Hearth Record

Lifespring Hospice

A hospice in Norman, Oklahoma 73069

2411 Springer Drive, Norman, Oklahoma 73069. (405) 329-4545.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 36 hospices serving ZIP code 73069 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 17, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 17, 2026: recertification inspection by the state11 deficiencies
  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 103 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure emergency preparedness disaster table-top exercises, drills, community drills or plan activation events were conducted at the agency’s branch operations for calendar years 2024 and 2025 for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of emergency preparedness records showed no emergency preparedness disaster table-top exercises, drills, community drills or plan activation events for the agency’s branch site operations located in Chickasha and Pauls Valley in calendar years 2024 and 2025. On 04/17/25 at 11:00 a.m., Staff B stated Chickasha and Pauls Valley locations did not have exercises, drills, events in 2024 and 2025.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 999 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure: 1.Medical social work completion of the initial psychosocial assessment no later than five calendar days after the election of hospice care for nine (Patients #3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 and #16) of 20 patients. 2.Chaplain completion of the initial spiritual assessment no later than five calendar days after the election of hospice care for six (Patients #4, 5, 6, 10, 12 and#16) of 20 patients. Findings: Patient #3A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 03/18/26 with no completion of an initial psychosocial assessment from 03/18/26 to 04/16/26 (30 days after election of the hospice benefit) and showed no patient or caregiver refusal of medical social worker services/visits. On 04/17/26 at 12:35 p.m., Staff C stated the initial psychosocial assessment had not been completed within the first five days after election of the hospice benefit. Patient #4A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 09/10/22 with:1.No completion of an initial psychosocial assessment after election of the hospice benefit and no patient or caregiver refusal of medical social worker services/visits. 2.No completion of an initial spiritual assessment after election of the hospice benefit and no patient or caregiver refusal of medical social worker or chaplain services/visits. A review of a POC dated 02/21/26 to 04/21/26 showed no medical social work and no chaplain services/visits and showed no documentation of patient or caregiver refusal of medical social worker or chaplain services/visits. On 04/17/26 at 12:42 p.m., Staff C stated the initial psychosocial assessment, and spiritual assessments had not been completed within the first five days after election of the hospice benefit. Patient #5A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 09/10/22 with:1.Completion of an initial psychosocial assessment on 03/06/26 (nine days after election of the hospice benefit) and showed no patient or caregiver refusal of medical social worker services/visits. 2.No completion of an initial spiritual assessment after election of the hospice benefit and showed no patient or caregiver refusal of chaplain services/visits. A review of a POC dated 02/26/26 to 05/26/26 showed no chaplain services/visits and showed no documentation of patient or caregiver refusal of chaplain services/visits. On 04/17/26 at 1:00 p.m., Staff C stated the initial psychosocial assessment was conducted late, and the comprehensive spiritual assessments had not been completed within the first five days after election of the hospice benefit. Patient #6A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 09/20/24 with:1.No completion of an initial psychosocial assessment by 09/25/24 (five days after election of the hospice benefit) and showed no patient or caregiver refusal of medical social worker services/visits. 2.Completion of an initial spiritual assessment on 10/03/24 (13 days after election of the hospice benefit) and showed no patient or caregiver refusal of chaplain services/visits. On 04/17/26 at 1:05 p.m., Staff C stated the initial psychosocial assessment was not conducted, and the comprehensive spiritual assessments had not been completed within the first five days after election of the hospice benefit. Patient #8A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 09/13/24 with no completion of an initial psychosocial assessment by 09/18/24 (five days after election of the hospice benefit) and showed no patient or caregiver refusal of medical social worker services/visits. On 04/17/26 at 1:20 p.m., Staff C stated the initial psychosocial assessment was not conducted within the first five days after election of the hospice benefit. Patient #9A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 04/02/26 with completion of an initial psychosocial assessment on 04/11/26 (nine days after election of the hospice benefit) and showed no patient or caregiver refusal of medical social worker services/visits. On 04/17/26 at 1:25 p.m., Staff C stated the initial psychosocial assessment was not conducted within the first five days after election of the hospice benefit. Patient #10A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 03/20/26 with:1.No completion of an initial psychosocial assessment by 03/25/26 (five days after election of the hospice benefit) and showed no patient or caregiver refusal of medical social worker services/visits. 2.No completion of an initial spiritual assessment by 03/25/26 (five days after election of the hospice benefit) and showed no patient or caregiver refusal of chaplain services/visits. On 04/17/26 at 1:26 p.m., Staff C stated the initial psychosocial assessment, and the comprehensive spiritual assessments had not been completed within the first five days after election of the hospice benefit.Patient #12A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 06/11/25 with:1.Completion of an initial psychosocial assessment on 08/27/25 (77 days after election of the hospice benefit) and showed no patient or caregiver refusal of medical social worker services/visits. 