Hearth Record

Kindred Hospice

A hospice in Independence, Ohio 44131

4401 Rockside Rd, Suite 214, Independence, Ohio 44131. (216) 642-1297.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 30 hospices serving ZIP code 44131 had 1.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 9, 2023: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 9, 2023: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 265 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 19 (Patients #1,#2,#3,#5,#7.#10,#12) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. Patient 1: The medication profile contained Maalox scheduled every 4 hours in error instead of as needed. The profile also contained duplicative Oxycodone listings with 5mg and 10mg every 6 hours as needed with no instructions for different indications to determine appropriateness of administration of the different doses. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The medication profile contained duplicative Levsin listings with the same dose and frequency dated 5/25/23 and 8/31/23. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The medication profile contained duplicative Prazosin listings with differing doses at bedtime, with no further instructions if to be taken together or potential error. The profile also contained duplicative Keppra 1000mg listings with instructions to administer 1.5 tablets daily and 1 tab at bedtime. There were no instructions to specify whether to be given at different times of day or to be taken together. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medication profile contained Miralax oral powder with no instructions for a diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medication profile contained oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medication profile contained nystatin topical powder with no defined area for administration. Corrected on site. Patient 12: The medication profile contained gabapentin 300mg daily and 400 mg at bedtime. There were no instructions to specify whether to be given at different times of day or to be taken together. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #1,#8,#11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record contained an initial bereavement assessment 11/6/23 with a start of care 10/31/23. Patient 8: The medical record contained an initial bereavement assessment 9/22/23 with a start of care 9/14/23. Patient 11: The medical record contained an initial bereavement assessment 10/13/23 with a start of care 10/7/23.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient 13: There was no evidence of RN visits between 9/8/23 and 9/27/23, and between 9/27/23 and 10/14/23.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 172 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patients #1,#3,#5,#7,#10,#12) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The medical record contained an order for Maalox scheduled every 4 hours instead of as needed. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The medical record contained duplicative Keppra orders with daily and bedtime doses without instructions whether to be taken together or separate times. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medical record contained an order for Miralax oral powder with no instructions for a diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medical record contained an order for oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medical record contained an order for nystatin topical powder with no defined area for administration. Corrected on site. Patient 12: The medical record contained duplicative gabapentin orders with daily and bedtime doses without instructions whether to be taken together or separate times. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 198 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #1,#2,#10,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a hospital bed and low air loss mattress. There was no evidence of the bed and mattress included as DME in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification identifying patient use of a bedside commode and Broda chair. There was no evidence of the commode and chair included as DME in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing documentation 10/12/23 identifying patient use of a Broda chair. There was no evidence of the chair included as DME in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 14: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient use of a scoop mattress since admission and a Hoyer lift since 10/25/23. There was no evidence of the mattress and lift included as DME in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice investigates all adverse events, incidents, accidents, variances or unusual occurrences that involve patient care and develops a plan of correction to prevent the same or similar event from occurring again. Patient 14: The medical record contained nursing documentation 10/25/23 identifying patient had a fall. There was no evidence of an incident report to document the fall occurred and was investigated. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0569. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient 12: Upon home visit observation, the nurse did not use barrier to protect bag from facility chair surface as per agency bag technique policy.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 16 (Personnel #7) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge and tub bath Personnel 7: There was no evidence that the aide was observed demonstrating a bed bath, sponge bath, or tub bath prior to completing independently. Corrected on site with late documentation by RN of witnessing tasks.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 192 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #2,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 2: The aide care plan contained a task for stand by assist with walker for ambulation. The medical record contained RN documentation since 10/11/23 identifying patient could no longer safely ambulate. Corrected on site. Patient 14: The medical record contained RN documentation identifying patient is a Hoyer lift for transfers. The aide care plan did not contain instructions for transfer with mechanical lift. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 201 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 19 (Patients #4,#5,#8) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 4: The medical record contained an ordered aide frequency of twice weekly. There was no evidence of aide visits completed the week of 10/15/23. Corrected on site with late entry for missed visit explanation. Patient 5: The medical record contained an ordered aide frequency of twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second aide visit completed the weeks of 9/24/23 and 10/15/23. Corrected on site with late entry for missed visit explanation. Patient 8: The medical record contained an ordered aide frequency of twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second aide visit completed the weeks of 10/15/23 and 10/22/23. Corrected on site with late entry for missed visit explanation. The record also contained aide documentation 10/22/23 stating the patient’s chin was shaved. There was no evidence of a task for shaving on the aide care plan. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #13) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 13: There was no evidence of aide supervisory visits completed by the RN between 9/8/23 and 9/27/23 and 9/27/23 and 10/14/23.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 7: The medical record contained an order for an indwelling catheter to be replaced for dislodgement, leakage, or signs and symptoms of infection. Nursing documentation 10/24/23 identified the nurse replaced the catheter with no indication for the replacement.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 119 words

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #1,#7) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record contained urostomy care orders that did not specify if nursing facility or hospice nursing is responsible for the weekly site cares and daily bag drainage. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medical record contained an order for an indwelling catheter that did not specify if nursing facility or hospice nursing is responsible for catheter changes. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 9, 2023Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 18, 2014.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 22% at home, 45% in assisted living, 2% in a nursing facility, 31% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.8%
Visits near death95.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Curo Health Services LLC owns 100% directly since Mar 1, 2022.
  • Curo Health Services LLC runs it.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%); Teresa J Wimms (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Mar 1, 2022
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)Jul 11, 2018

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.22% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 73.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 30 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 44131, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 1; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.