Hearth Record

Choice Health at Home - Sapulpa Tulsa Hospice

A hospice in Tulsa, Oklahoma 74133

8010 S 101st East Avenue, Suite 200, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74133. (918) 512-8388.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 36 hospices serving ZIP code 74133 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 14, 2024: a complaint and recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 14, 2024: complaint and recertification inspection by the state11 deficiencies
  • Names and Contact Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(1))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the Emergency Preparedness communication plan included updated required information for the hospice staff for all patients, staff and volunteers. Findings: A review of administrative records showed documentation that the Emergency Preparedness communication plan did not include current staff contact information for the hospice. On 08/14/24 at 12:30 p.m., Staff A stated the Emergency Preparedness communication plan did not include updated contact information of current staff for the hospice.”

    Rule E0030. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure emergency preparedness disaster declaration, table-top exercises, drills, community drills or plan activation events were conducted for calendar years 2022, 2023 and 01/01/24 to 08/13/24 for all patients, volunteers, and employees. Findings: A review of administrative records related to emergency preparedness showed no documentation of emergency preparedness disaster declaration, table-top exercises, drills, community drills or plan activation events for calendar years 2022, 2023 and 01/01/24 to 08/13/24 On 08/14/24 at 12:30 p.m., Staff A stated: The agency had no emergency preparedness disaster declaration, table-top exercises, drills, community drills or plan activation events for calendar years 2022, 2023 and 01/01/24 to 08/13/24.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 136 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure completion of an initial assessments/plan of care no later than five calendar days after the election of hospice benefits for one (Patient #3) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #3 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 04/12/24 with current POC from 07/14/24 to 09/14/24. Documentation showed no MSW initial psychosocial assessment within five days of the initial comprehensive assessment (election of benefits) and development of the POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of assessment and showed no communications or notifications to the physician. On 08/14/24 at 12:40 p.m., Staff B stated the psychosocial component of the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit for patient #3.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 146 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure development of a bereavement POC for two (Patients #4 and 10) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #4 A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 04/02/24 with IDG updates on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and 08/08/24. Documentation showed no bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. On 08/14/24 at 12:52 p.m., Staff B stated patient #4 had no bereavement POC. Patient #10 A review of the clinical record showed an initial bereavement assessment dated 05/02/24 with IDG updates on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and 08/08/24. Documentation showed no bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. On 08/14/24 at 1:02 p.m., Staff B stated patient #10 had no bereavement POC.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,188 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure: 1. Social work services were provided in accordance with the plan of care for two (Patients #1 and #4) of 19 patients; 2. SN performed wound site care consistent with the physician order for one (Patient #3) of 19 patients; and 3. Aide visits were provided in accordance with the plan of care for five (Patients #7, 8, 9, 12 and 14) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #1 A review of a POC dated 06/30/24 to 08/28/24 with IDG updates on 07/25/24 and 08/08/24 showed documentation of an MSW visit frequency of three times a month, then two times a month. Documentation showed during the month of 07/01/24 to 07/31/24 MSW visits were conducted on 07/01/24 and on 07/15/24 (three visits ordered, two visits scheduled and/or conducted). Documentation showed no communications between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered MSW visit frequencies. On 08/14/24 at 12:40 p.m., Staff B stated MSW visits were not provided in accordance with the POC for patient #1. Patient #3 A review of a POC dated 07/17/24 to 09/14/24 with an IDG updates on 07/10/24 and 07/25/24 showed documentation for SN to conduct wound site care: cleanse site with normal saline, place crushed Flagyl (an antibiotic) in the wound site and cover with island dressing each SN visit. Documentation showed during SN visits dated 07/24/24, 07/30/24 and on 08/05/24 wound care was completed as follows: cleansed wound site with Dakins solution, placed crushed Flagyl (an antibiotic) in the wound site and covered with an island dressing. Documentation showed no communications or changes in orders for the wound site care. On 08/14/24 at 12:50 p.m., Staff B stated wound site care performed on 07/24/24, 07/30/24 and on 08/05/24 were not in accordance with the POC (wound site care orders) for patient #3. Patient #4 A review of a POC dated 07/01/24 to 09/28/24 with IDG updates on 07/10/24 and 07/25/24 showed documentation of an MSW visit frequency of three times a month for one month, then two times a month for two months. Documentation showed during the month of 07/01/24 to 07/31/24 MSW visits were conducted on 07/02/24 and on 07/15/24 (three visits ordered, two visits scheduled and/or conducted). Documentation showed no communications between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered MSW visit frequencies. On 08/14/24 at 12:52 p.m., Staff B stated MSW visits were not provided in accordance with the POC for patient #4. Patient #7 A review of a POC dated 06/10/24 to 09/07/24 with IDG updates on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and 08/08/24 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of four times a week for one week, then six times a week for 12 weeks. Documentation showed during the week of 06/23/24 to 06/29/24 on 06/24/24 two aide visits were conducted; on 06/26/24 (one aide visit was conducted, two aide visits ordered), on 06/27/24 (one aide visit was conducted, two aide visits ordered). Documentation showed no communications between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered aide visit frequencies. On 08/14/24 at 12:55 p.m., Staff