Hearth Record

Visting Nurse Association of Cleveland Hospice

A hospice in Brooklyn Heights, Ohio 44131

925 Keynote Cir, Suite 300, Brooklyn Heights, Ohio 44131. (216) 902-7265.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 30 hospices serving ZIP code 44131 had 1.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 1, 2026: an other federal inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 3, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 744 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current prescription and over the counter (OTC) drugs; supplements; herbal remedies; [and] other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The medication review process includes the identification of the following: the effectiveness of drug therapy; drug side effects; actual or potential drug interactions; duplicate drug therapy; [and] drug therapy associated with laboratory monitoring. The assessment includes evidence that common side effects of medication in the hospice populations are anticipated, and, as appropriate, preventive measurements are implemented to manage the side effects. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added, or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, observation, and interview. Agency policy #H3.01 “Comprehensive Assessment” (revised 08/2021), read in part, “The comprehensive assessment must take into consideration the following: Drug profile. A review of the entire patient’s prescription and over the counter medications. Staff will assess during the initial enrollment with the contracting pharmacy and with each addition or change in the medication profile.” In 8 of 19 (42%) clinical records reviewed the agency did not ensure the medication profile contained the patient’s current prescription medications and was updated when a new medication was added. Clinical Record 2: The hospice election of benefit was dated 04/13/2023. The physician’s order dated 04/04/2024 for the recertification period dated 04/07/2024 ordered: “Oxygen @ 2-4 liters per minute (lpm) via nasal cannula pro re nata/as needed (prn) dyspnea.” At the time of the review on 04/30/2024, oxygen was not documented on the medication profile. Clinical Record 5: The hospice election of benefit was dated 01/02/2024.The physician’s order dated 03/27/2024 for the recertification period dated 04/01/2024 ordered: “Oxygen @ 2-4 liters per minute (lpm) via nasal cannula pro re nata/as needed (prn) dyspnea.” At the time of the review on 04/30/2024, oxygen was not documented on the medication profile. Clinical Record 7: The hospice election of benefit was dated 12/20/2023. The physician’s order dated 03/19/2024 for the recertification period dated 03/19/2024 ordered: “Oxygen @ 2-4 lpm via nasal cannula prn dyspnea.” At the time of the review on 05/01/2024, oxygen was not documented on the medication profile. Clinical Record 9: The hospice election of benefit was dated 08/10/2023. The physician’s order dated 03/22/2024 for the recertification period dated 04/06/2024 ordered: “Oxygen @ 2-3 lpm (may increase to 5 lpm) via nasal cannula prn dyspnea.” At the time of the review on 05/01/2024, oxygen was not documented on the medication profile. Clinical Record 10: The hospice election of benefit was dated 11/03/2023. The physician’s order dated 02/01/2024 for the recertification period dated 02/01/2024 ordered: “Oxygen @ 2-4 lpm via nasal cannula prn dyspnea.” At the time of the review on 05/01/2024, oxygen was not documented on the medication profile. Clinical Record 13/Home Visit 2: The hospice election of benefit was dated 04/19/2024. During the home visit with the Registered Nurse (RN) [Personnel Record 3], the patient had Soothe XP eyedrops at the bedside. The patient stated that they instilled the drops into both eyes 4-5 times per day per their eye doctor. The patient stated that they had begun using the eye drops prior to their admission. At the time of the review on 05/02/2024, Soothe XP eye drops were not documented on the medication profile. Clinical Record 14: The hospice election of benefit was dated 04/18/2024. The physician’s order dated 04/18/2024 ordered: “Oxygen @ 2-4lpm via nasal cannula prn dyspnea.” At the time of the review on 05/02/2024, oxygen was not documented on the medication profile. Clinical Record 19: The hospice election of benefit was dated 08/16/2023. The communication note entered by the registered nurse dated 08/24/2023 documented, “MD sent prescription for Augmentin 500mg bid x 7days and Mucinex with order for prn visit today to check lungs and vital signs.” At the time of the review on 04/29/2024, Augmentin and Mucinex were not documented on the medication profile. During an interview and a joint record review on 05/02/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) confirmed that oxygen was documented on the certification orders and was not transposed onto the medication profiles. The DPCS stated that this was part of a library test in some cases that needed to be removed and that the missing medications identified had since been made.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 216 words

