2: But (Dr.) does need to try a closer trauma center. Referring Transfer Center: OK Thank you Transfer Center for Hospital #2: Thank you Referring Transfer Center: Bye bye Document titled “Transfer Center Activity,” dated 05/21/2024, revealed: “...Level of Care Emergency Medicine; Reason: No specialty at sending facility...05/21 2124 Request Began...(Referring Transfer Center Employee) called from (Referring Transfer Center) with a trauma pt for a MVA from (Hospital #1). Advised they reached out to (eventual receiving hospital) who did not decline but they wanted to send home pt and the referring provider didn’t want to send (Patient #1) home. Let them know if the patient is a true trauma they need to go to the closest facility and if (eventual receiving hospital) did not decline they need to go there...2223: Transfer type set to Emergency Transfer...2234: Request Canceled Reason: Cancelled- inquiry only....” The transfer log for all transfer requests was reviewed and Patient #1 was not on the log. Employee #4 confirmed in an interview conducted on 10/16/2024, that HonorHealth Deer Valley was the next hospital the Referring Transfer Center would attempt because it was the next closest to the hospital that eventually accepted the patient. Employee #4 aslo confirmed the transfer log contains all incoming transfer requests and if the request was cancelled or accepted. Employee #4 confirmed Patient #1 was not on the transfer log because the Transfer Center of Hospital #2 did not take the patient’s information. Employee #24 confirmed in an interview conducted on 10/16/2024, the complete transfer request record was not filled out for Patient #1 because they did not make it that far in the process, but they do have record of the call request. Employee #24 also confirmed the Transfer Center for Hospital #2 does not require a reason for a decline from another facility before they can accept the transfer. Employee #24 further confirmed that the normal processes were not followed.”

    Rule A2400. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Recipient Hospital Responsibilities

    The inspectors’ words, 1,579 words

    “RECIPIENT HOSPITAL RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 489.24(f) A participating hospital that has specialized capabilities or facilities (including, but not limited to, facilities such as burn units, shock-trauma units, neonatal intensive care units, or (with respect to rural areas) regional referral centers, which, for purposes of this subpart, means hospitals meeting the requirements of referral centers found at §412.96 of this chapter) may not refuse to accept from a referring hospital within the boundaries of the United States an appropriate transfer of an individual who requires such specialized capabilities or facilities if the receiving hospital has the capacity to treat the individual. This requirement applies to any participating hospital with specialized capabilities, regardless of whether the hospital has a dedicated emergency department. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45618 Based on a review of hospital records and interview, it was determined the hospital failed to accept a transfer of an emergency patient who required specialized services not offered at the referring hospital. Findings include: Policy titled “Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) Policy,” revealed: “...HonorHealth will accept transfers of any un-stabilized person with an emergency medical condition from another hospital without regard to the person’s ability to pay if: 1. The transferring hospital does not have the specialized capability and equipment to provide the necessary stabilizing treatment; 2. HonorHealth has the specialized capability (if HonorHealth has the required on-call physician and he is available, then HonorHealth has the specialized capability) to provide the necessary stabilizing treatment and a physician is able to accept the transferred patient; and 3. HonorHealth has the capacity to provide this treatment (including bed availability, staffing, equipment, etc.). All transfers will be initiated in the HonorHealth Transfer Center. A Transfer Center Coordinator will be responsible for: Determining if the HonorHealth hospital has bed capacity (including appropriate equipment) and hospital staff availability; Determining if the HonorHealth hospital has an accepting physician; Facilitating a conversation between the sending and receiving physicians. HonorHealth Transfer Center personnel will document the circumstances under which it refuses to accept a transfer from another hospital....” Patient #1’s medical records from Hospital #1, contained a note titled “Emergency Department Note,” dated 05/21/24, which revealed: “...In summary the patient was involved in an MVC in which (Patient #1) sustained a right zygomatic fracture, large right subgaleal hematoma, closed head injury, concussion, first rib fracture, C5 on C6 injury, possible transverse process fracture, and possible pulmonary contusion. Dr (at