2.Completion of an initial spiritual assessment on 06/23/25 (12 days after election of the hospice benefit) and showed no patient or caregiver refusal of chaplain services/visits. On 04/17/26 at 1:32 p.m., Staff C stated the initial psychosocial assessment, and the comprehensive spiritual assessments had not been completed within the first five days after election of the hospice benefit. Patient #16A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 09/27/24 with:1.No completion of an initial psychosocial assessment by 10/01/24 (five days after election of the hospice benefit) and showed no patient or caregiver refusal of medical social worker services/visits. 2.No completion of an initial spiritual assessment by 10/01/24 (five days after election of the hospice benefit) and showed no patient or caregiver refusal of chaplain services/visits. A review of a POC dated 09/22/25 to 11/20/25 showed no medical social work services/visits and showed no documentation of patient or caregiver refusal of medical social work services/visits. On 04/17/26 at 2:10 p.m., Staff C stated the initial psychosocial assessment, and the comprehensive spiritual assessments had not been completed within the first five days after election of the hospice benefit.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 2,141 words

    “Based on record reviews and interviews, the hospice failed to ensure bereavement care plans were initiated or were included as a part of the overall POC after the initial and ongoing bereavement assessments for 20 (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and #20) of 20 patients. Findings: On 04/15/26 at 10:00 a.m., Staff D stated:1.The patients are given a bereavement risk score at the initial spiritual and bereavement assessment and are advised of spiritual and bereavement services provided by the Hospice. If the patient or family requests spiritual or bereavement services, the social worker or chaplain is added to the POC. 2.The bereavement program consists of intermittently timed mail outs and follow up telephone calls which begin after the patient’s death. 3.The Hospice does not maintain a written POC for bereavement until after death and it was not included in the overall POC unless the patient’s family or caregiver was assessed as a high risk for bereavement. Patient #1A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 12/13/24 with a completion of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 12/16/24. A review of a POC dated 02/06/26 to 04/06/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/05/26, 02/19/26, 03/05/26, 03/19/26, 04/02/26 and on 04/15/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 12:00 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #2A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 09/11/24 with a completion of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 09/12/24. A review of a POC dated 03/05/26 to 05/03/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/09/26, 02/23/26, 03/09/26, 03/23/26 and on 04/06/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 12:22 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #3A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 03/18/26 with no conduction of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment between 03/18/26 and 04/15/26. A review of a POC dated 03/18/26 to 06/15/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/19/26, 04/02/26 and on 04/15/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 12:35 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #4A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 09/10/22 with no conduction of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment. A review of a POC dated 02/21/26 to 04/21/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/23/26, 03/09/26, 03/23/26 and on 04/06/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 12:42 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #5A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 02/26/26 with no conduction of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment. A review of a POC dated 02/26/26 to 05/26/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/23/26, 03/09/26, 03/23/26 and on 04/06/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 1:00 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #6A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 09/20/24 with completion of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 10/03/24. A review of a POC dated 03/14/26 to 05/12/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/24/26, 04/02/26 and on 04/15/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 1:05 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #7A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 01/19/26 with no conduction of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment. A review of a POC dated 01/19/26 to 04/18/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 01/22/26, 02/05/26, 02/19/26, 03/05/26, 03/19/26, 04/02/26 and on 04/15/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 1:10 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #8A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 09/13/24 with completion of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 09/17/24. A review of a POC dated 03/07/26 to 05/05/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/19/26, 04/02/26 and on 04/15/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 1:20 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #9A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 04/02/26 with conduction of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 04/06/26. A review of a POC dated 04/02/26 to 06/30/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/15/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 1:25 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #10A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 03/20/26 with no conduction of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment between 03/20/26 and 04/17/26. A review