Grayce Enhanced Hospice Care
A hospice in Lubbock, Texas 79413
6307 Indiana Ave, Lubbock, Texas 79413. (806) 589-2007.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 7 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 8of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
7 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 20 hospices serving ZIP code 79413 had 1.
The last inspection on record was on May 6, 2024: a follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
7 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
May 6, 2024: follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner1 deficiency
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 180 words
“It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care reflects patient and family goals, identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 5 (20%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the individualized plan of care included planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessment. THIS IS A CONTINUING REQUIRED ACTION. Clinical Record 1: The patient was admitted to home health services on 03/28/2024 with a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure. The registered nurse documented on the initial comprehensive assessment dated 03/28/2024 that the patient had bi-lateral edema to feet. The plan of care dated 03/28/2024 through 06/25/2024 did not include interventions or goals for the patient’s edema. The Director of Nursing was interviewed on 05/07/2024 during a joint review of records and agreed there was no documented evidence that the plan of care included interventions and goals for the problem identified in the initial assessment. PRIOR REQUIRED ACTION.”
Mar 22, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner6 deficiencies
-
Medical director (42 CFR 418.102)
The inspectors’ words, 209 words
“It is required that the hospice medical director, physician employees, and contracted physician(s), in conjunction with the patient’s attending physician, are responsible for the palliation and management of the terminal illness as well as conditions related to the terminal illness. THIS IS A CMS CONDITION LEVEL FINDING This CONDITION was not met as evidenced by a review of clinical records, interviews, document review and interviews which revealed the hospice: Failed to ensure that the hospice medical director or physician designee provided written certification of terminal illness, including the primary terminal diagnosis, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness{HCPC.4. I/L667}; and Failed to ensure that the hospice medical director or physician-designee provided written and signed recertification of the terminal illness (CTI) to meet the hospice care benefit requirement {HCPC. 6. IL668}. The cumulative effect of these deficiencies has resulted in the hospice organization’s inability to ensure the provision of quality of care for the Condition of Participation CFR 418.102: Medical Director. The collective deficient practice illustrated systemic process failures that had the potential to affect all patients receiving hospice care and services from the agency.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 283 words
“It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care reflects patient and family goals, identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 14 (21%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the written plan of care included planned interventions and goals based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 2: The patient’s date of election was 02/15/2024 with a primary hospice diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The registered nurse (RN) initial assessment on 02/15/2024 documented that the patient was at risk for falling. The benefit period reviewed 2/15/24-05/14/24 did not include problems, goals, and interventions for the fall risk. Clinical Record 4: The patient’s date of election was 01/17/2024 with a primary hospice diagnosis was malignant neoplasm of the brain unspecified. The RN assessment on 01/17/2024 documented that the patient was at risk for falling and had a pain rating of 4. The benefit period reviewed for 1/17/24-4/15/24 did not include problems, goals, and interventions for the fall risk and pain. Clinical Record 7: : The patient’s date of election was 08/30/2023 with a primary hospice diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The RN initial assessment on 08/30/2023 documented that the patient was at risk for falling. The benefit period reviewed for 8/30/23-10/28/23 did not include problems, goals, and interventions for the fall risk. During a joint review of the record and an interview on 03/22/2024, the Director of Nursing agreed there was no documented evidence that the plans of care included problems, goals, and interventions for the problems identified in the assessments.”
-
Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 1,001 words
“It is required that the hospice medical director or physician designee reviews the clinical information for each patient being evaluated for admission and provides written certification that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is six months or less if the illness runs its normal course. The physician considers the following when making this determination the primary terminal condition, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 13 of 14 (93%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the hospice medical director or physician designee provided written certification of terminal illness, including the primary terminal diagnosis, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. Clinical Record 1: The patient’s date of election was 01/30/2024. There was no documented evidence of a written initial certification of terminal illness, including the primary terminal diagnosis, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. Clinical Record 2: The patient’s date of election was 02/15/2024. There was no documented evidence of an initial certification of terminal illness including the primary terminal diagnosis, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. Clinical Record 3: The patient’s date of election was 10/31/2023. There was no documented evidence of an initial certification of terminal illness including the primary terminal diagnosis, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. Clinical Record 4: The patient’s date of election was 01/17/2024. There was no documented evidence of an initial certification of terminal illness including the primary terminal diagnosis, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. Clinical Record 5: The patient’s date of election was 12/02/2023. There was no documented evidence of an initial certification of terminal illness including the primary terminal diagnosis, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. Clinical Record 6: The patient’s date of election was 01/24/2024. There was no documented evidence of an initial certification of terminal illness including the primary terminal diagnosis, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. Clinical Record 7: The patient’s date of election was 08/30/2023. There was no documented evidence of an initial certification of terminal illness including the primary terminal diagnosis, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. Clinical Record 8: The patient’s date of election was 01/12/2024. There was no documented evidence of an initial certification of terminal illness including the primary terminal diagnosis, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. Clinical Record 10: The patient’s date of election was 10/25/2023. There was no documented evidence of an initial certification of terminal illness including the primary terminal diagnosis, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. Clinical Record 11: The patient’s date of election was 11/08/2023. There was no documented evidence of an initial certification of terminal illness including the primary terminal diagnosis, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. Clinical Record 12: The patient’s date of election was 11/22/2023. There was no documented evidence of an initial certification of terminal illness including the primary terminal diagnosis, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. Clinical Record 13: The patient’s date of election was 08/30/2023. There was no documented evidence of an initial certification of terminal illness, including the primary terminal diagnosis, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. Clinical Record 14: The patient’s date of election was 10/02/2023. There was no documented evidence of an initial certification of terminal illness, including the primary terminal diagnosis, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. During a joint record review and interview on 03/22/2024, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the record lacked a written initial certification of terminal illness, including the primary terminal diagnosis, related diagnosis(es), if any, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness.”
