Mission Hospice
A hospice in Pasadena, California 91107
2555 East Colorado Blvd Suite 301, Pasadena, California 91107. (626) 799-2727.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 15 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
15 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 131 hospices serving ZIP code 91107 had 5.
The last inspection on record was on Jun 5, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
15 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jun 5, 2025: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 1,053 words
“Based on observation, interview, and record review the Hospice Agency (HA - agency providing care to terminally ill patients who have six months or less to live) staffs failed to reconcile (the process of comparing a patient’s medication orders to all of the mediations that the patient has been taking) medications for three of 14 sampled patients (Patient 1, Patient 2, and Patient 9) and update their medication profiles with the currently used medications. This failure had the potential to place patients at risk for medication errors and adverse drug reactions. 1. During a review of Patient 1’s Patient Face Sheet indicated Patient 1 had a start of care date on 5/16/2024, with a terminal diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (heart unable to pump blood to the body effectively). During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review on 6/3/2025, at 2:40 p.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) reviewed Patient 1’s medication with Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 (LVN 4) using the Medication Profile record, dated 6/2/2025. LVN 4 stated Patient 1 was no longer taking the following medications listed in the Medication Profile: -Albuterol-Ipratropium (a medication that makes breathing easier) 2.5 mg- (mg-milligram, unit of measurement) 0.5 mg/3ml (ml-milliliter, unit of measurement) inhalation (taking my inhaling-smelling deeply through the nose) solution. LVN 4 stated the medication was discontinued on 8/26/2024.-Metoprolol Tartrate (heart medication) 25 mg oral tablet. LVN 4 stated the medication was discontinued on 10/24/2024. During a further review of the medication record indicated Patient 1 was taking Lorazepam (to treat anxiety) 2 mg/ml. 0.25 ml by mouth every 4 hours as needed. This medication was not listed in the Medication Profile. A review of the Medication Profile indicated, there was incorrect information listed: -Promethazine (treats allergies, nausea) 6.25 mg 15 mg/5ml syrup. Patient 1 was taking the 5 mg/5ml concentration.-Bisac-Evac (a laxative) 10 mg rectal suppository, administer 1 suppository rectally every 3 days as needed for constipation. The directions of frequency Patient 1 was taking every 24 hours.-Milk of magnesia (for constipation) 24% oral concentrate, administer 15 ml oral once a day as needed for constipation. Patient 1 was taking 1200mg/15 ml concentration. The dosage of administration was 30 ml.-Acetaminophen (pain reliever) mg oral tablet 500 mg oral tablet, take 2 tablets oral 3 times a day. Patient 1 was taking the medication twice (2) a day for pain management.-Acetaminophen (pain reliever) 500 mg oral tablet take 1 tablet every 6 hours as needed for mild pain. At Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF), take 1 tablet every 8 hours as needed for mild pain.-Morphine (a strong pain reliever) 20 mg/ml oral concentrate. Administer 0.25 ml orally every 2 hours as needed for severe pain/shortness of breath (SOB). At the SNF, the concentration of medication was 100 mg/5ml bottle, take 0.25 ml every 2 hours as needed for severe pain/SOB. LVN 4 stated last time Patient 1 took the medication was on 2/6/25. During an interview on 6/3/2025, at 3:00 p.m., LVN 2 stated, LVN 2 had been trying to review the medication every visit. LVN 2 stated, LVN 2 was supposed to review the medications every visit to prevent medication errors. LVN 2 stated, it was important to make sure patients were receiving right medication and right dose for their health and safety. 2. during a review of Patient 2’s Face Sheet indicated Patient 2 had a start of care date on 12/19/2024, with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain (brain not functioning properly). During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review on 6/3/2025, at 2:25 p.m., LVN 2 reviewed Patient 2’s medication with Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3) using the Medication Profile record, dated 6/2/2025. LVN 3 stated Patient 2 was taking the following medication, not listed in the Medication Profile: Tylenol 325 mg, 1 tab let by mouth every 4 hours as needed for mild pain. LVN 3 stated Patient 2 was no longer taking the following medications listed in the Medication Profile: -Levothyroxine (treats the thyroid) 125 mcg (mcg-micrograms, unit of measurement) oral tablet.-Hydroxyzine hydrochloride (helps control anxiety) 25 mg oral tablet.-Lorazepam (to treat anxiety) 0.5 mg. LVN 3 stated Patient 2 had not taken this medication in 2025. LVN 3 stated medication was automatically discontinued if patient had not taken the medication after the 14th day.-Tylenol 500 mg oral tablet. LVN 3 stated medication was discontinued on 12/2024. 3. During a review of Patient 9’s Face Sheet indicated Patient 9 had a start of care date on 7/27/2024, with a principal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (a brain disorder that affects memory, manifested by gradual memory loss). During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/3/2025, at 10 a.m., during Patient 9’s home visit, with RN 1 and LVN1, RN1 and LVN1 conducted a physical assessment on Patient 9. RN1 discussed Patient 9’s medications with Patient 9’s home nurse. RN1 did not compare Hospice Agency medication list with labels on Patient 9’s medication bottle. RN1 stated it was important to complete patients’ medication reconciliation to prevent medication errors. During an interview on 6/4/2025 at 10:45 a.m. with the Director of Patient Care Services/Administrator Designee (DD/AD), the DD/AD stated patients’ medications should be reconciled by a visiting nurse on a weekly basis. DD/AD stated that the visiting nurse reconciled medications while the patient was living at home by reviewing all medications with the patient and/or family and asking the patient and/or the family if there was any change. The visiting nurse should compare the existing medications