of a POC dated 03/20/26 to 05/18/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/02/26 and on 04/15/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 1:26 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #11A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 10/11/23 with no conduction of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment. A review of a POC dated 03/29/26 to 05/27/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/02/26 and on 04/15/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 1:30 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #12A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 06/11/25 with conduction of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 06/23/25. A review of a POC dated 04/07/26 to 06/05/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/02/26 and on 04/15/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 1:32 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #13A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 03/04/25 with no conduction of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment. A review of a POC dated 02/27/26 to 04/27/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/05/26, 03/19/26, 04/02/26 and on 04/15/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 1:36 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #14A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 03/04/25 with no conduction of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment. A review of a POC dated 02/18/26 to 05/18/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/19/26, 03/05/26, 03/19/26, 04/02/26 and on 04/15/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 1:50 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #15A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 12/12/24 with no conduction of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment. A review of a POC dated 02/05/26 to 04/05/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/19/26, 03/05/26, 03/19/26, 04/02/26 and on 04/15/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 1:57 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #16A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 09/27/24 with no conduction of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment. A review of a POC dated 09/22/25 to 11/20/25 and IDG updates to the POC on 10/02/25, 10/15/25, and on 10/30/25 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 2:00 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #17A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 07/01/25 with no conduction of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment. A review of a POC dated 12/28/25 to 02/25/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 01/08/26 and on 01/22/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 2:22 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC and no bereavement POC until after death on 01/26/26. Patient #18A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 02/08/26 with conduction of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment on 02/16/26. A review of a POC dated 02/08/26 to 05/08/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/19/26, 03/05/26, 03/19/26 and on 04/02/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 2:25 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #19A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 06/27/23 with date of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment is unknown (due to data migration from one eMR system to another). The documentation showed the patient revoked benefits and was discharged for outpatient treatment on 11/07/25. A review of a POC dated 10/14/25 to 12/12/25 and IDG updates to the POC on 10/15/25, and on 10/30/25 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 2:27 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC. Patient #20A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 07/10/23 with date of the initial spiritual/bereavement assessment is unknown (due to data migration from one eMR system to another). The patient deceased on 09/24/23. A review of a POC dated 07/23/23 to 12/12/25 and documentation showed no IDG updates to the POC, showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC, and showed no changes in hospice physician orders. On 04/17/26 at 2:35 p.m., Staff C stated the patient had no bereavement POC or bereavement interventions and goals on the IDG POC.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 289 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure care was coordinated between the IDG members and the physician for two (Patients #1 and #2) of 20 patients. Findings: Patient #1A review of a POC dated 02/06/26 to 04/06/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/05/26, 02/19/26, 03/05/26, 03/19/26, 04/02/26 and on 04/15/26. A review of the clinical record showed a chaplain visit frequency of one time a month for three months; and a medical social work visit frequency of one time a month for one month, two times a month for one month, then one time a month for one month. The clinical record showed chaplain missed visits on 02/11/26, 03/02/26 and 04/06/26 (three visits ordered, no visits conducted). The clinical record showed medical social work missed visits on 02/06/26,03/02/26, 03/13/26 and on 04/07/26 (four visits ordered, no visits conducted). The clinical record showed no discussion by the IDG about the missed visits and showed no hospice physician orders to change the service disciplines or the disciplines visit frequencies. Patient #2A review of a POC dated 03/05/26 to 05/03/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/09/26, 02/23/26, 03/09/26, 03/23/26 and on 04/06/26.A review of the clinical record showed a chaplain visit frequency of one time a month for two. The clinical record showed chaplain missed visits on 03/12/26 (one visit ordered, no visit conducted) and showed no attempts to make up the visit. The clinical record showed no discussion by the IDG about the missed visits and showed no hospice physician orders to change the service disciplines or the disciplines visit frequencies. On 04/17/26 at 12:22 p.m., Staff C stated the IDG team members did not document any discussion about the chaplain missed visit.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 848 words

