Hearth Record

Heartland Hospice (Mason)

A hospice in Okemos, Michigan 48864

2150 Association Dr, Suite 200, Okemos, Michigan 48864. (517) 244-0404.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 19 hospices serving ZIP code 48864 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on May 3, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 3, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 records (Patient #6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #6: There was not evidence of a spiritual assessment.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 245 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 records (Patient #6, #8, #9,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #6: Upon observation during the home visit, the medications on the hospice documentation contained Ativan, Codeine-Guaifenesin, Ondansetron, and Risperidone. These medications were not included on the medication profile at the SNF. Patient #8: Upon observation during the home visit, the medications on the hospice documentation contained Bisacodyl, Lorazepam, Morphine solution, and Senna. These medications were not included on the medication profile at the SNF. In addition, the medication profile at the SNF contained Vitamin B-12. This was not included in the hospice documented medication profile. Patient #9: The medication profile contained Miconazorb AF 2% topical powder. Apply to affected areas with yeast as needed. There was not evidence of a specific location or a specific frequency. Corrected on site. In addition, Triamcinolone 0.1% topical ointment, apply to affected areas twice daily. There was not evidence of a specific location. Corrected on site. Patient #10: The medication profile contained Acetaminophen 325mg, 2 caps q6h prn pain or fever. There was not evidence of a parameter for the fever. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 records (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #3: There was not evidence of a bereavement assessment.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 124 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 records (Patient #2) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient that reflects patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #2: The patient was admitted with diagnosis of fronto-temporal neuro-cognitive disorder. Documentation revealed that the patient was confused, forgetful, chair bound, incontinent of bowel and bladder, combative at times, paranoid, obsessive-compulsive, and a mental disorder. There was not evidence that that care plan included neurological goals and interventions. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 177 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 records (Patient #3,#9,#10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #3: Documentation dated 4/25/24 indicated that a respiratory therapist was was supposed to come to the patient’s home to check if the patient needed to change his C-Pap mask. There was not evidence in the patient record that the patient wears a C-Pap mask, or was on C-Pap. Patient #9: The record contained an order for Miconazorb AF 2% topical powder. Apply to affected areas with yeast as needed. There was not evidence of a specific location or a specific frequency. Corrected on site. In addition, Triamcinolone 0.1% topical ointment, apply to affected areas twice daily. There was not evidence of a specific location. Corrected on site. Patient #10: The record contained an order for Acetaminophen 325mg, 2 caps q6h prn pain or fever. There was not evidence of a parameter for the fever. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 records (Patient #12) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #12: An order from the medical director dated 12/29/23, read to discharge the patient on 1/2/24 for no longer being appropriate. There was not evidence that the patient was declining. There was also no evidence that a discussion occurred among the IDG regarding a discharge, or plans for preparing the patient for discharge.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 125 words

    “Upon client record review, 3 of 14 records (Patient #7,#10,#13) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #7: The social work visit frequency was 2 every 30 days. The record indicated only 1 visit in March on 3/22/24. In addition, the nurse visit frequency was 2x/week. For the week of 4/14/24-4/20/24, the record indicated only 1 visit on 4/19/24. Patient #10: The skilled nurse visit frequency was 2x/week. For the week of 4/21/24-4/27/24, The record indicated only 1 visit on 4/22/24. Patient #13: The skilled nurse frequency was increased to daily due to imminent death on 12/1/23 at 8:18am. There was not evidence of a visit on this date.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 records (Patient #9) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #9: The aide plan of care indicated to provide a partial sponge bath every visit when requested by patient, provide a shower every visit when requested by patient, and to provide a shampoo at every visit when requested by patient. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 154 words

    “Upon patient record review 4 of 14 records (Patient #6,#7,#8,#9) did not have evidence of documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care Patient #6: Nail care was listed as a task to be performed with every visit. On 4/9/24, 4/12/24, and 4/16/24. Documentation by the aide indicated that it was not done because supplies were not available. Patient #7: The aide visit frequency was 2x/week. For the week of 4/14/24-4/20/24, the record indicated only 1 visit on 4/17/24. Patient #8: The aide visit frequency was 2x/week. For the week of 4/21/24-4/27/24, the record indicated only 1 visit on 4/23/24. Patient #9: Nail care was listed as a task to be performed with every visit. On 4/1/24, 4/4/24, 4/8/24, and 4/11/24. Documentation by the aide indicated that it was not done because supplies were not available.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 14 records (Patient #7,#9) did not have evidence of documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient #7: The aide visit frequency was 2x/week. There was not evidence of an aide supervisory visit from 2/27/24-3/15/24. Patient #9: The aide visit frequency was 2x/week. There was not evidence of an aide supervisory visit for the month of April.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was not evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. Documentation indicates the volunteer percentage of usage for the year 2023 was 1.94%.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 records (Patient #4) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient #4: The skilled nurse visit frequency was 1x/week. There was not evidence of a visit for the week of 4/14/24-4/20/24.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 records (Patient #6,#8) did not have evidence that the hospice provided the SNF with the following information: • Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 3, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 11, 2000.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 55% at home, 33% in assisted living, 11% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8%
Visits near death90.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Odyssey Healthcare Inc. owns 100% directly since Jul 1, 2001.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Jeffrey Vanwingen (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Danielle Noble (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); Ronald C Lazas (corporate director, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate director, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Odyssey Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jul 1, 2001
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.73% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 71% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 19 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 48864, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.