Ez Comfort Hospice Care
A hospice in Santa Clarita, California 91321
24868 Apple St. Suite 202, Santa Clarita, California 91321. (805) 422-8587.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 16 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 6of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
16 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 133 hospices serving ZIP code 91321 had 5.
The last inspection on record was on Sep 19, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.
2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
16 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Aug 7, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission16 deficiencies
-
Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)
The inspectors’ words, 100 words
“Observed in Data Session. The organization’s quality assessment and performance improvement program (QAPI) did not reflect the complexity of the organization and its services or involves all services provided by the organization, including those provided under contract or arrangement and did not focus on indicators that are related to improved palliative outcomes. For example, in review of the 2025 QAPI plan the organization had one indicator for unwanted hospitalizations but nothing related to palliative outcomes and the QAPI plan failed to address durable medical equipment (DME), pharmacy, bereavement or volunteer services. This was validated with the QA Nurse and Administrator/DPCS.”
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
“Observed in Data Session. There was no evidence that the governing body and leadership had established requirements to support patient care treatment and services as evidenced by Condition Level findings at 418.58 and 418.60. This was discussed with the Administrator/DPCS.”
-
Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1)(i))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, of discharged hospice patients the surveyor noted that while the organization had a clear process in place that respects the patient’s right to elect and revoke hospice care, the signed revocation notice could not be found for RRDC # 8. There was documentation of two telephone calls and voice mails left with no response however no further follow up was documented. This was validated with the Administrator/DPCS.”
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
The inspectors’ words, 113 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization did not complete the comprehensive assessment no later than five calendar days after the election of hospice care. In review of the medical record for RRNHV # 4 there was no evidence that the spiritual assessment had been completed. There was documentation by the Chaplain that the family wanted spiritual care services however the patient’s husband had COVID at the time of admission. There was no evidence of follow up in the medical record to arrange a time for the spiritual assessment although the chaplain did make a routine visit approximately 4 weeks later. This was validated with the Administrator/DPCS.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 138 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization did not comply with their policy no. 2-010.1 Bereavement Services which states a bereavement risk assessment will be completed by the hospice social worker at the time of admission. In review of the medical record for RRNHV #1 there was no evidence that a bereavement risk assessment had been completed. Additionally, the organization did not complete the post death bereavement assessment in accordance with their policy which states that the post death bereavement assessment will be completed 3-5 weeks following the death. In review of the medical record for RRBR #10 the post death bereavement assessment was completed two days following the death and for RRBR #11 the post death bereavement assessment was completed four days following the death. This was validated with the Administrator/DPCS.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 118 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 10 patient records reviewed, the plan of care did not include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. In review of the medical record RRNHV #1 the plan of care had not been updated with to reflect a problem of elevated SBP of 170/102 where a new order was received for Losartan 50mg 1 tablet PO daily. Also for RRNHV # 2 the plan of care failed to address wound care for the left buttock. Additionally, in review of the medical record for RRNHV #4 the plan of care failed to address the high risk for aspiration. This was validated by the Administrator/DPCS.”
-
Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(1))
“Observed in Data Session. The organization’s quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program was not focused on the indicators related to improved palliative outcomes and hospice services. In review of the organization’s QAPI program the surveyor noted that the performance improvement projects selected by the organization were focused on reducing unwanted hospitalizations and were not focused on palliative outcomes including improving a patient’s quality of life and reducing suffering from life-threatening illnesses. This was validated with the Administrator/DPCS.”
-
Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(2)(ii))
“Observed in Data Session. The organization did not analyze and compare internal data over time to identify levels of performance, patterns, trends, and variations. In review of the organization’s infection control plan the surveyor noted that although the organization had collected data they had not trended the data to identify opportunities for improvement. This was validated with the QA Nurse and Administrator.”
-
Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(1)(iii))
“Observed in Data Session. The hospice did not select performance improvement activities that affect palliative outcomes, patient safety, and the quality of care and that are based on the incidence, prevalence, and severity of problems in its high-volume, high-risk, and problem-prone areas. In review of the organization’s quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program the surveyor noted that the organization had selected a focus of unwanted hospitalizations for 2025 and 2023. This was validated with the Administrator/DPCS.”