Hospital #1) spoke with Dr. (at eventual receiving hospital) who had then requested a CTA of the neck to rule out vascular injury because of the mechanism suggested by the first rib fracture. I followed up when the report of the CTA neck returned and advised Dr. (at eventual receiving hospital) that no further pathology was radiographically evident, At that point the patient was accepted by Dr. (at eventual receiving hospital) for transfer to the emergency department at (eventual receiving hospital)...Patient with Presentation consistent with TBI, mild LOC, alcohol intoxicated, involved in a MVA...with large subgaleal hematoma on right forehead/temporal area, concerns for acute right 1 rib posterior fracture, T1 lef {sic} lateral process fracture, Spondylolisthesis on C5 over C6, concerns for being traumatic given rib fracture and tenderness on area. Also right zygoma fracture possible acute due ot {sic} tenderness on Area...Patient requires Trauma surgery/Neurosurgery evaluation and admission for observation...disposition is pending receiving facility acceptance. AZ reach contacted....” Document titled “Transfer Center Activity,” from Hospital #2, dated 05/21/2024, revealed: “...Level of Care Emergency Medicine; Reason: No specialty at sending facility...05/21 2124 Request Began...[Coleen] called from AZ Reach with a trauma pt for a MVA from (Hospital #1). Advised they reached out to (eventual receiving hospital) who did not decline but they wanted to send home pt and the referring provider didn’t want to send (Patient #1) home. Let them know if the patient is a true trauma they need to go to the closest facility and if (eventual receiving hospital) did not decline they need to go there...2223: Transfer type set to Emergency Transfer...2234: Request Canceled Reason: Cancelled- inquiry only....” Transcript pf phone call between Referring Transfer Center and Transfer Center for Hospital #2, as follows: Referring Transfer Center: Who has a trauma patient Transfer Center for Hospital #2: Ok where are they coming form Referring Transfer Center: (Hospital #1) Transfer Center for Hospital #2: (Hospital #1) and they have a trauma patient? Referring Transfer Center: Correct Transfer Center for Hospital #2: Ok hold on one moment. Ok where is that at? Referring Transfer Center: Ganado. Transfer Center for Hospital #2: There should be closer traumas to that. They’re not on our normal distance list. That seems further out. Have you tried (eventual receiving hospital) trauma? Referring Transfer Center: Yeah, we tried (eventual receiving hospital), they couldn’t accommodate so (Dr. at Hospital #1) said head to Phoenix and you’re the first stop Transfer Center for Hospital #2: So then it’s not a true trauma. If (Patient #1’s) a trauma, they can not, nobody can turn away a trauma Referring Transfer Center: Oh ok Transfer Center for Hospital #2: So if it’s a true trauma then they have to take it, if not then finish the intake and I’ll see if we can accommodate, but if it’s a true trauma, they should not be refusing it Referring Transfer Center: Ok, well my understanding is that (Dr. at Hospital #1) talked to them and they wouldn’t take (Patient #1) so he said don’t call (eventual receiving hospital), so you’re the next stop and that’s why I’m calling you. (Patient #1) was intoxicated and had a motor vehicle accident and had multiple fractures. (Patient #1) is stable. Transfer Center for Hospital #2: Yeah, (Patient #1’s) definitely a trauma. Do you have the provider who declined the trauma out of (eventual receiving hospital)? Referring Transfer Center: I do not Transfer Center for Hospital #2: Ok Referring Transfer Center: I do not Transfer Center for Hospital #2: Ok, if you could get that from (Hospital #1) we will need to document that because this trauma is coming way out of the closest trauma, for what the protocols are, they should go to the next closest. And (eventual receiving hospital) is their closest. Referring Transfer Center: I understand. I have Dr. (at Hospital #1) on the line now, I can go back to (Dr.) and tell (Dr.) what you said. Transfer Center for Hospital #2: Yeah, if you could please Referring Transfer Center: Yeah, do you want to chat with (Dr.) or do you want me to tell (Dr.) Transfer Center for Hospital #2: No, just let him know we will need that information because they are passing up a trauma center to come all the way to Phoenix. They shouldn’t be doing that. Referring Transfer Center: Ok, hold on 03:05-4:19: Call on hold Referring Transfer Center: Thank you so much holding, I do apologize. Ok, so what (Dr.) said to me is they did not decline. What they said was do a CTA, if there’s no vascular then (Patient #1) can go home. Dr. (at Hospital #1) is not feeling comfortable with sending (Patient #1) home. The CT was negative. So that’s why (Dr.) said (Dr.) didn’t bother calling (eventual receiving hospital) back or (Dr.) doesn’t want to go to (eventual receiving hospital) Transfer Center for Hospital #2: No, (Dr.) does need to attempt (eventual receiving hospital). If (Dr.) gets a true decline then (Dr.) can attempt us or New Mexico which may have a trauma center that’s closer Referring Transfer Center: Ok, I’ll let (Dr.) know Transfer Center for Hospital #2: But (Dr.) does need to try a closer trauma center. Referring Transfer Center: OK Thank you Transfer Center for Hospital #2: Thank you Referring Transfer Center: Bye bye Document titled “Transfer Center Activity,” dated 05/21/2024, revealed: “...Level of Care Emergency Medicine; Reason: No specialty at sending facility...05/21 2124 Request Began...