Heart of Hospice, LLC
A hospice in Lafayette, Louisiana 70508
901 Hugh Wallis Road South, Suite B104, Suite B104, Lafayette, Louisiana 70508. (337) 232-8159.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 7 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
7 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 14 hospices serving ZIP code 70508 had 2.
The last inspection on record was on Mar 19, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
7 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Mar 11, 2026: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 219 words
“Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an initial bereavement assessment was completed no later than 5 days after the date of hospice election as part of the patient’s comprehensive assessment for 3 (#7, #9, #11) out of 19 sampled patients. Findings:Review of the agency’s policy and procedure titled, Bereavement Assessment with a revised date of 03/01/2021 revealed, “Purpose: To ensure appropriate and coordinated bereavement services are provided to families and caregivers of hospice patients. Procedure: 1. The Social Worker or designee will complete a Bereavement Risk Assessment within 5 days of admission to hospice…” Review of patient #7’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date and election date for hospice services was 02/17/2026. Review of patient #9’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date and election date for hospice services was 2/22/2026.Review of patient #11’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care of date and election date for hospice services was 02/14/2026. There was no evidence patient #7, #9, and #11’s Bereavement Risk Assessments were completed within 5 days of admission.On 03/10/2026 at 11:00 a.m., an interview and record review was conducted with S1ED (Executive Director). She confirmed the initial Bereavement Risk Assessments for Patient #7, Patient #9, and Patient #11 were not completed within 5 days of admission.”
-
Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))
The inspectors’ words, 1,051 words
“Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the patient’s written individualized POC (plan of care) was followed as evidenced by the agency failing to ensure the HA (Hospice Aide), SN (Skilled Nurse), MSW (Medical Social Worker), and CH (Chaplain) followed the POC for visits as ordered for 5 (#4, #5, #8, #12, and #14) out of 19 sampled patients. Findings: 1. Patient #4. Review of the patient’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date was 07/18/2025. The patient’s admitting diagnosis was Alzheimer’s disease. The benefit period reviewed was 01/14/2026 to 03/14/2026. Review of the patient’s POC for benefit period 01/14/2026 to 03/14/2026 revealed an order for HA effective 01/14/2026 2wk1, 3wk8 (Hospice Aide visits two times a week for one week, three visits a week for eight weeks). The POC revealed an order for MSW effective 01/14/2026 1M1, 2M1, 1M1, 4 prn for urgent psychosocial needs/interventions (Medical Social Worker visit effective the week of 01/14/2026 one visit a month for one month, two visits a month for one month, one visit a month for one month, four visits as needed…). Further review of the POC revealed an order for CH effective 01/14/2026 2M2, 1M1, 3 prn for urgent spiritual care needs/interventions (Chaplain visits effective 01/14/2026 two visits a month for two months, one visit a month for one month, three visits as needed…). Review of the patient’s HA visit notes for the week of 01/18/2026 revealed no evidence that 3 HA visits were made for that week as ordered. Review of the patient’s MSW visit notes for the time from 01/14/2026 to 01/31/2026 revealed no evidence that a visit was made as ordered. Review of the patient’s CH visit notes for the time from 01/14/2026 to 01/31/2026 revealed no evidence that 2 visits were made as ordered. On 03/10/2026 at 10:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ED (Executive Director) after she reviewed the patient’s electronic clinical record. S1ED confirmed that the HA, MSW, and CH visits were not made as ordered per the patient’s benefit period POC dated 01/14/2026 to 03/14/2026. 