Hearth Record

Interim Healthcare Hospice

A hospice in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112

3613 NW 56th Street, Suite 385, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112. (405) 848-3555.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 42 hospices serving ZIP code 73112 had 6.5.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 7, 2024: a complaint and recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 7, 2024: complaint and recertification inspection by the state14 deficiencies
  • EP Training and Testing (42 CFR 418.113(d))

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure emergency preparedness testing and training was conducted with employees at least annually for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of administrative records showed no emergency preparedness plan program for testing and training employees was conducted at least annually for calendar years 2022 and 2023. On 08/07/24 at 12:00 p.m., Staff B stated the agency had no documentation of the emergency preparedness plan program carried out annual testing and training for employees in calendar years 2022 and 2023.”

    Rule E0036. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure emergency preparedness disaster declaration, table-top exercises, drills, community drills or plan activation events were conducted for 05/12/2023 to 08/07/24 for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of administrative records related to emergency preparedness showed no documentation of emergency preparedness disaster declaration, table-top exercises, drills, community drills or plan activation events for 05/12/2023 to 08/07/24. On 08/07/24 at 12:00 p.m., Staff B stated: The agency had no emergency preparedness disaster declaration, table-top exercises, drills, community drills or plan activation events for 05/12/2023 to 08/07/24.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 251 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure delivery of medication for symptom control was received by the patient/caregiver within 2 hours of order for one (Patient #3) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #3 A review of a POC dated 06/10/23 to 09/07/23 showed documentation of an SN visit frequency of two times a week. Documentation showed a clinical note dated 07/12/23 at 12:00 a.m., the patient was apneic with symptoms of increased anxiety documented as agitation and restlessness, an order for lorazepam (an anxiety medication) was ordered to be delivered by the pharmacy. A SN visit note at 8:00 a.m. documented the patient was apneic, non-responsive and restless; daily SN visits were ordered. A clinical note at 10:20 a.m. documented the patient was experiencing increased agitation and restlessness and the lorazepam that was ordered had not been delivered by the pharmacy. An order for Dilaudid (a pain medication) and an additional order for lorazepam (an anxiety medication) was ordered to be delivered STAT (immediately [within 2 hours]) to the pharmacy for the patient. Additional documentation showed the medication was received by the pharmacy at 1:20 p.m. (13 + hours after initial order, 3 hours after the second order). Documentation showed no communications with the contracted pharmacy (name withheld). Administrative records (Complaints, Incidents and Grievances) showed no documentation of the incident. On 08/07/24 at 3:00 p.m., Staff B stated medications ordered by the hospice are to be delivered by the contracted pharmacy to the patient/caregiver within 2 hours.”