(Referring Transfer Center Employee) called from (Referring Transfer Center) with a trauma pt for a MVA from (Hospital #1). Advised they reached out to (eventual receiving hospital) who did not decline but they wanted to send home pt and the referring provider didn’t want to send (Patient #1) home. Let them know if the patient is a true trauma they need to go to the closest facility and if (eventual receiving hospital) did not decline they need to go there...2223: Transfer type set to Emergency Transfer...2234: Request Canceled Reason: Cancelled- inquiry only....” The transfer log for all transfer requests was reviewed and Patient #1 was not on the log. Employee #4 confirmed in an interview conducted on 10/16/2024, that HonorHealth Deer Valley was the next hospital the Referring Transfer Center would attempt because it was the next closest to the hospital that eventually accepted the patient. Employee #4 aslo confirmed the transfer log contains all incoming transfer requests and if the request was cancelled or accepted. Employee #4 confirmed Patient #1 was not on the transfer log because the Transfer Center of Hospital #2 did not take the patient’s information. Employee #24 confirmed in an interview conducted on 10/16/2024, the complete transfer request record was not filled out for Patient #1 because they did not make it that far in the process, but they do have record of the call request. Employee #24 also confirmed the Transfer Center for Hospital #2 does not require a reason for a decline from another facility before they can accept the transfer. Employee #24 further confirmed that the normal processes were not followed.”

    Rule A2411. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 28, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 20, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jan 4, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Oct 17, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 3 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 2 better and 0 worse of 7; readmission, 0 better and 1 worse of 9.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (558 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 72% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 72% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), better than the national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, better than the national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13.3%, heart failure 9.5%, pneumonia 13.4%, COPD 9.9%, stroke 9.9%, heart bypass surgery 2.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13.6%, heart failure 20.6%, pneumonia 17.4%, COPD 21.6%, heart bypass surgery 12.6%, hip or knee replacement 7.5%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 194 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 3% left before being seen.
  • 60% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.02 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Nov 4, 1987.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by DNV, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 4 of 5.
  • 83% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Honorhealth runs it.
  • 21 owners or officers are people: Charles D Mitchell (corporate director); Fred Hessler (corporate director); Lisa Elizabeth Montman (corporate officer, 0%); Lisa Elizabeth Montman (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Lisa Elizabeth Montman (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Andrew A Kassir (corporate director); Julie M Arvo Mackenzie (corporate director); Drew M Brown (corporate director); Kathleen Wade (corporate director); Jesika Bailie (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Jesika Bailie (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Alpa P Shah (corporate director); Peter Hathaway (corporate director); Kathryn Jo Lincoln (corporate director); Todd Laporte (corporate officer, 0%); Todd Laporte (corporate director, 0%); Todd Laporte (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Steven Wheeler (corporate director); Frank Pugh (corporate director); Robert Michael Welborn (corporate director); Heidi Jannenga (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership, the latest on Nov 24, 1997.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 53 hospitals CMS lists in Maricopa County, 29 have an overall star rating from CMS: 5 rated 5 of 5, 5 rated 4 of 5, 11 rated 3 of 5, 7 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.