Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in San Diego, California 92122

5080 Shoreham Place Suite 105, San Diego, California 92122. (858) 565-2499.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 21 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

21 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 48 hospices serving ZIP code 92122 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 5, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

21 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

21 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 5, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care21 deficiencies
  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the agency has conducted exercises to test the emergency plan every two years. The agency did not provide any emergency plan exercises or events.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 7: The initial spiritual assessment was completed 3/4/25 with start of care 2/24/25.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 177 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #4,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 4: Upon observation during the home visit, the facility medication list has immodium 1 tab as needed instead of instructions to take 2 tabs with first loose stool and then 1 tab with subsequent loose stools; potassium chloride ER 20meq instead of 10meq; and facility list has aspercreme lidocaine that is not on the hospice medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient 9: Upon observation during the home visit, the facility medication list does not have dulcolax suppository that is on the hospice medication profile; and facility list contains milk of magnesia and eye multivitamin that is not on the hospice medication profile. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 11: The initial bereavement assessment was completed 6/16/24 with a start of care 6/8/24.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the hospice follows the individualized plan of care developed in in collaboration with the attending physician (if any), the patient or representative, and the primary caregiver in accordance with the patient’s needs if any of them so desire. Patient 4: There was no evidence of collaboration with the attending to develop the plan of care.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 175 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #1,#6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying the patient had dysphagia and a risk for aspiration. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to dysphagia included in the plan of care. The plan of care identified the patient advanced directives for no mechanical ventilation. The medical record also contained a POLST with code status of DNR that was not reflected on the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The plan of care identified patient as DNR, however the medical record had an updated POLST identifying Full Code status. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #1) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a hospital bed, over bed table, and walker; and 12/30/24 identifying bedrails. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #3,#4,#9,#11) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patient 3,4,9,11: There was no evidence of IDG collaboration with the attending physician no less frequently then every 15 days”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 5: The medical record contained an order for social work visits once monthly. There was no evidence of a visit in February 2025.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #15,#16,#17) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient 15,17: There was no evidence the bereavement care plan tasks of support group offered or resources given, memorial service invitation, and holiday letters sent. Patient 16: There was no evidence the bereavement care plan tasks of 2 week condolence cards, support group offered or resources given, memorial service invitation, and holiday letters sent.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 169 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 3: The aide care plan contained bathing task of shower every visit and tub bath every visit. The medical record also contained orders for a Hoyer lift but the aide care plan did not have instructions for transfer assistance needed. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The agency’s volunteer utilization rate was 0.07% for 2024.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #2) did not have evidence the alternate administrator’s personnel record verifies that: • There is a signed job description for this role • The employee has been orientated to this role Personnel 2: There was no evidence of a signed job description as alternate administrator.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 2 of 15 (Personnel #2,#10) did not have evidence that the hospice employees have received orientation on their specific job requirements. Personnel 2: There was no evidence of orientation to job role as DPCS and alternate administrator. Personnel 10: There was no evidence of orientation to job role as Volunteer Coordinator.”

    Rule L0662. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #11) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel 11: There was no evidence of a skills competency in the personnel file.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #9) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient 9: The patient representative elected to receive the Notification of Hospice Non-Covered Items upon admission 10/30/24. The addendum was not issued until 11/8/24.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #2,#9) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient 2,9: The plan of care identified the patient as DNR. There was no documentation to support code status.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #19) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient 19: There was no evidence of a physician order to discharge the patient due to extended prognosis.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #1,#8) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation 12/30/24 of an aide supervisory note. The patient was not receiving aide services. Patient 8: The medical record contained inaccurate orders for oxygen equipment. After agency investigation, the patient has never needed oxygen.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(a))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #7) did not have evidence that personnel credentialing activities are conducted to verify qualifications of all credentialed/licensed personnel in the positions they hold at the time of hire, at renewal or in accordance with specific state practice act requirements. Personnel 7: There was no evidence of current professional licensure. LCSW expired 2/28/25.”

    Rule L0784. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #11) did not have evidence of criminal background checks being obtained in accordance with state requirements. In the absence of state requirements, criminal background checks are obtained within three months of the date of employment for all states that the individual has lived or worked in the past 3 years. Personnel 11: There was no evidence of a criminal background check.”

    Rule L0796. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 5, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care21 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 24, 1998.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 52% at home, 31% in assisted living, 2% in a nursing facility, 14% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.1%
Visits near death93.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLC owns 99% directly since Jul 1, 2001.
  • Curo Health Services LLC runs it.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%); Douglas M Crowley (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Mehreen Shah (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 1, 2001
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Jul 11, 2018
Odyssey Healthcare Holding CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 1, 2001
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLCOwns 5% or more directly99%Jul 1, 2001
Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLCLimited partner99%Jul 1, 2001
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLCGeneral partner1%Jul 1, 2001

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.5% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 63.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 48 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92122, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 21.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.