Hearth Record

Hospice of Northeastern Michigan

A hospice in Gaylord, Michigan 49735

830 S Otsego Ave, Gaylord, Michigan 49735. (989) 731-2744.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 9 hospices serving ZIP code 49735 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 9, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 9, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner3 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 351 words

    “It is required that the drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by interview and observation. In 2 of 6 (33%) home visits conducted it was noted that the patient’s current drug profile was not updated at the time of each comprehensive assessment when changes were made to an existing medication. CLINICAL RECORD 1/HOME VISIT 1: The patient elected the benefit on 06/27/2025. During an observed home visit on 01/06/2026 with the hospice aide (Personnel Record 7) to the Assisted Living facility and following medication reconciliation with the facility’s printed drug profile, it was determined that the patient was taking Aspirin 81 mg daily, but it was not on the agency’s current drug profile. Following record review, it was determined that the aspirin was discontinued 07/2025 but still remained on the facility’s medication profile. CLINICAL RECORD 6/HOME VISIT 6: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/08/2025. During an observed home visit on 01/08/2026, the registered nurse (Personnel Record 4) identified expired medications in the comfort pack during medication reconciliation. The following medications, originally ordered on 01/08/2025, had expired on 12/05/2025: Hyoscyamine 0.125 mg (1 every 4 hours as needed for congestion/bladder spasms), Haldol liquid concentrate 2 mg/mL (0.5 mL by mouth or under the tongue every 6 hours as needed for nausea/restlessness), Lorazepam 0.5 mg tablet (1 tablet every 6 hours as needed for anxiety), Acetaminophen rectal suppository (1 every 6 hours as needed for mild pain/fever), and Bisacodyl rectal suppository 10 mg (1 daily as needed for constipation. This was confirmed with the registered nurse onsite. After a joint review of the records and discussion with the Manager of Clinical Operations, it was determined that the patient had been transferred to the assisted living facility around that time, and the medication was likely not removed from the drug profile during the transition. The Manager confirmed that the registered nurse case manager should have identified this discrepancy.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 444 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including the following: interventions to manage pain and symptoms. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 23 (13%) clinical records reviewed it was revealed that the agency did not ensure that the patients’ individualized written plans of care included all the interventions to manage the assessed symptoms. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/04/2025. At the time of admission on 01/04/2025, the patient was prescribed oxygen at 6 liters per minute via nasal cannula, to be used continuously, and this order was accurately reflected on the agency’s current medication list and plan of care. However, review of skilled nursing visit documentation demonstrated inconsistent reporting of the ordered oxygen flow rate. Multiple visit notes documented that the patient was receiving oxygen at flow rates below the prescribed 6 liters per minute, including: 11/26/2025: 4 L/min; 12/04/2025: 3.5 L/min; 12/11/2025: 5 L/min; 12/18/2025: 4.5 L/min; and 12/31/2025: 4 L/min. There were no interventions noted the plan of care related to titration of the oxygen. CLINICAL RECORD 13: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/11/2025 with a primary diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the frontal lobe. At admission, the nurse documented that the patient was taking Metformin 500 mg daily for Type II Diabetes. However, review of both the initial and current plans of care revealed no identified problem, interventions, or goals addressing the patient’s diabetes. Additionally, the patient was receiving Decadron daily for brain swelling, which may further elevate blood glucose levels. CLINICAL RECORD 19: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/24/2025 with a diagnosis of Senile Degeneration of the Brain. Following documentation review, it was noted on 04/07/2025 that triage received a call on from the patient’s daughter stating her mom’s blood glucose level was 222 and she was instructed to contact hospice if above 200. The triage nurse documented that the chart was reviewed but there was no plan of care noted to address the blood glucose levels and no insulin, or any other medications for diabetes profiled on patient’s plan of care. When reviewing a history and physical from 03/10/2025, the documentation showed the patient had Type II Diabetes and was on Farxiga 5 mg daily. There were no problems, interventions or goals noted related to diabetes. Following a joint review of the records and discussion with the Manager of Clinical Operations and the AVP Program Administrator, it was determined that the plans of care did not include interventions corresponding to the assessed problems.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 120 words

    “It is required that the hospice assesses the skills and competencies of all individuals providing care, including volunteers providing services and, as necessary, provides in-service training and education programs where required. This standard was not met as evidenced by interview and personnel record review. 1 of 2 (50%) personnel records of registered nurses hired within the last three years reviewed, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure that a competency assessment was completed upon hire. PERSONNEL RECORD 9: This registered nurse was hired on 03/20/2023. The personnel record contained no documented evidence of a competency assessment. The Statewide Director of Quality stated in an interview on 01/09/2026, “We have looked all over and are unable to find anything.””

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 9, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 3, 1990.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 56% at home, 20% in assisted living, 16% in a nursing facility, 8% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.7%
Visits near death97.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 25 owners or officers are people: Michael L Damstra (corporate director); Sanford J Linden (corporate director); Bradley Killaly (corporate director); Marcie M Hillary (corporate officer); Patrick Miller (corporate officer); Patrick Miller (corporate director); Brian M Connolly (corporate director); Eric Kaplan (corporate officer); Lee Ann Myers (corporate officer); Lee Ann Myers (managing employee (on the payroll)); Molly Petersen (corporate director); Krista Newman (corporate officer); Mary Sanders (corporate director); Kurt Ludlow (corporate director); Steven C Wade (corporate director); John Evangelisita (corporate director); Melissa D Ring (managing employee (on the payroll)); Gerald Fitzgerald (corporate director); Joanna Szejbach (managing employee (on the payroll)); Shaz Shuja Anwar (managing employee (on the payroll)); John Raymond Maurer (corporate director); Jane Mcnamara (corporate director); Nancy Lynn Philappart (corporate director); Jamie L Cockerel (corporate officer); Michael A Jones (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 90% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.13% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 78.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 9 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 49735, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 3.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 9 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 49735
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Hospice of Northeastern Michigan This hospice3
The Care Team Hospice18
Munson Hospice and Palliative Care7
Mclaren Hospice5
Heartland Hospice (Grand Rapids)0
Gentiva II12
Compassus - Northern Michigan5
Elara Caring17
Harmony Home Health and Hospice Care11

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.