Hearth Record

Choice Health at Home - Southeastern Oklahoma Hospice

A hospice in Ada, Oklahoma 74820

117 S. Broadway, Ada, Oklahoma 74820. (580) 332-6900.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 19 hospices serving ZIP code 74820 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 5, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 5, 2026: complaint inspection by the state5 deficiencies
  • Initial assessment (42 CFR 418.54(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 231 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure completion of an initial evaluation for hospice services within 48 hours from receipt of referral for three (Patients #4, 6 and 7) of 10 patients. Findings: Patient #4A review of the clinical record showed a referral for hospice services on 05/12/26 and showed start of care dated 05/15/26 (3 days from receipt of the referral). The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal or request to delay hospice services, no communication with the physician and no change in orders. Patient #6A review of the clinical record showed a referral for hospice services on 02/11/26 and showed start of care dated 02/16/26 (5 days from receipt of the referral). The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal or request to delay hospice services, no communication with the physician and no change in orders. Patient #7A review of the clinical record showed a referral for hospice services on 02/19/26 and showed start of care dated 02/25/26 (5 days from receipt of the referral). The clinical record showed no patient or caregiver refusal or request to delay hospice services, no communication with the physician and no change in orders. On 08/05/26 from 1:05 p.m. to 1:20 a.m., Staff B stated there was no documentation in the clinical records for the delay in hospice service evaluations for patients #4, 6 and #7.”

    Rule L0522. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 844 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure a bereavement care plan was initiated or was included as a part of the overall POC after the initial spiritual and bereavement assessments for 10 (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and #10) of 10 patients. Findings: Patient #1A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 05/05/26, and completion of the spiritual and bereavement assessments on 05/08/26. A review of a POC dated 05/05/26 to 08/02/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/02/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. The clinical record showed no changes in orders. Patient #2A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 01/07/26, and completion of the spiritual and bereavement assessments on 01/08/26. A review of a POC dated 01/07/26 to 04/06/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 01/06/26, 01/20/26, 02/03/26, 02/17/26, 03/03/26, 03/17/26 and on 03/31/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. The clinical record showed no changes in orders. Patient #3A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 03/09/26, and completion of the spiritual and bereavement assessments on 03/11/26. A review of a POC dated 03/09/26 to 06/06/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/20/26, 04/03/26, 04/17/26, 04/28/26, 05/12/26 and on 05/26/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. The clinical record showed no changes in orders. Patient #4A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 05/15/26, and completion of the spiritual and bereavement assessments on 05/18/26. A review of a POC dated 05/15/26 to 08/12/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/26/26, 06/09/26, 06/23/26, 07/07/26 and on 07/22/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. The clinical record showed no changes in orders. Patient #5A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 05/09/26, and completion of the spiritual and bereavement assessments on 05/12/25. A review of a POC dated 05/09/26 to 07/25/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/09/26, 06/23/26, 07/07/26 and on 07/22/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. The clinical record showed no changes in orders. Patient #6A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 02/11/26, and completion of the spiritual and bereavement assessments on 02/18/26. A review of a POC dated 06/16/26 to 08/14/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/23/26, 07/07/26, 07/22/26 and on 08/04/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. The clinical record showed no changes in orders. Patient #7A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 02/25/26, and completion of the spiritual and bereavement assessments on 02/27/26. A review of a POC dated 05/26/26 to 08/23/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/29/26, 06/12/26, 06/26/26, 07/10/26 and on 07/24/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. The clinical record showed no changes in orders. Patient #8A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 07/15/26, and completion of the spiritual and bereavement assessments on 07/16/26. A review of a POC dated 07/15/26 to 10/12/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 