Hearth Record

Apreva Hospice

A hospice in San Diego, California 92108

1565 Hotel Circle South, Suite 320, San Diego, California 92108. (619) 450-4414.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 43 hospices serving ZIP code 92108 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on May 9, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 9, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies
  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 104 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 live discharge records reviewed, the patient discharged from service without the completion of a Notice of Medicare Non Coverage (NOMNC) or contact with the Medicare Administrative Contractor prior to discharging patient from service. On review of RRDC #1, the agency was discharging for cause for not allowing care and there was no NOMNC was completed prior to discharging or notification to the the Medicare administrative contractor of the discharge. On RRDC #2, the agency did not get a signed NOMNC prior to discharging a patient for an extended diagnosis. This finding was reviewed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0505. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 active patient records reviewed, the nurse surveyor noted that plan of care goals were not measurable and/or time specific for achieving goals. For example, RRHV #1-#4 and RRNHV #1-#10, the plan of cares did not have timeframes for achieving goals. Examples include: dyspnea will be managed at acceptable level to patient, pain is managed at acceptable rating, and most all goals had no timeframe or a timeframe as “while on hospice”. This finding was reviewed with the organization leadership.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 170 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 out of 14 active patient records reviewed, the organization failed to update the patient’s plan of care. On RRHV#3, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the plan of care had not been updated to include goals or interventions for added medication therapies one due to a new lesion and one for a new topical medication. On RRHV #4, it was noted that patient was started on a topical agitation cream and the plan of care had not been updated to include goals or interventions for this new treatment. On RRNHV #1 and RRNHV #3, teaching goals from admissions have been on the care plan since admission and not updated to reflect the current condition. RRNHV #2, patient started Lidocaine patches after admission, but the Plan of care was not updated to reflect those changes. On RRNHV #4, it was noted that patient was started on antibiotic for UTI prevention and no goal developed for this. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 active patient records reviewed, the hospice nurse surveyor noted medication orders were not clear and accurate. On RRHV # 1 the physician’s orders in the plan of care documented Morphine 15 mg immediate release tab Q6prn for mod pain and Morphine concentrate 10mg Q 2 PRN mod pain; however, there was no indication how to handle the duplicate therapy. On RRHV #2 and RRHV #3, the physician order in the plan of care documented MiraLAX and Bisacodyl PRN for constipation, with no indication for how to handle the duplicate therapy. On RRHV #4, there were multiple duplicate PRN medications for the same indication, one example includes senna PRN for constipation and Bisacodyl Suppository PRN for constipation and not indication how to handle the duplicate therapies. On review of RRNHV #1-10, these records further demonstrate duplicate PRN medication therapy with the same examples. This was discussed with the leadership team.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    “Observed in Record Review. On 1 of 2 live discharge records reviewed., the organization failed to coordinate the discharge with family prior to discharge. On RRDC #1, the organization discharged the patient from service without coordination with the attending physician and the family. This finding was reviewed with agency leadership.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(2)(ii))

    “Observed in Data Session. During the data management session with the organization, it was noted that the organization had been collecting event data. However, the data for Medication Error and Medication Adverse Events were all gathered under other events and not broken into each area to analyze and identify and trend over time. In addition, the hand hygiene data had not been collected so it could not be analyzed or trended as well. This finding was reviewed with agency leaders.”

    Rule L0564. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(2)(ii))

    “Observed in Data Session. During the data management session with the organization, it was noted that the organization had not improved compliance with hand hygiene because there was no data had not been aggregated to evaluate hand hygiene compliance. This finding was reviewed with agency leaders.”

    Rule L0581. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization failed to provide services that meet the patient needs. During tracer activities for volunteer services, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the volunteer percentage for 2025 was between 3-4% each month. The organization is in the process of an active performance improvement project around volunteers. They also have a new volunteer coordinator who started 1 week ago as part of the plan to address the issue. This finding was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. On 1 of 2 live discharge records reviewed., the organization failed to contact the attending physician to plan the patient needs prior to discharge. On RRDC #1, the organization discharged the patient from service without planning care treatment and services with the attending physician prior to discharge. This finding was reviewed with agency leadership.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 3 of 4 home visits conducted, the patient’s individualized emergency management plan was not completed and in the home. On RRHV #1, RRHV #3 and RRHV #4, it was noted that patients did not have an emergency plan completed. This finding was discussed with agency leadership.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

All 9 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 9, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies cited
May 8, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Mar 21, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Mar 5, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Mar 5, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Feb 26, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Feb 23, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Feb 21, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jan 5, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 2, 2009.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 88.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 29% at home, 61% in assisted living, 10% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.4%
Visits near death88.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Abode Healthcare, Inc. owns 100% directly since Jul 1, 2022.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Jay Koeper (corporate officer, 0%); Jay Koeper (corporate director, 0%); Jennifer Phipps (corporate officer); Margaret Sherry Pemberton (corporate officer); Margaret Sherry Pemberton (corporate director); Daniel Harrison (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Natasha Vakili (managing employee (on the payroll)); Michael A Mcmaude (corporate officer); Michael A Mcmaude (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Silverton Abode Holding CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 9, 2021
Brightspring Health Holdings CorpOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 16, 2021
Silverton Intermediate Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 9, 2021
Phoenix Guarantor Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 16, 2021
Res-Care Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 16, 2021
Silverton Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 9, 2021
Phoenix Intermediate Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 16, 2021
Abode Healthcare, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jul 1, 2022
Brightspring Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 16, 2021
Silverton Abode, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 9, 2021
Kkr Phoenix Aggregator L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies48%Jan 30, 2024
Kkr Americas Fund Xii LPOwns 5% or more through other companies42%Jan 30, 2024
Walgreen CoOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Jan 30, 2024
Walgreens Holding CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Jan 30, 2024

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 87% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.84% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 47% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 43 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92108, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.