Hearth Record

Astrum Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Santa Clarita, California 91350

28100 Bouquet Canyon Rd. Suite 206, Santa Clarita, California 91350. (747) 322-7757.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 108 hospices serving ZIP code 91350 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 15, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 15, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission5 deficiencies
  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 125 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted that there was no evidence of a Registered Nurse comprehensive assessment for the interdisciplinary team completed every 15 days. For example, a review of the medical record for RRHV#3 revealed the 4th comprehensive assessment [update] was completed 18 days after the 3rd update. The 6th update was completed 16 days after the 5th update. 

Example #2: A review of the medical record for RRNHV#5 revealed the 3rd comprehensive assessment [update] was completed 24 days after the 2nd update, during the 1st benefit period. During the 2nd benefit period the 3rd update was completed 17 days after the 2nd update. This observation was reviewed with the Director of Patient Care Services. 

”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Observed in Data Session. The organization did not take action when it did not achieve planned improvements. For example, the performance improvement goal for the organization’s fall prevention program was to decrease the number of falls for the year(s) 2022, 2023. A review of the annual incident report data revealed that the patient’s experienced falls and the fall rate did not decrease. The organization’s goal was not achieved and steps to achieve success or change outcomes were not described in the reporting document. This observation was reviewed with the Director of Patient Care services.”

    Rule L0564. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(3))

    “Observed in Data Tracer. Since the organization did not document steps to achieve success or change outcomes in the reporting document related to fall prevention for the year(s) 2022, and 2023. The hospice did not track its performance related to improvements with the fall prevention program. This observation was reviewed with the Director of Patient Care services.”

    Rule L0570. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 242 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization did not ensure its policy titled Certification of Terminal Illness was implemented. For example, a review of the Certification of Terminal Illness statement(s) for benefit period #5, and benefit period #6 for RRNHV#1, revealed that the Certifying Physician Summary did not document clinical information to support the medical prognosis and support for recertification of hospice services. This area of the document was left blank. Tools to document determining terminal prognosis such as the fiscal intermediary’s Local Coverage Determinations was also left blank. 

Example #2: A review of the Certification of Terminal Illness statement(s) for benefit period #5 for RRNHV#2, revealed that the Certifying Physician Summary did not document clinical information to support the medical prognosis and support for recertification of hospice services. This area of the document was left blank. Tools to document determining terminal prognosis such as the fiscal intermediary’s Local Coverage Determinations was also left blank. 

Example #3: A review of the Certification of Terminal Illness statement(s) for benefit period #1, and benefit period #2 for RRNHV#6, revealed that the Certifying Physician Summary did not document clinical information to support the medical prognosis and support for recertification of hospice services. This area of the document was left blank. Tools to document determining terminal prognosis such as the fiscal intermediary’s Local Coverage Determinations was also left blank. This observation was reviewed with the Director of Patient Care Services.

”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 182 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not implement its policy related to entries in the medical record. For example, during the review of the medical record for RRHV#3, the Medical Director’s signature line on the Certification of Terminal Illness statement(s) for benefit period #1, and benefit period #2, did not include a date. 

Example #2: During a review of the medical record for RRNHV#1, the Medical Director’s signature line on the Certification of Terminal Illness statement(s) for benefit period #5 and benefit period #6, did not include a date. 

Example #3: During a review of the medical record for RRNHV#2, the Medical Director’s signature line on the Certification of Terminal Illness statement(s) for benefit period #5 did not include a date. 

Example #4: During a review of the medical record for RRNHV#3, and RRNHV#6, the Medical Director’s signature line on the Certification of Terminal Illness statement(s) for benefit period #1 and benefit period #2, did not include a date. This observation was reviewed with the Director of Patient Care Services.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 15, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 25, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 103 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 1.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 80% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 98% at home, 2% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day103.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends1.1%
Visits near death80.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 93.48% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 108 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91350, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.