    Rule L0512. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 232 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure completion of initial assessments/plan of care no later than 5 calendar days after the election of the hospice benefits for two (Patients #1 and #2) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #1 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 10/12/21 with POC from 10/12/21 to 01/09/22. Documentation showed a psychosocial assessment by the LCSW was completed on 10/20/21 (8 days after the hospice election date). Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of assessments and showed no communications or notifications to the physician. On 08/07/24 at 1:05 p.m., Staff A stated the spiritual component of the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit for patient #1. Patient #2 A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 12/07/21 (documentation showed a date of 12/12/21) with POC from 12/07/21 to 02/04/22. Documentation showed a spiritual assessment by the Chaplain was completed on 12/20/21 (13 days after the hospice election date). Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of assessments and showed no communications or notifications to the physician. On 08/07/24 at 1:12 p.m., Staff A stated the spiritual component of the initial POC was not completed within the first five days after the election of the hospice benefit for patient #2.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,077 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure development of a bereavement POC for 12 (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #1 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 10/20/21. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #2 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 12/20/21. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #3 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 06/14/23. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #4 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 01/10/22. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #5 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 02/08/24. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #6 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 02/14/24. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #7 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 09/12/23. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #8 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 08/22/23. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #9 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 10/14/22. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #10 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 08/01/24 (date of initial comprehensive assessment was 07/30/24). Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #11 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 06/22/24. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #12 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 10/26/22. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #13 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 05/06/24. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #14 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 07/23/24. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #15 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 02/15/23. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #16 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 09/05/23. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #17 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 07/16/24. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #18 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 07/11/23. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. Patient #19 A review of the clinical record showed a bereavement assessment dated 07/15/24. Documentation showed no bereavement POC and no subsequent development by the IDG of a bereavement POC. Documentation showed no patient or caregiver refusal of a bereavement POC and showed no change in orders. On 08/07/24 at 11:30 a.m., Staff F stated: 1. Bereavement program activities are initiated after a patient has deceased and; 2. Patient family members or significant others identified as the bereaved receive standardized bereavement letters, information mail outs and some telephone contacts over a 13-month period from the date the patient has deceased. At 1:05 p.m. to 2:12 p.m., Staff A stated for patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19: 1. Had no bereavement POCs. 2. Bereavement program activities are initiated after a patient has deceased and; 3. Patient family members or significant others identified as the bereaved receive standardized bereavement letters, information mail outs and some telephone contacts over a 13-month period from the date the patient has deceased.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 997 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure: 1. Aide visits were provided in accordance with the plan of care for four (Patients #8, 10, 11 and 15) of 19 patients; 2. SN visits were provided in accordance with the plan of care for two (Patients #3 and 15) of 19 patients; 3. Chaplain visits were provided in accordance with the plan of care for two (Patient #8 and 16) of 19 patients and; 4. MSW visits were provided in accordance with the plan of care for three (Patients #8, 15 and 16) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #3 A review of a POC dated 10/12/21 to 01/09/22 showed documentation of an SN visit frequency of two times a week. Documentation showed during the week of 06/30/24 to 07/06/24 a SN visit was missed on 07/04/24 due to the holiday (two visits ordered, one visit conducted). Documentation showed no communications between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered SN visit frequencies. On 08/07/24 at 1:20 p.m., Staff A stated SN visits were not provided in accordance with the POC for patient #3. Patient #8 A review of a POC dated 10/12/21 to 01/09/22 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of one week one, then two times a week for eight weeks; and a Chaplain visit frequency of one time a week; and a MSW visit frequency of one time a month for two months. Documentation showed during the weeks of 06/16/24 to 06/22/24 an aide visit was missed on 06/20/24 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted), 06/30/24 to 07/06/24 an aide visit was missed on 07/04/24 due to the holiday (two visits ordered, one visit conducted), 07/07/24 to 07/13/24 an aide visit was missed on 07/10/24 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted), 07/14/24 to 07/20/24 an aide visit was missed on 07/19/24 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted), 07/20/24 to 08/03/24 an aide visit was missed on 07/30/24 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted); and 06/13/24 to 06/15/24 an chaplain visit was not scheduled (one visits ordered, no visit conducted), 06/16/24 to 06/22/24 an chaplain visit was not scheduled (one visits ordered, no visit conducted), 06/30/24 to 07/06/24 an chaplain visit was not scheduled (one visits ordered, no visit conducted), and 07/28/24 to 08/03/24 an chaplain visit was not scheduled (one visits ordered, no visit conducted); and during the weeks of 06/13/24 to 07/13/24 no MSW visit was scheduled (one visits ordered, no visit conducted). Documentation showed no communications between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered SN, aide, chaplain or MSW visit frequencies. On 08/07/24 at 1:55 