    “It is required that the comprehensive assessment includes an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals, focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. Agency policy #H10.01 “Bereavement Program Services” (revised 03/2022) read in part, “The initial Bereavement Risk Assessment is completed by the MSW at or near the time of admission.” In 2 of 19 (11%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. Clinical Record 3: The hospice election of benefit was dated 04/25/2023. The comprehensive assessment was completed on 04/25/2023. At the time of the review on 04/30/2024, there was no documented evidence of the completion of an initial bereavement assessment. Clinical Record 17: The hospice election of benefit was dated 01/27/2024. The comprehensive assessment was completed on 01/27/2024. At the time of the review on 05/02/2024, there was no documented evidence of the completion of an initial bereavement assessment. During an interview and a joint record review on 05/02/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) confirmed there was no evidence of an initial bereavement assessment and that one should have been completed.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 254 words

    “It is required that hospice care and services provided to patients and families follow the individualized plan of care established by: the hospice IDG in collaboration with the attending physician (if any). This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 19 (11%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that services were provided in accordance with the plan of care. Clinical Record 4: The hospice election of benefit was dated 09/18/2023. The hospice plan of care dated 03/16/2024 ordered Spiritual Care (PC) services: “PC 1 week 1, 1 every 5 week 5, effective 03/24/2024.” At the time of the review on 04/30/2024, there was no documented PC visit the week of 03/24/2024. There was no evidence of a documented missed visit or explanation of why services were not provided as ordered. Clinical Record 13: The hospice election of benefit was dated 04/19/2024. The hospice plan of care dated 04/19/2024 ordered: “PC 1 week 1, 2 week 7, effective 04/21/2024. At the time of the review on 05/02/2024, there were two documented spiritual care (PC) visits for the week of 04/23/2024, dated 04/23/2024 and 04/26/2024. There was no documented explanation of why services were not provided as ordered. During an interview and a joint record review on 05/02/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) stated that the missed visit entry and the corrected PC visit frequency had since been entered into the electronic medical record (EMR), and education would be provided to ensure future compliance.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 271 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care: reflects patient and family goals; identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments; [and] includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. Agency policy #H3.03 “Interdisciplinary Care Plan” (revised 08/2021), read in part, “Components of the interdisciplinary care plan include... Patient and family goals and interventions based on the identification of the needs of the patient, family and caregivers in the initial, comprehensive and updated comprehensive assessments... Measurable outcomes anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care...” In 1 of 19 (5%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the patient’s plan of care reflected patient and family goals. Clinical Record 4: The hospice election of benefit was dated 09/18/2023. The hospice plan of care dated 03/16/2024 documented the patient’s diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (DM). The Skilled Nursing (SN) visit notes dated 03/20/2024 through 04/25/2024 documented assessment of the patient’s blood sugar levels. The Registered Nurse (RN) visit note dated 04/04/2024 documented the frequency of fingerstick blood sugar checks performed by the patient/caregiver was daily and the patient was utilizing diet and oral hypoglycemic agents to manage the DM. At the time of the review on 04/30/2024, the hospice plan of care dated 03/16/2024 did not document goals related to the patient’s DM. During an interview and a joint record review on 05/02/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) stated that the goals were inadvertently omitted had since been corrected”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 223 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including a detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet specific patient and family needs. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. Agency policy #H3.03 “Interdisciplinary Care Plan” (revised 08/2021), read in part, “Components of the interdisciplinary care plan include:... Detail of the scope and frequency of services needed to meet the needs of the patient/family.” In 1 of 19 (5%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the patient’s plan of care (POC) included the scope and frequency of services to be provided. Clinical Record 10: The hospice election of benefit was dated 11/03/2023. The hospice plan of care dated 02/01/2024 ordered “MSW and Spiritual (Pastoral Care) as needed.” The POC did not document the scope and frequency of services to be provided. During an interview and a joint record review on 05/02/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) confirmed that the social worker and the chaplain wanted to remain involved on an as needed basis. The DPCS verbalized understanding that an as needed frequency does not meet the requirement and that they are involved as needed as part of the interdisciplinary team.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 268 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including the drugs and treatment necessary to meet the needs of the patient. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. Agency policy #H3.03 “Interdisciplinary Care Plan” (revised 08/2021), read in part, “Components of the interdisciplinary care plan include... Patient and family goals and interventions based on the identification of the needs of the patient, family and caregivers in the initial, comprehensive and updated comprehensive assessments...Drugs and treatment necessary to meet the needs of the patient...” In 1 of 19 (5%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the patient’s plan of care included all treatments necessary to meet the patient’s needs. Clinical Record 4: The hospice election of benefit was dated 09/18/2023. The hospice plan of care dated 03/16/2024 documented the patient’s diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (DM). The Skilled Nursing (SN) visit notes dated 03/20/2024 through 04/25/2024 documented assessment of the patient’s blood sugar levels. The Registered Nurse (RN) visit note dated 04/04/2024 documented the frequency of fingerstick blood sugar checks performed by the patient/caregiver was daily and the patient was utilizing diet and oral hypoglycemic agents to manage the DM. At the time of the review on 04/30/2024, the POC dated 03/16/2024 did not document the daily blood glucose monitoring. During an interview and a joint record review on 05/02/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) confirmed that the fingerstick blood sugar checks had been inadvertently omitted and had since been corrected.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 976 words

