Hearth Record

Hospice of Acadiana Inc.

A hospice in Lafayette, Louisiana 70503

2600 Johnston Street, Suite 200, Lafayette, Louisiana 70503. (337) 232-1234.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 17 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

17 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 17 hospices serving ZIP code 70503 had 2.

The last inspection on record was on May 2, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

17 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

17 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 2, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 31 (Patient #9) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patient 09: The patient record does not include evidence that the patient chooses or refuses to choose an attending physician for hospice services.”

    Rule L0515. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 31 (Patient #8, 11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 08: The patient was admitted on 4/15/25, the initial comprehensive Spiritual assessment was complete on 4/22/25. Patient 11: The patient was admitted on 3/22/25, the initial comprehensive Spiritual assessment was completed on 3/28/25.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 210 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 31 (Patient #2, 4, 7, 21) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 02: The medication profile includes Miralax 17G powder orally one time a day for bowel regimen, it does not include a diluent. The medication profile includes Voltaren gel, no dose indicated, apply topically 2 times a day as needed for pain, it does not include an application site. (Order corrected on site.) Patient 04: Upon review of the medications in the home, the primary caregiver reports that the patient does not take tamsulosin 0.4mg which remains on the medication profile. Patient 07: The medication profile includes polyethylene glycol 17G powder orally one time a day for bowel regimen, it does not include a diluent. (Order corrected on site.) Patient 21: The medication profile includes polyethylene glycol 17G powder packet, take orally 1 time a day, it does not include a diluent. (Order corrected on site.)”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 279 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 31 (Patient #4, 6, 7, 9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 04: The patient was admitted on 11/5/24 with a primary diagnosis of sarcopenia, he has a secondary diagnosis of epilepsy determined as related to his hospice services, he takes phenobarbital and levetiracetam for epilepsy/seizure management. The plan of care does not include a problem statement with interventions and goals for the management of the epilepsy/seizures or seizure precautions. Patient 06: The patient was admitted on 4/24/25 to General Inpatient level of care with a primary diagnosis of Neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, he is admitted with signs and symptoms of agitation and combativeness and was transferred from the hospital where he exhibited the same behaviors. The plan of care does not include a problem statement with interventions and goals for the management of the agitation. Patient 09: The patient record includes documentation of dysphagia with changes in patients ability to feed herself with noted symptoms of possible aspiration. The patient consumed 3 meals per day one month prior to admission and now eats 1 small meal a day, requires assisted feeding and medications must be crushed and added into pudding. The plan of care does not include a problem statement for nutrition with interventions and goals to include aspiration precautions.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 131 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 31 (Patient #3) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient 03: The plan of care includes hospice aide services with frequency orders of a range of 1-2 times per week, effective 1/2/25 and continuing into benefit 2 effective 4/2/25. (Updated and corrected order on site.)”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 31 (Patient #2, 7, 21) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 02: Medication orders on 9/21/24 includes Miralax 17G powder orally one time a day for bowel regimen, it does not include a diluent. Orders on 4/22/24 includes Voltaren gel, no dose indicated, apply topically 2 times a day as needed for pain, it does not include an application site. (Orders updated and corrected on site.) Patient 07: Medication orders on 4/10/25 includes polyethylene glycol 17G powder orally one time a day for bowel regimen, it does not include a diluent. (Orders updated and corrected on site.) Patient 21: The medication orders on 5/23/24 for polyethylene glycol 17G powder packet, take orally 1 time a day, does not include a diluent. (Orders updated and corrected on site.)”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 190 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 31 (Patient #2, 3, 7, 10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 02: The patient documentation on 4/25/25 indicates the patient utilizes a rollator (rolling walker) for ambulatory assistance, this is not included in the plan of care. (Corrected on site.) Patient 03: The patient record indicates that the patient utilizes a rollator (rolling walker) for ambulatory assistance, this is not included in the plan of care. (Corrected on site.) Patient 07: The patient record indicates the patient is non-ambulatory and utilizes a wheelchair to self propel himself for mobility. The plan of care does not include a wheelchair. (Corrected on site.) Patient 10: The patient record upon admission (7/19/24) and onward indicates that the patient is weak and utilizes a wheelchair for ambulation, this is not included in the plan of care. Documentation on 3/5/25 performed by LPN indicates that the patient ambulates with a walker, this is not included in the plan of care. (Corrected on site.)”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 224 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 31 (Patient #2, 8, 12, 18) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 02: The patient has declined spiritual care and social work services and visits and denies needs or interventions, the plan of care has not been updated to discharge previous interventions and goals. (Corrected on site.) Patient 08: The patient record includes evidence of significant wounds including stage IV coccyx wound, left hip wound, unstageable right heel wound with eschar and right heel wound with eschar. The plan of care does not include patient specific interventions for the wounds. (Updated on site.) Patient 12: The plan of care includes orders for monthly SW visits, the plan of care does not include problem statements with interventions and goals for SW services. (Updated plan of care on site.) Patient 18: The plan of care includes order for volunteer visits 1-4 times per month starting 2/4/25, the plan of care is not updated to include volunteer services with interventions and goals. The patient/primary caregiver have initiated requests for assistance with nursing home placement with SW visits, interventions and goals that have not been included in the plan of care. (Updated and corrected on site.)”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 4 of 31 (Patient #7, 18, 20) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 209 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 31 (Patient #26, 27, 28, 29) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient 26: The patient record does not include a plan of care for bereavement services reflective of the needs of the bereaved following the patient death. Patient 27: The patient record does not include a plan of care for bereavement services reflective of the needs of the bereaved following the patient death. Patient 28: The patient record does not include a plan of care for bereavement services reflective of the needs of the bereaved following the patient death. Patient 29:The patient record does not include a plan of care for bereavement services reflective of the needs of the bereaved following the patient death.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 233 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 31 (Patient #5, 6) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 05: The patient was admitted on 4/22/25 to General Inpatient level of care, the aide task assignment does not specify frequencies for performing oral care, hair care, or bathing. (Updated and corrected on site.) Patient 06: The patient was admitted on 4/24/25 to General Inpatient level of care, the aide task assignment does not specify a frequency of tasks for bathing, hair care/shampooing, and oral care. The assistance level for patient needs is not specified and ranges from fully independent to full assistance, the aide is allowed to determine level of task and the care is not assigned as patient specific. (Updated and corrected on site.)”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 31 (Patient #13, 15, 16) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training. Patient 13: The patient record includes orders for Hospice Aide services for 6 times per week. The patient received 7 visits the week of 3/23/25 - 3/29/25 Patient 15: The patient record includes orders for Hospice Aide services 2 times per week. The patient received 1 visit the week of 3/2/25 - 3/8/25, and 1 visit the week of 4/13/25 - 4/19/25 Patient 16: The patient record includes order for Hospice Aide services 6 times per week. The patient received 5 visits the week of 4/14/25 - 4/19/25 and 5 visits the week of 3/30/25 - 4/5/25.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel #5: The employee record does not include evidence of an initial competency assessment.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 31 (Patient #21) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 21: The patient record dated 1/16/25, 1/26/25 and 1/30/25 includes documentation of a hospice aide supervisory visits performed by the RN, the patient record does not include hospice aide services.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 31 (Patient #25) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient 25: The patient/family elected to revoke the hospice benefit, the record does not include a discharge summary.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 225 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 31 (Patient #7, 30) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 07: The patient was admitted on 4/10/25 with a secondary related diagnosis of Type II diabetes mellitus without complications, the patient is prescribed Humalog twice daily, dose dependent on finger stick blood glucose results. The plan of care does not include a problem statement with interventions and goals for the management of the diabetes. The patient record indicates that he has a history of aggression and anxiety with a diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia, indicated as a related diagnosis. The patient takes sertraline, trazadone, Zyprexa, buproprion, risperidone to control his mood and behavior, the plan of care dose not include a problem statement with interventions and goals for the management of the aggression and anxiety. The patient record includes volunteer services to be provided weekly effective 4/16/25, there is no evidence of volunteer visits being made. Patient 30: The medication profile in the hospice plan of care includes haloperidol 1mg every 4 hours as needed, the patient resides at a skilled nursing facility, this medication is not included in the plan of care at the skilled nursing facility. (Order corrected.)”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