p.m., Staff A stated SN, aide, chaplain or MSW visits were not provided in accordance with the POC for patient #8. Patient #10 A review of a POC dated 07/30/24 to 10/27/24 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of one week one, then two times a week for 12 weeks. Documentation showed during the week of 07/30/24 to 08/03/24 no aide visit was conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted). Documentation showed no communications between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered aide visit frequency. On 08/07/24 at 2:04 p.m., Staff A stated aide visit was not provided in accordance with the POC for patient #10. Patient #11 A review of a POC dated 06/18/24 to 09/15/24 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of one week one, then two times a week for 12 weeks. Documentation showed during the week of 06/23/24 to 06/29/24 an aide visit was missed on 06/25/24 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted), 06/30/24 to 07/06/24 an aide visit was missed on 07/04/24 due to the holiday (two visits ordered, one visit conducted), 07/07/24 to 07/13/24 an aide visit was missed on 07/10/24 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted), 07/14/24 to 07/20/24 an aide visit was missed on 07/17/24 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted), 07/21/24 to 07/27/24 an aide visit was missed on 07/23/24 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted) and 07/28/24 to 08/03/24 an aide visit was conducted on 08/01/24 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted). Documentation showed no communications between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered aide visit frequency. On 08/07/24 at 2:05 p.m., Staff A stated aide visit was not provided in accordance with the POC for patient #11. Patient #15 A review of a POC dated 06/07/24 to 08/05/24 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of one week one, then three times a week for eight weeks; a SN visit frequency of two times a week for eight weeks; and a MSW visit frequency of one time a month for two months. Documentation showed during the weeks of 06/30/24 to 07/06/24 an aide visit was missed on 07/03/24 and 07/04/24 (three visits ordered, one visit conducted); 06/30/24 to 07/06/24 an SN visit was missed on 07/04/24 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted); and during the weeks of 06/07/24 to 07/25/24 one MSW visit was missed on 06/07/24 (one visits ordered, no visit conducted). Documentation showed no communications between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered aide and MSW visit frequencies. On 08/07/24 at 2:15 p.m., Staff A stated SN, aide and MSW visits were not provided in accordance with the POC for patient #15. Patient #16 A review of a POC dated 06/27/24 to 08/25/24 showed documentation of an MSW visit frequency of one time a month for two months; and a chaplain visit frequency of two times a month for two months. Documentation showed during the time period of 06/27/24 to 08/03/24 an MSW visit was missed on 07/29/24 (one visit ordered, no visit conducted) and a chaplain visit was conducted on 07/16/24 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted). Documentation showed no communications between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered chaplain or MSW visit frequencies. On 08/07/24 at 2:20 p.m., Staff A stated chaplain or MSW visits were not provided in accordance with the POC for patient #16.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure plans of care were fully developed to include service discipline frequencies and durations to meet individualized patient care for one (Patients #1) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #1 A review of a POC dated 10/12/21 to 01/09/22 with IDG updates on 10/13/21 and on 10/27/21 showed no documentation of SN, chaplain or MSW service discipline visit frequencies and durations. Documentation showed no communications between the IDG related to service discipline frequencies and durations. On 08/07/24 at 1:05 p.m., Staff A stated the POC for patient #1 did not show visit frequencies or durations for SN, chaplain or MSW service disciplines.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 390 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure patient refusal of hospice aide services was communicated and addressed by the IDG for two (Patients #8 and 11) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #8 A review of a POC dated 06/13/24 to 08/11/24 with IDG updates on 06/26/24, 07/10/24 and on 07/24/24 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of one week one, then two times a week for eight weeks and a chaplain visit frequency of one time a week. Documentation showed aide service discipline missed visits of 06/20/24, 07/04/24, 07/10/24, 07/19/24 and on 07/30/24; and chaplain service missed visits during 06/13/24 to 06/15/24 an chaplain visit was not scheduled (one visits ordered, no visit conducted), 06/16/24 to 06/22/24 an chaplain visit was not scheduled (one visits ordered, no visit conducted), 06/30/24 to 07/06/24 an chaplain visit was not scheduled (one visits ordered, no visit conducted), and 07/28/24 to 08/03/24 n chaplain visit was not scheduled (one visits ordered, no visit conducted). Documentation showed no communications between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered aide or chaplain visit frequencies and showed no coordination of care with the patient/caregiver to resolve issues with missed aide and chaplain service discipline visits. On 08/07/24 at 1:55 p.m., Staff A stated the IDG should have shown documentation of attempts to resolve the aide and chaplain missed visits and the IDG should have decreased the aide visit frequency and/or discontinued the aide service discipline based on the patients/caregivers requests for patient #8. Patient #11 A review of a POC dated 06/18/24 to 09/15/24 with IDG updates on 06/20/24, 07/17/24 and 07/31/24 showed documentation of an aide visit frequency of one week one, then two times a week for 12 weeks. Documentation showed aide service discipline missed visits on 06/25/24, 07/04/24, 07/10/24, 07/17/24 and on 07/23/24. Documentation showed no communications between the IDG and showed no changes in the ordered aide or chaplain visit frequencies and showed no coordination of care with the patient/caregiver to resolve issues with missed aide and chaplain service discipline visits. On 08/07/24 at 2:05 p.m., Staff A stated the IDG should have shown documentation of attempts to resolve the aide missed visits and the IDG should have decreased the aide visit frequency and/or discontinued the aide service discipline based on the patients/caregivers requests for patient #11.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 125 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure and maintain evidence that its QAPI Program showed measurable improvement in indicators related to improved palliative outcomes and hospice services for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of administrative record documentation showed no measurable improvements in indicators related to improved palliative outcomes and hospice services for: 1st quarter (January to March) and 3rd quarter (July to September) 2022; and 2nd quarter (April to June), 3rd quarter (July to September) and 4th quarter (October to December 2023. Additional requests for administrative records yielded no results. On 08/07/24 at 3:50 p.m., Staff B stated the hospices QAPI program for 2022 and 2023 showed no measurable improvement in indicators related to palliative outcomes and hospice services.”

