Hearth Record

Arbor Hospice

A hospice in Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103

2366 Oak Valley Dr, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103. (734) 662-5999.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 26 hospices serving ZIP code 48103 had 9.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 9, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 9, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner7 deficiencies
  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 400 words

    “It is required that the hospice provides information on advance directives upon initiation of hospice care. Whether or not the patient has executed an advance directive is documented in a prominent part of the patient’s record. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. 4 of 23 (17%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the patients’ advanced directives were documented in a prominent part of the charts, in accordance with agency policy. Policy and Procedures: Agency Policy #1000, titled “Do not Resuscitate - Advanced Directives”, effective date 02/01/2020, read in part, “2. If available, a copy of any advanced directive is placed in the patient’s clinical record and the patient wishes, including the DNR (do not resuscitate) status is included in the care planning for the patient.” CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient was admitted on 11/12/2025. The initial plan of care, dated 11/12/2025-02/09/2026, did not identify the patient’s choice for advanced directives. The Advanced Directives section on the plan of care was blank. CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient was admitted on 11/17/2025. The initial skilled nursing assessment did not include documentation of the patient’s advanced directives. Advanced directives were not noted on the initial plan of care. Advanced directives were not included in the prominent “Patient Notification” area of the face sheet. CLINICAL RECORD 12: The patient was transferred from another hospice on 01/02/2026. The benefit period was 01/02/2026-01/07/2026 and new benefit period began 01/08/2026. The plans of care did not address the patient advanced directives. The nursing assessment on 01/02/2026 did not address the patient’s advanced directives. There was documentation of a DNR found in the transfer records of the previous hospice. CLINICAL RECORD 15: The patient was admitted on 12/10/2025. The initial skilled nursing assessment did not evidence that the advanced directives and DNR status were addressed. In the initial plan of care dated 12/10/2025, the Advanced Directives section was blank. The prominent “Patient Notification” area of the face sheet read, “Advanced Directives (0).” The Social Work assessment dated 12/13/2025 documented that the patient was a DNR, but the document was not in a prominent place in the chart that would be easy to find in the event of an emergency. The Statewide Director of Compliance reviewed clinical records on 01/08/2026 and confirmed that the advanced directives were not documented in a prominent part of the clinical records.”

    Rule L0503. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 410 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. 3 of 23 (13%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that all patients had a comprehensive assessment within 5 days after the election of hospice care. CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient elected hospice on 11/12/2025. The initial nursing comprehensive assessment was completed on 11/12/2025. The sections for psychosocial factors that may impact care, living arrangements, social service screening, financial assessment, and psychosocial/environmental summary of problems were left blank in the assessment. The section for spiritual issues in the comprehensive nursing assessment was left blank. The patient refused Social Work and Chaplain visits. The clinical record provided no evidence that a comprehensive psychosocial assessment and spiritual assessment were completed within 5 days of the election of hospice care. A Social Worker completed a psychosocial assessment on 11/18/2025 (6 days). CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient elected hospice on 11/17/2025. The skilled nursing comprehensive assessment was completed on 11/17/2025. The sections for psychosocial factors that may impact care, living arrangements, social service screening, financial assessment, and psychosocial/environmental summary of problems were left blank. The section for spiritual issues in the comprehensive nursing assessment was left blank. The patient refused Social Work and Chaplain visits. The clinical record provided no evidence that a comprehensive psychosocial assessment and spiritual assessment were completed within 5 days of election of hospice care. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient elected hospice on 12/20/2025. The nursing comprehensive assessment was completed on 12/20/2025. The sections for psychosocial factors that may impact care, living arrangements, social service screening, financial assessment, and psychosocial/environmental summary of problems were left blank. The section for spiritual issues in the comprehensive nursing assessment was left blank. The patient refused Social Work and Chaplain visits. The clinical record provided no evidence that a comprehensive psychosocial assessment and spiritual assessment were completed within 5 days of election of hospice care. The Statewide Director of Compliance confirmed that the clinical records did not contain evidence of a spiritual assessment or psychosocial assessment within the first 5 days of care and noted that in the the skilled nursing assessments, the psychosocial and spiritual assessment areas were blank.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 180 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, supplements, herbal remedies, and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. 1 of 23 (4%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the medication profile was updated on each patient. CLINICAL RECORD 15: The patient was admitted on 12/12/2025 at home. The nursing comprehensive assessment documented that the patient is utilizing continuous oxygen. The medication profile did not include oxygen. As of the date of review, on 01/08/2026, although the oxygen dosage was documented in the IDG notes, the oxygen is not included on the medication profile. In an interview on 01/08/2025, the Statewide Director of Compliance stated, “You are right” after reviewing the clinical record.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide qualifications (42 CFR 418.76(a)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 420 words