07/22/26 and on 08/04/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. The clinical record showed no changes in orders. Patient #9A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 02/07/25, and completion of the spiritual and bereavement assessments on 02/11/25. A review of a POC dated 06/02/26 to 07/31/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/09/26, 06/23/26, 07/07/26, 07/22/26 and on 08/04/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. The clinical record showed no changes in orders. Patient #10A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 12/18/25 and completion of the spiritual and bereavement assessments on 12/22/25. A review of a POC dated 06/16/26 to 08/14/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/23/26, 07/07/26, 07/22/26 and on 08/04/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. The clinical record showed no changes in orders. On 08/05/26 from 12:40 p.m. to 1:30 p.m., Staff B stated:Patients #2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and #10 did not have bereavement care plans in place. Patients #1 and #3 had bereavement care plans initiated after the patients’ deaths.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 230 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure:Aide visits were provided in accordance with the plan of care for one (Patient #2) of 10 patients.The hospice aide did not obtain a patient weight weekly in accordance with the plan of care for one (Patient #5) of 10 patients. Findings: Patient #2A review of a POC dated 01/07/26 to 04/06/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 01/06/26, 01/20/26, 02/03/26, 02/17/26, 03/03/26, 03/17/26 and on 03/31/26 showed an aide visit frequency of two times a week. During the week of 05/24/26 to 05/30/26 an aide visit was conducted on 05/25/26 (one visit conducted, two visits ordered). The clinical record showed no communication between the IDG and showed no refused or missed visit and no changes in the ordered aide visit frequency. On 08/05/26 at 12:50 p.m., Staff B stated the aide visits were not conducted as ordered. Patient #5A review of a POC dated 05/09/26 to 07/25/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/09/26, 06/23/26, 07/07/26 and on 07/22/26 showed an aide visit frequency of two times a week and showed orders for the aide to weigh the patient weekly. The clinical records showed no patient weights were obtained by the aide during the aide visits from 05/28/26 to 07/24/26. On 08/05/26 at 1:12 p.m., Staff B stated the patient was not weighed during the aide visits.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 556 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the plan of care was fully developed to include services necessary for:The palliation and management of the terminal illness (hospice diagnosis) for four (Patients #2, 4, 7 and #9) of 10 patients. Aide services interventions and goals for nine (Patients #2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and #10) of 10 patients.Interventions and goals related to the management of pain for three (Patients #3, 4 and #9) of 10 patients. Findings: Patient #2A review of a POC dated 01/07/26 to 04/06/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 01/06/26, 01/20/26, 02/03/26, 02/17/26, 03/03/26, 03/17/26 and on 03/31/26 did not include interventions and goals necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness breast cancer and did not include hospice aide interventions and goals.Patient #3A review of a POC dated 03/09/26 to 06/06/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/20/26, 04/03/26, 04/17/26, 04/28/26, 05/12/26 and on 05/26/26 did not include hospice aide or pain management interventions and goals. Patient #4A review of a POC dated 05/15/26 to 08/12/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/26/26, 06/09/26, 06/23/26, 07/07/26 and on 07/22/26 did not include interventions and goals necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness dementia and did not include hospice aide or pain management interventions and goals.Patient #5A review of a POC dated 05/09/26 to 07/25/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/09/26, 06/23/26, 07/07/26 and on 07/22/26 did not include hospice aide interventions and goals.Patient #6A review of a POC dated 06/16/26 to 08/14/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/23/26, 07/07/26, 07/22/26 and on 08/04/26 did not include hospice aide interventions and goals. Patient #7A review of a POC dated 05/26/26 to 08/23/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/29/26, 06/12/26, 06/26/26, 07/10/26 and on 07/24/26 did not include did not include interventions and goals necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness of heart failure and did not include hospice aide interventions and goals. Patient #8A review of a POC dated 07/15/26 to 10/12/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 07/22/26 and on 08/04/26 did not include hospice aide interventions and goals. Patient #9A review of a POC dated 06/02/26 to 07/31/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/09/26, 06/23/26, 07/07/26, 07/22/26 and on 08/04/26 did not include did not include interventions and