    “It is required that the Interdisciplinary Group, in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician (if any), reviews, revises, and documents the individualized care plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires; but no less frequently than every 15 calendar days. A revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and a record of the patient’s progress toward the outcomes and goals specified in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. Agency policy #H3.03 “Interdisciplinary Care Plan” (revised 08/2021), read in part, “Components of the interdisciplinary care plan include...Patient and family goals and interventions based on the identification of the needs of the patient, family and caregivers in the initial, comprehensive and updated comprehensive assessments...The interdisciplinary care plan will be reviewed and updated as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but at a minimum every 15 calendar days.” In 7 of 19 (37%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that plan of care revisions included information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment. Clinical Record 2: The hospice election of benefits was dated 04/13/2023. The initial MSW and PC evaluations and plans of care were completed on 04/18/2023. The hospice plan of care dated 04/07/2024 ordered Social Work (MSW) and Spiritual Care (PC) service “1 week 1, q5 week 5 effective 04/21/2024.” The Interdisciplinary team (IDT) meeting dated 03/27/2024 and the updated assessments documented plans to continue MSW and PC interventions and goals into the next certification period due to continued psychosocial and spiritual needs. At the time of the review on 04/30/2024, the updated MSW and PC interventions were not included in the 04/07/2024 plan of care. Clinical Record 6: The hospice election of benefit was dated 04/06/2023. The initial MSW and PC evaluations and plans of care were completed on 04/10/2023. The hospice plan of care dated 03/31/2024 ordered MSW and PC services “1 week 9.” The IDT meeting dated 03/27/2024 and the updated assessments documented plans to continue MSW and PC interventions and goals into the next certification period due to continued psychosocial and spiritual needs. At the time of the review on 05/01/2024, the updated MSW and PC interventions were not documented in the plan of care dated 04/07/2024. Clinical Record 7: The hospice election of benefit was dated 12/20/2023. The initial MSW and PC evaluations and plans of care were completed on 12/20/2023 and 01/05/2024, respectively. The hospice plan of care dated 03/19/2024 ordered MSW and PC services “1 week 1, q9 week 9, effective 03/31/2024.” The IDT meeting dated 03/27/2024 and the updated assessments documented plans to continue MSW and PC interventions and goals into the next certification period due to continued psychosocial and spiritual needs. At the time of the review on 05/01/2024, the updated MSW and PC interventions were not documented in the plan of care dated 03/31/2024. Clinical Record 9: The hospice election of benefit was dated 08/10/2023. An initial MSW and PC evaluation and plan of care were completed on 08/17/2023 and on 08/15/2023, respectively. The hospice plan of care dated 04/06/2024 ordered MSW and PC services “1week1, 1 every 2 week 8, effective 04/07/2024.” The IDT meeting dated 03/27/2024 and the updated assessments documented plans to continue MSW and PC interventions and goals into the next certification period due to continued psychosocial and spiritual needs. At the time of the review on 05/01/2024, the updated MSW and PC interventions were not documented in the plan of care dated 04/06/2024. Clinical Record 10: The hospice election of benefit was dated 11/03/2023. The initial MSW and PC evaluations and plans of care were completed on 11/06/2023 and 11/07/2023, respectively. The plan of care dated 02/01/2024 documented: “PC to evaluate and develop a plan of care and MSW to evaluate and develop a plan of care.” The IDT meeting dated 01/31/2024 and updated assessments did not document the plan to continue MSW and PC into the next certification period due to the documented declination of services. At the time of the review on 05/01/2024, MSW and PC interventions had not been removed from the plan of care dated 02/01/2024. Clinical Record 11: The hospice election of benefit was dated 07/21/2023. The initial MSW and PC evaluations and plans of care were completed on 08/01/2023 and 07/26/2023, respectively. The hospice plan of care dated 03/17/2024 ordered MSW services “1 week 1, 1 every 4 week 4” and PC services “1 week 1, 1 q5 week 5, effective 03/31/2024.” The IDT meeting dated 03/13/2024 and updated assessments documented the plan to continue MSW and PC interventions and goals into the next certification period due to continued psychosocial and spiritual needs. At the time of the review on 05/01/2024, the updated MSW and PC interventions were not included in the plan of care dated 03/17/2024. Clinical Record 12: The hospice election of benefit was dated 10/04/2021. The initial MSW and PC evaluations and plans of care were dated as completed on 10/06/2021. The hospice plan of care dated 03/22/2024 ordered MSW services “1 week 1, 1 every 4 week 4,” and PC services “1 week 1, 1 q5 week 5.” The IDT meeting dated 03/13/2024 and updated assessments documented the plan to continue MSW and PC interventions and goals into the next certification period due to continued psychosocial and spiritual needs. At the time of the review on 05/01/2024, the updated MSW and PC interventions were not included in the plan of care dated 03/22/2024. During an interview and a joint record review on 05/02/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) stated that the POC did not include the interventions and goals formed from the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. The DPCS stated that their team would be reviewing the process within the electronic medical record (EMR) and making changes to ensure future compliance.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 156 words

