Hearth Record

Cura-Hpc, LLC

A hospice in Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135

4510 East 31st Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135. (918) 994-4807.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 36 hospices serving ZIP code 74135 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 5, 2025: a complaint and recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 5, 2025: complaint and recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1)-(2))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure development of a community-based risk assessment (All Hazards Risk Assessment) for 106 patients and all employees. A review of administrative records showed no community-based risk assessment which addressed the agency and the patient population. On 02/05/25 at 2:50 pm, Staff C stated there was no documentation of an all-hazards risk assessment.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 484 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure an individualized plan of care was fully developed to include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness for ten (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 13, 14 and 18) of 19 patients reviewed. Patient #1 A plan of care dated 12/20/24 to 03/19/25 documented a primary diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #2 A review of the plan of care dated 11/28/24 to 01/26/25 documented a primary diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #3 A plan of care dated 10/07/24 to 01/04/25 documented a primary diagnosis of generalized atherosclerosis and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #4 A plan of care dated 12/19/24 to 03/18/25 documented a primary diagnosis of generalized atherosclerosis and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #5 A plan of care dated 10/09/24 to 01/06/25 documented a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #6 A plan of care dated 03/26/24 to 06/23/24 documented a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #8 A plan of care dated 12/01/24 to 01/29/25 documented a primary diagnosis of generalized atherosclerosis and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #13 A plan of care dated 11/06/24 to 01/04/25 documented a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #14 A plan of care dated 10/14/24 to 12/12/24 documented a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #18 A plan of care dated 09/16/24 to 11/14/24 documented a primary diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. On 02/05/25 at 2:45 pm, Staff B stated the plans of care for Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 13, 14 and 18 failed to include patient specific services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 5, 2025Complaint and recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 8, 2004.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 21% at home, 5% in assisted living, 74% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.4%
Visits near death93.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Sullivan Hcp Trust owns 33.1% directly since Sep 1, 2015; Senko Holdings II, LLC owns 33.1% directly since Sep 1, 2015; Mayflower Properties LLC owns 33.1% directly since Sep 1, 2015.
  • Matrix Provider Solutions LLC runs it.
  • 13 owners or officers are people: Scott D Pilgrim (owns 5% or more through other companies); Jonathan Rhodes (owns 5% or more through other companies); Jonathan Rhodes (corporate director); Jonathan Rhodes (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kimberly A Kidd (managing employee (on the payroll)); James Frank Sullivan (owns 5% or more through other companies); Jeffrey W Young (owns 5% or more through other companies); Jeffrey W Young (corporate director); Jeffrey W Young (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jack Byers (owns 5% or more through other companies); Jack Byers (corporate director); Jack Byers (managing employee (on the payroll)); Mark A Lietzke (owns 5% or more through other companies).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Sullivan Hcp TrustOwns 5% or more directly33.1%Sep 1, 2015
Senko Holdings II, LLCOwns 5% or more directly33.1%Sep 1, 2015
Mayflower Properties LLCOwns 5% or more directly33.1%Sep 1, 2015
Matrix Provider Solutions LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)Aug 1, 2014

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.44% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 72.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 36 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74135, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 2.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.