2. Patient #5. Review of the patient’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date was 01/04/2026. The patient’s admitting diagnoses included heart disease, Alzheimer’s disease and cerebral infarction. The benefit period reviewed was 01/04/2026 to 04/03/2026. Review of the patient’s POC for benefit period 01/04/2026 to 04/03/2026 revealed an order for HA 2wk13, (Hospice Aide two visits a week for thirteen weeks). Review of the patient’s HA visit notes for the weeks of 01/04/2026 and 01/18/2026 revealed no evidence that 2 HA visits were made for those weeks as ordered. On 03/10/2026 at 1:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ED after she reviewed the patient’s electronic clinical record. S1ED confirmed that the HA visits were not made as ordered per the patient’s benefit period POC for the weeks of 01/04/2026 and 01/18/2026. 3. Patient #8. Review of the patient’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date was 02/13/2026. The patient’s admitting diagnosis included liver cell carcinoma. The benefit period reviewed was 02/13/2026 to 05/13/2026. Review of the patient’s POC for benefit period 02/13/2026 to 05/13/2026 revealed an order for SN effective 02/15/2026 5wk1, 4wk1, 2wk10, 12SN prn visits for urgent symptom management (skilled nurse visits effective the week of 02/15/2026 five visits a week for one week, four visits a week for one week, two visits a week for ten weeks, and twelve skilled nurse visits as needed for urgent symptom management). Further review of the POC revealed an order for HA effective 02/15/2026 3wk12, 1wk1 (Hospice Aide effective 02/15/2026 two visits a week for twelve weeks, one visit a week for one week). Review of the patient’s SN visit notes for the week of 02/22/2026 revealed no evidence that 4 skilled nurse visits were made for that week as ordered. Review of the patient’s HA visit notes for the week of 02/15/2026 revealed no evidence that 3 HA visits were made for that week as ordered. On 03/10/2026 at 3:25 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ED after she reviewed the patient’s electronic clinical record. S1ED confirmed that the SN and HA visits were not made as ordered per the patient’s benefit period POC dated 02/13/2026 to 05/13/2026. 4. Patient #12. Review of the patient’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date was 02/21/2026. The patient’s admitting diagnosis included dysphagia following cerebral infarction. The benefit period reviewed was 02/21/2026 to 05/21/2026. Review of the patient’s POC for benefit period 02/21/2026 to 05/21/2026 revealed an order for SN 1wk1, 4wk1, 3wk11, 2wk1, 12SN prn visits for urgent symptom management (skilled nurse visits one time a week for one week, four visits a week for one week, three visits a week for eleven weeks, two visits a week for one week, and twelve skilled nurse visits as needed for urgent symptom management). Review of the patient’s SN visit notes for the week of 02/22/2026 revealed no evidence that 4 skilled nurse visits were made for that week as ordered. On 03/11/2026 at 4:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ED after she reviewed the patient’s electronic clinical record. S1ED confirmed that the SN visits were not made as ordered per the patient’s benefit period POC dated 02/21/2026 to 05/21/2026. 5. Patient #14. Review of the patient’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date was 09/02/2022. The patient’s admitting diagnosis included malignant neoplasm of bladder. The benefit period reviewed was 02/13/2026 to 04/13/2026. Review of the patient’s POC for benefit period 02/13/2026 to 04/13/2026 revealed an order for SN 2every2wk2, 2wk7, 1wk1, 18SN prn visits for urgent symptom management (skilled nurse visits two visits every two weeks for two weeks, two visits a week for seven weeks, one visit a week for one week, eighteen skilled nurse visits as needed for urgent symptom management). Review of the patient’s SN visit notes for the week of 02/22/2026 revealed that 2 skilled nurse visits were made for that week and there were no orders for visits that week. On 03/11/2026 at 4:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ED after she reviewed the patient’s electronic clinical record. S1ED confirmed that the SN visits were not made as ordered per the patient’s benefit period POC dated 02/13/2026 to 04/13/2026.”