  • N/a (42 CFR 418.110(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 152 words

    “Upon inspection throughout the facility, it was observed that the penetrations through the ceiling to the attic/roof space were not properly sealed to provide a fire barrier or fire stop. These openings were found in the electrical room, riser room, garage, storage rooms, oxygen storage room and boiler room. In healthcare facilities, unsealed penetrations and gaps in life safety ceilings can compromise fire protection measures, potentially delaying sprinkler or smoke detector activation and increasing the risk of fire spread. CODE REFERENCE: NFPA 101-2012, 8.3.5.1 “Penetrations for cables, cable trays, conduits, pipes, tubes, combustion vents and exhaust vents, wires, and similar items to accommodate electrical, mechanical, plumbing, and communication systems that pass through a wall, floor, or floor/ceiling assembly constructed as a fire barrier shall be protected by a firestop system or device. Gaps and holes from unsealed penetrations allow easy access for both fire and smoke to spread quickly throughout the building.”

    Rule L0827. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 2, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 7, 1985.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 64% at home, 9% in assisted living, 23% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 3% in an inpatient hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.6%
Visits near death91.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 24 owners or officers are people: Paul Breaux (corporate director); Janice Beyt (corporate director); Nelda W Breaux (corporate director); Patricia Cran (corporate director); Stacy Mistric (corporate director); Stacy Mistric (managing employee (on the payroll)); Thomas M Franklin (managing employee (on the payroll)); Louis Richard (corporate director); Trey Hightower (corporate director); Aaron Beyt (corporate director); Lawrence Vincent (corporate director); Tyson Cromwell (corporate director); Nancy Bedford Mount (corporate director); Bryan Frederick (corporate director); Linda Lipstate (corporate director); Mary Jane Bauer (corporate director); Steve Landry (corporate director); Travis Godley (corporate director); Melinda Oberleitner (corporate director); Ann Clark (corporate director); Burton E Cestia (corporate director); Kevin Berken (corporate director); Gregory S Riggs (corporate director); Gregory S Riggs (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 92% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 95% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.75% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 58.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 17 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70503, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 17.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.