Hearth Record

Audubon Hospice of Lafayette, Inc.

A hospice in Lafayette, Louisiana 70508

221 Rue De Jean,, Ste 205, Lafayette, Louisiana 70508. (337) 541-1000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 14 hospices serving ZIP code 70508 had 2.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 25, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 25, 2025: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 432 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to maintain a system of communication to ensure that coordination of care was provided as evidenced by the SN (skilled nurse) failing to inform the physician of the patients complaint of pain for 1 (#13) out of 14 (#1-#14) sampled patients. Patient #13. Review of the patients electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date was 09/22/2024. The patients diagnoses included severe protein calorie malnutrition and repeated falls. The benefit period reviewed was 09/22/2024 to 12/03/2024. Review of the patients POC (plan of care) for benefit period 09/22/2024 to 12/03/2024 revealed an order for SN 2/wk, decreased to 1/wk beginning 09/30/2024 (skilled nurse visits two times a week, decrease to one visit a week beginning 09/30/2024.) Review of the patients RN (Registered Nurse) Initial Assessment visit note dated 09/22/2024 under the pain assessment section revealed, “;...Management...Target pain goal: 2 on a pain scale of 1-10...What pain level warrants further attention: 5 ...” Review of the patients skilled nurse visit note dated 09/26/2024 at 10:29 AM to 11:02 AM revealed the patient complained of pain 8/10 (pain scale 1-10, with 10 being worse) during the visit. There was no evidence the skilled nurse informed the physician of the patients pain. Review of the patients skilled nurse visit note dated 09/30/2024 at 12:07 PM to 12:38 PM revealed the patient complained of pain 8/10 during the visit. There was no evidence the skilled nurse informed the physician of the patients pain. On 02/25/2025 at 10:40 AM, an interview was conducted with S1ADM (Administrator). After S1ADM reviewed Patient #13s initial assessment conducted on admission, she confirmed that the target goal for pain was a level 2 on a pain scale of 1-10. S1ADM stated that pain level of 5 or greater warranted further attention and that the physician should be informed. On 2/25/2025 at 11:50 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with S2RN. S2RN confirmed that she was the nurse that made the SN visits on 09/26/2024 and on 09/30/2024. S2RN reviewed the electronic SN visit notes and confirmed the patient complained of pain that was at a level 8 for both visits and she confirmed that there was no evidence the physician was informed of patients pain. On 02/25/2025 at 12:15 PM, an interview was conducted with S1ADM. She reviewed the SN visit notes dated 09/26/2024 and 09/30/2024. S1ADM confirmed the patient complained of pain that was at a level 8 out of 10. S1ADM confirmed there was no evidence the SN informed the physician of patients pain and confirmed that she should have.”

    Rule L0554. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 701 words

    “Based on observation and interview, the agencys RN (Registered Nurse) failed to follow accepted standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases while performing wound care for Patient #2. Review of Patient #2s electronic clinical record revealed the election date for hospice services was 12/12/2023. Her start of care date was 02/07/2025. The patients admitting diagnosis included in part the following diagnoses: senile degeneration of brain, anxiety disorder, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, and essential (primary) hypertension. The benefit period reviewed was 02/04/2025 to 04/04/2025. Further review of the patients electronic record revealed a physician order with a start date of 02/24/2025 that read, “;Wound Cleanser External Solution—Dose: 1ml (milliliter); Instructions: apply top wound for 5 days and then prn (as needed); Indication: Wound care.” Review of CDCs (Centers for Disease Control) “;Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers” dated 02/27/2024 (https://www.cdc.gov/clean-hands/hcp/clinical-safety/index.html#cdc_clinical_safety_best_practices_recomm-recommendations) read in part,...CDC provides the following recommendations for hand hygiene in healthcare settings...Know when to clean your hand: ...before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient...after contact with blood, body fluids, or contaminated surfaces...Know when to wear (and change) gloves: ...When to change gloves and clean hands...if gloves become soiled with blood and body fluids after a task...if moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient or if a clinical indication for hand hygiene occurs...if they look dirty or have blood or body fluids on then after completing a task... On 02/24/25 at 12:00 PM, a home visit was conducted with S3RN at a nursing facility. She stated she would be assessing the wound on the patients right leg and performing wound care. She went into the patients bathroom and washed her hands and donned clean gloves. S3RN placed a barrier of the bedside table and placed the wound care supplies on the bedside table. S3RN removed the transparent dressing from the patients right lower leg. Bloody drainage was observed on the dressing. Upon removing the dressing, it cause the patients wound to start bleeding. S3RN reached in her clean wound care supply bag and removed clean gauze with the same gloves that she used to remove the bloody dressing. She sprayed the wound with wound cleanser and cleaned it with the gauze. Blood was observed on the gauze. SN then discarded the blood stained gauze and reached in her clean wound care supply bag with the contaminated gloves and removed a transparent dressing. She applied the dressing on the patients wound. She reached again into her clean wound supply bag with the contaminated gloves and removed her pen to sign and date the patients dressing. S3RN removed her gloves and put on a clean pair of gloves without sanitizing her hands to clean her vital sign equipment and placed in her bag. She also placed the bag with the wound care supplies back in her bag. Then, she removed her gloves and washed her hands. On 02/24/2025 at 12:42 PM, after completing the visit, S3RN was informed that she didnt changed her gloves until after she completed the patients wound care. She was informed that she removed the patients old dressing; cleaned the patients wound; touched the gauze that had blood on it and reached into her clean wound care supply bag twice to get supplies without changing her gloves. She confirmed that she should have changed her gloves, sanitized her hands, and put on a clean pair of gloves after she removed the old dressing from the patients wound. She confirmed that she should have changed her gloves, sanitized her hands, and put on a clean pair of gloves after cleaned the patients wound and touched the gauze with blood on it. She also confirmed that she should not have reached in her clean wound supply bag with the same gloves. On 02/24/2025 at 12:15 PM, an interview was conducted with S1DON. S1DON confirmed that S3RN should have changed her gloves and sanitized her hands after removing the patients old dressing and when she cleaned the wound. She also confirmed that S3RN should not have reached in her clean wound supply bag with changing her gloves.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 25, 2025Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 8, 2009.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 3.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 66% at home, 9% in assisted living, 20% in a nursing facility, 6% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends3.3%
Visits near death95.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 8 owners or officers are people: Jason D Landry (managing employee (under contract), 100%); Raymond W Banker (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Raymond W Banker (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Elizabeth Keller Stringfellow (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Rick J Faul (managing employee (under contract), 100%); Raymond W Banker (owns 5% or more directly, 80%); Jonathan Rills (owns 5% or more directly); Linda Dianne Troxclair (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 74% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 75% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.4% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 57.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 14 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70508, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 2.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.