Hearth Record

Heart of Hospice

A hospice in Franklin, Louisiana 70538

1810 Main Street, Franklin, Louisiana 70538. (337) 828-2678.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 13 hospices serving ZIP code 70538 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 29, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 29, 2024: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 144 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an initial bereavement assessment was completed with a patients family and/or other individuals for 1 (Patient #4) of 19 (Patient #1, Patient #2, Patient #3, Patient #4, Patient #5, Patient #6, Patient #7, Patient #8, Patient #9, Patient #10, Patient #11, Patient #12, Patient #13, Patient #14, Patient #15, Patient #16, Patient #17, Patient #18, and Patient #19) sampled patients reviewed for initial bereavement requirements. Findings: Review of Patient #4s hospice plan of care for the certification period of 08/31/2024 through 11/28/2024 revealed there was no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, an initial bereavement assessment had been completed since admission on 08/31/2024. In an interview on 10/28/2024 at 11:47 a.m., S1Executive Director indicated S3Master Social Worker (MSW) had not completed an initial bereavement assessment for Patient #4 as required.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Licensed professional services (42 CFR 418.62(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 374 words

    “Based on record reviews and interviews, the agency failed to ensure the nurse assessed wounds weekly for 2 (Patient #1 and Patient #15) of 6 (Patient #1, Patient #7, Patient #9, Patient #12, Patient #13, and Patient #15) sampled patients reviewed for weekly wound care measurements. Findings: Review of the Wound Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society’s Guidelines revealed, in part, assessment and documentation of wound status, which includes comprehensive clinical data demonstrating evidence of progress in healing or failure to heal. Comprehensive wound assessment includes: dimensions and depth; presence, location and depth of any sinus tracts or undermining areas; status and characteristics of the wound bed; volume, color, and odor of exudates; evidence of infection in surrounding tissues. Further review revealed when recorded over time this information can be used to track the progress of wound healing. Review of the agencys Wound Assessment, Documentation and Photography policy and procedure revised on 03/01/2021 revealed, in part, wound measurements were to be documented in the medical record weekly. Patient #1 Review of Patient #1s Wound Record Report revealed Patient #1 had a right lower buttock stage II pressure ulcer (open wound caused by pressure). Further review revealed the week of 09/08/2024 through 09/14/2024 no wound care measurements were obtained. Further review revealed Patient #1s wound care measurements were not obtained for the week of 09/08/2024 through 09/14/2024 or for the week of 09/15/2024 through 09/21/2024. There was no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, Patient #1s wound was measured weekly for the above mentioned time period as required. In an interview on 10/29/2024 at 10:47 a.m., S1Executive Director (ED) indicated wounds were expected to be measured weekly. Patient #15 Review of Patient #15s Wound Record Report revealed Patient #15 had a right lower buttock stage II pressure ulcer. Further review revealed no wound care measurements were obtained for Patient #15s wound for the week of 03/24/2024 through 03/30/2024 There was no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, Patient #15s wound was measured weekly for the above mentioned time period. In an interview on 10/29/2024 at 10:27 a.m., S1ED indicated no wound care measurements were obtained of Patient #15s right lower buttock wound the week of 03/24/2024 through 03/30/2024 as required.”

    Rule L0585. Standard-level.

  • Written agreement (42 CFR 418.112(c)(8))

    The inspectors’ words, 173 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the contract with a patients nursing facility contained a provision which required hospice to report all alleged violations of mistreatment, neglect, or verbal, mental, sexual, and physical abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of patient property for 1 (Patient #1) of 1 (Patient #1) sampled patient contracts reviewed for contract requirements. Findings: Review of Patient #1s Hospice Agreement between the agency and Patient #1s nursing facility dated 07/16/2024 revealed, in part, there was no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, that the contract contained a provision which required hospice staff to report to the nursing facility administrator any alleged violations of mistreatment, neglect, or verbal, mental, sexual, and physical abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of patient property. In an interview on 10/28/2024 at 3:24 p.m., S2Business Office Manager indicated Patient #1s contract between the agency and Patient #1s nursing facility did not have provisions for reporting abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property as required.”

    Rule L0771. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 164 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure a statewide criminal background check was completed as required for a registered nurse for the state of Louisiana for 1 (S1Executive Director) of 5 (S1Executive Director, S3Master Social Worker, S4Medical Director, S5Alternate Executive Director, and S6Registered Nurse) sampled licensed employees reviewed for criminal background checks requirements. Findings: Review of S1Executive Directors (ED) personnel file revealed a date of hire as executive director of 03/10/2024. Review further revealed S1EDs criminal background check was completed on 10/08/2019. Further review revealed S1EDs criminal background check revealed it only included three parishes, and did not include a statewide check. There was no documented evidence, and the agency presented no documented evidence, S1ED had a criminal background check completed for the entire state of Louisiana. In an interview on 10/29/2024 at 11:15 a.m., S1ED indicated the agency was unable to locate any documentation a statewide criminal background check had been completed for herself, S1ED, since date of hire.”

    Rule L0796. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 29, 2024Recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 26, 2005.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 76% at home, 9% in assisted living, 15% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.6%
Visits near death97.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Louisiana Health CARE Group LLC owns 100% directly since Sep 1, 2021.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer, 0%); Courtney Guillory (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly Seymour (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer, 0%); Wendy Daigle (corporate director); Roland J Degeyter (managing employee (on the payroll)); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Amy Cormier (corporate director, 0%); Heather Hayes (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 22, 2023
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 1, 2021
Louisiana Health CARE Group LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Sep 1, 2021

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 73.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 13 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70538, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.