goals necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness atrial fibrillation and did not include hospice aide or pain management interventions and goals. Patient #10A review of a POC dated 06/16/26 to 08/14/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 06/23/26, 07/07/26, 07/22/26 and on 08/04/26 did not include hospice aide interventions and goals. On 08/05/26 from 12:50 p.m. to 1:27 p.m., Staff B stated the POCs did not include interventions and goals related to their hospice diagnoses for patients #2, 4, 7 and #9. On 08/05/26 from 12:40 p.m. to 1:30 p.m., Staff B stated the care plans for:Patients #2, 4, 7 and #9 did not include interventions and goals related to their hospice diagnoses.Patients #2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and #10 did not include interventions and goals for the hospice aide services.Patients #3, 4 and #9 did not include interventions and goals related to management of the patients’ pain.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 246 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure physicians orders were entered into the patients’ clinical records upon receipt for two (Patients #1 and #3) of 10 patients. Findings: Patient #1A review of the clinical record showed a POC dated 05/05/26 to 08/02/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 05/02/26 showed an entry into the patient’s medication profile morphine sulfate 20mg per ml every two hours as needed for pain on 05/12/26 and showed no physicians order for the medication. A SN visit note dated 05/08/26 documented the nurse requested an order from the hospice physician during the visit for morphine sulfate 20mg per ml every two hours as needed for increased pain. A review of SN visit notes dated 05/09/26, 05/10/26 and 05/12/26 documented the patient was taking morphine sulfate for pain management. On 08/05/26 at 12:40 p.m., Staff B stated the clinical record showed no entry of the 05/08/26 physician’s order for morphine sulfate. Patient #3A review of the clinical record showed a POC dated 03/09/26 to 06/06/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/20/26, 04/03/26, 04/17/26, 04/28/26, 05/12/26 and on 05/26/26 showed a physician’s order dated 05/14/26 for wound care: cleanse with normal saline, apply Xeroform and cover with bordered foam dressing two times a week. The order did not document the wound site location for the wound care. On 08/05/26 at 1:00 p.m., Staff B stated the clinical record showed no location site for the wound care.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jul 2, 2024: recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 644 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure an individualized plan of care was fully developed to include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness for fourteen (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of 14 patients reviewed. Patient #1 A plan of care dated 04/24/24 to 06/22/24 documented a primary diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #2 A review of the plan of care dated 05/16/24 to 08/13/24 documented a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #3 A plan of care dated 04/19/24 to 06/17/24 documented a primary diagnosis of sarcopenia and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #4 A plan of care dated 05/11/24 to 07/09/24 documented a primary diagnosis of prostate cancer and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #5 A plan of care dated 04/28/24 to 06/26/24 documented a primary diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #6 A plan of care dated 06/12/24 to 09/09/24 documented a primary diagnosis of chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #7 A plan of care dated 02/21/24 to 05/18/24 documented a primary diagnosis of breast cancer and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #8 A plan of care dated 04/17/24 to 07/15/24 documented a primary diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #9 A plan of care dated 03/31/24 to 05/29/24 documented a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #10 A plan of care dated 03/15/24 to 06/12/24 documented a primary diagnosis of cerebral ischemia and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #11 A plan of care dated 03/20/24 to 06/17/24 documented a primary diagnosis of lung cancer and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #12 A plan of care dated 03/17/24 to 05/15/24 documented a primary diagnosis of colon cancer and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #13 A plan of care dated 03/25/24 to 06/22/24 documented a primary diagnosis of liver cancer and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #14 A plan of care dated 05/21/24 to 08/18/24 documented a primary diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. On 07/02/24 at 2:15 pm, Staff A stated the plans of care for Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 failed to include individualized services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 466 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to: 1. ensure the plan of care was revised to reflect the presence of wounds for two (Patients #1 and 5) of 14 patients; and 2. ensure the plan of care was revised to reflect changes in the services for a change in the primary diagnosis for one (Patient #2) of 14 patients. 