-
Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d))
“Observed in Data Session. The organization had not documented the reasons for conducting performance improvement projects, and the measurable progress achieved on them. In review of the organization’s performance improvement projects (PIP) the surveyor noted that the organization’s process is to focus on one PIP each year however they had selected unwanted hospitalizations for 2023 and again in 2025 with the same results. This was validated with the QA Nurse and Administrator/DPCS.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, hospice staff failed to comply with the organization’s policy no. 9-009.1 Hand Hygiene. For RRHV #1 the LVN failed to perform hand hygiene before donning gloves in accordance with the organization policy. Also, for RRHV #2 the Chaplain failed to perform hand hygiene following contact with the patient, the patient’s surroundings and before leaving the home at the end of the visit. This was discussed with the Chaplain and validated with the Administrator/DPCS.”
-
Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(1))
“Observed in Leadership Session. The organization’s infection prevention and control program was not organizationwide and an integral part of the organization’s quality assessment and performance improvement program. In review of the organization’s infection control plan the surveyor noted that it was not integrated into their overall QAPI plan. The organization had collected infection surveillance data however it did not include the type infection and it was not trended or analyzed over time. This was validated with the QA Nurse and Administrator/DPCS.”
-
Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(2)(ii))
“Observed in Data Session. The organization’s Hand Hygiene program included staff education, competency assessment completed at the office and a post test completed by the staff however there was no evidence that the organization assessed compliance with hand hygiene by observations of staff providing patient care year to date 2025, 2024 or 2023. This was validated with the Quality Coordinator and Administrator/DPCS.”
-
Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))
“Observed in Data Session. The organization failed to document its efforts to recruit and retain volunteers. In discussion with the Volunteer Coordinator and the Administrator/DPCS there was no evidence that the hospice had documented their recruitment and retention efforts.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 207 words
“Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 2 home visits conducted, with hospice nursing staff, the patient record contained errors and was inaccurate. For RRHV #1 the medication list in the home provided by the hospice included Tramadol 50g 1 tab PO every 8 hours as needed however the patient has not been given that medication in the 8 months she has been on hospice. Also, the medication list included Senna 8.6 mg PO 1 tablet daily however the husband is giving the patient Senokot gummies for the past 2 months. The patient is also receiving Melatonin gummies which were not on the medication list. Additionally, for RRHV #3 who resided in an assisted living facility the hospice medication list included Melatonin 1 mg 1 tab daily at bedtime prn however the Med Tech from the facility reported that the medication has never been giving to the patient also the facility medication list included Ibuprofen 600mg PO four times a day as needed however the medication was not on the hospice medication list and the hospice medication list included Tramadol 50mg 1 tablet PO twice a day however the facility has not been giving the medication. This was validated with the hospice nursing staff and the Administrator/DPCS.”
-
Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, the organization had not provided information and education to the patient/family/caregiver on the handling and storage of medical gases and supplies. For RRHV #2 who had been on the hospice program for more than 19 months the surveyor noted that there were three e-tanks stored in a closet with two oxygen tanks standing upright unsecured. This was validated by the Administrator/DPCS.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2025 | Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission | No deficiencies cited |
| Aug 7, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 16 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 28, 2017.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 8.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 68.3% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 90% at home, 7% in assisted living, 3% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 8.9 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 5.5% |
| Visits near death | 68.3% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 9 owners or officers are people: Robin Joy Litvak (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Robin Joy Litvak (corporate officer, 100%); Robin Joy Litvak (corporate director, 100%); Robin Joy Litvak (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Robin Joy Litvak (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Vitaliy Litvak (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Vitaliy Litvak (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Ronald Schwartz (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Ronald Schwartz (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 6 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 95.65% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 7.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 6 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 133 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91321, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 16.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Ez Comfort Hospice Care This hospice | 16 |
| Golden Time Hospice, Inc. | 37 |
| Ama Hospice, Inc. | 5 |
| La Casa Care Hospice, Inc. | 0 |
| Vertex Hospice Care, Inc. | Not given |
| Providence at Home With Compassus Hospice Care La County | 5 |
| Kaiser Foundation Hospital Valley Continuing Care | 10 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corp | 18 |
| Assisted Home Hospice | 2 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California | 3 |
| Access Tlc Hospice | 4 |
| St Liz Hospice, Inc. | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.