B stated aide visits were not provided in accordance with the POC for patient #7. Patient #8 A review of a POC dated 06/26/24 to 09/23/24 with IDG updates on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and 08/08/24 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of four times a week for one week, ten times a week for 12 weeks, then two times a week for one week. Documentation showed on 07/01/24 an order to discontinue 2nd daily home aide visits. Documentation showed during the week of 06/30/24 to 07/06/24, aide visits were conducted on: 07/01/24, 07/02/24, 07/03/24 and on 07/05/24 (four aide visits were conducted, five aide visits ordered), and during the week of 07/14/24 to 07/20/24, aide visits were conducted on: 07/15/24, 07/16/24, 07/17/24 and on 07/19/24 (four aide visits were conducted, five aide visits ordered). Documentation showed no communications between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered aide visit frequencies. On 08/14/24 at 12:57 p.m., Staff B stated aide visits were not provided in accordance with the POC for patient #8 Patient #9 A review of a POC dated 07/17/24 to 09/14/24 with IDG updates on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and 08/08/24 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of three times a week for one week, then five times a week for eight weeks. Documentation showed on 07/17/24 an order to change the aide visit frequency to five times a week for one week, then eight times a week for eight weeks. Documentation showed during the week of 07/21/24 to 07/27/24, aide visits were conducted on: 07/22/24, 07/23/24, 07/24/24 (x2 visits), 07/25/24 and on 07/26/24 (X2 visits) (seven aide visits were conducted, eight aide visits ordered), and during the week of 08/04/24 to 08/10/24, aide visits were conducted on: 08/05/24 (X2 visits), 08/06/24, 08/07/24 (X2 visits), 08/08/24 and on 08/09/24 (seven aide visits were conducted, eight aide visits ordered). Documentation showed no communications between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered aide visit frequencies. On 08/14/24 at 1:00 p.m., Staff B stated aide visits were not provided in accordance with the POC for patient #9 Patient #12 A review of a POC dated 05/16/24 to 08/13/24 with IDG updates on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and 08/08/24 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of two times a week for one week, six times a week for 12 weeks, then two times a week for one week. Documentation showed on 06/26/24 an order to change the aide visit frequency to eight times a week for one week, 10 times a week for six weeks, then four times a week for one week. Documentation showed during the week of 05/16/24 to 05/18/24, aide visits were conducted on 05/17/24 (one visit conducted, two visits ordered). During the week of 06/23/24 to 06/29/24, aide visits were conducted on: 06/24/24 (X2 visits), 06/26/24 (X2 visits), 06/27/24 (X2 visits) and on 06/28/24 (X2 visits) (eight visits conducted, 10 visits ordered). During the week of 07/14/24 to 07/20/24 aide visits were conducted on: 07/15/24, 07/16/24, 07/17/24 and on 07/19/24 (four aide visits were conducted, five aide visits ordered). Documentation showed no communications between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered aide visit frequencies. On 08/14/24 at 1:06 p.m., Staff B stated aide visits were not provided in accordance with the POC for patient #12. Patient #14 A review of a POC dated 06/08/24 to 09/05/24 with IDG updates on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and 08/08/24 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of four times a week for 13 weeks. Documentation showed during the week of 06/23/24 to 06/29/24, aide visits were conducted on 06/25/24 and on 06/27/24 (two visits conducted, four visits ordered). During the week of 06/30/24 to 07/06/24, aide visits were conducted on: 07/02/24 (X2 visits) (two visits conducted, four visits ordered). Documentation showed no communications between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered aide visit frequencies. On 08/14/24 at 1:09 p.m., Staff B stated aide visits were not provided in accordance with the POC for patient #14”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 288 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the plans of care included a hospice diagnosis for eight (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10 and #13) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #1 A recertification plan of care dated 06/30/24 to 08/20/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and on 08/08/24 documented no hospice diagnosis. Patient #2 A recertification plan of care dated 06/25/24 to 08/23/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and on 08/08/24 documented no hospice diagnosis. Patient #3 A recertification plan of care dated 07/17/24 to 09/14/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and on 08/08/24 documented no hospice diagnosis. Patient #4 A recertification plan of care dated 07/01/24 to 09/28/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and on 08/08/24 documented no hospice diagnosis. Patient #5 A recertification plan of care dated 07/03/24 to 08/31/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and on 08/08/24 documented no hospice diagnosis. Patient #9 A recertification plan of care dated 07/17/24 to 09/14/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and on 08/08/24 documented no hospice diagnosis. Patient #10 A recertification plan of care dated 07/30/24 to 10/27/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and on 08/08/24 documented no hospice diagnosis. Patient #13 A recertification plan of care dated 07/12/24 to 09/09/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and on 08/08/24 documented no hospice diagnosis. On 08/14/24 at 12:40 p.m. to 1:08 p.m., Staff B stated the POCs for patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10 and #13 did not include hospice diagnoses.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 126 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure utilization of QAPI data to improve program effectiveness, quality of patient care and overall program improvement for all patients, volunteers, and employees. Findings: A review of QAPI Program for calendar years 2022 and 2023; and 01/01/24 to 08/13/24 showed no QAPI program data collection sources or analysis/reporting of collected data or reporting activities for calendar year 2022, 07/01/23 to 12/31/23 and 01/01/24 to 06/30/24. Additional requests for administrative records yielded no results. On 08/14/24 at 12:00 p.m., Staff A stated the hospice had no administrative records which showed data collection sources, analysis/reporting of collected data or activities that showed improved quality of patient care for calendar year 2022, 07/01/23 to 12/31/23 and 01/01/24 to 06/30/24.”