    “It is required that a hospice aide provides services: ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 13 (8%) clinical records reviewed of patients that received Hospice Aide services, the agency did not ensure that hospice aide services were provided as ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG). Clinical Record 2: The patient elected hospice care on 04/13/2023. The hospice plan of care dated 04/07/2024 ordered HA services “2week8, 1week4.” A review of the clinical record on 04/30/3034 revealed one (1) visit documented for the week of 04/23/2024, dated 04/23/2024. There was no evidence of a documented missed visit and no documented reason the services were not provided as per the ordered frequency. During an interview and a joint record review on 05/02/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) stated that a missed visit entry had since been entered for the missing visit.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 167 words

    “It is required that a patient clinical record containing past and current findings is maintained for each hospice patient. The record may be maintained electronically or on paper. Each patient’s record includes, at a minimum physician orders. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 19 (5%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the patient’s records included physician orders. Clinical Record 19: The hospice election of benefit was dated 08/16/2023. The communication note entered by the Registered Nurse (RN) dated 08/24/2023 documented: “MD sent prescription for Augmentin 500 mg bid x 7 days and Mucinex with order for prn visit today to check lungs and vital signs.” At the time of the review on 04/29/2024, there was no documented physician order for Augmentin and Mucinex. During an interview and a joint record review on 05/02/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) stated that the nurse had obtained the order but failed to write the order.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 1, 2026Other federal inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
May 3, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 6, 1990.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 88.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 99% at home, 1% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.5%
Visits near death88.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Benevolent Cleveland Hospice Holdings LLC owns 100% directly since May 1, 2025.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Matthew John Johnson (owns 5% or more through other companies, 65%); Matthew John Johnson (corporate officer, 65%); Matthew John Johnson (corporate director, 65%); Joshua Brett Rosen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 35%); Joshua Brett Rosen (corporate officer, 35%); Joshua Brett Rosen (corporate director, 35%); Jackie Newbert (managing employee (on the payroll), 5%); Louis J Demicco (managing employee (under contract), 5%); Jaclyn Bachik (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jaclyn Bachik (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Benevolent Cleveland Hospice Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%May 1, 2025

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 90.32% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 59.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 30 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 44131, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 1; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.