Hearth Record

Bristol Hospice LLC

A hospice in Fall River, Massachusetts 02723

1 Father Devalles Blvd, Suite 309, Fall River, Massachusetts 02723. (774) 379-7232.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 14 hospices serving ZIP code 02723 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 18, 2024: an initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 18, 2024: initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner4 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 178 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 10 (10%) clinical records reviewed of patients that received chaplain services, the hospice did not ensure that the initial comprehensive assessment was made no later than five calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/30/2023 with a diagnosis of Malignant neoplasm of bladder. The plan of care dated 11/30/2023 ordered Chaplain services two (2) times a month for three (3) months. The Chaplain completed the initial spiritual assessment visit on 12/06/2023, with six (6) days outstanding. During a joint review of the clinical record and interview, the Clinical Director confirmed that the Chaplain made the initial visit later than the required 5-day calendar days.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 210 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed, the hospice did not ensure that the patient’s plan of care identified planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 4: The patient elected hospice care on 03/19/2024. The physician’s Certification of Terminal Illness (CTI), dated and signed 03/19/2024, documented that the patient was recently hospitalized for aspiration pneumonia. The pre-admit note completed by the Registered Nurse (RN) on 03/18/2024 and the initial comprehensive assessment completed by the RN on 03/19/2024 documented that the patient had dysphagia and was recently hospitalized for aspiration pneumonia. The plan of care dated 03/19/2024 through 06/16/2024 documented the patient’s goal: “Patient will be free from signs and symptoms of aspiration.” The plan of care did not include documentation of interventions based on the problems of dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia identified in the comprehensive assessment. During a joint review of the clinical record and interview, the Clinical Director confirmed there were no documented interventions based on problems identified in the comprehensive assessment.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 193 words

    “It is required that a hospice aide provides services: ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group; included in the plan of care; permitted to be performed under state law and regulation; [and] consistent with the hospice aide training. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed of patients receiving Hospice Aide (HA) services, the hospice did not ensure that the Hospice Aide provided services ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group, included in the plan of care. Clinical Record 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/30/2023 with a diagnosis of Malignant neoplasm of bladder. The plan of care for the certification period dated 12/3/2023 through 01/28/2024 ordered HA services three (3) times a week. For the weeks of 12/24/2023 through 12/30/2024 and 12/31/2023 through 01/06/2024, the HA documented two (2) visits weekly. A review of the clinical record revealed no evidence of documented missed visits or documented reasons why the visits were missed. During an interview and a joint review of the clinical record, the Clinical Director confirmed that the HA did not follow the frequency order on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 213 words

    “It is required that a patient clinical record containing past and current findings is maintained for each hospice patient. The record may be maintained electronically or on paper. Each patient’s record includes, at a minimum: signed copies of the notice of patient rights and the hospice election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. In 1 of 2 (50%) clinical records reviewed of live discharged patients, the hospice did not ensure that the patient’s clinical record contained a copy of a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage signed at least two calendar days before Medicare-covered services ended. Clinical Record 13: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/24/2023 with a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. The interdisciplinary (IDG) team determined the patient was no longer terminally ill and agreed to discharge the patient on 01/02/2024. A review of the notification to the patient and family of the discharge and the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form revealed that the patient was discharged on 01/02/2024. The form was signed on 01/04/2024. During a joint review of the clinical record and interview with the clinical director, it was confirmed there was no documented evidence that the patient and family were notified in the appropriate amount of time of the patient’s discharge plan.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 18, 2024Initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 10, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 35% at home, 13% in assisted living, 52% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.7%
Visits near death95.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Bristol Hospice, L.L.C. owns 100% directly since Apr 20, 2022.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: Alex Edward Mauricio (corporate officer, 0%); Alex Edward Mauricio (corporate director, 0%); John Charles Garbarino (corporate officer, 0%); John Charles Garbarino (corporate director, 0%); Charles D Hackett (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Michael Derrick (corporate officer, 0%); Betty J Brennan (corporate director, 0%); Phillip Teves (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Hyrum Kirton (corporate director, 0%); David A Malm (corporate officer, 0%); David A Malm (corporate director, 0%).
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Bristol Hospice Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 20, 2022
Bristol Ultimate Holdco, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 20, 2022
Bristol Hospice, L.L.C.Owns 5% or more directly100%Apr 20, 2022
Bristol Hospice Topco Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 20, 2022
Webster Equity Partners Bristol Cf LPOwns 5% or more through other companies69.8%Apr 20, 2022
Aware Super Pty, Ltd.Owns 5% or more through other companies8.28%Apr 20, 2022
Webster Equity Partners IV Bristol Cf LPOwns 5% or more through other companies5.72%Apr 20, 2022

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 84% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 85% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 14 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 02723, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.