Hearth Record

Elara Caring

A hospice in Jackson, Michigan 49202

209 E Washington Ave, Suite 450a, Jackson, Michigan 49202. (517) 435-3055.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 12 hospices serving ZIP code 49202 had 9.

The last inspection on record was on May 2, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 2, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 23 (Patient #6, 7, 11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #6 - Patient admitted 03/05/25 Initial bereavement completed on 04/29/25. Patient #7 - Patient admitted 12/17/24 Initial bereavement completed on 12/30/24. Patient #11 Patient admitted 01/18/24 but Initial Bereavement not completed until 02/26/24.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 133 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 23 (Patient #8, 9, 14, 20) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #8 - Oxygen not on medication sheet but O2 equipment on POC. Patient #9 - Oxygen not on medication sheet but O2 equipment on POC. Patient #14 - Carbidopa 0.25mg Levodopa 100mg 1 tablet and Clonazepam 1 tablet as directed. Patient #20 - Medication sheet for hospice oxygen at 4L/min continuously per nasal cannula but SN has 3L/min.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 23 (Patient #7, 17) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #7 - No documentation of wounds times 3 weeks 03/19/25 to 04/09/25. Patient #17-Patient had an JG tube on admission 01/23/25 but no documentation of site on any visit through 04/23/25.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 23 (Patient #8, 9, 14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #8 - Oxygen not on POC but O2 equipment on POC. Verified patient is on O2. Patient #9 - Oxygen not on POC but O2 equipment on POC. Verified patient is on O2. Wound care did not contain frequency. Patient #14 - POC contains Carbidopa 0.25mg Levodopa 100mg 1 tablet and Clonazepam 1 tablet as directed.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 102 words

    “Upon client record review, 3 of 23 (Patient #6, 16, 18) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #6 - SC visit frequency 1wk1, 1 q2wk 12 effective 03/05/25 made visit week of 03/30 and 04/07 without a PRN order. Patient #16 - SN flushed foley catheter on 04/29/25 but unable to find order for flushes. Patient #18 - During home visit SN noted dressing on suprapubic catheter - no order for dressing noted. During visit nurse states it was wet and would get it changed.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 181 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 23 (Patient #11, 23) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #11 - Aide care plan updated on 04/14/25 task make bed does not contain a frequency. Patient #23 - Aide care plan 04/09/25 contains task: bed bath and shower every visit - does not have documented the patient is cognitively and functionally able to make decision and aide is not able to make decision.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 118 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 23 (Patient #9, 12, 23) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #9 - Aide care plan to change linen first visit of every week - aide changed both visits week of 03/09/25. Patient #12 - Aide care plan had full sponge bath - Aide documented partial bath on 03/31/25 and 04/09/25. Patient #23 - Aide care plan 04/02/25 shower every visit - aide did bed bath on 04/07/25”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 23 (Patient #9, 10, 15) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient #9 - Aide supervisory visit done on 04/01/25 then again on 04/16/25. Patient #10 - Aide supervisory visit on 03/20/25 then again on 04/07/25 greater than 14 days. Patient #15 - Aide supervisory visit on 04/07/25 then again on 04/24/25 great than 14 days.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 180 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 5 of 23 (Patient #1, 3, 6, 8, 19) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #1 - SN documented on 01/04/25 that patient did not have any narcotics at time of death but patient was on Morphine, Oxycodone and Lorazepam. Patient #3 - SN documented on 12/11/24 “medication disposed of per facility policy” but patient died at home. Patient #6 - SN documented on 04/11/25 no changes in aide plan of care but aide has not made visit since 03/26/25. Patient #8 - MSW wrote order on 03/09/25 MSW evaluation complete - no further visit required then wrote visit frequency for 1 every wk5, 1 every week 4, 1 every week 3. Patient #19 - SN did not document on visit how INR was obtained on 02/07/25, 03/04,25 or 03/18/25.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 23 (Patient #17, 20) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient #17 - No orders on POC for JG tube. Orders are on SNF care plan. Patient #20 - Glucerna 1 can BID is not on agency POC but on SNF care plan.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 23 (Patient #17) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient #17 - No documentation on POC who is responsible for JG tube agency or SNF.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 2, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 26, 1998.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 45% at home, 24% in assisted living, 31% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11.8%
Visits near death93.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Great Lakes Acquisition Corp. owns 100% directly since Aug 27, 2010.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Daniel R Manley (corporate officer); Ananth P Mohan (corporate officer, 0%); Ananth P Mohan (corporate director); John Mcmahon (corporate officer); Katie L Monastiere (corporate officer, 0%); Joshua Gotbaum (corporate director, 0%); Harvey Tepner (corporate director, 0%); James Starr (managing employee (on the payroll)); Chelsea Faye Scripture (managing employee (on the payroll)); Angel Stansbury (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
GL Holding Corp.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 12, 2014
Bw Homecare Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 8, 2016
Elara Holdings, L.L.C.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 30, 2019
Great Lakes Acquisition Corp.Owns 5% or more directly100%Aug 27, 2010
Bw GL Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 8, 2016
Bw Nhhc Holdco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 8, 2016
Gl Superholding Corp.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 12, 2014
Bw Nhhc Co-Invest, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies42.85%Jul 1, 2023
Kia Ix (Hh) Investor, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies40.27%Jul 1, 2023
Kelso Hh Co-Investment, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies19.2%Dec 30, 2019
Kelso Investment Associates Ix, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies15.68%Dec 30, 2019
Blue WOLF Capital Fund III L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies11.13%Jul 1, 2023
Bw III Homecare Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies11.13%Jul 1, 2023
Stepstone H Opportunities Fund, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies8.78%Dec 30, 2019
Stepstone K Strategic Opportunities Fund II L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.48%Dec 30, 2019
Ironsides Direct Investment Fund IV, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies4.94%Dec 30, 2019
Uss-Constitution Co-Investment Fund II, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies4.94%Dec 30, 2019
Kep VI LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies4.52%Dec 30, 2019

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.77% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 65.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 49202, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.