with current physician orders. DD/AD stated that the visiting nurse should reconcile medications while the patient was living at a facility by reviewing the patient’s facility medication administration record with the facility staff. The DD/AD stated the visiting nurse should also read the labels on patient’s medication bottles for the expiration date and errors. DD/AD stated the reason to reconcile patients’ medications were to prevent medication errors. DD/AD stated patients’ health could be affected if medications were not provided as ordered. During a review of the HA’s Policy and Procedure (P&P), titled “Medication Reconciliation”, dated 1/1/2016, the P&P indicated, “The Registered Nurse (RN) or Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) shall perform medication reconciliation at each patient visit. This is a required clinical practice that supports continuity of care, reduces the risk of medication errors, and promotes optimal therapeutic outcomes.””
Nov 15, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission14 deficiencies
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. There was evidence that the governing body and leadership had not established requirements to support patient care treatment and services as evidenced by the emergency plan had not been updated thus with condition level observations at 418.113. This was discussed with the Administrator.”
-
EP Program Patient Population (42 CFR 418.113(a)(3))
“Observed in Emergency Management Session. The organization’s emergency operations plan did not identify the patient population it would serve and the types of services it would have the ability to provide in an emergency as evidenced by the organization was not able to produce this documentation at the time of survey. This was confirmed with the Administrator.”
-
Procedures for Tracking of Staff and Patients (42 CFR 418.113(b)(6)(ii))
“Observed in Emergency Management Session. The organization’s communications plan did not include a plan identifying its primary and alternate means of communicating with staff and relevant authorities including: how and when alternate/backup communication methods are used; testing the functionality of the organization’s alternate/backup communication systems or equipment. This was discussed with the Administrator.”
-
Policies/Procedures-Volunteers and Staffing (42 CFR 418.113(b)(4))
“Observed in Emergency Management Session. The staffing plan did not address the management of all staff and volunteers. The plan did not address: Reporting processes; roles and responsibilities for essential functions; integrating staffing agencies, volunteer staffing, or deployed medical assistance teams into assigned roles and responsibilities; verifying the identity and licensures of volunteer practitioners (such as nurses, respiratory therapists, physical therapists). This was discussed with the Administrator.”
-
Information on Occupancy/Needs (42 CFR 418.113(c)(7))
“Observed in Emergency Management Session. The organization’s communications plan did not describe how it would report information about its needs and ability to provide assistance to relevant authorities as evidenced by the organization was not able to produce this documentation at the time of survey. This was confirmed with the Administrator.”
-
EP Training and Testing (42 CFR 418.113(d))
“Observed in Emergency Management Session. The organization did not have a written education and training program in emergency management that is based on the prioritized risks identified as part of its hazard vulnerability analysis, the emergency operations plan, communications plan, and policies and procedures. This was discussed with the Administrator.”
-
EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1)(i))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 3 of 7 HR files reviewed, the organization had not documented initial education and training in emergency management to all new staff. There was no documented initial training in the files for the Volunteer, MSW or Hospice aide. This was discussed with the Administrator.”
-
EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1)(iii))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 2 of 7 HR files reviewed, the organization had not documented ongoing education and training to all staff at least every two years. There was no documented training on the emergency management plan for the past two years in the file for the Medial Director and the Volunteer. This was discussed with the Administrator.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 109 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 19 patient records reviewed, the written plan of care was not based on the patient’s goals and the time frames, settings, and services required to meet those goals. In the chart for RRDC#15, the patient was newly ordered to be on oxygen, yet there was no associated goal on the plan of care related to the patient’s knowledge of safe oxygen use. In the chart for RRNHV#12, the patient’s medications were changed due to severe pain with nausea and vomiting. The plan of care was not updated to include any goals for pain and nausea. This was discussed with the Clinical Manager.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 102 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 19 patient records reviewed, the plan of care did not include a detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs. In the chart for RRHV#4, the plan of care did not include the volunteer visits. There was an order marked late entry written at the end of the month which described the volunteer visit frequencies that had previously occurred. In the charts for RRNHV#5 and RRDC#16, the dietician had interventions/goals yet no visit frequency on the recert POC. This was confirmed with the Clinical Manager.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 98 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 19 patient records reviewed, the plan of care did not include clear and complete orders for all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. In the chart for RRHV#4, the patient had MiraLAX, Senna and Bisacodyl suppository all ordered prn for constipation without further direction as to when one medication was to be taken vs another. In the chart for RRDC#15, while oxygen safety had been taught, this was not included on the patient’s plan of care. This was discussed with the Clinical Manager.