    Rule L0562. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 140 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure utilization of QAPI data to improve program effectiveness, quality of patient care and overall program improvement for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of administrative record documentation showed no QAPI program data collection sources, analysis/reporting of collected data or reporting activities for QAPI indicators related to improved palliative outcomes and hospice services for: 1st quarter (January to March) and 3rd quarter (July to September) 2022; and 2nd quarter (April to June), 3rd quarter (July to September) and 4th quarter (October to December 2023. Additional requests for administrative records yielded no results. On 08/07/24 at 3:50 p.m., Staff B stated the hospices QAPI program for 2022 and 2023 showed no collection sources, analysis/reporting of collected data or reporting activities for QAPI indicators related to palliative outcomes and hospice services.”

    Rule L0563. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 172 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure governing body oversite of the conduction of patient centered QAPI Program activities for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of administrative records showed no governing body oversite of the ongoing QAPI program which identified the hospice that included data collection, analysis and reporting activities for the hospice for: 1st quarter (January to March) and 3rd quarter (July to September) 2022; and 2nd quarter (April to June), 3rd quarter (July to September) and 4th quarter (October to December 2023. Additional requests for administrative records yielded no results. On 08/07/24 at 3:50 p.m., Staff B stated the governing body meeting minutes for the hospice showed no documentation of governing body oversite of QAPI program activities that included review and approval of data collection, analysis, implementation and follow up of QAPI activities for: 1st quarter (January to March) and 3rd quarter (July to September) 2022; and 2nd quarter (April to June), 3rd quarter (July to September) and 4th quarter (October to December 2023.”

    Rule L0574. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 141 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure its infection control program included surveillance monitoring and reporting was included in QAPI program activities for all patients and employees. Findings: Administrative records which showed documentation the Hospices infection control program surveillance data was included in QAPI program activities for: 1st quarter (January to March) and 3rd quarter (July to September) 2022; and 2nd quarter (April to June), 3rd quarter (July to September) and 4th quarter (October to December 2023). Additional requests for administrative records yielded no results. On 08/07/24 at 3:50 p.m., Staff B stated there was no infection control program surveillance data included in QAPI program activities for: 1st quarter (January to March) and 3rd quarter (July to September) 2022; and 2nd quarter (April to June), 3rd quarter (July to September) and 4th quarter (October to December 2023.”