Oct 22, 2024: complaint inspection by the state5 deficiencies
-
Drugs biologicals medical supplies & dme (42 CFR 418.106)
The inspectors’ words, 140 words
“The facility failed to meet the Condition of Participation: Drugs Biologicals Medical Supplies & DME. Based on record review and interview, the agencys SN (Skilled Nurse) failed to ensure the patient (#1) and the patients caregiver received adequate education and training to determine the ability of the patient and/or caregiver to safely administer the medications in the patients emergency medication kit (EKIT) in the home as per the patients POC (Plan of Care) for 1 (#1) out of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled patients. (L0692) Based on record review and interview, the hospice agency failed to ensure its policies and procedures were followed as evidenced by the SN failing to reconcile the patients emergency medication kit (EKIT) in the home for 1 (#1) out of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled patients. (L0696) See findings at L0692 and L0696.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 860 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice agency failed to ensure the patients rights to receive effective pain management and symptom control for conditions related to the terminal illness as evidenced by the SN (Skilled Nurse) failing to reconcile the patients (#1) medication in his EKIT (Emergency Medication Kit) to ensure the patients Morphine (pain medication) was in the home during a skilled nurse visit made on 09/14/2024 for 1 (#1) out of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled patients. Review of the agencys policy titled, Emergency Medication Kit Usage-Hospice with an effective date of 09/25/2008 and a last revision date of 10/25/2010. The policy read in part, Purpose: to identify a uniform methodology in the utilization of emergency medication kits in the Hospice patients home used to provide timely access to medications needed for urgent symptom control. Policy: Emergency medication kits (comfort packs) can be utilized for emergency use and management of comfort-related symptoms. Procedure: 1. A complete list of all drugs contained within the emergency medication kit and information on each drug will be included in each kit... 4. A nurse will assess the contents of the emergency medication kit at every visit as part of the medication reconciliation process. Review of Patient #1s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care and election date for hospice services was 09/13/2024. The patients admitting diagnosis included in part the following diagnoses: Hypertensive Heart Disease Without Heart Failure, Hemothorax and Multiple Fractured Ribs. The benefit period reviewed was 09/13/2024 to 12/11/2024. Review of the patients POC (Plan of Care) for benefit period 09/13/2024 to 12/11/2024 revealed under Goals—Patient pain will be reduced (as evidenced by reduction in pain score) within 24 hours. Further review of the POC revealed under Medications an order for Morphine Concentrate 100mg (milligram) /5ml (milliliter)(20mg/ml) oral solution oral every 4 hours as needed for pain, EKIT(indicating that this medication was in the patients emergency medication kit) Review of the SN visit note dated 09/13/2024 revealed that an EKIT for Patient #1 was sent to the pharmacy for the family pick up. Review of the SN visit note dated 09/14/2024 revealed under Medications, the SN documented that the comfort pack (EKIT) was present and intact. Further review revealed the SN indicated that a medication reconciliation was performed during the visit. A review of the agencys call log revealed a call was received on 09/15/2024 at 11:55 a.m. from the Patient #1s daughter. She stated the patient had a change in condition. He was wheezing, confused, agitated and was in pain and very uncomfortable. Further review revealed that S3RN (Registered Nurse) responded at 12:13 p.m. S3RN stated that she would follow-up and address the patients needs. Review of the SN visit note dated 09/15/2024 revealed that S3RN arrived at Patient #1s home at 1:21 p.m. Further review of the visit note revealed, “;Pt is visibly in pain, complaining of rib discomfort. Observed moaning, facial grimacing, shuffling of feet and signs of terminal agitation. Pt appeared restless and uncomfortable. Family reports these symptoms started yesterday unresolved.” On 10/21/2024 at 4:30 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with Patient #1s daughter. Patient #1s daughter stated she picked up the patients emergency medication kit from the pharmacy. She was told that the kit was supposed to have Morphine, which was for the patients pain. On 09/15/2024, she called the agency because her father was complaining of pain and was very anxious. She was told by the person on the phone to give him Morphine. When she went to look for the Morphine in the emergency medication kit, there was no Morphine. On 10/22/2024 at 12:55 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with S3RN. She stated that on 09/15/2024, when she arrived at the patients home, there was no Morphine in the home. On 10/22/2024 at 12:25 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with S3RN. She stated when she arrived at the patients home on 09/15/2024, she checked the comfort kit and discovered that there was no Morphine in the kit. She stated a family member had went to the pharmacy to pick it up. On 10/22/2024 at 3:54 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with S4RN. He stated that when he went to the patients home on 09/14/2024, the EKIT had not been opened yet. When asked if he opened the EKIT to check the medications, he stated that he could not recall if he opened the EKIT. When asked how he conducted a medication reconciliation during the visit, he stated that he reconciled the medications that were presented to him. When asked if there was Morphine in the home, he stated that he did not recall Morphine being in the home at the time he reconciled the medications. He confirmed that he did not reconcile the EKIT medications. On 10/22/2024 at 4:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ED (Executive Director). S1ED was asked should the nurse who made the visit on 09/14/2024 have checked the comfort pack (EKIT) to make sure that the patient had received all the necessary medications. She confirmed that the nurses should conducted a medication reconciliation of the patients emergency medication kit every visit.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 344 words
“Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the individualized written POC (plan of care) included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions as evidenced by failing to include orders for medication to manage the patients (#2) symptoms for 1 (#2) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled patients. Review of the agencys Policy and Procedure titled Initial & Comprehensive Admission Assessment & Plan of Care with a revised date of 04/01/2022 read: “;...4. All treatments, medications, and services provided must be on the... plan of care...” Review of Patient #2s electronic clinical record revealed the patients start of care date was 09/13/2024. The patients admitting diagnoses included Cerebrovascular Disease with Multi-Infarct Dementia, Cerebral Infarction, Hypertension, and Atrial Fibrillation. The patients benefit period reviewed was 09/13/2024 to 12/11/2024. Review of the patients SN (Skilled Nurse) visit narrative note dated 09/17/2024 revealed, “;Late entry for 09/16/2024.... Family states they were told they were going to get something stronger than Imodium for pt (patient) as well as antibiotics but have not received anything. SN VU (verbalized understanding) and apologized for this issue. SN recommended Lomotil and family is willing to try it... Family in agreeance and okay with just receiving Lomotil to slow down diarrhea for pt... Lomotil sent in to local pharmacy... for family to pick up...” On 10/22/2024 at 10:22 a.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S2RN (Registered Nurse). S2RN stated the family was complaining about the patient having diarrhea and not getting any medications to resolve it. S2RN stated she informed the family she would get an order for Lomotil to address the patients diarrhea and she sent the order to the patients pharmacy. Review of the patients electronic clinical record, which included the medication list, revealed there was no order for Lomotil. On 10/22/2024 at 4:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ED (Executive Director). She reviewed the patients electronic clinical record and confirmed the patient had diarrhea and that there was no order for Lomotil to manage the diarrhea.”
-
Administration of drugs and biologicals (42 CFR 418.106(d))
The inspectors’ words, 451 words
“Based on record review and interview, the agencys SN (Skilled Nurse) failed to ensure the patient (#1) and the patients caregiver received adequate education and training to determine the ability of the patient and/or caregiver to safely administer the medications in the patients emergency medication kit (EKIT) in the home as per the patients POC (Plan of Care) for 1(#1) out of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled patients. This deficient practice resulted in delay of management of the patient’s increased level of pain. Review of Patient #1s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care and election date for hospice services was 09/13/2024. The patients admitting diagnosis included in part the following diagnoses: Hypertensive Heart Disease Without Heart Failure, Hemothorax and Multiple Fractured Ribs. The benefit period reviewed was 09/13/2024 to 12/11/2024. Review of the patients POC (Plan of Care) for benefit period 09/13/2024 to 12/11/2024 revealed an order to provide education to patient/caregiver regarding current medication regimen, instruction include: medication name, purpose, dosing, schedule, side effects, effectiveness and potential medication interactions. Review of the SN (Skilled Nurse) visit dated 10/14/2024 revealed the SN documented that education was provided to the patients caregiver on medication regimen, managing dyspnea, and pain management. On 10/21/2024 at 4:30 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with Patient #1s daughter who stated that she picked up the patients emergency medication kit from the pharmacy on 09/14/2024. She stated that a nurse made a visit that day and had not discussed how to give the medications. She stated they had to call a friend who was a hospice nurse to help them to administer the patient some of his medications. She stated that on 09/15/2024, the patient was complaining with increased pain and was very agitated. She had to call the agency because she had no idea on how to give the medications. On 10/22/2024 at 3:54 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with S4RN (Registered Nurse). S4RN was asked if he educated the patient and/or the patients caregiver on the emergency medication kit (EKIT) medications. He stated that he had discussed with the patients daughter the patients medication regimen. S4RN was asked if he educated her specifically on how to administer the emergency kit medications. S4RN stated that he felt that he didnt need to because there was a pharmacist in the family. On 10/22/2024 at 4:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ED (Executive Director). She stated that the nurses should be educating the patient and/or caregiver on the side effects, usage, purpose and administration of the patients emergency medications every visit. She stated that nurse should have ensured that the patient and/or caregiver were able to give the medication safely by observing them.”