    Rule L0563. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 128 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure governing body oversite of the conduction of patient centered QAPI Program activities for all patients, volunteers, and employees. Findings: A review of administrative records showed no governing body oversite of the ongoing QAPI program which identified the hospice that included data collection, analysis and reporting activities for the hospice for calendar year 2022, 07/01/23 to 12/31/23 and 01/01/24 to 06/30/24. Additional requests for administrative records yielded no results. On 08/14/24 at 12:00 p.m., Staff A stated the hospice had no documentation which showed governing body oversite of QAPI program activities which showed review and approval of data collection, analysis, implementation and follow up of QAPI activities for calendar year 2022, 07/01/23 to 12/31/23 and 01/01/24 to 06/30/24.”

    Rule L0574. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure its infection control program surveillance monitoring and reporting was included in QAPI program activities for calendar year 2022, 07/01/23 to 12/31/23 and 01/01/24 to 06/30/24 for all patients, volunteers, and employees. Findings: Administrative records showed no infection control program surveillance data was included in QAPI program activities for calendar year 2022, 07/01/23 to 12/31/23 and 01/01/24 to 06/30/24. On 08/14/24 at 12:30 p.m., Staff A stated there was no infection control program surveillance data included in QAPI program activities for calendar year 2022, 07/01/23 to 12/31/23 and 01/01/24 to 06/30/24.”