    Rule L0580. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 173 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure provision of a completed summary of care to the receiving service provider at the time of transfer/discharge from the hospice for two (Patients #4 and #5) of 19 patients. Findings: Patient #4 A review of the clinical record showed the patient was transferred from the hospice on 03/07/24 to another hospice service provider. Documentation showed no transfer/discharge summary was provided to the hospice service provider. On 08/07/24 at 1:24 p.m., Staff A stated the hospice failed to provide a completed summary of care to the receiving service provider at the time of transfer/discharge for patient #4. Patient #8 A review of the clinical record showed the patient was transferred from the hospice on 05/01/24 to home health services. Documentation showed no transfer/discharge summary was provided to the home health service provider. On 08/07/24 at 1:27 p.m., Staff A stated the hospice failed to provide a completed summary of care to the receiving service provider at the time of transfer/discharge for patient #8.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 607 words

    “Based on observation, record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the IDG communicated and coordinated the patients care with the residential care facility (Nursing Home, name withheld) for three (Patients #8, 9 and #11) of 19 patients. Findings: On 08/07/24 at 9:00 a.m., the OSDH surveyor entered the residential care facility (Nursing Home, name withheld). Hospice home charts (binders) were reviewed for two (Patients #8 and 9); and Patient #11 had no hospice home chart (binder). At 9:20 a.m., NH staff A stated the hospice was supposed to leave written reports (communication sheets) after each home visit for all patients on their services. Patient #8 A review of the NH hospice chart (binder) showed documentation of the last POC update by the IDG was dated 01/10/24. Documentation showed the last written report of care by the hospice was dated 05/09/24. A review of a POC dated 06/13/24 to 08/11/24 with IDG updates on 06/26/24, 07/10/24 and on 07/24/24 showed orders for SN visit frequency of one week one, then two times a week for eight weeks; aide visit frequency of one week one, then two times a week for eight weeks; chaplain visit frequency of one time a week for eight weeks and a MSW visit frequency of one time a month for two months for palliation and management of terminal illness related to breast cancer. Documentation showed no IDG communications or coordination of care with the residential care facility (Nursing Home, name withheld). On 08/07/24 at 1:55 p.m., Staff A stated documentation showed no IDG communications or coordination of care with the residential care facility (Nursing Home) for patient #8. Patient #9 A review of the NH hospice chart (binder) showed documentation of the last POC update by the IDG was dated 01/17/24. Documentation showed the last written report of care by the hospice was dated 02/28/24. A review of a POC dated 06/18/24 to 09/15/24 with IDG updates on 06/20/24, 07/17/24 and 07/31/24 showed orders for SN visit frequency two times a week for eight weeks, ten one week one; aide visit frequency of two times a week for eight weeks, then one week one; chaplain visit frequency of one time a month for two month and a MSW visit frequency of one time a month for two months for palliation and management of terminal illness related to hypertension with heart disease. Documentation showed no IDG communications or coordination of care with the residential care facility (Nursing Home, name withheld). On 08/07/24 at 2:02 p.m., Staff A stated documentation showed no IDG communications or coordination of care with the residential care facility (Nursing Home) for patient #9. Patient #11 NH hospice chart (binder) was requested. NH had no hospice chart (binder) and showed no documentation of the POC or last update by the IDG and no written report of care (communication sheets) by the hospice. A review of a POC dated 06/18/24 to 09/15/24 with IDG updates on 06/20/24, 07/17/24 and 07/31/24 showed orders for SN visit frequency two times a week for eight weeks, ten one week one; aide visit frequency of two times a week for eight weeks, then one week one; chaplain visit frequency of one time a month for two month and a MSW visit frequency of one time a month for two months for palliation and management of terminal illness related to sarcopenia. Documentation showed no IDG communications or coordination of care with the residential care facility (Nursing Home, name withheld). On 08/07/24 at 2:15 p.m., Staff A stated documentation showed no IDG communications or coordination of care with the residential care facility (Nursing Home) for patient #11.”

    Rule L0780. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 7, 2024Complaint and recertification inspection by the state14 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 19, 2004.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 14 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 85% at home, 9% in assisted living, 6% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.7%
Visits near death97.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Sharon Kay Collins (corporate director, 10%); Joseph Stephan Johnson (owns 5% or more directly); Joseph Stephan Johnson (corporate director); Joseph Stephan Johnson (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 81% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 63.21% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 42.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 42 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73112, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6.5; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.