    “Based on record reviews and interviews, the agency failed to ensure continued review and update of hospice aide care plans for nine (Patients #1, 2, 4, 8, 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19) of 20 patients. Findings: Patient #1A review of a POC dated 02/06/26 to 04/06/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/05/26, 02/19/26, 03/05/26, 03/19/26, 04/02/26 and on 04/15/26 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of one time a week for one week, three visits every week for eight weeks, then one time a week for one week. An aide care plan dated 12/10/24 showed no further update to the hospice aide care plan, including frequencies and durations of services since 12/10/24. On 04/17/26 at 12:00 p.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan had not been reviewed and updated at each recertification. Patient #2A review of a POC dated 03/05/26 to 05/03/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/09/26, 02/23/26, 03/09/26, 03/23/26 and on 04/06/26 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of one time a week for one week, three visits every week for eight weeks. An aide care plan dated 09/12/24 showed no further update to the hospice aide care plan, including frequencies and durations of services since 09/12/24. On 04/17/26 at 12:22 p.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan had not been reviewed and updated at each recertification. Patient #4A review of a POC dated 02/21/26 to 04/21/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/23/26, 03/09/26, 03/23/26 and on 04/06/26 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of three visits every week for eight weeks and one time a week for one week. An aide care plan dated 07/15/24 showed no further update to the hospice aide care plan, including frequencies and durations of services since 07/15/24. On 04/17/26 at 12:42 p.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan had not been reviewed and updated at each recertification. Patient #8A review of a POC dated 03/07/26 to 05/05/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/19/26, 04/02/26 and on 04/15/26 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of three visits every week for eight weeks and one time a week for one week. An aide care plan dated 09/15/24 showed no further update to the hospice aide care plan, including frequencies and durations of services since 09/15/24. On 04/17/26 at 1:20 p.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan had not been reviewed and updated at each recertification. Patient #13A review of a POC dated 02/27/26 to 04/27/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/05/26, 03/19/26, 04/02/26 and on 04/15/26 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of one time a week for one week, three visits every week for eight weeks. An aide care plan dated 03/04/25 showed no further update to the hospice aide care plan, including frequencies and durations of services since 03/04/25. On 04/17/26 at 1:36 p.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan had not been reviewed and updated at each recertification. Patient #15A review of a POC dated 02/05/26 to 04/05/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/19/26, 03/05/26, 03/19/26, 04/02/26 and on 04/17/26 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of one time a week for one week, three visits every week for eight weeks. An aide care plan dated 12/13/24 showed no further update to the hospice aide care plan, including frequencies and durations of services since 12/13/24. On 04/17/26 at 1:57 p.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan had not been reviewed and updated at each recertification. Patient #16A review of a POC dated 09/22/25 to 11/20/25 and IDG updates to the POC on 10/02/25, 10/15/25, and on 10/30/25 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of three times a week for eight weeks, two times a week for one week. An aide care plan dated 09/30/24 showed no further update to the hospice aide care plan, including frequencies and durations of services since 09/30/24. On 04/17/26 at 2:10 p.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan had not been reviewed and updated at each recertification. Patient #17A review of a POC dated 12/28/25 to 02/25/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 01/08/26 and on 01/22/26 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of three times a week for eight weeks, two times a week for one week. An aide care plan dated 07/07/25 showed no further update to the hospice aide care plan, including frequencies and durations of services since 07/07/25. On 04/17/26 at 2:22 p.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan had not been reviewed and updated at each recertification. Patient #19A review of a POC dated 10/14/25 to 12/12/25 and IDG updates to the POC on 10/15/25, and on 10/30/25 ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of two times a week for nine weeks. An aide care plan dated 07/12/24 showed no further update to the hospice aide care plan, including frequencies and durations of services since 07/12/24. On 04/17/26 at 2:27 p.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan had not been reviewed and updated at each recertification.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure on-site aide supervisory visits were completed every 14 days for one (Patient #3) of 20 patients. Findings: Patient #3A review of the POC dated 03/18/26 to 06/15/26 showed a home health aide visits frequency of two times a week for twelve weeks, then one time a week for one week. A review of the clinical record showed aide visits were conducted on 03/27/26, 03/30/26, 04/02/26 and 04/09/26. The clinical record showed no supervisory visits from 03/18/26 to 04/10/26(23 days between supervisory visits). On 04/17/26 at 12:35 p.m., Staff C stated the supervisory aide visits were not conducted every 14 days.