-
Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))
The inspectors’ words, 339 words
“It is required that the hospice medical director or physician-designee provides written and signed recertification of the terminal illness to meet the hospice care benefit requirement. Recertification for the hospice care benefit is informed by the medical director or physician designee’s review of the patient’s clinical information. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 5 of 14 (36%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the hospice medical director or physician-designee provided written and signed recertification of the terminal illness (CTI) to meet the hospice care benefit requirement. Clinical Record 3: The patient’s date of election was 10/31/2023. There was no documented evidence a recertification of the terminal illness was completed for the second benefit period starting 01/29/2024. Clinical Record 5: The patient’s date of election was 12/02/2023. There was no documented evidence that a recertification of the terminal illness was completed for the second benefit period starting 03/01/2024. Clinical Record 7: The patient’s date of election was 08/30/2023. There was no documented evidence that a recertification of the terminal illness was completed for the additional benefit period starting 10/29/2023, 12/28/2023, and 02/26/2023. Clinical Record 9: The patient’s date of election was 08/30/2023. There was no documented evidence that a recertification of the terminal illness was completed for the additional benefit period starting 10/29/2023, 12/28/2023, and 02/26/2023. The statement that the patient’s medical prognosis is that their life expectancy is 6 months or less if the terminal illness runs its normal course” and what the patient’s diagnosis was but did not have a narrative with what made the patient eligible. There were no clinical findings written/typed out on the CTIs. Clinical Record 10: The patient’s date of election was 10/25/2023. There was no documented evidence a recertification was completed for the second benefit period starting 01/23/2024. During a joint record review and interview on 03/22/2024, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the record lacked a written and signed recertification of the terminal illness for the benefit periods listed.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 163 words
“It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician: a copy of the hospice discharge summary and the patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records reviewed for discharged patients revealed that the agency did not ensure the discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. Clinical Record 11: The discharge summary dated 12/27/2023 lacked documented evidence that the discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. Clinical Record 12: The discharge summary dated 11/28/2023 lacked documented evidence that the discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. During a joint record review and interview on 03/22/2024, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the record lacked evidence that the discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 347 words
“It is required that the hospice discharge summary provided to a facility receiving a hospice patient for care—or to the patient’s community attending physician upon hospice discharge—includes at least the following: a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management, the patient’s current plan of care, the patient’s latest physician orders, and any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the receiving facility or the attending physician. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records reviewed for discharged patients revealed that the agency did not ensure the discharge summary included a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management, the patient’s current plan of care, the patient’s latest physician orders, and any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the receiving facility or the attending physician. Clinical Record 11: The discharge summary dated 12/27/2023 lacked a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management, the patient’s current plan of care, the patient’s latest physician orders, and any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the receiving facility or the attending physician. Clinical Record 12: The discharge summary dated 11/28/2023 lacked a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management, the patient’s current plan of care, the patient’s latest physician orders, and any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the receiving facility or the attending physician. During a joint record review and interview on 03/22/2024, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the record lacked a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management, the patient’s current plan of care, the patient’s latest physician orders, and any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the receiving facility or the attending physician.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2024 | Follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner | 1 deficiency cited |
| Mar 22, 2024 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner | 6 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since May 14, 2021.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 87.9% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 23% at home, 77% in assisted living.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 13.7 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 6.7% |
| Visits near death | 87.9% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 9 owners or officers are people: Greg Blanchard (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Greg Blanchard (corporate officer, 50%); Greg Blanchard (corporate director, 50%); Laura Williams (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Laura Williams (corporate director, 25%); Laura Williams (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Kasey Cox (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Kasey Cox (corporate director, 25%); Kasey Cox (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 88.71% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 78.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 8 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 20 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 79413, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 1; this one had 7.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Accentcare Health | 3 |
| Grayce Enhanced Hospice Care This hospice | 7 |
| Covenant Health at Home With Compassus, Hospice of Lubbock | 1 |
| Gentiva | 7 |
| Excelacare Hospice | 1 |
| Cuidado Casero Home Health Lubbock | Not given |
| Hospice of the South Plains | 0 |
| Direct Health Care Inc. | 0 |
| Beyondfaith Hospice of Lubbock LLC | 0 |
| Enlightened Heights Hospice and Palliative Care | 0 |
| American Star Home Health Care Inc. | 1 |
| UMC Home Health and Hospice, An Amedisys Partner | 7 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.