Hearth Record

Silverado Hospice San Diego

A hospice in San Diego, California 92123

5471 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 300, San Diego, California 92123. (888) 555-1005.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 49 hospices serving ZIP code 92123 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on May 30, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 30, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission5 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 16 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to reassess its patient’s. During record review for HOSRRHV#4, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient had a wound and the staff were providing wound care but it had not been assessed since it was first noted with full assessment and measurements 24 days prior to survey. Per the org policy it should have been measured weekly and assessed minimally at the comprehensive assessment every 14 days. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 16 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to maintain a complete and accurate record. During record review for HOSRRNHV#3, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed documentation at SOC of a wound and wound care which included goals on the POC. There was no documentation of the wound or wound care on subsequent visits. Upon discussion with the care manager, who did not admit the patient, it was discovered the patient never had a wound to the coccyx as documented. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 107 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 16 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. During record review for HOSRNHV#1 and HOSRRNHV#8, , the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the plan of care did not contain all needed elements. In HOSRRNHV#1, the patient had a wound that had healed but the wound orders and goals/ interventions were not discontinued. In HOSRRNHV#8, the patient had a wound that was healed 11 days after it was first entered per the nurses narrative notes but the goals/ interventions and orders were not discontinued until 9 days later. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 16 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to provide care, treatment, or services in accordance with orders. During record review for HOSRRNHV#7, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient had orders stating Cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply triple antibiotics, cover with non-adhesive dressing, and secure with gauze bandage x2 days a week and prn if soiled or dislodged. During a recent RN PRN visit the wound care was documented as cleansed with wound cleanser, DSD applied. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 131 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 16 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to provide interdisciplinary, collaborative care, treatment, or services. During record review for HOSRRHV#3, the nurse surveyor observed there was a triage call for a patient fall without injury in a facility. The triage nurse assigned a PRN visit to the nurse on-call. The visit was listed as missed and a nurse went out the next day. Upon discussion with the Hospice Team, it was noted that the nurse had issues with a power outage that night and was unable to go. There was no documentation of a phone call or reach out to the facility or the triage nurse to discuss the inability to make the visit. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

Feb 27, 2024: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Nursing services (42 CFR 418.64(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 589 words

    “Based on interview, and record review, the agency failed to complete a comprehensive wound assessment, per the agency’s wound care guidelines, for 1 of 2 sampled patients (1).As a result, Patient 1’s wound care and treatment were delayed. Findings:Patient 1 was admitted to the agency 1/26/21 with diagnoses which included heart disease, per the agency’s Patient Information Report.A review of Patient 1’s medical record was conducted. Per the Visit Note Report, the following event happened:On 2/19/21, Skilled Nurse (SN) 2 documented that Patient 1 developed stage III (open wounds that affected the top two layers of skin and fatty tissue) pressure ulcers to the right outer side of the foot and unstageable pressure ulcer to the left heel. On 2/25/21, SN 1 documented that Patient 1’s wounds were “...not assessed ...wound care not provided: Caregiver completed care ...”On 2/28/21, SN 2 documented Patient 1’s wounds had yellow-green drainage with a foul odor. There was no documented evidence that SN 2 measured Patient 1’s wounds. On 3/4/21, SN 1 documented Patient 1’s wounds had no change in status. However, there was no documented evidence SN 2 measured Patient 1’s wounds. On 3/10/21, SN 3 documented Patient 1’s wounds had no change in status. There was no documented evidence that SN 2 measured Patient 1’s wounds. On 3/18/21, SN 1 documented Patient 1’s left heel had no change in the status, and Patient 1’s right outer side of the foot had a foul odor. There was no documented evidence that the wounds were thoroughly assessed. On 3/21/21, SN 4 documented Patient 1’s left heel had a malodorous smell and an 80 % slough (dead tissues), and Patient 1’s right outer side of the foot had minimal to moderate weeping. There was no change in treatment provided. On 3/22/21, SN 1 documented Patient 1’s wounds had no change in status. A foul odor to the left lower extremities remains. There was no documented evidence that the wounds were measured. On 3/24/21, SN 1 documented Patient 1’s left leg had deep tissue injury with some drainage and foul odor. On 3/26/21, SN 1 documented Patient 1’s right foot was “unstageable.” On 3/29/21, SN 1 documented Patient 1’s weeping venous stasis ulcers. There was no request for a treatment order to be changed.On 4/2/21, SN 1 documented Patient 1’s left foot deterioration to the left heel, thick tan drainage, slough, and odor, pending a new order. There was no treatment order changed.Per the Hospital Record, dated 4/6/21, Patient 1 was sent to the Emergency Room for advanced wound care. Patient 1 was found to have maggots in her foot. On 6/22/21 at 9 A.M., an interview was conducted with SN 1. SN 1 stated she had difficulty assessing Patient 1’s wounds and never measured Patient 1’s wounds. On 6/22/21 at 10:08 A.M., an interview was conducted with the Patient Care Manager (PCM). The PCM stated registered nurses should complete the wound assessment every seven days and any change of condition should have been addressed. Per the agency’s Charting on a New Wound Guidelines, “...measure wound every 7 days...re-evaluate in 2 weeks or 14 days...Do a complete Skin assessment...”Per the agency’s Wound Care Guidelines, “ ...wounds should be assessed and evaluated by the Hospice RN at least weekly (complete a comprehensive wound assessment) ...All wound interventions should be attempted by the Hospice clinical team...Utilization of an of an outside vendor for wound care:...(1) Complicated and complex wounds...a.Stage 3+ wounds b. Unstable wounds c. Significant purulent drainage d. Gangrene e. Chronic and/or severe wound infections... “”

    Rule L0591. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 7 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 30, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission5 deficiencies cited
Oct 22, 2024Infection control inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Oct 22, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
May 1, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Feb 27, 2024Complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency cited
Feb 27, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Nov 3, 2023Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 24, 2007.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 16.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 43% at home, 44% in assisted living, 6% in a nursing facility, 7% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day16.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.3%
Visits near death97.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Silverado Senior Living Holdings Inc. owns 100% directly since Jan 6, 2011.
  • 17 owners or officers are people: Loren B Shook (corporate officer, 50%); Loren B Shook (corporate director, 50%); Loren B Shook (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); John C Lewis (corporate director, 25%); Loren B Shook (owns 5% or more through other companies, 17.53%); Angela Dey Collins (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Ingrid Mcdonald (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Catherine Quinn Davis (managing employee (on the payroll)); Heather Kemnetz (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Carmin Tomassi (corporate officer, 0%); Carmin Tomassi (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Loren S Novak (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Wayne Sanner (corporate officer, 0%); Wayne Sanner (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Brian Stern (corporate director, 0%); Lisa Ann Wappler (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Lisa Ann Wappler (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Silverado Senior Living Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jan 6, 2011
Silverado Shareholders LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies90.07%Jun 1, 2025
Rlh Silverado L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies47.12%Jun 1, 2025
Richard Riordan Administrative TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies26.01%Jun 1, 2025
C Shook TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies12.58%Jun 1, 2025
Nancy Smith Family TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies9.29%Jun 1, 2025

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.5% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 59.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 49 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92123, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.