    “It is required that all hospice aide services must be provided by an individual who has successfully completed one (1) of the four (4) training and competency evaluations programs described below. The individual furnishes hospice aide services on behalf of a hospice only after successfully completing a competency evaluation program also described below. The hospice maintains documentation that each hospice aide has met the requirements. The competency evaluation addresses each of the following subject areas from item 2, above; they are evaluated by observation of an aide’s performance with a patient or pseudo-patient, including: a) Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff; b) Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration; c) Appropriate and safe techniques in performing personal hygiene and grooming tasks, including items on the following basic checklist: i. Bed bath; ii. Sponge, tub, and shower bath; iii. Hair shampoo (sink, tub, and bed); iv. Nail and skin care; v. Oral hygiene; vi. Toileting and elimination; d) Safe transfer techniques and ambulation; e) Normal range of motion and positioning. The remaining subject areas in item 2 above may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination, or after observation of a hospice aide with a patient or a pseudo-patient during a simulation. The competency evaluation is performed by a registered nurse in consultation with other skilled professionals, as appropriate. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview and personnel record review. 2 of 2 (100%) personnel records of hospice aides reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the aides completed competency assessments upon hire prior to providing patient care. Policy and Procedures: Agency policy No.0660 titled “Competency Assessment”, effective 01/01/2021, read in part, “As a component of the orientation process, new staff complete a competency evaluation prior to providing care.” PERSONNEL RECORD 3: This hospice aide was hired on 02/17/2025. The personnel record contained no evidence of an initial competency assessment upon hire prior to performing patient care. PERSONNEL RECORD 5: This hospice aide was hired on 07/17/2025. The personnel record contained no evidence of an initial competency assessment upon hire prior to providing patient care. The Statewide Director of Quality reported in an interview on 01/09/2026, “We will learn from this, we do not have a general competency assessment for aides on hire with all the elements. We just do the annual on-site.” NOTE: The annual on-site evaluation form did not include all of the required task elements to be validated..”

    Rule L0609. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 216 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse who is a member of the Interdisciplinary Group. Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. 1 of 16 (6%) clinical records reviewed with hospice aide services revealed that the agency did not ensure that the hospice aide (HA) care plans included complete care instructions to meet the needs of the patient. CLINICAL RECORD 18: The patient was admitted on 11/03/2025 with a diagnosis of lung cancer. The initial nursing comprehensive assessment documented that the patient had a large skin tear on his back, and also continued to smoke despite using oxygen. The plan of care dated 11/03/2025 included an order for oxygen and wound care. The HA care plan dated 11/03/2025 did not include oxygen safety precautions and the Oxygen Use field was left blank. The HA care plan included an assignment to provide a shower but did not address how the HA should handle the wound dressing on the patient’s back. In an interview on 01/09/2025, the Statewide Director of Compliance stated, “You are right” after reviewing the clinical record.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 172 words

    “It is required that the hospice assesses the skills and competencies of all individuals providing care, including volunteers providing services and, as necessary, provides in-service training and education programs where required. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview and personnel record review. 1 of 1 (100%) personnel record of a registered nurse (RN) hired within the past three years reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that a competency assessment was completed upon orientation prior to providing patient care. Policy and Procedures: Agency policy No.0660 titled “Competency Assessment”, effective 01/01/2021 read in part, “As a component of the orientation process, new staff complete a competency evaluation prior to providing care. PERSONNEL RECORD 6: This RN was hired on 09/09/2024. The record contained no documented evidence of a competency assessment upon hire. In an interview on 01/09/2026, the Statewide Director of Quality stated, “We had staff changes in the last three years and they must have made changes that don’t meet the standard. We will get it fixed.””

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 183 words

    “It is required that a patient clinical record containing past and current findings is maintained for each hospice patient. The record contains correct clinical information that is available to the patient’s attending physician and hospice staff. Each patient’s record includes, at a minimum: physician orders. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. 1 of 23 (4%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that physician orders were clear and complete. CLINICAL RECORD 18: The patient was admitted on 11/03/2025. The initial nursing comprehensive assessment identified and documented a skin tear on the patient’s back that was 6cm x 3cm x 0.1cm in size. The plan of care dated 11/03/2025 included an order that read “Integumentary Interventions: cleanse with soap and water, cover with non-adherent pad, if wound opens, secure with Tegaderm or paper tape, start effective date 11/03/2025. The order did not specify where the wound was located. The Statewide Director of Compliance reviewed the clinical record and confirmed that the intervention order for wound care did not include a location of the wound.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 9, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 25, 1988.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 58% at home, 21% in assisted living, 16% in a nursing facility, 5% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.9%
Visits near death94.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Hospice of Michigan, Inc. owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 2016.
  • 22 owners or officers are people: Michael L Damstra (corporate director); Bradley Killaly (corporate director); Marcie M Hillary (corporate officer); Patrick Miller (corporate officer); Patrick Miller (corporate director); Brian M Connolly (corporate director); Eric Kaplan (corporate officer); Lee Ann Myers (corporate officer); Molly Petersen (corporate director); Krista Newman (corporate officer); Mary Sanders (corporate director); Sarah Posa (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kurt Ludlow (corporate director); Victoria M Tarazi (managing employee (on the payroll)); Steven C Wade (corporate director); John Evangelisita (corporate director, 0%); Gerald Fitzgerald (corporate director); John Raymond Maurer (corporate director); Jane Mcnamara (corporate director); Nancy Lynn Philappart (corporate director); Jamie L Cockerel (corporate officer); Michael A Jones (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Hospice of Michigan, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 2016

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.67% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 68.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 26 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 48103, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.