Hearth Record

Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California

A hospice in Encino, California 91436

16830 Ventura Blvd Suite 315, Encino, California 91436. (818) 358-0273.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 100 hospices serving ZIP code 91436 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on May 17, 2024: an initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 17, 2024: initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner3 deficiencies
  • Initial assessment (42 CFR 418.54(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 233 words

    “The hospice registered nurse must complete an initial assessment within 48 hours after the election of hospice care unless the physician, patient, or representative requests that the initial assessment be completed in less than 48 hours. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 23 (4%) clinical records reviewed, the hospice did not ensure that the hospice Registered Nurse (RN) completed an initial assessment within 48 hours of the patient’s election of hospice care. Clinical Record 19: The patient elected the hospice care on 09/28/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of heart failure. On 09/29/2023 the RN attempted to admit the patient. The patient’s son declined and stated he preferred a visit on Monday 10/02/2023. The RN completed the initial assessment on 10/02/2023, four (4) days after the patient elected hospice care. There was no evidence that the physician was notified of the delay in care or updated physician orders for admission. There was no evidence of an updated election of hospice care. During an interview and a joint record review on 05/17/2024, the Patient Care Administrator/RN confirmed the finding, stating they thought if the patient/family chose the visit date it would be within the standard. In 1 of 23 (4%) clinical records reviewed the hospice did not ensure that the RN initial comprehensive assessment was completed within 48 hours of the election of hospice care.”

    Rule L0522. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 386 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 23 (13%) clinical records reviewed, the hospice did not ensure that the interdisciplinary group completed an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 5: The patient elected the hospice care on 06/28/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis. The Registered Nurse (RN) documented the need for a Medical Social Worker (MSW) evaluation in the initial comprehensive assessment. The MSW documented their initial assessment on 07/05/2023, six (6) days after the patient’s election of hospice care. There was no documentation as to why the initial MSW assessment was not completed within five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/09/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The RN documented the need for a MSW evaluation in the initial comprehensive assessment. The MSW documented their initial assessment on 02/21/2024, twelve (12) days after the patient’s election of hospice care. There was no documentation as to why the initial MSW assessment was not completed within five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 12: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/14/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of cerebral atherosclerosis. The RN documented the need for a MSW and spiritual care (SC) evaluation in the initial comprehensive assessment. The SC and MSW documented their initial assessments on 02/22/2024, eight (8) days after the patient’s election of hospice care. There was no documentation as to why the initial MSW and SC assessments were not completed within five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care. During an interview and a joint record review on 05/13/2024 and 05/16/2024, the Patient Care Administrator/RN confirmed the findings. In 3 of 23 (13%) clinical records reviewed revealed the hospice did not ensure that the interdisciplinary group completed the comprehensive assessment within 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 229 words

    “It is required that a hospice aide provides services: ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group; included in the plan of care; permitted to be performed under state law and regulation; [and] consistent with the hospice aide training. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 18 (6%) clinical records reviewed of patients receiving Hospice Aide (HA) services, the agency did not ensure that the HA provided services included in the plan of care. Clinical Record 9: The patient elected hospice care on 02/15/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of cerebral atherosclerosis. The HA care plan dated 03/23/2023 assigned the HA the relevant tasks: activity allowed, bedbound. The HA visit notes dated 04/30/2024, 05/01/2024, 05/02/2024, 05/08/2024, and 05/09/2024, documented “wheelchair used-performed.” The HA care plan did not assign the task of “wheelchair used-performed.” During an interview and a joint record review on 05/16/2024, the Patient Care Administrator/Registered Nurse (RN) confirmed the finding, stating that the facility staff are the ones who get the patient up into the wheelchair and the HA should not have documented “wheelchair used” task was performed as the HA was not the one completing it. In 1 of 18 (6%) clinical records reviewed with aide services provided, the agency did not ensure the hospice aide (HA) provided services as ordered by the IDG and included in the plan of care.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 17, 2024Initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 6, 1995.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 20.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 12% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 60% at home, 25% in assisted living, 13% in a nursing facility, 2% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day20.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends12%
Visits near death97.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Vitas Hospice Services, LLC owns 100% directly since Jan 22, 2014.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Kevin Mcnamara (corporate director, 33%); Diana Naderi (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Elo Sahagian-Tanielian (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Joel Wherley (corporate officer, 0%); Joel Wherley (corporate director, 0%); Alexander Fernandez (corporate officer, 0%); Michael Witzeman (corporate officer, 0%); Brian Judkins (corporate officer, 0%); Brian Judkins (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Chemed CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 22, 2014
Comfort CARE Holdings CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 22, 2014
Vitas Hospice Services, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 22, 2014
Vitas Healthcare CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 27, 2001

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.22% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 63.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 52 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 100 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91436, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 3.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.