”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 239 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 19 patient records reviewed, the plan of care revisions were not based on information from updates to the patient’s comprehensive assessment and did not address the patient’s progress toward goals and outcomes. In the chart for RRHV#1, the patients current plan of care included goals which all were anticipated to have been met before the end of the previous benefit period. The patient has been on service for 9 months and there remain educational goals since admission such as patient/caregiver will verbalize understanding of pain management program without an indication if that goal had been met yet. In the chart for RRHV#4, progress toward goals was not documented as all SN goals on the current plan of care were to be met prior to the beginning of the current benefit period. In the chart for RRDC#16, a wound care goal was that the caregiver would demonstrate proper wound care by a date more than 3 months prior to the date of the survey. There was no documented progress toward this goal other than moving the goal date out each time the order was renewed every 2 weeks. In the chart for RRNHV#5, all SN goals were to be met prior to the current benefit period. The goal patient/caregiver will verbalize understanding of pain management regimen remained on the plan of care 6 months post admission. This was discussed with the Clinical Manager.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 108 words
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 hospice aide personnel files, at the time of hire, the supervisor had not evaluated the following areas by observing a hospice aide’s performance of the tasks with a patient or pseudo-patient as part of a simulation: appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include bathing. The initial competency evaluation for the hospice aide was documented as completed 2 months post hire. It included only a bed bath as the bathing option with a bed shampoo. The first documented competency of a shower bath was 9 months post-hire. This was discussed with the Clinical Manager and Administrator.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 2 of 7 HR files reviewed, staff had not participated in education as required by law and regulation. There was no documented annual education about blood borne pathogens in the files for the Medical Director and Volunteer. This was discussed with the Administrator.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2025 | Complaint inspection by the state | 1 deficiency cited |
| Dec 27, 2024 | Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission | No deficiencies cited |
| Nov 15, 2024 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 14 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 18, 1996.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 88.4% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 37% at home, 18% in assisted living, 45% in a nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 13.7 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 10% |
| Visits near death | 88.4% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Lehmann Family 1991 Trust owns 20% directly since Jun 30, 2023; The Klavan Family Trust owns 20% directly since Jun 30, 2023; The Tzippy Friedman Notis 1990 Trust owns 20% directly since Jun 30, 2023; Ira D Friedman 1991 Trust owns 20% directly since Jun 30, 2023; Friedman Family Trust owns 20% directly since Jun 30, 2023.
- 12 owners or officers are people: Aaron Friedman (owns 5% or more through other companies, 20%); Libby Lehmann (owns 5% or more through other companies, 20%); Rachel Klavan (owns 5% or more through other companies, 20%); Ira David Friedman (owns 5% or more through other companies, 20%); Ira David Friedman (corporate officer, 20%); Ira David Friedman (corporate director, 20%); Rachel Klavan (corporate director); Carlos Paz (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jigar Sharad Kadakia (managing employee (under contract)); Joshua Klavan (corporate officer); Joshua Klavan (corporate director); Zaid Pervaiz (other role (CMS gives no detail), 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lehmann Family 1991 Trust | Owns 5% or more directly | 20% | Jun 30, 2023 |
| The Klavan Family Trust | Owns 5% or more directly | 20% | Jun 30, 2023 |
| The Tzippy Friedman Notis 1990 Trust | Owns 5% or more directly | 20% | Jun 30, 2023 |
| Ira D Friedman 1991 Trust | Owns 5% or more directly | 20% | Jun 30, 2023 |
| Friedman Family Trust | Owns 5% or more directly | 20% | Jun 30, 2023 |
| Longwood Management LLC | Other role (CMS gives no detail) | 0% | Dec 8, 1995 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 98.58% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 8.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 131 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91107, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 15.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Mission Hospice This hospice | 15 |
| Corinthian Hospice, Inc. | Not given |
| Roze Room Hospice of San Gabriel Valley | 7 |
| Holy Cross Hospice, Inc. | 1 |
| St Elizabeth Hospice Care, Inc. | 4 |
| St Vincent Hospice Services, Inc. | 5 |
| Tender Loving Hospice Care, Inc. | Not given |
| Solid Care Hospice and Palliative Services, Inc. | 3 |
| Atrium Hospice, Inc. | 3 |
| Altadena Hospice Care, Inc. | 6 |
| Gentle Care Hospice Services Corp. | 2 |
| Blue River Hospice, Inc. | 12 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.