1. Patient #1 A review of the plan of care dated 04/24/24 to 06/22/24 and plan of care updates dated 04/30/24, 05/14/24, 05/28/24 and 06/11/24 showed a skilled nurse frequency of one visit per week for nine weeks and documented no presence of wounds or impaired skin integrity. A review of the clinical record showed the following: A skilled nurse assessment dated 06/05/24 documented the presence of a diabetic ulcer which was reported to the interdisciplinary group, with no documentation of physician notification or update to the plan of care. A skilled nurse assessment dated 06/12/24 documented the presence of a diabetic ulcer to the 4th left toe, with no update to the plan of care. A physician’s order dated 06/12/24 documented facility staff to paint the diabetic ulcer with Betadine daily, with no update to the plan of care. A skilled nurse assessment dated 06/19/24 documented the presence of a diabetic ulcer to the 4th left toe, with no update to the plan of care. Patient #5 A review of the plan of care dated 04/28/24 to 06/26/24 and plan of care updates dated 05/03/24, 05/17/24, 05/31/24 and 06/14/24 showed a skilled nurse frequency of one visit per week for nine weeks and documented no presence of wounds or impaired skin integrity. A review of the clinical record showed the following: A skilled nurse assessment dated 05/01/24 documented the presence of a lesion to the upper left back, with no update to the plan of care. A skilled nurse assessment dated 06/19/24 documented the presence of a lesion to the upper left back, with no update to the plan of care. 2. Patient #2 A review of the plan of care dated 05/16/24 to 08/13/24 and plan of care updates dated 05/28/24 and 06/11/24 documented a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A physician’s order dated 06/14/24 showed the primary diagnosis was to be changed to hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. A plan of care update dated 06/25/24 showed no changes in the services necessary for the management and palliation of the updated primary diagnosis. On 07/02/24 at 2:00 pm., Staff A stated: 1.the plan of care for Patients #1 and 6 were not updated to reflect the changes in skin integrity; and 2.. the plan of care for Patient #2 was no updated to reflect changes in the services necessary for the management and palliation of the updated primary diagnosis.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to analyze quality indicators. This failed practice had the potential to place 21 current patients and any new patient admitted to the hospice at risk for repeated hospice mishaps due to failure of the hospice to self-identify problem areas. A review of administrative records showed no analysis of quality indicators for 2023 and from January 1st, 2024, to March 31st, 2024. On 07/02/24 at 1:45 pm, Staff A stated the QAPI for 2023 and from January 1st, 2024, to March 31st, 2024, not contain an analysis of quality indicators.”

    Rule L0562. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 5, 2026Complaint inspection by the state5 deficiencies cited
Jul 2, 2024Recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 16, 2004.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 79% at home, 14% in assisted living, 3% in a nursing facility, 4% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.6%
Visits near death95.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Kindful Hospice I, LLC owns 100% directly since Aug 1, 2018.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: David Jackson (owns 5% or more through other companies, 8.94%); Katrina Lanier (corporate officer, 0%); David Jackson (corporate officer, 0%); David Jackson (corporate director, 0%); Katie Elizabeth Sandlin (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Jordan Landress (managing employee (on the payroll)); Marc J Davis (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Marc J Davis (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Choice Health at Home Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 29, 2021
Kindful Hospice I, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Aug 1, 2018
Tcfiii Ch LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 29, 2021
Choice Health at Home, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 29, 2021
Choice Hospice of Oklahoma LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 29, 2021
Tcfiii Ch Investor LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies65.43%Dec 29, 2021
Trive Capital Fund III LPOwns 5% or more through other companies42.11%Dec 29, 2021
Tcfiii Ch Spv LPOwns 5% or more through other companies23.31%Dec 29, 2021
Coltala Choice, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies16.61%Dec 29, 2021
Choice Rehab Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies8.93%Dec 29, 2021

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 86.72% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 56.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 19 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74820, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.