    Rule L0580. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 587 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to review and update a hospice aide care plan prior to the provision of aide services for seven (Patients #5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16 and #17) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #5 A recertification plan of care dated 07/03/24 to 08/31/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and on 08/08/24 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of four times a week for one week, then six times a week for eight weeks. Documentation showed a hospice aide care plan dated 11/29/23 with an aide frequency of four week two, then six week eleven. Documentation showed no aide care plan (aide assignment) review and update since 11/29/23 by the IDG. Patient #9 A recertification plan of care dated 07/17/24 to 09/14/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and on 08/08/24 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of three times a week for one weeks, then five times a week for eight weeks. Documentation showed a hospice aide care plan dated effective 11/29/23 with an aide frequency of four week one, then six week six. Documentation showed no aide care plan (aide assignment) review and update since 11/29/23 by the IDG. Patient #10 A recertification plan of care dated 07/30/24 to 10/27/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and on 08/08/24 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of six times a week for one week, then eight times a week for 12 weeks. Documentation showed a hospice aide care plan dated effective 05/01/24 with an aide frequency of two week one, six week 12, then two week one. Documentation showed no aide care plan (aide assignment) review and update since 05/01/24 by the IDG. Patient #13 A recertification plan of care dated 07/12/24 to 09/09/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/27/24, 07/10/24, 07/25/24 and on 08/08/24 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of two times a week for one week, six times a week for eight weeks then two times a week for one week. Documentation showed a hospice aide care plan dated effective 01/14/24 with an aide frequency of four week one, six week two, three week five, then two week one. Documentation showed no aide care plan (aide assignment) review and update since 01/14/24 by the IDG. Patient #16 A recertification plan of care dated 07/28/23 to 09/25/23 and IDG updates to the POC on 08/03/23, 08/17/23 and on 08/31/23 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of two times a week for eight weeks. Documentation showed a hospice aide care plan dated effective 11/30/22 with an aide frequency of three times a week for four weeks. Documentation showed no aide care plan (aide assignment) review and update since 11/30/22 by the IDG. Patient #17 A recertification plan of care dated 05/05/24 to 08/02/24 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/16/24, 05/30/24 and on 06/13/24 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of two times a week for 13 weeks. Documentation showed a hospice aide care plan dated effective 02/05/24 with an aide frequency of three times a week for four weeks. Documentation showed no aide care plan (aide assignment) review and update since 02/05/24 by the IDG. On 08/14/24 at 12:55 p.m. to 1:08 p.m., Staff B stated the clinical records for patients #5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16 and #17 showed no review and update of the aide care plans (aide assignment) at time of recertification.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 142 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure personnel records were maintained with required annual employee performance evaluations and annual continuing education hours for three (Volunteer #1, 2 and #3) of three volunteers and five employees. Findings: Volunteer 1 A review of personnel records showed no annual performance evaluation and no annual continuing education for the 06/06/22 to 08/14/24 employment period. Volunteer 2 A review of personnel records showed no annual performance evaluation and no annual continuing education for the 06/28/22 to 08/14/24 employment period. Volunteer 3 A review of personnel records showed no annual performance evaluation and no annual continuing education for the 11/09/22 to 08/14/24 employment period. On 08/14/24 at 12:00 p.m., Staff C stated the personnel records were provided in their entirety and did not contain all the required information for Volunteers 1, 2 and 3.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 14, 2024Complaint and recertification inspection by the state11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 18, 2016.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 11 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 54% at home, 34% in assisted living, 8% in a nursing facility, 2% in a skilled nursing facility, 2% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.8%
Visits near death90.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Kindful Hospice I, LLC owns 100% directly since Jun 30, 2018.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: David Jackson (owns 5% or more through other companies, 9.69%); Joel A Adkisson (managing employee (under contract)); Katrina Lanier (corporate officer); Katrina Lanier (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Angela Wheeler (managing employee (on the payroll)); David Jackson (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Katie Elizabeth Sandlin (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); James Garner (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Choice Health at Home Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 29, 2021
Kindful Hospice I, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jun 30, 2018
Tcfiii Ch LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 29, 2021
Choice Health at Home, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 29, 2021
Tcfiii Ch Investor LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies65.43%Dec 29, 2021
Trive Capital Fund III LPOwns 5% or more through other companies64.37%Oct 23, 2023
Tcfiii Ch Spv LPOwns 5% or more through other companies35.63%Oct 23, 2023
Coltala Choice, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies16.61%Oct 23, 2023
Choice Rehab Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies8.93%Oct 23, 2023
Trive Capital Ch Blocker LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies5%Dec 29, 2021
Choice Hospice of Oklahoma LLCOwns 5% or more through other companiesDec 29, 2021

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 87% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 68.09% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 57% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 36 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74133, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.