Hearth Record

Shield Hospice

A hospice in San Diego, California 92126

7940 Silverton Avenue Suite 203, San Diego, California 92126. (858) 433-7128.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 77 hospices serving ZIP code 92126 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 19, 2025: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 19, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 15 (Patients # 1, 4, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment takes into consideration the imminence of death. Patients # 1, 4, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13: The patients’ medical records did not contain evidence that during the comprehensive assessment the imminence of death was taken into consideration.”

    Rule L0528. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 250 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 15 (Patients # 3, 4, 11, 14) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient # 3: The patient had orders dated 9/3/23 for an aide 2 PRN visits that did not contain a scope and on 8/21/23 MSW as needed with no frequency or scope. There was no indication of the quantity of visits. Patient # 4: The patient had orders dated 7/14/23 for an aide 2 PRN, MSW 1 PRN, SC 1 PRN. None of the orders contained a scope. There was no indication of the quantity of visits. Patent # 11: The patient had orders dated 11/2/24 for an MSW 1 PRN and on 10/30/24 an order for a nurse 2 PRN. Neither order contained a scope. There was no indication of the quantity of visits. Patient # 14: The patient had orders dated 4/3/25 for an MSW, SC as needed and a nurse the PRN. None of the orders contained a scope. There was no indication of the quantity of visits.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 15 (Patients # 7, 9) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patient # 7: The patient’s documentation of the 3/24/23 IDG meeting did not contain the MSW’s signature demonstrating participation. Patient # 9: The patient’s documentation of the 2/10/23 IDG meeting did not contain the MSW’s signature demonstrating participation.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 407 words

    “Upon patient record review, 14 of 15 (Patient # 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patients # 1, 14: The most current aide plan of care did not contain frequencies for the tasks of, a) turn and reposition and b) change patient linens. Patients # 2, 5, 11: The most current aide plan of care did not contain frequencies for the tasks of, a) turn and reposition, b) record bowel movement and c) change linens. Patient # 4: The most current aide plan of care did not contain frequencies for the task of record bowel movements. Patient # 6, 15: The most current aide plan of care did not contain frequencies for the tasks of, a) turn and reposition, b) record bowel movement, c) change linens, d) empty urine collection bag and e) measure urine output. Patients # 7, 8: The most current aide plan of care did not contain frequencies for the tasks of, a) feeding assistance, b) record bowel movement and c) change linens. Patient # 9: The most current aide plan of care did not contain frequencies for the tasks of, a) turn and reposition, b) record bowel movement, c) change linens and d) assist with medications per RN’s instructions. Patients # 10, 12: The most current aide plan of care did not contain frequencies for the tasks of, a) turn and reposition, b) record bowel movement, c) change linens, d) assist with medications per RN’s instructions and e) encourage fluids if not contraindicated. Patient # 13: The most current aide plan of care did not contain frequencies for the tasks of, a) turn and reposition, b) record bowel movement, c) change linens, d) feeding assistance and e) aspiration precautions.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 11 (Personnel # 8) did not have evidence in the hospice aide personnel file that a registered nurse made an annual on-site visit to the location where a patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess each aide while he or she is performing care. Personnel # 8: The aide’s employee file did not contain evidence that a registered nurse made an annual on-site visit at the patient’s residence to observe and assess the aide while performing care with the aide present.”

    Rule L0632. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 19, 2025Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 8, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 26% at home, 74% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 9 owners or officers are people: Rogelio Luciano Pineda (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Rogelio Luciano Pineda (corporate officer, 50%); Rogelio Luciano Pineda (corporate director, 50%); Rogelio Luciano Pineda (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Maluisa Magno Pineda (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Maluisa Magno Pineda (corporate officer, 50%); Maluisa Magno Pineda (corporate director, 50%); Maluisa Magno Pineda (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Frederick Jenkin (managing employee (under contract), 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 77 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92126, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.