-
Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(B))
The inspectors’ words, 574 words
“Based on record review and interview, the hospice agency failed to ensure its policies and procedures were followed as evidenced by the SN failing to reconcile the patients emergency medication kit (EKIT) in the home for 1 (#1) out of 3 (#1, #2, and #) sampled patients. This deficient practice resulted in a delay of timely management of the patient’s increased level of pain due to failure to have Morphine readily available in the patient’s EKIT. Review of the agencys policy titled, Emergency Medication Kit Usage-Hospice with an effective date of 09/25/2008 and a last revision date of 10/25/2010. The policy read in part,...1. A complete list of all drugs contained within the emergency medication kit and information on each drug will be included in each kit... 4. A nurse will assess the contents of the emergency medication kit at every visit as part of the medication reconciliation process. Review of Patient #1s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care and election date for hospice services was 09/13/2024. The patients admitting diagnosis included in part the following diagnoses: Hypertensive Heart Disease Without Heart Failure, Hemothorax and Multiple Fractured Ribs. The benefit period reviewed was 09/13/2024 to 12/11/2024. Review of the SN visit dated 09/13/2024 revealed that an EKIT (emergency medication kit) for Patient #1 was sent to the pharmacy and the family would pick up. Review of the SN visit dated 09/14/2024 revealed under Medications, the SN documented that the comfort pack (EKIT) was present and intact. Further review revealed that the SN indicated that a medication reconciliation was performed during the visit. On 10/21/2024 at 4:30 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with Patient#1s daughter who stated that on 09/14/2024, she picked up the patients emergency medication kit from the pharmacy. She was told that the kit was supposed to have Morphine, which was for the patients pain. On 09/15/2024, she called the agency because the patient was complaining of pain and was very anxious. She was told by the person on the phone to give him Morphine. There was no Morphine when she went to look for the Morphine in the emergency medication kit. On 10/22/2024 at 12:25 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S3RN (Registered Nurse). She stated when she arrived at the patients home on 09/15/2024, she checked the comfort kit/EKIT and discovered that there was no Morphine in the kit. On 10/22/2024 at 3:54 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S4RN. He stated that when he went to the patients home on 09/14/2024, the EKIT had not been opened yet. When asked if he opened the EKIT to check the medications, he stated that he could not recall if he opened the EKIT. When asked how he conducted a medication reconciliation during the visit, he stated that he reconciled the medications that were presented to him. When asked if there was Morphine in the home, he stated that he did not recall Morphine being in the home at the time he reconciled the medications. He confirmed that he did not reconcile the EKIT medications. On 10/22/2024 at 4:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ED (Executive Director). S1ED was asked should the nurse who made the visit on 09/14/2024 have checked the comfort pack (EKIT) to make sure the patient had received all the necessary medications. She confirmed that the nurses should have conducted a medication reconciliation of the patients emergency medication kit on every visit.”
All 4 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | Recertification inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Mar 11, 2026 | Recertification inspection by the state | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Dec 3, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Oct 22, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | 5 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 12, 2007.
- Ownership: other.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.3% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 77% at home, 8% in assisted living, 12% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% elsewhere.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 11.3 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 6.9% |
| Visits near death | 93.3% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Louisiana Health CARE Group LLC owns 100% directly since Sep 1, 2021.
- 6 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer, 0%); Abigail Benoit (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Christopher J Fontenot (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Brittany Montgomery (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unitedhealth Group Incorporated | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 22, 2023 |
| LHC Group Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Sep 1, 2021 |
| Louisiana Health CARE Group LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Sep 1, 2021 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 90% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 70% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 14 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70508, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 7.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Hope Healthcare and Hospice, LLC | 1 |
| N S I Hospice, L L C | 2 |
| Heart of Hospice, LLC This hospice | 7 |
| Traditions Health | 5 |
| Audubon Hospice of Lafayette, Inc. | 2 |
| Bridgeway Healthcare and Hospice of Acadiana | 1 |
| Hospice of Acadiana Inc. | 17 |
| Community Hospice of Lafayette | 0 |
| Hospice Compassus - Lafayette | 0 |
| St Joseph Hospice of Acadiana, LLC | 6 |
| Amedisys Hospice | 11 |
| Louisiana Hospice and Palliative Care | 1 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.