Hearth Record

Anthem Hospice

A hospice in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105

425 W. Wilshire Boulevard, Suite C, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105. (405) 482-8965.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 27 hospices serving ZIP code 73105 had 6.5.

The last inspection on record was on May 7, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 7, 2026: recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 537 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure bereavement care planning for seven (Patients #5, 7, 10, 17, 18, 19 and #20) of 20 patients. Findings: Patient #5A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 08/25/25 with a completion of the initial spiritual and bereavement assessment on 08/26/25. A review of a POC dated 04/22/26 to 06/20/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/14/26 and on 04/28/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Patient #7A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 08/19/25 with a completion of the initial spiritual and bereavement assessment on 08/19/25. A review of a POC dated 04/16/26 to 06/14/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/14/26 and on 04/28/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Patient #10A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 03/18/26 with a completion of the initial spiritual and bereavement assessment on 03/19/25. A review of a POC dated 03/18/26 to 06/15/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/24/26, 04/07/26, 04/21/26 and on 05/05/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Patient #17A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 11/15/25 with a completion of the initial spiritual and bereavement assessment on 11/17/25. A review of a POC dated 02/13/26 to 05/13/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/03/26, 02/17/26, 03/03/26, 03/10/26, 03/24/26 and on 04/07/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Patient #18A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 11/18/25 with a completion of the initial spiritual and bereavement assessment on 11/18/25. A review of a POC dated 02/16/26 to 05/16/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 02/03/26, 02/17/26 and on 03/03/26 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Patient #19A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 08/05/25 with a completion of the initial spiritual and bereavement assessment on 08/06/25. A review of a POC dated 11/03/25 to 01/31/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 11/04/25, 11/21/25, 12/02/25, 12/16/25 and on 12/23/25 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. Patient #20A review of the clinical record showed an election of the hospice benefit on 11/13/25 with a completion of the initial spiritual and bereavement assessment on 11/13/25. A review of a POC dated 11/13/25 to 02/10/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 11/25/25 and on 12/19/25 showed no bereavement care plan and no bereavement interventions and goals included as a part of the overall POC. On 05/07/26 at 10:45 a.m. to 11:52 a.m., Staff A stated the Patients #5, 7, 10, 17, 18, 19 and #20 did not have bereavement care plans in place.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 339 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure plans of care: 1.Included interventions and goals for the hospice diagnosis for two (Patients #2 and #3) of 20 patients. 2.Were updated to meet patient care needs for one (Patients #19) of 20 patients. Findings: INTERVENTIONS Patient #2A review of a POC dated 04/13/26 to 06/11/26 with IDG updates on 04/14/26 and on 04/28/26 showed no SN service discipline interventions and goals for the hospice diagnosis of nutritional marasmus. The clinical record showed no communications between the IDG members related to the hospice diagnosis. On 05/07/26 at 10:35 a.m., Staff A stated the POC did not show SN interventions or goals for the hospice diagnosis. Patient #3A review of a POC dated 04/21/26 to 06/11/26 with IDG updates on 04/21/26 and on 05/05/26 showed no SN service discipline interventions and goals for the hospice diagnosis of unspecified protein calorie malnutrition. The clinical record showed no communications between the IDG members related to the hospice diagnosis. On 05/07/26 at 10:37 a.m., Staff A stated the POC did not show SN interventions or goals for the hospice diagnosis. UPDATED Patient #19A review of a POC dated 11/03/25 to 01/31/26 with IDG updates on 11/04/25, 11/21/25, 12/02/25, 12/16/25 and on 12/23/25 showed a SN service discipline visit frequency of one time a week. The clinical record showed SN visits were conducted for the weeks of:11/03/25 to 11/09/25 on 11/04/25 and 11/06/25 (one visit ordered, two visits conducted).11/10/25 to 11/16/25 on 11/11/25 and 11/13/25 (one visit ordered, two visits conducted).11/17/25 to 11/23/25 on 11/18/25 and 11/20/25 (one visit ordered, two visits conducted).12/01/25 to 12/07/25 on 12/02/25 and 12/04/25 (one visit ordered, two visits conducted).12/08/25 to 12/14/25 on 12/09/25, 12/11/25 and 12/13/25 (one visit ordered, three visits conducted). The clinical records showed no communications between the IDG members about the need to increase the SN visit frequency and showed no changes in the orders. On 05/07/26 at 10:37 a.m., Staff A stated the POC did not show an increase in the SN visits.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(1))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to maintain a QAPI program for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of QAPI program records showed no QAPI activities, data or meeting minutes in the calendar year of 2024. On 05/07/26 at 10:05 a.m., Staff B stated:1.The hospice was bought out at the end of 2024, and the previous owner did not give access to the QAPI records. 2.There were no QAPI program records for calendar year 2024.”

    Rule L0561. Standard-level.

  • Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 163 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure QAPI PIPs reflected the needs of its patient population for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of QAPI program records showed no QAPI PIP activities, data or meeting minutes in the calendar year of 2024. A review of QAPI program records for first quarter 2025 on 04/29/25 showed no identification, data analysis or monitoring activities of a PIP. A review of QAPI program records for second quarter 2025 on 09/10/25 showed no identification, data analysis or monitoring activities of a PIP. A review of QAPI program records for third quarter 2025 on 10/14/25 showed no identification, data analysis or monitoring activities of a PIP. On 05/07/26 at 10:05 a.m., Staff B stated:1.The hospice was bought out at the end of 2024, and the previous owner did not give access to the QAPI records.2.There were no QAPI program records for calendar year 2024.3.There were no PIPs in place for calendar year 2025.”

    Rule L0572. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 684 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure continued review and update of a hospice aide care plan for eight (Patients #2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11 and 19) of 20 patients. Findings: Patient #2A review of a POC dated 04/21/26 to 06/19/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/21/26 and on 05/05/26 which ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of three times a week. The clinical record showed no such update to the hospice aide care plan and showed no update to the frequency of aide services since 02/20/26. On 05/07/26 at 10:35 a.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan was not reviewed or updated during the RN recertification visit. Patient #4A review of a POC dated 04/16/26 to 07/14/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/14/26 and on 04/28/26 which ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of one time a week. The clinical record showed no update to the hospice aide care plan and showed no update to the frequency of aide services since 01/20/26. On 05/07/26 at 10:40 a.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan was not reviewed or updated during the RN recertification visit. Patient #5A review of a POC dated 04/22/26 to 06/20/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/14/26 and on 04/28/26 which ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of one time a week. The clinical record showed no update to the hospice aide care plan and showed no update to the frequency of aide services since 02/16/26. On 05/07/26 at 10:45 a.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan was not reviewed or updated during the RN recertification visit. Patient #6A review of a POC dated 04/19/26 to 06/17/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/21/26 and on 05/05/26 which ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of two times a week. The clinical record showed no update to the hospice aide care plan and showed no update of the frequency of aide services since 02/18/26. On 05/07/26 at 10:45 a.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan was not reviewed or updated during the RN recertification visit. Patient #8A review of a POC dated 04/17/26 to 06/15/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 04/14/26 and on 04/28/26 which ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of three times a week. The clinical record showed no update to the hospice aide care plan and showed no update to the frequency of aide services since 02/20/26. On 05/07/26 at 10:45 a.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan was not reviewed or updated during the RN recertification visit. Patient #9A review of a POC dated 03/23/26 to 05/21/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/24/26, 04/07/26, 04/21/26 and on 05/05/26 which ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of two times a week. The clinical record showed no update to the hospice aide care plan and showed no update to the frequency of aide services since 01/22/26. On 05/07/26 at 11:05 a.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan was not reviewed or updated during the RN recertification visit. Patient #11A review of a POC dated 04/06/26 to 06/04/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 03/31/26, 04/16/26 and on 04/28/26 which ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of three times a week. The clinical record showed no update to the hospice aide care plan and showed no update to the frequency of aide services since 02/20/26. On 05/07/26 at 11:20 a.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan was not reviewed or updated during the RN recertification visit. Patient #19A review of a POC dated 11/03/25 to 01/31/26 and IDG updates to the POC on 11/04/25, 11/21/25, 12/02/25, 12/16/25 and on 12/23/25 which ordered hospice aide visits at a frequency of one time a week. The clinical record showed no update to the hospice aide care plan and showed no update to the frequency of aide services since 08/05/25. On 05/07/26 at 11:45 a.m., Staff A stated the aide care plan was not reviewed or updated during the RN recertification visit.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure a record of volunteer program cost savings for all patients, employees and volunteers. Findings: A review of volunteer program records showed no cost savings reports for calendar year 2024. On 05/05/26 at 12:35 p.m., Staff B stated:1.The hospice was bought out at the end of 2024, and the previous owner did not give access to the volunteer program records.2.There were no volunteer program records for calendar year 2024.”

    Rule L0646. Standard-level.

  • Retrieval of clinical records (42 CFR 418.104(f))

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure it maintained access to the eMR system clinical records for all hospice patients. Findings.A request for access to the clinical records for patients who were on services through 12/31/24 yielded no results.On 05/05/26 at 12:35 p.m., Staff B stated:1.The hospice was bought out at the end of 2024, and the previous owner did not give access to the clinical records (eMR system) for patients who were on hospice services through 12/31/24.2.They were unable to locate the previous owner.”

    Rule L0685. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 7, 2026Recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 21, 2005.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 8.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day8.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.4%
Visits near death90.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Centrix Fund I LP owns 100% directly since Oct 16, 2024.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Jeffrey Elliott (owns 5% or more through other companies, 25%); Tarik M Shirif (owns 5% or more through other companies, 25%); Joshua Smith (owns 5% or more through other companies, 25%); David R Klementz (owns 5% or more through other companies, 25%); Waddah Nassar (managing employee (under contract)); Nadar Nassar (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Centrix Fund I LPOwns 5% or more directly100%Oct 16, 2024

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 86.67% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 27 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73105, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6.5; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.