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure volunteer services were a part of the hospice program in calendar years 2024 and 2025 for all patients, caregivers and employees. Findings: A review of hospice program volunteer records showed the hospice program had no volunteer personnel and showed no volunteer recruitment activities in calendar years 2024 and 2025. On 04/15/26 at 10:15 a.m., Staff E stated:1.The hospice had no volunteer personnel.2.The hospice had no records which showed volunteer recruitment activities from 04/03/24 to 04/15/26. At 11:00 a.m., Staff A stated they identified problems with the volunteer program and a performance improvement project was implemented for 2nd quarter of 2026.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure volunteer services met hospice program requirements in calendar year 2024 and 2025 for all patients, caregivers, and employees. Findings: A review of volunteer records showed the hospice program had no utilization of volunteer personnel in calendar year 2024 and a utilization of 0.01% in calendar year 2025. On 04/17/26 at 10:15 a.m., Staff E stated:1.She was helping from the corporate office but there had not been a volunteer coordinator at the hospice for some time.2.There were not any volunteers for the hospice in 2024 or 2025. At 11:00 a.m., Staff A stated we identified problems with the volunteer program and a performance improvement project was implemented for 2nd quarter of 2026.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 192 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure governing board appointment of an administrator for the hospice for all patients, families, caregivers and employees. Findings: On 04/14/26 at 12:30 p.m., after arrival at the agency the OSDH surveyor was connected by telephone to Staff D (name withheld) who identified himself as the administrator of the hospice. A review of emergency preparedness records dated 06/27/25 identified an individual (name withheld) differently than Staff D as the administrator for the hospice. A review of governing board meeting minute records for calendar year 2025 showed no appointment of Staff D as the administrator for the hospice. A request for governing board administrative records that showed Staff D was appointed as the administrator for the hospice yielded no results. On 04/16/26 at 2:00 p.m., Staff A stated there were no governing board meeting minutes that showed Staff D was appointed by the governing board. On 04/17/26 at 11:30 a.m., a review of a document titled, Hospice Governing Body Meeting Minute 3rd quarter 2025 showed Staff D was designated as the administrator. Staff A stated the governing board meeting minute record was dated 04/17/26.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Hospice multiple locations (42 CFR 418.100(f)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 229 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure CMS NPI included two branch sites (McAlester and Sayre locations) for the hospice for all patients and staff. Findings: On 04/13/26, a review of hospice federal provider information showed the hospice was located in Norman, Oklahoma and had branch operation sites in Chickasha, Oklahoma, Pauls Valley, Oklahoma and Shawnee, Oklahoma. On 04/14/26 at 12:00 p.m., the OSDH surveyor arrived at the hospice. On 04/14/26 at 1:30 p.m., an entrance conference was conducted by telephone with Staff A and B. Documentation that identified the branch sites for the hospice was requested. A review of a printed document showed the addresses for the branch sites as Shawnee, Pauls Valley and Chickasha, Oklahoma and handwritten onto the document were the words “drop sites” which identified the cities of McAlester and Sayre, Oklahoma. On 04/14/26 at 3:00 p.m., Staff B stated:1.The hospice had branch sites in Shawnee, Pauls Valley and Chickasha.2.They had drop site locations in McAlester and Sayre which the staff used to drop things off and pick up supplies. On 04/14/26 at 3:30 p.m., Staff E stated:1.The drop site locations were inside of company-related home care agency’s offices (names withheld) in McAlester and Sayre.2.CMS was not informed of the drop site locations and the hospice did not file a request to add the locations as branch sites for the hospice.”

    Rule L0656. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 131 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure an inpatient care contract was in place to meet patient pain management and respite care needs for all patients, caregivers and employees. Findings: On 04/14/26 at 1:30 p.m., a request for general inpatient contract records for calendar years 2024 and 2025 yielded no results. On 04/15/26 At 10:00 a.m., Staff A stated:1.The general inpatient contract lapsed in July of 2025.2.The Hospice did not have a contract for general inpatient care.3.Their practice was to negotiate with a patient’s facility of choice for respite care when it was needed. At 3:00 p.m., a contract titled, Agreement for Inpatient Hospital Care, dated 04/15/26 was reviewed. Staff A stated she was not aware the Hospice did not have a contract for general inpatient care.”

    Rule L0711. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 17, 2026Recertification inspection by the state11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 21, 2007.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 17 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 57% at home, 27% in assisted living, 10% in a nursing facility, 5% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day17.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4.9%
Visits near death97.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Karen E Vahlberg (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Karen E Vahlberg (corporate officer, 100%); Karen E Vahlberg (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Karen E Vahlberg (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 72% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 77% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 93.37% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 34.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 36 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73069, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.